FIRST SECTION DECISION

In relation to these proceedings, the applicant also complained that the District Court had operated with an excessive threshold as to the legal conditions

The applicant added that the buildings housing the Piteşti Court of First Instance and County Court had not been accessible to people with disabilities during

In this connection, the Court notes that the applicant presented before the national courts arguments linked to the proportionality of his eviction, such as

The Court, however, considers that it is necessary to examine first whether the applicant company is entitled to make an application under Article 34 of the

Under this provision the Court should examine whether the applicant suffered a significant disadvantage, whether respect for human rights would in any event require an examination

On 25 May 2012 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint before the Constitutional Court (Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske) relying on Article 14 of the Constitution

In the light of the above, the Court considers that the second applicant has failed to show that his return to Afghanistan would expose him to a real

“A constitutional appeal may be lodged against an individual decision or an action of a State body or an organisation exercising delegated public powers which violates or denies