ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Aquatic Toxicology
jou rn al h om ep a ge :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / a q u a t o x
Mortality and deformities in European lobster (Homarus gammarus) juveniles exposed to the anti-parasitic drug teflubenzuron 夽
Ole B. Samuelsen
a,∗, Bjørn T. Lunestad
b, Eva Farestveit
a, Ellen S. Grefsrud
a, Rita Hannisdal
b, Bjarte Holmelid
b, Tore Tjensvoll
b, Ann-Lisbeth Agnalt
aaInstituteofMarineResearch,P.O.Box1870Nordnes,N-5817Bergen,Norway
bNationalInstituteofNutritionandSeafoodResearch,P.O.Box2029Nordnes,N-5817Bergen,Norway
a r t i c l e i n f o
Articlehistory:
Received4November2013
Receivedinrevisedform10January2014 Accepted24January2014
Availableonline4February2014
Keywords:
Teflubenzuron
Europeanlobsterjuveniles Mortality
Deformities
a b s t r a c t
Thisstudydescribesexperimentscarriedouttoexamineeffectsoftheantiparasiticdrugteflubenzuron, usedindelousingfarmedsalmon,onanon-targetspecies,theEuropeanlobster(Homarusgammarus).
Juvenilelobsterswerefedtwodosesofteflubenzuron,10and20mg/kgsuccessivelyfor7dayscorre- spondingtoastandardmedicationofthefish(10mg/kgday)andtwicethestandarddose(20mg/kg day).Monitoringlasted3monthstoincludeatleastonemoultingperiodforallindividuals.Cumula- tivemortalitywashigherinallreplicatesgivenmedicatedfeedcomparedwiththecontrolgroup.Mean cumulativemortalityforeachdosingwas41±13%for10mg/kgand38±8%for20mg/kg,i.e.nodiffer- ence.Drugresiduewasanalysedinalljuvenilesthatdied,inadditionto12juvenilesatday8andthefirst 12survivinglobsters.Adeclineinconcentrationofteflubenzuronfromover8000ng/g(day5)to14ng/g (day70)wasobservedinthejuvenilesthatdiedduringtheexperiment.Twelveindividualsthatdiedcon- tained82ng/gorlesswhereasthemeanconcentrationinthefirst12lobstersthatsurvivedmoultingwas 152ng/g.Followingasingleoraladministration,thehalf-lifeofteflubenzuroninlobsterwasestimated to3.4daysandtheinitialconcentration(C0)to515ng/gattimet0.Attheendofthestudyaconsiderable numberofjuvenilelobsterswereobservedwithdeformitiesinvariousorgans;carapace,walkinglegs, cheliped,tailfan,abdomenandantenna.Theoccurrenceofobserveddeformitiesvariedfrom0to15%
intreatedreplicatesandwillmostlikelyaffectabilitytolocateandconsumefood(antenna,clawand walkinglegs),respiration(carapace)andabilitytomove/swim(walkinglegs,tailfanandabdomen).In total,themortalityandsenescentdamageswerecloseto50%inallreplicates.Juvenilesthatsurvived medicationwithoutdeformitieshowever,moultedandincreasedinsizeateachmoultequallywellas theunmedicatedcontrols.
©2014TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Salmonlice(Lepeophtheirus salmonis,Krøyer1837) aresmall marine ectoparasites that feed on mucous, blood and skin on salmonandtroutandifpresentinsufficientnumbers,maycause mortalitybyosmoticstressandsecondaryinfectionsbybacterial andviralpathogens.Infestationwithsealiceisthereforeconsid- eredamajorproblemfortheAtlanticsalmon(Salmosalar)industry inEuropeandNorthAmerica(PikeandWadsworth,1999;Costello, 2006;Burkaetal.,2012).Inadditiontoreducingthegeneralwel- fareofthefarmedfish,salmonlicecauseasignificanteconomicloss
夽Thisisanopen-accessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCom- monsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativeWorksLicense,whichpermits non-commercialuse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedthe originalauthorandsourcearecredited.
∗Correspondingauthor.Tel.:+4797076918.
E-mailaddress:ole.samuelsen@imr.no(O.B.Samuelsen).
duetoreducedgrowth,increasedmortality,downgradingofflesh qualityandthecostofdelousingtreatments(MacKinnon,1997).
