FOURTH SECTION DECISION

The Court notes that the applicant lodged an appeal against the first-instance decision and also an administrative action with the Administrative Court against

17 In this case, the Court unanimously found Finland to have violated its positive obligations to secure respect for private life pursuant to Article 8 of the European Convention

“simplified reasons”. It held that the use of open-ended concepts by the legislator could not be considered, in itself, as unconstitutional, as it allowed the courts a

The applicant complains that the restriction on his mode of dress constitutes an interference with his right to freedom of expression in violation of Article 10 which provides

The applicants complained under Article 8 of the Convention that the Norwegian authorities had violated the first applicant’s right to respect for her family

Section 94(2) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, as amended by the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004, provides that, where a

In contrast, the Governments of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia maintained that there were no effective remedies at the applicants’ disposal, given notably the

under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that they did not receive a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal as one of the Court of Appeal judges, P.L.,