FIRST SECTION DECISION

In relation to these proceedings, the applicant also complained that the District Court had operated with an excessive threshold as to the legal conditions

They noted that the Migration Board had decided that the applicant’s asylum application would be examined in Sweden, considering, inter alia, the fact that his asylum

Regarding Belgium, the Court found a violation of Article 3 in respect of the authorities’ decision to expose the applicant to the asylum procedure in Greece, whose deficiencies

On 13 March 2006 the Berlin Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Regional Court's decision of 23 February 2006 refusing to appoint him a counsel

Under this provision the Court should examine whether the applicant suffered a significant disadvantage, whether respect for human rights would in any event require an examination

14, according to which the Court can declare an application inadmissible if it considers that “the applicant has not suffered a significant disadvantage, unless

They maintained that the judgment of the Diyarbakır Assize Court had been served on the applicant's representative on 5 August 1998 and that this judgment

In the light of the above, the Court considers that the second applicant has failed to show that his return to Afghanistan would expose him to a real