Excessivenumbersof adultlicein a salmonfarm alsoincrease thenumberof freeswimminglarvae inthesurroundingwater, hencegeneratinganegativeimpactonwildpopulationsofseatrout (Salmotrutta)andmigratingwildpost-smoltsofAtlanticsalmon (Wagneretal.,2008;Costello,2009).
Severalantiparasitic agents are currently in use for delous- ing farmed fish and the compounds are either dissolved in water and used for bath treatment or administered orally via the feed. In Norway, teflubenzuron [1-(3,5-dichloro-2,4- difluorophenyl)-3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl)urea] and diflubenzuron [1-(4-chloro-phenyl)-3-(2,6-difluorobenzoyl)urea]) were fre- quently in use from late 1990s and until 2001. From 2002, emamectinandthepyrethroids,cypermethrinanddeltamethrin were the drugs of choice but due to instances with reduced sensitivity for these drugs, flubenzurons were reintroduced in 2009. Consumption of teflubenzuron was 2028, 1018, 26 and 751kg active compound in the years 2009–2012 respectively 0166-445X/$–seefrontmatter©2014TheAuthors.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.01.019
(NorwegianInstituteofPublicHealth,Oslo,Norway,www.fhi.no).
Flubenzuronsareorallyadministeredagentsthatactbyinterfering withthesynthesisofchitininthesalmonlice.Theyareeffective againstallstagesofsealicethatundergomoulting,includingthe larval and pre-adultstages (Bransonet al.,2000; Ritchieet al., 2002;Campbelletal.,2006a,b).Teflubenzuronisadministeredvia medicatedpelletscontaining2gteflubenzuronperkgfeedandthe recommendeddosingregimenis10mg/kgfishdailyfor7days.The excretionpathwayofteflubenzuroninAtlanticsalmonismainly viatheliverandbiletotheintestineandtheeliminationistemper- aturedependantwithhalf-livesinmusclebetween2and6days (Anon, 1999).SincethebioavailabilityinAtlanticsalmonislow (approximately10%)andthemetabolismisminimal,mostofthe drugwillbereleasedfromthefishasparentcompoundviafaeces intheperiod ofmedicationand immediatelyfollowing a treat- ment(Anon,1999).Apreliminarystudyanalysingfaecalmaterial fromAtlanticsalmonundergoingmedicationwithteflubenzuron showedconcentrationsmorethantwicetheinitialconcentration inthemedicatedfeed(Samuelsen, unpublisheddata). Solubility ofteflubenzuroninwaterislow(0.0094mg/Lat20◦C),andthe substanceassociatereadilywithparticlesrichinorganiccontent (Marsellaetal.,2000).Itisthereforereasonabletobelievethatonce pellets and faecal material containing teflubenzuron reachthe marinesediment,thecompounddoesnotreadilydisappear.Based onresultsfromaScottishstudy,ahalf-lifeofteflubenzuronof115 daysinamarinesedimentcouldbecalculated(Langford,2011).
Ithasbeenshown thattheorganicwasteintheformofexcess pelletsandfaecalmaterialfromfishfarmsundergoingmedication containshighconcentrationsofflubenzurons(Selviketal.,2002).
However, concentrations found in sediment samples collected inthevicinityoffiveinvestigated farmsweremuch lower.The highestconcentrationwas40mg/kgsediment(wetweight)(Selvik et al., 2002; Langford, 2011; Samuelsen, unpublished data). In contrast,usingaremotelyoperatedvehicle(ROV)pelletsandlarge faecalparticleswereregisteredonthebottomin thevicinityof fishfarms(Kutti,2008).Itisthereforereasonabletoexpectthat theaccesstodrugcontainingorganicwastefornon-targetspecies willvaryconsiderableevenwithinasmallarea.
