THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

In relation to these proceedings, the applicant also complained that the District Court had operated with an excessive threshold as to the legal conditions

The applicant complained under Article 8 of the Convention that his right to respect for his private and family life had been violated, as he and his wife had been

On 2 September 2006 the first applicant wrote a letter to the Ministry of the Interior, Zagreb Police Department and the State Attorney’s Office stating that she

On 17 March 2004 the applicants requested the Court of Criminal Inquiry to suspend the trial pending a decision from the European Court of Human Rights.. In an order of

The applicant could not derive from his rights as a natural father a right to be heard in the proceedings for the change of his child’s surname, because his rights

The Government allege that the applicant has failed to exhaust domestic remedies as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention in that he did not request the Chancellor of

The applicant complains that the Council's delay in providing access to his social service files subjected him to degrading treatment contrary to Article 3 of

On 29 January 1999, pursuant to a “protest” (application for supervisory review) by the President of the Supreme Court of North Ossetia-Alania, the Presidium of the Supreme Court