• No results found

February, 2012 PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT TEAM MEETING 8 Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation in Tanzania July 2009 – June 2014 15

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "February, 2012 PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT TEAM MEETING 8 Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation in Tanzania July 2009 – June 2014 15"

Copied!
62
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation in Tanzania July 2009 – June 2014

15TH PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT TEAM MEETING

8th February, 2012

Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Mitigation (CCIAM) Programme in Tanzania

(2)

1

CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS, ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION IN TANZANIA (CCIAM) PROGRAMME NOTICE OF THE 15th PMT MEETING

Date: 8th February, 2012 Time: 10.00 a.m.

Venue: Council Chamber, UDSM Item

No ITEMS OF THE AGENDA Page

1. Adoption of the agenda 1

2. To receive, consider a report on reviewed concept notes and recommend for

approval by the JSC. 4

3. Modalities for evaluation of full proposals 8

(3)

2

MEMBERS AND INVITEES TO THE 15TH PMT MEETING 8th February, 2012

MEMBERS

1. Prof. V.R. Muhikambele CCIAM Programme Director 2. Prof. S.M.S. Maliondo CCIAM Programme Coordinator

3. Prof. J.V. Tesha CCIAM Institutional Programme Coordinator – UDSM 4. Dr. R. Kiunsi CCIAM Institutional Programme Coordinator – ARU 5. Dr. E. Mpeta CCIAM Institutional Programme Coordinator – TMA INVITED MEMBERS

6. Mr. B. Sanyagi Programme Officer, UDSM 7. Mr. Nathan Mwendamseke A/Administrative Officer IN ATTENDANCE

CCIAM Secretariat 8. Dr. Nazael Madalla

RE: SPECIAL CCIAM PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT TEAM MEETING

Please be informed that you are invited to the special CCIAM PMT meeting to be held on 8th February, 2012 at the Council Chamber, UDSM, at 10.00 a.m.

The Agenda of the Meeting:

1. Adoption of the agenda

2. To receive, consider reviewed concept notes and recommend for approval by the JSC.

3. Modalities for evaluation of full proposals

The Programme will meet your travel and per diem expenses.

CCIAM Secretariat

For: PROGRAMME DIRECTOR

Postal address: Telephone: Fax:

E-Mail Address:

P.O. Box 3151 Morogoro, Tanzania

+255 22 260 4388 +255 22 260 4388

(4)

3

ITEM 2 OF THE AGENDA

To RECEIVE, CONSIDER reviewed concept notes and RECOMMEND for approval by the JSC

(5)

4 1.1 Preamble

The Programme Document specifies that there should be three calls for research concept notes and research proposals. Therefore, the second call for concept notes was made through Majira of 21st October 2011, Guardian of 26th October 2011 and Daily News of 28th October 2011(see Appendix 1). The deadline for submission of both hard and electronic copy was 25th November 2011 at 15:30.

The call mainly focused on thematic area 1: Development of appropriate climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in forestry, other land uses, ecosystems and biodiversity management. The call was meant to cover areas that are not addressed in the ongoing research activities which included:

• Modelling of impacts of climate change and management scenarios in forestry, land-use, ecosystem and biodiversity,

• Assessment of innovative agricultural land use and farming systems for adaptation to and mitigation of climate change to support REDD initiatives,

• Development and testing of various range land management strategies for the purpose of reducing pressure on forest resources for adaptation and mitigation to climate change.

• In addition to proposals addressing thematic area 1, some proposals on “Policy and legal framework analysis of climate change adaptation and mitigation with emphasis on economic efficiency, ecological effectiveness and wider political legitimacy” will be considered.

1.2 Evaluation/Review Process

A total of 48 concept notes were received (see Appendix 2) and screened to ensure that only the concept notes that met the requirements of the call were to be shortlisted. A total of 31 concept notes were short listed (see Appendix 3).

Nine reviewers were consulted and agreed to review the concept notes. The concept notes and subsequent reports were sent electronically. The names of the reviewers are:

(1) Dr Anne Mugaas, Norges Vel (2) Dr Stein Bie

(3) Dr Ladislaus Nshubemuki (4) Dr Jeremiah Haki (5) Dr Burhan Nyenzi

(6) Prof Kingiri Senelwa, Moi University (7) Prof Godwin Kowero, African Forest Forum (8) Mr. Trygve Refsdal,

(9) Dr Mahamane Larwanou, African Forest Forum

Each concept note was sent to at least two reviewers. The reviewers evaluated the concept notes based on the approved guidelines modified by adding a section 1.3 requesting the reviewers to indicate the weakness and strengths of each concept note and recommendation (see Appendix 4).

Reports from reviewers were summarized for each concept note as shown in Appendix 5. A total of 18 out of the 31 concept notes scored 60% and above thus considered eligible for development into full proposals (Table 1).

(6)

5 Table 1: Scores of reviewed concept notes

No Name of Proponent Concept note Title I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Average

10 Ms. R. Kitula Schematic modelling of impacts of climate

change and evolution of mangrove forest

governance structures in Tanzania 76 70 83 76.3

16 Prof. F.S. Magingo Application of mycobiotechnology in afforestation to mitigate climate change

effects for sustainable livelihood 77 72 74.5

9

Prof. D.N. Kimaro

Functional Relationships and Mechanisms Linking Biodiversity to Resilience/Adaptive Change of the Ecosystems in the Usambara

Mountains, Tanzania 80 67 73.5

30 Dr. H.J. Ndangalasi Modelling Combined Impacts of Climatic Change and Socio-Economic Stresses on Biodiversity and Rural Livelihoods in Kilosa

District, Tanzania 78 80 60 72.7

27 Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Comments on Evaluation of Different

Management Options in Enhancing Resilience and Capability of Wetland Ecosystems to Sequester Carbon and Contribute to

Community Livelihood 72 72 72

31 Dr. E.F. Nzunda Modelling Scenarios of REDD+ in Response to

Regulation of Population 76 72 68 72

24 Prof. S. Mwakalila Development of Integrated Watershed and Community-based Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for Sustainable Water Resources

Management 68 72 70

23 Prof. P.K.T. Munishi Assessment, Modelling and Prediction of the Response of Different Biota and Ecosystem Services to Climate Change Scenarios in

Tanzania 74 68 70 62 68.5

19 Prof. R.H. Mdegela Integrating Dairy and Crop Production inConservation Agriculture to Enhance Adaptation to and Mitigation of Climate

Change in Njombe District 63 76 63 67.3

(7)

6

No Name of Proponent Concept note Title I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Average

22 Prof. Mtengeti Rangeland Management Strategies for

Adaptation and Mitigating Climatic Change in

Agro-pastoral communities 65 68 63 67 65.8

20 Dr. M. Mdemu Assessing leakage levels in REDD pilot project

areas in Tanzania 76 42 76 64.7

26 Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Modelling and Optimization of Rural Households Energy Mix for Reduction of Deforestation and Land Degradation in