Sinceamajorpartoftheteflubenzuronadministeredviafish feedwillendupinthesurroundingenvironment,therehavebeen concernsaboutthepossibletoxiceffectsonnon-targetmarinebiota (Burridgeetal.,2010; Eisler,1992;Fisherand Hall,1992;Haya etal.,2005).Sinceteflubenzuronreduceschitinsynthesis,thedrug isrelativelynon-toxictomarinespecieslikefish,algaeandmol- luscs,butispotentiallyhighlytoxictoanyspeciesthatundergo moultingwithintheirlifecycle,includingcommerciallyimportant specieslikelobster,crabsandshrimps.Astudyoftheeffectoforally administeredflubenzuronsonnon-targetcrustaceanis,however, complicatedbythefactthattheinvestigationmustincludeamoult- ingphaseandtheexperimentalset-upbedesignedtoassurelow mortalityofnon-medicatedcontrolgroups.Furthermore,sinceitis likelythatnon-targetcrustaceansmayingestteflubenzuronfrom contaminatedsediments,faeces,excessfoodpelletsorbyeating contaminateddepositfeederslikepolychaetesitisdifficulttopre- dictadosingregimenthatinfullrepresentstheconditionundera fishfarm.Inordertohaveeffect,adefinedconcentrationofthedrug mustprobablybepresentinanindividualataspecifictimeperiod duringthemoultingcycle.Theconcentrationrangethatinduces mortality following moulting in marine non-target crustaceans is,however,notknown.Furthermore,sinceteflubenzuronaffects theformationofthenewexoskeletonitisapossibilitythatnon- fataldamagemayoccur.Copepodeggs(Acartiatonsa)exposedto diflubenzurondissolvedinwaterat1and10g/Lshowedreduced hatchingabilityandthosethathatchedwereabnormallyshaped andfailedtomoultatthenextstageofdevelopment(Testerand Costlow,1981).
For drugslike teflubenzurongivingnoimmediate andacute effect, knowledge of the uptake and elimination kinetics in a specificspecieswillprovideimportantinformationindetermining theperiodoftimeafteranexposurewherethedrugisexpectedto haveeffect.
Theaimofthisstudywastoexaminetheeffectsoftefluben- zurononjuvenilelobsterwhenoffereddosessimilartothedose administeredtothefarmedfishandtwicethisdosecorresponding totheconsumption ofdrugcontainingfaecal particles.Further- more,theuptakeandeliminationofteflubenzuroninlobsterwas studiedfollowingasingleoraladministration.
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Animalsandfeed
This study was approved by the National Animal Research Authority(NARA)inNorwayandhasbeencarriedoutinaccordance withTheCodeofEthicsoftheWorldMedicalAssociationforanimal experimentshttp://europa.eu.int/scadplus/leg/en/s23000.htm.
Aseriesofexperimentswereruntoassesstheeffectsoforally administeredteflubenzurononEuropeanlobster(Homarusgam- marus).Juvenilestagesoflobsterwerechosenastheymoultmore frequentlythansubadultsandadults.Thejuvenileswereproduced attheInstituteofMarineResearch(IMR)fieldstationatParisvatnet locatedoutsideBergen(60◦3775N,4◦4811E)inlateJuly/August 2010.Broodstockwerecollectedfromthesurroundingareaclose by,inØygarden.Sizesofthejuvenileswererecordedascarapace length(CL)measuredasthedistancefromtheposteriorrimofthe eyesockettotheposterioredgeofcarapaceandtotallength(TL) measuredasthedistancefromtheanteriortipofrostrumtothe endoftelson.CLandTLwererecordedwithacallipertotheclosest 0.1mmbelow.Wetbodyweight(BW)wasrecordedonaTE2101 Sartoriusscaletothenearest0.1g.
Twodosesofteflubenzuronwerechosen,10and20mg/kg.The lowerdosecorrespondstothedoseadministeredtothesalmon whereasthehighdoseissimilartotheconcentrationfoundinfae- calmaterialfromsalmonundergoingmedication.Thelobsterswere fedspecialcommerciallyproducedpellets(3mm)patentedbyNor- wegianLobsterFarm(www.norwegian-lobster-farm.com/en/)and producedbyNofima(www.nofima.no/en).Thepelletshadanaver- ageweightof 50±5mg.The medicatedfeeds werecustomised to a 3g individual and madeby homogeneously mixing 60 or 120mgteflubenzuronwith1gglucoseandusingafewdropsof herring oil,and by gentleshakingthe drugwascoatedontwo batchesof100gpellets.Assumingevendistribution,this corre- spondstoconcentrationsof30g(lowdose)or60g(highdose) drugperpellet.Analysisof10 pelletsfromeach prepareddose revealed an average concentration of 36±6g/pellets for low doseand72±13g/pelletsforthehighdose(analyticprocedures describedinSection2.4.1)providingdosesof12mg/kg(lowdose) and24mg/kg(highdose)fora3globster.
