FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

apply, at any time, for compensation on the basis of the Act on Compensation for Excessive Duration of Judicial Proceedings covering the entire length of the

Furthermore, the Court notes that the applicants maintain contact with X and that they can request more extended contact rights, as well as the termination of the

The Deputy High Court Judge rejected the applicant’s judicial review claim on two grounds: first, that the threshold of Article 3 had not been reached in the

The Court is confident that, when the applicants’ removal takes place, the Finnish authorities will duly inform the Italian authorities of the applicants’

On 24 October 2005 the Human Rights Office requested that the prosecutor’s office of the Zavodskoy District of Grozny (“the district prosecutor’s office”)

Furthermore, the Court notes that in June 2005 the applicants successfully lodged a complaint in court against the decision of 13 March 2002 and also informed

While the impugned acts had not constituted a crime against humanity under domestic law until the entry into force of the 2003 Criminal Code, it is evident from the

On 13 June 2000 the Administrative Court held that an oral hearing was manifestly unnecessary in the matter because both parties had submitted all the necessary information