Central Regions of Tanzania 55 57 64.3

15 Prof. S.S. Madoffe Quantification of Carbon Stock Changes under different Forest tenure and their Implication to

Livelihood in Miombo woodland, Tanzania 68 79 45 64 11 Dr. R. Lockina Mitigating REDD+ Additionality, carbon

markets and community Participation 76 42 73 63.7

13 Prof. E.J. Luoga REDD+ and its implications on enhanced ecosystem integrity and Local Community

Livelihoods in Miombo Woodlands 63 63 63

18 Dr. G.E. Mbeyale Piloting apiculture for Sustainable Natural Resource Management among small scale farmers as a strategy for mitigating and

adaptation to climate chang 61 50 75 62

7 Prof. J.R.

Kideghesho Synergies of Community Based Wildlife Management to improved adaptation strategies and mitigation of climate change

impacts on ecosystem services 64 55 68 54 60.3

6 Prof. J. Hella Economic Assessment of Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability in

Tanzania: The case of Pangani river basin 55 64 61 60 4 Prof. D.S. Matovelo Supporting the Vulnerable: Increasing the

Adaptive Capacity of Pastoralists to Climatic

Change in Longido and Ngorongoro Districts 66 46 65 59

(8)

7

No Name of Proponent Concept note Title I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Average

2 Dr. L.B. Chang'a Title: Enhancing accuracy and reliability of

weather and climate prediction for effective climate change adaptation and mitigation in

Tanzania 42 74 58

28 Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Developing local based technologies for improved food security, land use plan and drought adaptation in semi arid areas of

Tanzania 39 54 75 56

8 Dr. A. Kijazi Adaptation to Cope with Extreme

hydrometeorological Events for Innovative Land Use and Farming Systems in Western

Tanzania 44 52 65 53.7

14 Prof. H.V. Lyaruu Climate change and variability Impact on Biodiversity: Altitudinal Distribution and

Assessment of two Potential Bio-indicator Plant Species in the North Uluguru Mountains,

Tanzania 68 67 23 52.7

25 Dr. J.K. Mwalilino Reducing emissions and environmental degradation associated with livelihood activities of communities around Lake Rukwa

basin 61 44 48 51

29 Prof. P. Mwang’ingo Investigating the potential of urban and peri- urban forests in offsetting carbon dioxide emissions and microclimate modification in

Tanzania 43 35 69 49

12 Prof. L.J. M.

Kusiluka Community Engagement in Reconciling

Biodiversity Conservation, Sustainable Farming

Systems and Climate Change Mitigation 56 60 24 46.7 17 Prof. F.S. Magingo Conserving forest by using endophytic fungi

isolated from medicinal plants to make anti-

diarrheal medications. 37 36 62 45

(9)

8

No Name of Proponent Concept note Title I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Average

3 Dr. L.B. Chang'a Assessing the vulnerability and adaptability of

Marine Botanical Communities to the impacts of climate variability and change along the

coast of Tanzania 39 56 25 54 43.5

1 Prof. F.K. Bee The Role of Agricultural Marketing

Cooperative Societies in Mitigating Climate Change impacts on Land and Forest Resources

in Tanzania 40 43 39 40.7

5 Prof. D.S. Matovelo Assessment of Climate Change Information Management Methods for Policy and Decision

Making in Tanzania 34 35 51 40

21 Prof. H.B. Moshi Adaptation and Climate Change: The Case of Rainfed and Irrigated Farms in Manyara

Region 32 29 30.5

(10)

9

No Name of Proponent Concept note Title I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Average

1 Prof. F.K. Bee The Role of Agricultural Marketing Cooperative Societies in Mitigating Climate Change impacts on

Land and Forest Resources in Tanzania 40 43 39 40.7

2 Dr. L.B. Chang'a Title: Enhancing accuracy and reliability of weather and climate prediction for effective climate change adaptation and mitigation in Tanzania

42 74 58.0

3 Dr. L.B. Chang'a Assessing the vulnerability and adaptability of Marine Botanical Communities to the impacts of climate variability and change along the coast of Tanzania

39 56 25 54 43.5

4 Prof. D.S. Matovelo Supporting the Vulnerable: Increasing the Adaptive Capacity of Pastoralists to Climatic

Change in Longido and Ngorongoro Districts 66 46 65 59

5 Prof. D.S. Matovelo Assessment of Climate Change Information Management Methods for Policy and Decision

Making in Tanzania 34 35 51 40

6 Prof. J. Hella Economic Assessment of Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability in Tanzania: The

case of Pangani river basin 55 64 61 60

7 Prof. J.R. Kideghesho Synergies of Community Based Wildlife

Management to improved adaptation strategies and mitigation of climate change impacts on ecosystem services

64 55 68 54 60.3

8 Dr. A. Kijazi Adaptation to Cope with Extreme

hydrometeorological Events for Innovative Land

Use and Farming Systems in Western Tanzania 44 52 65 53.7

9

Prof. D.N. Kimaro

Functional Relationships and Mechanisms Linking Biodiversity to Resilience/Adaptive Change of the

Ecosystems in the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania 80 67 73.5

10 Ms. R. Kitula Schematic modelling of impacts of climate change and evolution of mangrove forest governance

structures in Tanzania 76 70 83 76.3

11 Prof. K.A. Kulindwa Mitigating REDD+ Additionality, carbon markets

and community Participation 76 42 73 63.7

(11)

10

No Name of Proponent Concept note Title I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Average

12 Prof. L.J. M. Kusiluka Community Engagement in Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation, Sustainable Farming Systems and

Climate Change Mitigation 56 60 24 46.7

13 Prof. E.J. Luoga REDD+ and its implications on enhanced ecosystem integrity and Local Community Livelihoods in

Miombo Woodlands 63 63 63.0

14 Prof. H.V. Lyaruu Climate change and variability Impact on

Biodiversity: Altitudinal Distribution and Assessment of two Potential Bio-indicator Plant Species in the North Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania

68 67 23 52.7

15 Prof. S.S. Madoffe Quantification of Carbon Stock Changes under different Forest tenure and their Implication to

Livelihood in Miombo woodland, Tanzania 68 79 45 64.0

16 Prof. F.S. Magingo Application of mycobiotechnology in afforestation to mitigate climate change effects for sustainable

livelihood 77 72 74.5

17 Prof. F.S. Magingo Conserving forest by using endophytic fungi isolated from medicinal plants to make anti-

diarrheal medications. 37 36 62 45.0

18 Dr. G.E. Mbeyale Piloting apiculture for Sustainable Natural

Resource Management among small scale farmers as a strategy for mitigating and adaptation to climate chang

61 50 75 62.0

19 Prof. R.H. Mdegela Integrating Dairy and Crop Production

inConservation Agriculture to Enhance Adaptation to and Mitigation of Climate Change in Njombe District

63 76 63 67.3

20 Dr. M. Mdemu Assessing leakage levels in REDD pilot project

areas in Tanzania 76 42 76 64.7

21 Prof. H.B. Moshi Adaptation and Climate Change: The Case of

Rainfed and Irrigated Farms in Manyara Region 32 29 30.5

22 Prof. Mtengeti Rangeland Management Strategies for Adaptation and Mitigating Climatic Change in

Agro-pastoral communities 65 68 63 67 65.8

(12)

11

No Name of Proponent Concept note Title I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX Average

23 Prof. P.K.T. Munishi Assessment, Modelling and Prediction of the Response of Different Biota and Ecosystem

Services to Climate Change Scenarios in Tanzania 74 68 70 62 68.5

24 Prof. S. Mwakalila Development of Integrated Watershed and Community-based Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for Sustainable Water Resources Management

68 72 70.0

25 Dr. J.K. Mwalilino Reducing emissions and environmental

degradation associated with livelihood activities of

communities around Lake Rukwa basin 61 44 48 51.0

26 Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Modelling and Optimization of Rural Households Energy Mix for Reduction of Deforestation and

Land Degradation in Central Regions of Tanzania 55 57 64.3

27 Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Comments on Evaluation of Different Management Options in Enhancing Resilience and Capability of Wetland Ecosystems to Sequester Carbon and Contribute to Community Livelihood

72 72 72.0

28 Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Developing local based technologies for improved food security, land use plan and drought

adaptation in semi arid areas of Tanzania 39 54 75 56.0

29 Prof. P. Mwang’ingo Investigating the potential of urban and peri- urban forests in offsetting carbon dioxide emissions and microclimate modification in Tanzania

43 35 69 49.0

30 Dr. H.J. Ndangalasi Modelling Combined Impacts of Climatic Change and Socio-Economic Stresses on Biodiversity and

Rural Livelihoods in Kilosa District, Tanzania 78 80 60 72.7

31 Dr. E.F. Nzunda Modelling Scenarios of REDD+ in Response to

Regulation of Population 76 72 68 72.0

PMT is requested to RECEIVE, CONSIDER and RECOMMEND to the Chairman to approve on behalf of the JSC.