2.2. Eliminationofteflubenzuron
The purpose of this experiment was to assess the elimina- tionrateofthedrugfromlobsterand calculatetheelimination half-life.TheexperimentwasconductedattheIMRlaboratoryin Bergen,Norwayintheperiod13thFebruaryto5thMarsin2012.
Atotalof36 lobsterjuvenileswithameanweightof4.3±1.0g wereused.Juvenileswerekeptseparatelyin18cm×16cm×13cm flow-throughplasticcontainersstackedintwostandseachhous- ingamaximumof25containers(5×5).Seawaterwasobtained from120mdepthclosetotheIMR-Bergen facility,heated toa temperatureof15.0±0.5◦Candaddedtotheexperimentalcon- tainersataflowofabout1L/min.Thejuvenileswerestarvedfor
3dayspriortoadministrationofonehigh-dosepelletcontaining 72±13gteflubenzuron.All36juvenilesconsumedtheirpellet andsixindividualswererandomlysampledatday2,4,7,11,16 and20postmedicationandanalysedfordrugresidues.
2.3. Simulationofa7-daymedicationperiod–followedby monitoringfor3months
Themainfocusofthisexperimentwastosimulateamedica- tionperiodof7days,similartotheprescribedmedicationregime atasalmonfarm.Theobjectivewastoassess long-termeffects overa3-monthperiodinmortality,growthandconcentrationof teflubenzuroninlobsterjuveniles.Theexperimentwasconducted attheIMRfieldstationatParisvatnetoutsideBergen,Norwayin theperiodAugust22toNovember23in2011,atotalof93days.
Theexperimentalperiodwaschosentoincludeatleastonemoult- ingforallindividuals.Seawater wasobtainedfrom25mdepth andthe temperaturein thetanksdecreased duringthe experi- mental period from14 to9◦C. A total of 286lobsterjuveniles weredividedintothreemajorgroups,twofedmedicatedpellets (highandlowdose)andonecontrolgroupfedun-medicatedfeed.
Eachmedicatedgroupwasdivided intothreereplicatesreceiv- inglow dose:C (n=38),F(n=38)and G(n=48)andhighdose:
A(n=38),D(n=38)andE(n=48).Numberofjuvenilesinthecon- trolgroupwas38.ReplicateF inlowdoseandcontrolwasrun outdoor,whiletheotherreplicateswererunindoor.Anetcovered theoutdoorreplicates.Thejuvenileswereheldseparatelyinwhite PVC plastic compartments of 170mL (7.0cm×3.5cm×7.0cm).
The bottom of the compartments was perforated with 2.5mm diameterroundholestoensurewaterflow.Eachreplicateandthe controlconsistedof8×5(or10×5)compartments,termedasa tray,heldtogetherbyplasticstrips.Eachtraywasplacedinsep- arate600L(1m×1m×0.6m)flow-throughfibreglasstankswith awaterflowof10–15L/min.Waterlevelinthetankswasabout 0.5mandflowwassetto30–40L/min.
Priortotheexperiment,thelobsterswerestarvedfor3days.The medicationperiodlastedfromday1to7andthepelletgivenatday 7wasleftforanother3daysbeforebeingremovedifnotconsumed.
Basedonpreviousknowledgeoffeedconsumption,lobsterswith aweightoflessthan2.0g(n=135includingthecontrol)werefed everysecondday(intotal4medicatedpellets)whereaslobsters withaweightequaltoorhigherthan2.0g(n=151includingthe control)werefeddaily(intotal7medicatedpellets).Eachindivid- ualwasinspecteddailyduringthemedicationperiod,anduneaten pelletsregistered.Mortalityandmoultingwasrecordeddaily.At day8,thedayafterthelastmedication,twoindividualsfromeach ofthesixmedicatedreplicatesweresampledandanalysedfordrug residues.Likewise,thetwofirstjuvenilesineachmedicatedrepli- catethatsurvivedmoultingweresampledandanalysedfordrug residues.Cumulativemortalityperdaywascalculatedsubtracting samplingatday8andsamplingofthefirsttwojuvenilessurviv- ingmoultingineachreplicate.Likewise,cumulativemoultingwas calculatedsubtractingsamplednumbers,includingmortality.At theendoftheexperiment(day93),allsurvivorswerecheckedfor deformitiesandCL,TLandBWrecorded.Juvenileswithdeformi- tiesweremonitoredoverseveralmoultingperiodstostudythe permanencyofthedamage.
