FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

The Court notes that the applicant, in his appeals to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, stated, inter alia, that he had been convicted solely on the basis of the

Section 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, as amended by the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004, provides that, where a

On 24 October 2005 the Human Rights Office requested that the prosecutor’s office of the Zavodskoy District of Grozny (“the district prosecutor’s office”)

The Court reiterates that domestic remedies have not been exhausted when an appeal is not admitted because of a procedural mistake by the appellant (see, as

On 2 September 2006 the first applicant wrote a letter to the Ministry of the Interior, Zagreb Police Department and the State Attorney’s Office stating that she

In the case of Shady Al Karazza (habeas corpus application no. The applicant had also filed a recourse against the deportation and detention orders issued against him

In view of the evidence submitted by the Government, the Court finds it established that the applicant’s counsel received the Administrative Court’s judgment rejecting the

under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that they did not receive a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal as one of the Court of Appeal judges, P.L.,