(13)

8

ITEM 3 OF THE AGENDA

TO RECEIVE, CONSIDER AND APPROVE THE PROPOSED LIST OF REVIEWERS AND MODALITIES OF REVIEW

(14)

9 3.1 Proposed list of reviewers

PMT is requested to NOTE that a total of six (6) experts who participated in reviewing concept notes have accepted to review the full proposals (Table 2). The CVs for reviewers 1 to 5 were approved by the JSC Meeting held on 24th May 2010.

The CVs for the Reviewer 1 – 5 were approved before the review of proposals for the first call. The CV for Reviewers No.6 is attached in Appendix 6.

Table 2: List of Reviewers for full proposals S/N NAME INSTITUTION

OF AFFILIATION

BRIEF PROFESSIONAL AREA OF

SPECIALIZATION

E-MAIL ADDRESS REMARKS

1 Dr. Stein Wølner

Bie Norway,

Consultant Governance [email protected] Accepted

2 Dr. Anne Mugaas Senior Advisor, Norges Vel

Social Anthropologist

3 Prof. Kingiri Senelwa Associate Professor Department Forestry &

Wood Science, Moi University

Sustainable Energy, Environment & Climate Change Systems

[email protected] or

Accepted

4 Prof. G. Kowero Africa Forest

Forum (AFF) Forest Economist [email protected] Accepted 5 Mr. Trygve Refsdal Norway,

Consultant Forest & Climate-

change Specialist [email protected] Accepted 6 Dr. Mahamane

Larwanou Africa Forest

Forum (AFF) Forest and other land

uses [email protected] Accepted

The PMT is REQUESTED to RECEIVE, CONSIDER and ENDORSE the list in Table 2.

3.2 Proposed modality for review of full research proposals 3.2.1 The Terms of Reference to guide the review process include:

a) Critically read and assess each proposal and recommend for approval or otherwise based on the criteria provided in the background and the score sheet Appendix 7.

b) Each reviewer should perform an individual and independent evaluation of each of the proposal.

c) Reviewers are requested to review all proposalsrecommended for review. Table 3 illustrates the score sheet containing the assessment criteria.

d) Recommend acceptability of the proposal as acceptable or not acceptable for funding.

e) Provide comments on each proposal regarding weaknesses, strengths and whether it is acceptable or not.

(15)

10

f) Identify proposals that are related and may be merged.

Criteria may include

a. Common themes and objectives b. Related title/topics

c. Large number of common collaborating researchers in a team

g) Prepare an report evaluation giving a summary of proposals that are to be funded from each theme are good for full proposal development and give general observations or assessment indicating strengths and weaknesses

h) Advise PMT on weaknesses in the whole process emerging from the reviewed proposals to be addressed in future submissions.

Each reviewer is expected to make an objective assessment of each proposal according to the prepared score sheet described in Table 3. An average score for each proposal will be calculated to obtain a final score.

(16)

11 Table 3: Criteria for Assessment of Research Proposal

No. Parameters Being Evaluated Descriptive Scale Score Range Actual Score 1 Title: Focused and relevant to the

research theme(s) as specified in this call

Relevant (4-5 points)

Partially relevant (2-3 points)

Irrelevant (0-1 points)

0-5

2 Background: Contain sufficient description of the state of knowledge and identification of gaps of the subject relevant to climate change initiatives with emphasis on REDD.

Very good (5-8 points)

Good (2-4 points)

Poor (0 – 1 points)

0-8

3 Research Problem and Justification:

The research problem/problem statement clearly stated, well articulated and logically presented.

Has a clear justification. Presents testable hypotheses or verifiable research questions.

Very good (7-10 points)

Good (2-6 points)

Poor (0 – 1 points)

0-10

4 Research objectives: Overall and specific objectives clearly stated and achievable, i.e. should be Specific Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Time bound.

Clear and achievable (3-5 points)

Clear but not achievable(1-2) points)

Unclear (0-points)

0-5

5 Literature review: Clearly

demonstrate knowledge on climate change impacts, adaptation and mitigation initiatives including REDD.

Include update information on social, economic, and cultural constraints and opportunities where relevant.

Knowledge of strategies for promoting technological change for addressing climate change. Include references from other countries engaged in REDD related activities.

Proponents should demonstrate a deeper understanding of the current debate on climate change

deliberations COP 15 – 17 regarding financing mechanisms and their requirements.

Very good (7-10 points)

Good (2-6 points)

Poor (0 – 1 points)

0-10

6 Methodology: Should have sufficient site description and justification for site selection. Appropriate sampling procedures. Clearly indicate the methods and

approaches/tools/procedure for data collection. A clear description of the required equipment for data collection. Provide a clear description of data analysis techniques

appropriate for the specific objectives.

Clear and adequate (7-10 points)

Clear but inadequate (3-6) points)

Unclear (0-2 points)

0-10

(17)

12 7 Relevance to climate change and

REDD initiatives in particular: does the proposal respond to adaptation issues and/or mitigation of climate change and policy implications?

Relevant (5-8 points)

Partially relevant (2-4 points)

Irrelevant (0 points)

1-8

8 Team composition: Multidisciplinary, multi-institutional with a gender balance consideration.

Very good (3-5 points)

Good (1-2 points)

Poor (0 points)

0-5 9 Participation of Norwegian

researcher(s).

Good (5 points)

Poor (0 points) 0-5

10 Output/Outcomes: Will the research lead to development of innovative technologies/models, catalytic to REDD initiatives, livelihood security and poverty reduction?

Clearly demonstrate the potential of proposed research in terms of

capacity building activities to enhance climate change adaptation and mitigation.

Certain (3-5 points)

Uncertain (1-2 points)

None (0 points)

0-5

11 Extent to which gender issues will be addressed:

Identification and description on how issues related to gender in the field will be considered and used to inform policies

Very Good (4-5 points)

Good (1-3 points)

Poor (0 point)

0-5

12 Communication Strategy for disseminating results:

Identification and description of media and pathways for

documentation and dissemination.

Very Good (4-5 points)

Good (1-3 points)

Poor (0 point)

0-5

13 Budget: Compliance to budget limits and budget guidelines as per Appendix 1.

Compliant (6-9) points)

Partially compliant (1-5 points)

Non-compliant (0 points)

0-9 14 Log frame analysis:

This is mandatory for all proposals. It should include goal, purpose,

objectives and outputs. Under goal, purpose and outputs they should have Objectively verifiable indicators, Means of verification and Important assumptions. Under each output, specific activities and results should be clearly stated.