2.4. Analyticalprocedures
Teflubenzuron(analyticalstandard),diflubenzuron(analytical standard),acetonitrile,heptane,diethyletherandacetone(allHPLC grade)werepurchasedfromSigma–Aldrich(Steinheim,Germany).
Tetrahydrofuran(HPLCgrade)andammoniumhydroxide(25%)(PA grade)werepurchased from Merck(Darmstadt, Germany). The waterusedwaspurifiedwithaMilli-Qwaterpurificationsystem
fromMillipore.Stocksolutionsofteflubenzuronanddiflubenzuron werepreparedataconcentrationof1mg/mLintetrahydrofuran andstoredat4◦C.Workingstandardswerepreparedbydilutionof stocksolutionswithamixofacetonitrile:water(50:50,v/v).
2.4.1. Concentrationsinfeedpellets
Eachpelletwasaddedtoa10mLtubecontaining2mLacetoni- trile,shakenfor10minfollowedbytransfer(1mL)toanEppendorf tubeandcentrifugationfor5minatapproximately14,500×gusing aBiofugeAtablecentrifuge(HeraeusSepatech,OsterodeamHartz, Germany).Acalibrationcurvefor teflubenzuronrangingfrom5 to40g/mLwasmadeintriplicatebydilutionofstocksolution withacetonitrile:water(50:50,v/v).Analysisoffivenon-medicated pelletswasincludedinordertoconfirmtheabsenceoftefluben- zuron. Thesamples wereanalysed by High-PerformanceLiquid Chromatographywithultravioletdetection(HPLC-UV) usingthe equipmentandanalyticalprocedureasdescribedinSelviketal.
(2002).
2.4.2. Concentrationsinlobsterjuveniles
Each individual lobster was weighed, placed in a 25mL centrifugetubeandthoroughlycrushedusingaglassrod.Difluben- zuron (50L, 0.5g/mL) wasadded tothesamplesas internal standard.Acetone(5–10mLdependingonsamplesize)wasadded andthemixturewashomogenisedbyawhirlmixerandplaced inanultrasonicbath(40kHz)for10minbeforethesampleswere centrifugedfor3minat2500×g (EppendorfCentrifuge5810R, Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). The resulting extract was transferred toa 10mLcentrifuge tube. Toremove fat, heptane wasadded(1mL)andthesolutionwasshakenbeforecentrifuga- tionat1250×gfor2min.Fromtheresultingtwo-phasemixture theupperheptanephasewasremovedanddischarged.Thisstep wasrepeatedonce.Theacetoneextractwasevaporatedtodry- ness under nitrogen at 40◦C, theresidue dissolvedin heptane (5mL)andcleaned-upbysolidphaseextractionusingaGX-271 ASPEC (Automated Solid Phase Extraction)system from Gilson (Middleton,USA).Thesolid phaseextractioncolumn,BondElut Si,500mg,3mL(AgilentTechnologies,Boeblingen,Germany)was conditionedwith2.5mLheptanepriortoloadingofthesample.
Afterloading,thecolumnwaswashedwith3mLofheptane,5mL heptane/diethylether(95:5,v/v)and5mLheptane/diethylether (90:10v/v).Theanalyteandinternalstandardwereelutedwith 5mLheptane/diethylether(60:40,v/v).Theeluatewasevaporated todrynessusingnitrogenat40◦Candre-dissolvedin250Lofa solutionofacetonitrile:water(40:60v/v).Thesamplewasfiltered througha0.45msyringefilterandwasreadyforanalysis.Forthe calibrationcurves,blanksampleswerespikedwithteflubenzuron atconcentrationsof15–500and500–8000ng/gandpreparedas describedabove.Thestandardcurveswerepreparedintriplicate.
The samples were analysed using a HP 1100 LC-system (Hewlett-Packard, Waldbronn, Germany) coupledto an Agilent MSDquadrupolemassspectrometer(AgilentTechnologies,Wald- bronn, Germany). ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn,Germany)wasusedforinstrumentcontrolanddata analysis.TheanalyticalcolumnusedwasaShodexAsahipakODP- 504D4.0mm×125mm,4m(ShowaDenko,Munich,Germany).
