THIRD SECTION FINAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

In relation to these proceedings, the applicant also complained that the District Court had operated with an excessive threshold as to the legal conditions

The applicant complained under Article 8 of the Convention that his right to respect for his private and family life had been violated, as he and his wife had been

On 28 November 2005 the applicant’s representative lodged another action with the Court of Appeal, asking the court to invalidate the CEC’s final protocol

On 2 September 2006 the first applicant wrote a letter to the Ministry of the Interior, Zagreb Police Department and the State Attorney’s Office stating that she

In the case of Shady Al Karazza (habeas corpus application no. The applicant had also filed a recourse against the deportation and detention orders issued against him

On 17 March 2004 the applicants requested the Court of Criminal Inquiry to suspend the trial pending a decision from the European Court of Human Rights.. In an order of

The Government allege that the applicant has failed to exhaust domestic remedies as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention in that he did not request the Chancellor of

The applicant complains that the Council's delay in providing access to his social service files subjected him to degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 of