Satisfactory (7-10 points)

Slightly satisfactory (4-6 points)

Not satisfactory (0-3 points)

0-10

Total Score 100

3.2.2 Reviewers specific comments on the reviewed concept note

• If you consider the proposal suitable to be developed into a full proposal, please indicate major weaknesses that will need to be addressed.

• Please provide any other comments which may assist the programme in the third and last call.

(18)

13 3.2.3 Submission

Reviewers should submit their written evaluation reports to:

Programme Coordinator CCIAM Programme Office Sokoine University of Agriculture P.O. Box 3151

Chuo Kikuu Morogoro

E-mail it to: ccia

3.3 The arrangements for Reviewers

The review will be conducted in two stages. In stage one, proposals will be sent to reviewers, evaluated and submitted, then a report submitted electronically from each reviewer. In stage two, four of the six reviewers will be invited to Morogoro or Dar es Salaam to compile a joint report for submission to the PMT.

Duration:

o Time for reviewing electronically – maximum of five days

o Time for selected reviwers to comple review report in Tanzania – maximum five days

Facilitation:

o Travel including return air tickets (where applicable) o Honorarium of $300 per day

o Bed, Breakfast and Lunch where applicable o Dinner $15@day where applicable

o Incidental expenses at $25@ day where applicable.

Each reviewer will be expected to sign a Contract between Reviewers and CCIAM Programme Management.

A copy of the contract is shown in Appendix 8.

The PMT is requested to RECEIVE, CONSIDER and APPROVE the proposed modalities for reviewing the proposals.

(19)

14 APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Second call for concept notes

CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS, ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION PROGRAMME IN TANZANIA

SECOND CALL FOR CONCEPT NOTES ON

RESEARCH PROPOSALS FOR CCIAM COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH PROJECTS

1.0 BACKGROUND

The Royal Norwegian Government and the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania have signed an agreement to support the participation of Tanzania in the development and implementation of the programme to address challenges of climate change with the purpose of increasing Tanzania’s participation in the mitigation of/and adaptation of the effects of climate change.

Developing, optimizing and sustaining readiness and adequacy in capacity to address the challenges brought by climate change will require a number of interventions through raising awareness, training to build capacity at various levels, and conducting research and outreach activities.

The research component has the following specific objectives which are translated into thematic areas:

1) Development of appropriate climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in forestry, other land uses, ecosystems and biodiversity management.

2) Assessment of climate change impacts and vulnerability on ecosystem services and livelihoods under REDD initiatives.

3) Policy and legal framework analysis of climate change adaptation and mitigation with emphasis on economic efficiency, ecological effectiveness and wider political legitimacy.

This call shall mainly focus on thematic are 1: Development of appropriate climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in forestry, other land uses, ecosystems and biodiversity management.

It is anticipated that this will cover areas that are not addressed in the ongoing research activities. The will include:

 Modelling of impacts of climate change and management scenarios in forestry, land-use, ecosystem and biodiversity

 Assessment of innovative agricultural land use and farming systems for adaptation to and mitigation of climate change to support REDD initiatives.

(20)

15

 Development and testing of various range land management strategies for the purpose of reducing pressure on forest resources for adaptation and mitigation to climate change

In addition to proposals addressing thematic area 1, some proposals on “Policy and legal framework analysis of climate change adaptation and mitigation with emphasis on economic efficiency, ecological effectiveness and wider political legitimacy” will be considered.

2.0 ELIGIBILITY

The call is open to researchers in collaborating institutions in Tanzania and in Norway. There are four collaborating institutions in Tanzania namely; Tanzania Meteorological Agency (TMA), Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), University of Dar es Salaam (UDSM) and Ardhi University (ARU). There also collaborating institutions in Norway that are coordinated through the University of Life Sciences (UMB). Concept notes for collaborative research projects should be demand driven and aim at enhancing research activities related to mitigation and adaptation of climate change impacts with a strong emphasis on REDD.

It is expected that prospective research projects may be conducted in areas where the REDD pilot projects areas will be undertaken.

3.0 FORMAT FOR DEVELOPING CONCEPT NOTES

A concept note is a brief outline of a proposed research. The concept note should:

• Outline background, spell out research problem, objectives, methodology, location where the work is expected to be carried out and indicative budget;

• Identify the principal researcher and other researchers involved in the project, their qualifications, specific roles and their track records; and

• Not exceed 3 pages, excluding the attachments - with single spaced paragraphs and font size 12 Times New Roman in Microsoft Word.

If the concept note is accepted, one will be invited to prepare a full proposal. However, one may be asked to clarify certain issues before proceeding to the full proposal stage. In some cases, related concept notes may be advised to merge. The acceptance of the concept note will not guarantee that one’s proposal will ultimately be accepted for funding.

Concept notes addressing more than one of the above themes are encouraged. The organization of the concept note should be as outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. Organization and narrative summary of the concept note 1. Research Title

15 - 20 words maximum The title should capture reader's attention on the essential theme(s) of the proposed research.

- Show clearly what is being investigated.

- Have a concise and focused title.

- Be short, preferably not more than one line.

- Avoid unnecessary punctuation (commas, colons, semi-colons).

-Should not repeat keywords.

2. Selected Thematic Area Select one of the three thematic areas and state the major research focus one intends to accomplish in the project

3. Research Problem A short summary of the research problem. What does the investigator want to find out?

What will be known after doing this research?

What are the research questions?

Use a clear and logical style in writing.

(21)

16

4. Background A concise review of the main research work and current issues in the specific subject area.

What is already known about this specific subject?

This is not a literature review; you do not need to do one for a concept note.

5. Objectives Should clearly state the overall and specific objectives as well as hypothesis.

6. Methodology Outline clearly the methods and approaches of data collection and analysis.

7. Expected outputs and outcomes of the proposed project

Clearly outline the outputs and outcomes that the project is expected to generate

8. Location Indicate clearly where the research will take place and justification for the choice of the site(s).

9. Researchers The principal researcher should be identified.

The name(s) and full contact details collaborating researchers should be provided.

State briefly the qualifications, research experience of all researchers and their roles in the project implementation.

Multidisciplinary, multi-institutional collaboration is highly encouraged.

Attach short CVs (maximum three pages each) 10. Budget lines Provide indicative budget with key cost centres

11. Project Timeframe Show the duration of the project and the timeline for major activities It is permissible for potential competitors who have queries concerning the compliance stipulations, other requirements and technical details of this Call to contact the Programme Coordinator for clarification. All queries should be submitted by email addressed to 4. INVOLVEMENT OF POSTGRADUATE STUDENTS IN RESEARCH PROJECTS

Each research project will be allocated at least two Masters Students. Each such postgraduate student will come into the project with additional funds provided separately by the programme. Such funds shall be paid directly to the projects absorbing the students. Research projects are not expected to budget for maintenance costs or university fees for such students. The students will be coming into projects to provide additional human resource for implementation of the respective approved research project activities.

5. SUBMISSION OF THE CONCEPT NOTE

Submission should be in a form of hard and electronic copy. The deadline for submission of both hard and electronic copy is 25th November 2011 at 15:30 East Africa time. Concept note received after the deadline will not be included in the evaluation.

When the Concept note is dully completed save the document as ‘last name of principle investigator-CCIAM Call for Concept note 2011’ (e.g. Name – CCIAM call for Concept note 2011). The electronic copy should be in word format.