The injectionvolumewas 10l.The mobilephase was a mix- ture of acetonitrileand aqueousammonium hydroxide (75:25, v/v)atanisocraticflowrateof0.7mL/minat25◦C.Theretention timewas4.8minfordiflubenzuronand5.3minforteflubenzuron.
The analyte and internal standard were analysed by negative electrosprayionisation(ESI)anddetectedastheirdeprotonated molecular anions by selected ion monitoring (SIM). The mass to charge (m/z) ratio was 378.9 (qual.) and 359.0 (quant.) for teflubenzuronand309.0(qual.)fordiflubenzuron.Thefollowing experimentalparameterswereused:nebuliserpressure,40psig;
dryinggastemperature,350◦C;dryinggasflow,8L/min;needle voltage,3600V;desolvatingchambertemperature,300◦C;frag- mentorvoltage,70V.Thelimitofdetection(LOD)wasdetermined to5ng/gandthemethodwaslinear(r=0.98)overtherangesstud- ied(15–500ng/g,500–8000ng/g).Inter-runprecisionrangedfrom 7.5to10.0%.
2.5. Statisticalanalysis
Forestimationofeliminationhalf-life(t½ˇ)alinearregression analysiswasmadeonlogarithmically(ln)transformeddrugcon- centrationsversustime usingtheformulat½=ln2/k,where kis theslopeoftheregressionline.Theinitialconcentration(Co)was determinedbyextrapolationoftheregressionlinetotimezero(to).
Analysisofvariance(ANOVA)wasmadeonsizescomparingrepli- catesandtreatments.Toanalysedifferencesbetweenlowandhigh doseconcentrations,analysisofcovariance(ANCOVA)wasapplied tolog-transformedconcentrations.
3. Results
3.1. Eliminationofteflubenzuron
Followingintakeofone pelletwithhighdoseteflubenzuron (72g) the concentrations in thelobsters decreased with time (Fig.1).Thehighestconcentration,602ng/g,wasmeasuredatthe firstsampling,i.e.2daysafterintake.Thelowestconcentrationat thatsamplingwas215ng/ggivinganindicationoftheindividual variation.FromthedatapresentedinFig.1aneliminationhalflife (t½ˇ)of3.4daysandaninitialconcentration(Co)515ng/gattime tocouldbedetermined.
3.2. Simulationofa7-daymedicationperiod-followedby monitoringfor3months
3.2.1. Mortality
Overall41%(n=46)ofthejuvenilesadministeredlowdoseof teflubenzurondied.Mortalitywas30%,39%and56%inthediffer- entreplicates.Mortalitycommencedwithonejuvenileatday4and of15juvenilesthatmoultedduringthemedicationperiod,10died immediatelyandonediedwhenmoultingforasecondtimeatday 51containing15ng/gteflubenzuron.Theremainingfivejuveniles didnotmoultasecondtimeandwerestillaliveattheendofthe experiment.Ofthejuvenilesexposedtoahighdoseoftefluben- zuron38%died(n=42)andmortalityvariedbetween32%,44%and 47%inthedifferentreplicates.Themortalitycommencedatday5 (threejuveniles)andoffthesevenindividualsthatmoulteddur- ingthemedicationperiodsixdied.Theonlysurvivoralsomoulted
y = 515e-0.20x R² = 0.99
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Mean concentration ng/g
Days in experiment
Fig.1.Meanconcentrationofteflubenzuron(n=6ateachsamplingtime)vstime profileinjuvenileEuropeanlobster(Homarusgammarus)followingasingleoral administrationof72gteflubenzuron.Standarddeviationaregivenasverticalbars.
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Cumulative mortality (%)
Days in experiment Low dose
High dose Control
Fig.2.Cumulativemortality(%)inEuropeanlobster(Homarusgammarus)juveniles givenpelletswithloworhighdoseofteflubenzuronfromday1to7comparedwith controlwithnomedicationinthefeed.Thenumbersforlowandhighdosesarethe meansofthreereplicates.
successfullyasecondtimeatday50andwasaliveattheendof theexperiment.Forbothlowandhighdose,morethan80%ofthe mortalityhadtakenplacebeforeday30.Inthecontrolgrouptotal mortalityamountedtofiveindividuals(13%),alldiedwithinthe first23days.Nodifferencewasfoundinmeancumulativemor- talitycomparinghigh-andlow-dosetreatmentsattheendofthe studywhereasbothtreatmentshadhighercumulativemortality comparedtothecontrolgroup(Fig.2).Someofthejuvenilesdied whileinamoultingprocessasshowninFig.3.
