FIRST SECTION DECISION

Furthermore, the Court notes that the applicants maintain contact with X and that they can request more extended contact rights, as well as the termination of the

53. The orders were then confirmed by the Head of the relevant MGB Division and the Minister. The trial court examined the evidence in respect of each of the relevant

In view of the evidence submitted by the Government, the Court finds it established that the applicant’s counsel received the Administrative Court’s judgment rejecting the

The applicant could not derive from his rights as a natural father a right to be heard in the proceedings for the change of his child’s surname, because his rights

19. Other provisions of the Code concerning examination of a case by a court of cassation are set out in Arkhipov v.. The applicant complained that the Supreme Court of

In a subsequent constitutional complaint the applicant argued, inter alia, that the Supreme Court had relied on the defendant company’s Collective Agreement although it

The Court notes that both parties to the case accept that there was an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for correspondence under Article 8 of the Convention

In the light of the above, the Court considers that the second applicant has failed to show that his return to Afghanistan would expose him to a real