The hard copy should be submitted together with a covering letter to the Programme Coordinator (PC) through the following address:

Programme Coordinator CCIAM Programme Office Sokoine University of Agriculture P.O. Box 3151

Chuo Kikuu Morogoro AND

(22)

17

An electronic copy of the document should be emailed to

Principal Investigator of each Concept note three weeks the submission.

Appendix 2: List of the submitted concept notes

CN/No PRINCINPAL INVESTIGATOR ELIGIBILITY PI INSTITUTION FOCUS AREA

1 Karugila, J. Yes SUA OMT

2 Mwakalila, S. Yes UDSM NF

3 Chang'a L. B Yes TMA OMT

4 Nzunda, E. F Yes SUA OMT

5 Moshi, H. P. B No UDSM B

6 Bee, F. K Yes SUA ( MUCCOBS) OMT

7 Mwalilino, J. K Yes SUA NF

8 Mtengeti, E. J Yes SUA C

9 Matovelo, D (f) Yes SUA OMT

10 Sanga, H. (f) Yes SUA B

11 Mung'ongo, C Yes UDSM OMT

12 Magingo, F. S. S Yes UDSM OMT

13 Munishi, P. K. T Yes A

14 Mjemah, I. C Yes SUA NF

15 Kijazi, A. L. Yes TMA A

16 Chang'a L. B Yes TMA A

17 Mwang'ingo, P. Yes SUA NF

18 Chang'a, L. B Yes TMA A

19 Luoga, E. J Yes SUA NF

20 Mdegela, R. Yes SUA B

21 Kusiluka, L. J. M Yes SUA B

22 Kitula, R (f) Yes UDSM (marine) A

23 Kahimba, F. Yes SUA A

24 Madoffe, S. S Yes SUA NF

25 Mbeyale, G. E Yes SUA NF

26 Kimaro, D.N. Yes SUA NF

27 Mdemu, M. Yes ARU OMT

28 Mwamakimbullah J.R.L Yes SUA B

29 Mwamakimbullah J.R.L Yes SUA NF

30 Mwamakimbullah J.R.L Yes SUA OMT

31 Ndangalasi, H.J. Yes UDSM NF

32 Mwamakimbullah J.R.L Yes SUA NF

34 Hella, J. Yes SUA NF

37 Njau, M. A Inc. ARU or SUA UDSM NF

38 Mashafi, C.A. No TAFIRI OMT

39 Mhita, M.S. No CWCAR OMT

40 Kinasha, A. No UNDP NF

41 Lyaruu, H.V.M. Yes UDSM NF

42 Magingo, F. S. S Yes UDSM B

44 Mukonjero, H. No UDSM OMT

45 Kamugisha, C.A. Yes UDSM NF

46 Kideghesho J.R. Yes SUA C

47 Kijazi, A. L. Yes TMA OMT

48 Matovelo, D.S. Yes SUA OMT

KEY NF = Not focused

(23)

18

OMT = Out of main theme advertised A = Modelling impacts of climate change

B = Innovative agriculture land use to support REDD C = Development and testing range land Management technologies

CRITERIA USED TO SHORTLIST 1. Eligibility

2. Format adherence

3. Involvement of postgraduate students 4. Research focus areas

(24)

19 Appendix 3: List of shortlisted concept notes

Name of Proponent Concept note Title

Prof. F.K. Bee The Role of Agricultural Marketing Cooperative Societies in Mitigating Climate Change impacts on Land and Forest Resources in Tanzania

Dr. L.B. Chang'a Title: Enhancing accuracy and reliability of weather and climate prediction for effective climate change adaptation and mitigation in Tanzania

Dr. L.B. Chang'a Assessing the vulnerability and adaptability of Marine Botanical Communities to the impacts of climate variability and change along the coast of Tanzania

Prof. D.S. Matovelo Supporting the Vulnerable: Increasing the Adaptive Capacity of Pastoralists to Climatic Change in Longido and Ngorongoro Districts

Prof. D.S. Matovelo Assessment of Climate Change Information Management Methods for Policy and Decision Making in Tanzania

Prof. J. Hella Economic Assessment of Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability in Tanzania: The case of Pangani river basin Prof. J.R. Kideghesho Synergies of Community Based Wildlife Management to improved adaptation strategies and mitigation of climate change impacts

on ecosystem services

Dr. A. Kijazi Adaptation to Cope with Extreme hydrometeorological Events for Innovative Land Use and Farming Systems in Western Tanzania Prof. D.N. Kimaro Functional Relationships and Mechanisms Linking Biodiversity to Resilience/Adaptive Change of the Ecosystems in the Usambara

Mountains, Tanzania

Ms. R. Kitula Schematic modelling of impacts of climate change and evolution of mangrove forest governance structures in Tanzania Prof. Dr. R. Lockina Mitigating REDD+ Additionality, carbon markets and community Participation

Prof. L.J. M. Kusiluka Community Engagement in Reconciling Biodiversity Conservation, Sustainable Farming Systems and Climate Change Mitigation Prof. E.J. Luoga REDD+ and its implications on enhanced ecosystem integrity and Local Community Livelihoods in Miombo Woodlands

Prof. H.V. Lyaruu Climate change and variability Impact on Biodiversity: Altitudinal Distribution and Assessment of two Potential Bio-indicator Plant Species in the North Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania

Prof. S.S. Madoffe Quantification of Carbon Stock Changes under different Forest tenure and their Implication to Livelihood in Miombo woodland, Tanzania

Prof. F.S. Magingo Application of mycobiotechnology in afforestation to mitigate climate change effects for sustainable livelihood Prof. F.S. Magingo Conserving forest by using endophytic fungi isolated from medicinal plants to make anti-diarrheal medications.

Dr. G.E. Mbeyale Piloting apiculture for Sustainable Natural Resource Management among small scale farmers as a strategy for mitigating and adaptation to climate chang

Prof. R.H. Mdegela Integrating Dairy and Crop Production inConservation Agriculture to Enhance Adaptation to and Mitigation of Climate Change in Njombe District

Dr. M. Mdemu Assessing leakage levels in REDD pilot project areas in Tanzania

Prof. H.B. Moshi Adaptation and Climate Change: The Case of Rainfed and Irrigated Farms in Manyara Region

Prof. Mtengeti Rangeland Management Strategies for Adaptation and Mitigating Climatic Change in Agro-pastoral communities

Prof. P.K.T. Munishi Assessment, Modelling and Prediction of the Response of Different Biota and Ecosystem Services to Climate Change Scenarios in Tanzania

Prof. S. Mwakalila Development of Integrated Watershed and Community-based Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for Sustainable Water Resources Management

(25)

20 Name of Proponent Concept note Title

Dr. J.K. Mwalilino Reducing emissions and environmental degradation associated with livelihood activities of communities around Lake Rukwa basin Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Modelling and Optimization of Rural Households Energy Mix for Reduction of Deforestation and Land Degradation in Central Regions of Tanzania

Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Comments on Evaluation of Different Management Options in Enhancing Resilience and Capability of Wetland Ecosystems to Sequester Carbon and Contribute to Community Livelihood

Prof. R.J.L.