Successfulmoultingafterthelastdoseofmedicinestartedat aroundday30,inbothtreatments.Notallmoultswerehowever recordedasthejuvenilescaneattheirexoskeletoninafewhours andmoultingscanthereforebemissed.Asaconsequence,only58%
ofthejuvenilesinthelow-dosetreatmentwererecordedtohave moultedcomparedto79%inthehigh-dosetreatmentand72%in thecontrol.However,intheendoftheexperiment,measurements ofCLandTLshowedthatallsurvivingjuvenileshadmoultedatleast oncebutrecordingsofexactdatesweremissing.Fourjuveniles wererecordedtohavemoultedtwice.
3.2.2. Growth
Whentheexperimentwasinitiatedthemeanjuvenilesizewas 16.0±2.1mmCL;45.4±6.3mmTLand2.2±0.9gBWandnosig- nificantdifference(ANOVA,p>0.05)wereregisteredinCL,TLor BWbetweenreplicatesortreatmentgroups.Intheexperimental periodthelobsterincreasedinweightandsizeequallyinallgroups andreplicates.Attheendoftheexperiment(day93)nosignificant differencewerefoundinneitherCL,TLorBW(Table1)(ANOVA, p>0.05).
3.2.3. Concentrationofteflubenzuroninthejuveniles
Duetovariable appetitetheprearranged dosewasnot con- sumedbyallindividualsduringthemedicationperiod.However, asthenumberofpelletseatenbyeachjuvenilewasrecordeditwas
Fig.3. Europeanlobsterjuvenile(nr.A06)hadconsumedthreepelletswithhigh doseofteflubenzuronbeforeitdiedduringthemoultingprocess,atday7.Thenew exoskeletonisvisibleundertheoldone.
Table1
Summaryofcarapacelength(CL),totallength(TL)andbodyweight(BW)ofEuro- peanlobster(Homarusgammarus)atday93.
Lowdose Highdose Control Carapacelength(mm) 18.6±7.7 18.3±2.3 18.0±2.2 Totallength(mm) 52.9±5.7 52.7±6.9 52.8±6.5 Bodyweight(g) 3.7±1.2 3.7±1.6 3.6±1.4
Number 66 68 32
4 7
4 4
7 7
4 4
4
4 4
4
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
C02C03 F02F03G03G06A01A03D01D03E01E02
Low dose High dose
Concentration (ng/g)
Fig.4.Concentrationofteflubenzuron(ng/g)atday8injuvenileEuropeanlobster (Homarusgammarus)thathadconsumedtheprescribednumberofpellets(marked aboveeachcolumn)withloworhighdoseofteflubenzuronfromday1to7.
possibletocalculatethegivendoseforeachindividual.Inthelow- dosegroupthejuvenilesconsumedonaverage79g/g,compared with173g/ginthehigh-dosegroup.Allthe12lobsterssampled onedayaftertheendofmedication(day8)consumedtheappointed numberofpellets.Themeanconcentrationsforlowandhighdoses were1715±770and2338±1727ng/g,respectively(Fig.4).How- ever,sinceoneindividual(A03)inthehigh-dosetreatmentwasa majorcontributortothedifference,themeanvalueforthisgroup wasreducedto1666±588ng/gifA03wasexcluded,givingnosig- nificantdifferenceinmeanconcentrationbetweenlowandhigh doses.Thefirstsixjuvenilessurvivinglowdosemoultedfromday 20to42,and thosesurviving highdoseatday23 (allsix).The concentrationsinthesejuvenileswereonaverage174±103ng/g and130±115ng/ginlow-andhigh-dosetreatment,respectively.
Therewasalargevariationbetweenthejuveniles,e.g.atday23 (highdose)theconcentrationvariedfrom26to351ng/g.
A decline in concentration of teflubenzuron withtime was observed in those juveniles that died during the experiment (Fig. 5).The highest concentrations weredetectedin two low- dosed juveniles with 8176 and 6843ng/g, respectively. In the high-dose treatment, the highest concentration detected was 4450ng/g.Overall,therewerenosignificantdifferencesinconcen- trationswhencomparinglowandhigh-dosedjuveniles(ANCOVA,
0 1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000 7 000 8 000 9 000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95
Concentration (ng/g)
Days in experiment
Low dose High dose
Fig.5. Concentrationofteflubenzuron(ng/g)inthejuvenileEuropeanlobster (Homarusgammarus)thatdiedduringtheexperiment.Teflubenzuronwasadmin- isteredfromday1to7.
