FIRST SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

The Deputy High Court Judge rejected the applicant’s judicial review claim on two grounds: first, that the threshold of Article 3 had not been reached in the

On 13 March 2006 the Berlin Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Regional Court's decision of 23 February 2006 refusing to appoint him a counsel

under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that they did not receive a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal as one of the Court of Appeal judges, P.L.,

the United Kingdom (no. 46295/99, 28 May 2002, ECHR 2002-IV) the Court found a violation of Article 5 § 4 on the basis that the applicant’s continued detention under a

They maintained that the judgment of the Diyarbakır Assize Court had been served on the applicant's representative on 5 August 1998 and that this judgment

“Cassation appeals and petitions against the court decisions referred to in part one of Article 383 of this Code may be lodged within one month from the date of delivery of the

On 13 June 2000 the Administrative Court held that an oral hearing was manifestly unnecessary in the matter because both parties had submitted all the necessary information