Mwamakimbullah Developing local based technologies for improved food security, land use plan and drought adaptation in semi arid areas of Tanzania

Prof. P. Mwang’ingo Investigating the potential of urban and peri-urban forests in offsetting carbon dioxide emissions and microclimate modification in Tanzania

Dr. H.J. Ndangalasi Modelling Combined Impacts of Climatic Change and Socio-Economic Stresses on Biodiversity and Rural Livelihoods in Kilosa District, Tanzania

Dr. E.F. Nzunda Modelling Scenarios of REDD+ in Response to Regulation of Population

(26)

21 Appendix 4: Guidelines used to evaluate Concept notes

GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING CONCEPT NOTES 1.0 Overview

A concept note is a brief outline of a proposed research. The concept note should:

• Outline background, spell out research problem, objectives, methodology, location where the work is expected to be carried out and indicative budget;

• Identify the principal researcher and other researchers involved in the project, their qualifications, specific roles and their track records; and

• Not exceed 3 pages, excluding the attachments - with single spaced paragraphs and font size 12 Times New Roman in Microsoft Word.

If the concept note is accepted, one will be invited to prepare a full proposal. However, one may be asked to clarify certain issues before proceeding to the full proposal stage. In some cases, related concept notes may be advised to merge. The acceptance of the concept note will not guarantee that one’s proposal will ultimately be accepted for funding.

1. 2. Organization and Format

The CCIAM Programme has three separate action research themes. Concept notes are invited from researchers from collaborating institutions intending to undertake action research on one of the thematic areas focusing on:

i) Development of appropriate climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in forestry, other land uses, ecosystems and biodiversity management

ii) Assessment of climate change impacts and vulnerability on ecosystem services and livelihoods under REDD initiatives

iii) Analysis of policies and legal frameworks on climate change adaptation and mitigation with emphasis on economic efficiency, ecological effectiveness and wider political legitimacy.

Concept notes addressing more than one of the above themes are encouraged. The organization of the concept note should be as outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. Organization and narrative summary of the concept note 1. Research Title

15 - 20 words maximum The title should capture reader's attention on the essential theme(s) of the proposed research.

- Show clearly what is being investigated.

- Have a concise and focused title.

- Be short, preferably not more than one line.

- Avoid unnecessary punctuation (commas, colons, semi-colons).

-Should not repeat keywords.

2. Selected Thematic Area Select one of the three thematic areas and state the major research focus one intends to accomplish in the project 3. Research Problem A short summary of the research problem. What does the

investigator want to find out?

(27)

22

What will be known after doing this research?

What are the research questions?

Use a clear and logical style in writing.

4. Background A concise review of the main research work and current issues in the specific subject area.

What is already known about this specific subject?

This is not a literature review; you do not need to do one for a concept note.

5. Objectives/Hypothesis Should clearly state the overall and specific objectives as well as hypothesis.

6. Methodology Outline clearly the methods and approaches of data collection and analysis.

7. Expected outputs and outcomes of

the proposed project Clearly outline the outputs and outcomes that the project is expected to generate

8. Location Indicate clearly where the research will take place and justification for the choice of the site(s).

9. Researchers The principal researcher should be identified.

The name(s) and full contact details collaborating researchers should be provided.

State briefly the qualifications, research experience of all researchers and their roles in the project implementation.

Multidisciplinary, multi-institutional collaboration is highly encouraged.

Attach short CVs (maximum three pages each) 10. Budget lines Provide indicative budget with key cost centers

11. Project Timeframe Show the duration of the project and the timeline for major activities

1.3 Assessment

Concept notes that demonstrate relevance to the themes and adhere to the guidelines will be reviewed by three experts based on criteria described in Table 2.

Table 2: Criteria for Assessment of Research Concept Notes

No. Parameters Being Evaluated Descriptive Scale Score Range Actual Score 1 Title: Focused and relevant to the

research theme(s) Very Relevant (4-5 points)

Slightly relevant (2-3 points)

Irrelevant (0-1 points)

0-5

2 Background: Contain sufficient description of the state of knowledge and identification of gaps of the subject.

Very good (10-15 points)

Good (2-9 points)

Poor (0 – 1 points)

0-15

3 Research Problem: clearly stated and logically presented.

Adequately stated (10-15 points)

Inadequately stated (4-9 points)

Poorly stated (0-3 points)

0-15

4 Research objectives: clear and

achievable. Clear and achievable (6-10

points) 0-10

(28)

23

Clear but not achievable(1-5) points)

Unclear (0-points) 5 Methodology: Clearly indicate the

methods and approaches of data collection and analysis

Clear and adequate (10-15 points)

Clear but inadequate (4-9) points)

Unclear (0-3 points)

0-15

6 Relevance to REDD initiatives:

address adaptation to and/or mitigation of climate change and policy implications

Very Relevant (6-10 points)

Slightly relevant (1-5 points)

Irrelevant (0 points)

0-10

Relevance to other Climate Change initiatives: address adaptation to and/or mitigation of climate change and policy implications

Very Relevant (3-5 points)

Slightly relevant (1-2 points)

Irrelevant (0 points)

0-5

7 Team composition: Multidisciplinary,

multi-institutional with a gender mix Very good (3-5 points)

Good (1-2 points)

Poor (0 points)

0-5 This will be evaluated later 8 Relevance to women participation Addressing (3-5 points)

Minimally addressing (1-2 points)

Not addressing (0 points)

0-5

9 Output/Outcomes: whether the research will lead to development of innovative technologies/models, catalytic to REDD initiatives, livelihood security and poverty reduction

Satisfactory (10-15 points)

Slightly satisfactory (4-9 points)

Not satisfactory (0-3 points)

0-15

Total Score 100

The reviewers will submit written reports to Programme Management Team (PMT) showing strengths and weaknesses of each submitted concept note with specific recommendations on whether the concept be rejected, accepted or revised.

The PMT will, after receiving reports, review and make recommendations accordingly to the Joint Steering Committee (JSC) for endorsement on whether a concept note be rejected or accepted. Should it be necessary some concept notes will be recommended for revision or merging with other related concept notes.

1.4 Reviewers specific comments on the reviewed concept note

• If you consider the concept note suitable to be developed into a full proposal, please indicate major weaknesses that will need to be addressed.

• Please provide any other comments which may assist the programme in the third and last call.

1.5 Submission

Reviewers should their written evaluation reports to:

Programme Coordinator CCIAM Programme Office Sokoine University of Agriculture P.O. Box 3151

Chuo Kikuu Morogoro

(29)

24 E-mail it to: ccia

(30)

25 Appendix 5: Details of individual concept note evaluation (separate booklet)

(31)

26

Appendix 6: Curriculum Vitae for Dr Mahamane Lawanou

CURRICULUM VITAE de Dr Larwanou MAHAMANE.

__________________________________________________________________________

I. ETAT CIVIL :

Nom Mahamane

Prénom Larwanou

Date et lieu de naissance 01/01/ 1967 à Guidan Ara Mijiniaoua, Guidan Roumdji (Maradi)

Situation matrimoniale Marié à une femme, père de 4 enfants

Nationalité Nigérienne.

Grade Docteur en Ecologie et biologie végétale

Profession Chargé de Programme Principal – African Forest

Forum - Enseignant-chercheur, Faculté d’Agronomie, Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey

Adresse:

African Forest Forum (AFF)

C/o World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) United Nations Avenue

P.O.Box 30677 – 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Phone: +254207224000 Ext 4128

Cell: +22796973442 OR +254714997787

E-maWebsite:

FORMATION ET DIPLOMES

2005 : Thèse de Doctorat Unique à la Faculté des Sciences de l'Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey. Option Biologie et écologie végétales. Thème : « Dynamique de la végétation dans le domaine sahélien de l’ouest nigérien suivant un gradient d’aridité : rôles des facteurs écologiques, sociaux et économiques ».

