FOURTH SECTION DECISION
Fulltekst
RELATERTE DOKUMENTER
In their observations to the Court following communication to the parties of a question under Article 6 § 1 about the overall length of the proceedings,
Furthermore, the Court notes that the applicants maintain contact with X and that they can request more extended contact rights, as well as the termination of the
The Deputy High Court Judge rejected the applicant’s judicial review claim on two grounds: first, that the threshold of Article 3 had not been reached in the
1 to create a welfare or pension scheme, the Court has held that if a Contracting State does decide to enact legislation providing for the payment as of right of a
In the second set of proceedings the applicant was accused, as a representative of the two companies, of aggravated tax fraud for having failed to submit a tax declaration to the
53. The orders were then confirmed by the Head of the relevant MGB Division and the Minister. The trial court examined the evidence in respect of each of the relevant
In contrast, the Governments of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia maintained that there were no effective remedies at the applicants’ disposal, given notably the
The Court notes that both parties to the case accept that there was an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for correspondence under Article 8 of the Convention