1992-1994 : Université d’Ibadan, Nigeria : Master of Science (M.Sc), option Ecologie forestière.

1988-1992 : Université d’Ibadan, Nigeria : Bachelor of Science (B.Sc), option gestion des ressources forestières.

1987-1988 : Université de Sokoto, Nigeria : Certificate of English.

(32)

27

1983-1987 : Lycée d’Enseignement Général de Maradi : Baccalauréat série D.

1979-1983 : Collège d’Enseignement Général de Guidan Roumdji : Brevet d’Enseignement du Premier Cycle (BEPC).

1973-1979 : Ecole Primaire de Tamroro : CEPE session de juin 1979.

CARRIERE PROFESSIONNELLE

2008: Senior Programme Officer (SPO), African Forest Forum (AFF), World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya: August 1, to date.

2008 : Coordonnateur adjoint du Centre Régional d’Enseignement spécialisé en Agriculture (CRESA) à partir de mars 2008.

2007 : Adjoint au chef de Département Génie rural, Eaux et Forêts de la Faculté d’Agronomie à partir de février 2007, Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey.

Janvier 2006 : Maitre – Assistant, Enseignant – Chercheur, Faculté d’Agronomie, Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey

Juin 2002 : Centre Régional de Recherches Agronomiques de Niamey en qualité de chercheur.

Octobre 2000 : Centre Régional de Recherche Agronomique de Kollo en qualité de chercheur

Mai 1995 : Chef de programme gestion des ressources naturelles au Centre Régional de la recherche Agronomique de Tahoua ;

Juillet 1994 : Je suis affecté au programme gestion des ressources naturelles, INRAN ;

Juin 1994 : Institut National de Recherche Agronomique du Niger (INRAN), Département de Recherche Forestière : Chercheur avec comme centre d’intérêt :

- Ecologie forestière et écologie des pâturages ;

- Conservation et utilisation des ressources génétiques forestières ; - Agroforesterie ;

- Aménagement des forêts ;

IV. DOMAINES D’ACTIVITES IV.1 Recherches :

♦ Ecologie et gestion des ressources naturelles ;

♦ Agroforesterie ;

♦ Botanique forestière ;

♦ Changements climatiques ;

♦ Sylviculture ;

♦ Aspects écologiques, sociaux et économiques liés à la désertification;

♦ Techniques de propagation de certaines espèces locales ;

♦ Gestion durable des forêts;

♦ Régénération et gestion des espèces des formations de bas-fonds ;

♦ Conservation ex-situ et in-situ:

♦ Comportement des espèces ligneuses suivant les unités physiographiques et pédologiques avec des techniques d’aménagement appropriées;

(33)

28

♦ Germination des espèces ligneuses à semences orthodoxes, récalcitrantes et intermédiaires.

♦ Inventaire des espèces forestières;

♦ Interface arbre/culture ;

♦ Etude d’impacts sur l'environnement ;

♦ Recherche participative en gestion des ressources naturelles ;

♦ Dynamique des parcs agroforestiers sahéliens ;

♦ Produits forestiers non ligneux ; IV.2 Encadrement et formation

Enseignant permanent au Département Génie Rural, Eaux et Forêts à la Faculté d’Agronomie de l’Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey à partir de janvier 2007.

 Enseignant vacataire au département eaux et forêts de la faculté d’agronomie de l’Université Abdou Moumouni de Niamey : Agroforesterie, botanique forestière et Sylviculture spéciale de 2003 à 2006;

 Formation des techniciens spécialisés des services de vulgarisation dans le cadre du Programme de Renforcement des Structures d’Appui à l’Agriculture (PRSAA), un projet financé par la Banque Mondiale, sur divers thèmes relatifs à la gestion des ressources naturelles ;

 Je dispense des cours de vacation à l’Institut Pratique du Développement Rural (IPDR) de Kollo, Niger ;

 Encadrement des étudiants de l’Université de Niamey et d’autres universités de la sous-région pour des stages et mémoires ;

 Encadrement des élèves de l’Institut Pratique du Développement Rural (IPDR) de Kollo, Niger pour des stages et mémoires.

 Encadrement des étudiants de l’Institut Pratique Rural de Katibougou, Mali

 Encadrement des étudiants du Centre Régional d’Enseignement Spécialisé (CRESA) en Agriculture de l’Université de Niamey et du CRESA bois-forêts de Yaoundé au Cameroun.

 Encadrement des étudiants de l’Université Usman Dan Fodio de Sokoto au Nigéria.

IV.3. Autres atouts

♦ Appui – conseil et dans les domaines ci-dessus ;

♦ Négociations dans les domaines de l’environnement notamment sur les changements climatiques, les forêts à travers le Forum des Nations Unies sur les Forêts, la désertification ;

♦ Elaboration des stratégies et politiques dans le domaine de gestion des ressources naturelles ;

♦ Relation forêts et ressources hydriques ;

♦ Bonne connaissance des politiques en développement rural ;

♦ Une expertise dans le développement, l’exécution et le suivi-évaluation des projets de développement et de recherche.

STAGES, SEMINAIRES ET CONFERENCES

1. 2011. Workshop on Forest Plantation and woodlots National /Regional Workshop, 13th Dec to 14th Dec 2011, Nairobi Safari Club, Nairobi, Kenya

2. 2011. Workshop on Classifying and Mapping Vegetation and Ecosystems of Saharan and Northern Mediterranean Africa in Nairobi, Kenya, from 14-16 December 201

3. 2011. United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP17) Durban, 28 November to 9 December 2011

4. 2011. Workshop on the Development of a SADC Regional FLEGT Programme; 26-28 October 2011, Birchwood Hotel, Johannesburg, South Africa

(34)

29

5. 2011. First steering committee meeting of the the AUC – EC – FAO project: Support of the implementation of the Great Green Wall for the Sahara and the Sahel Initiative (GGWSSI);

Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 26 – 27 September 2011

6. 2011. Fourth special session of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment; Bamako, 12-16 September 2011

7. 2011. Thirty – Fourth meeting of the afforestation and reforestation working group, UNFCCC Headquarters, Bonn, Germany, 10.12 October 2011

8. 2011. Thirty – third meeting of the afforestation and reforestation working group, UNFCCC Headquarters, Bonn, Germany, 22.24 August 2011

9. 2011. Validation workshop of the strategy and plan of implementation of the Great Green Wall for the Sahel and Sahara Initiative. Djibouti, March 6 – 13, 2011

10. 2011. Global Forum Landscape and Sustainability”, “Symposium on Ecosystem and

Landscape-Level Approaches to Sustainability”, “International Model Forest Network (IMFN)2011 Global Forum and meeting of the Governing Council of the African forest Model Network Burgos, Spain, 20 – 27 March, 2011

11. 2011. Backstopping missions to national teams in charge of the Great Green Wall in Niger, Chad and Ethiopia

Niger: April 19 – 23, 2011; Chad: May 2 – 6, 2011; Ethiopia, May 22 – 25, 2011

12. 2011. Investment Forum on Mobilizing Private Investment in Trees and Landscape Restoration, Nairobi, May 25 to 27 2011

13. 2011. First Africa Drylands Week: Towards a global vision and partnership on the Sustainable Land and Climate Risk Management for the Sahara and Sahel Initiative.

Dakar, Sénégal 10-17 June 2011

14. 2011. Sub-regional Workshop on Climate Change and Governance in Forestry: lessons and way forward for Southern Africa; June 02-03, 201. Lusaka, Zambia

15. 2011. Third – second meeting of the Afforestation and Reforestation Working Group;

UNFCCC Headquarters, Bonn, Germany 9.11 May 2011

16. 2011: Meeting of the Governing Council of AFF and its organs. February 28 to March 4, 2011. Mombasa Beach Hotel, Mombasa, Kenya.

17. 2011. Expert Meeting and Ministerial Consultation on the Great Green Wall Initiative and Lake Chad: Strategic directions for GEF investments. UN Campus Bonn, Germany, 18-19 February 2011.

18. 2011: Interactive Workshop on the Green Economy to brief the diplomats at the United Nations in New York City, New York, February 11, 2011.

19. 2011: 9th Session of the United Nations Forum on Forest (UNFF9). New York, January 24 to February 4, 2011.

20. 2011: Workshop on Agroforestry as a basis for food security and environmental resilience in Niger and across the Sahel. International workshop organized by the Government of Niger, ICRAF and AFF. Niamey, 13-19 January, 2011.

(35)

30

21. 2010: Launching workshop of the TCP/RAF/3302 (D): Preparation of National Strategies and Plans of Action for the Pilot Implementation of the Great Green Wall for the Sahara and Sahel in Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Mali and Niger. 3-5 November, 2010; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

22. 2010: Establishing a Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) process in the Sahel. Workshop organized by the African Forest Forum and ICRAF. 28-29 October, 2010;

Bamako, Mali.

23. 2010: Technical meeting of the re-greening the Sahel research project. Ouagadougou, 10-14 October

24. 2010: 20th Session of the Committee on Forestry and 2nd World Forest Week, 4-8 October 2010, Rome, Italy

25. 2010: 23rd world congress of the international union of forestry research organization (IUFRO) August 23 – 28, 2010, Seoul, South Korea

26. 2010: 20th Session of the Committee on Forestry and 2nd World Forest Week, 4-8 October 2010, Rome, Italy.

27. 2010: Technical meeting of the regreening the Sahel research project. Ouagadougou, 10-14 October.

28. 2010: Launching workshop of the TCP/RAF/3302 (D): Preparation of National Strategies and Plans of Action for the Pilot Implementation of the Great Green Wall for the Sahara and Sahel in Chad, Djibouti, Ethiopia, Mali and Niger. 3-5 November, 2010; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

29. 2010: Workshop on ``African-Swedish collaboration programme On Sustainable Forest Management”. Organized by KSLA and African Forest Forum. Lusaka 27-29 April 2010 30. 2010: Workshop on ``African-Swedish collaboration programme On Sustainable Forest

Management”. Organized by KSLA and African Forest Forum. Nairobi 20-22 April 2010 31. 2010: Workshop on “Climate change and African forests and wildlife: lessons and way

forward” 18-22 February 2010, Brazzaville, Congo. Organized by the African Forest Forum and the FAO.

32. 2010: African Forests and Wildlife: Response to the Challenges of Sustainable Livelihood Systems. 22-26 February 2010, Brazzaville, Congo, organized by the African Forestry and Wildlife Commission, FAO.

33. 2010: Workshop on “Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) on carbon stock in the Sahel”, 10-12 February 2010, Bamako, Mali. Organized by WWF, ICRAF and CILSS

34. 2010; Review on Conservation Agriculture with Trees (CAWT) for the Sahel: 8 to 10 March 2010, Bamako, Mali. Organized by ICRAF

35. 2010: Regional technical and validation workshop “Guidelines on Practices for Sustainable Forest Management in Drylands of Sub-Saharan Africa” Dakar, Senegal, 20-22 January 2010. Organized by FAO

36. 2010: Backstopping of the National component of the Great Green Wall for the Sahara and the Sahel Initiative in Djibouti. 22/03 – 05/04

(36)

31

37. 2009: Conference of the Parties (COP15) of the United Nations Framework Convention on climate Change. December 7 – 18. Copenhagen, Denmark.

38. 2009: Workshop on African forests and Climate Change: lessons and way forward for Eastern Africa. November 18-20, 2009, Nairobi, Kenya. Organized by the African Forest Forum and the FAO.

39. 2009: Oxfam America and USAID events on ``the other green revolution``. October 25 – 30, 2009. Washington DC, USA.

40. 2009: XIII World Forestry Congress, organized by FAO and the Government of Argentina. 18- 23 October, 2009, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

41. 2009: Classifying and Mapping Terrestrial Vegetation and Ecosystems Across Africa A Workshop conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), NatureServe, The Nature Conservancy (TNC), and the Regional Center for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD), September 21-24, 2009, Duduville, Kasarali, Nairobi, Kenya

42. 2009: Workshop on behind human dimension on the Sahel regreening. Organized by the University of Niamey and University of Stockholm. 4 – 10 September, 2009. Maradi, Niger.

43. 2009: Second World Agroforestry Congress. Organized by the World Agroforestry Centre and the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), 23-28 august, 2009, Nairobi, Kenya.

44. 2009: Workshop on conservation agriculture with trees (CAWT) organized by the World Agroforestry Centre. August 17 – 18, 2009, Jumuia Hotel, Limuru, Kenya

45. 2009: Special Session of the African Ministerial Conference on the Environment (AMCEN) on climate change, Nairobi, Kenya, 25 to 29 MAY 2009

46. 2009: Regional Workshop Sahelian Regional Workshop on “Moving Beyond Forestry Laws”

through Collective learning and action 04-08 May, 2009 - Bamako, Mali

47. 2009: Eighth Session of the United Nations Forum on Forests held in New York from 20 April – 1 May 2009.

48. 2009: Preparatory Meeting for UNFF8, Nairobi, Kenya, April 6-8, 2009

49. 2009: 19th session of the FAO committee on Forestry. March 16 – 20. Rome, Italy.

50. 2009: Colloque scientifique international sur la Grande Muraille Verte : choix des espèces végétales et des systèmes de mise en valeur et de suivi. 11 -12 février 2009, Hôtel Méridien Président, Dakar, Sénégal.

51. 2009: Common market for Eastern and Southern Africa: consultative meeting on Post Kyoto Climate Change Negotiations. A workshop organized by COMESA, AMCEN and African Union.

5- 6 February, 2009, Hilton Hotel, Nairobi Kenya

52. 2009: Expert meeting on Forest Dialogue for West Africa, organized by ECOWAS and FAO.

ERATA Hotel, Accra, 26-29 January 2009

53. 2009: Learning Agrobiodiversity: Options for Universities in Sub-Saharan Africa’. A workshop organized by Bioversity International, CTA and FAO. ICRAF Campus, January 21-23. Nairobi, Kenya.

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

To assess climate change impacts and vulnerability on ecosystem services and livelihoods under REDD initiatives.. To conduct policy and legal framework analysis of climate

The Royal Norwegian Government and the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania have signed an agreement to support the participation of Tanzania in the development

Project: Climate Change, Non-Timber Forest Products and Livelihood of Forest Dependent Communities - Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation in Tanzania..

The tool integrates climate change adaptation into community-level projects, as well as identifies adaptation actions like good farming practices that can improve

Research objectives: To explore the perceptions and experiences of ex-combatant women towards the current practice of climate change mitigation and adaptation programs in Aceh and