0 20 40 60 80 100
B C F G A D E
Control Low dose High dose
Percent (%)
Senescent damages Mortality
Fig.6. Ratioof%cumulativemortalityandsenescentdamagesbetweenreplicates ofEuropeanlobster(Homarusgammarus)juvenilesatday93whentheexperiment wasterminated.
p=0.178).Mortalityalsooccurredinindividualswithlowconcen- trationofthedrug,andevenin individualsmoulting laterthan 60daysaftermedicationwasended.Elevenindividualsthatdied contained82ng/gorlessandthelowestconcentrationwas14ng/g.
3.2.4. Deformities
Whentheexperimentwasterminated(day93),thesurviving juvenileswereinspectedfordeformities.Sincedeformitieswere absentamongjuvenilesinthecontrolgroupitwasassumedthat thedeformitiesweresenescentdamagesduetotheexposurefor teflubenzuron.Inoverall,29ofthe126survivingjuvenileswere deformedbutnodifferenceinnumberbetweenlow-andhigh-dose treatmentwasfound(n=14and15,respectively).Deformitiesvar- iedbetweenreplicatesfrom0to15%,andthereplicateswithlowest mortalityhadhighestnumberofsurvivorswithsenescentdamages (Fig.6).Deformitieswerefoundinthecarapace,walkinglegs,che- liped,tailfan,abdomenandtheantennas(Table2andFig.7b–d).
Ninejuvenileshaddevelopedmultipledeformitiesandwhereone juvenilehadthree(swollencarapace,stiffwalkinglegs,damagesto thetailfan),whiletheothereighthadtwo.Themostcommonco- occurringdeformitiesweredamagestothetailfanandstiffwalking legs(33%).
Affected juveniles were monitored over several moulting periodsandstiffwalkinglegs(Fig.7b)werereplacedinonemoult whereasseveredamagestothechelipeds(Fig.7d)neededthree moultingstoappearnormal.Damagestothetailfanseemedper- manentasthiswasnotrepairedthroughmoultings.
4. Discussion
Thechitinsynthesisinhibitorteflubenzuroniswidelyusedas anorallyadministeredagentagainstectoparasiticsalmonlicein marinesalmonfarming.Duetolowbioavailabilityandmetabolism inthefishandhighaffinityfororganicparticlesamajorpartofthe drugwillendupinthesurroundingenvironmentassociatedwith faecesoruneatenpellets.Concernshavebeenraisedaboutpossible effectsofvariousantiparasiticdrugsusedinfishfarmingonnon- targetmarinespecies.Inthisstudy,theeffectofteflubenzuronwas testedonEuropeanlobsterjuveniles.Twodoseswereused.One representedthedoseinmedicatedfeedprescribedforthesalmon, lowdose.Thesecond,highdose,representedthehigherconcentra- tionfoundinfaecesofmedicatedsalmon.Thestudyshowedthat lobsterswereaffected,eitherbymortalityorsenescentdamagesas observed3monthsaftermedication,givingatotaleffect(mortal- ityandsenescentdamages)ofingestingteflubenzuroncloseto50%, independentofwhetherloworhighdosewasadministered.The
Table2
ClassificationofdeformitiesfoundinjuvenilestagesofEuropeanlobster(Homarusgammarus)affectedbyteflubenzuroninthefeedfromday1to7.Observationsweremade atday93.
Organaffected Category Description Occurrence(%)
Carapace Puffy Carapacepuffy/swollen,orupfoldedononesideoftenleavingsomepartsofthegillsexposed 15 2ndto5thpereopod Stiff/twisted Thejointswerefusedtogetherasifovercalcificationmadethejointsgrowntogether.Theentire
pereopodlegwaslikeonestiffpiece,sometimes“frozen”inanarbitrary/twistedposition
20
1stpereopod/cheliped Miss-shaped Variousshapesofthechelipeddeviatingfromnormal 15
Uropod Damages Damagestopartsofthetailfan,orevenlackingoneorbothofthetailfans 23 Abdomen Stiff Abnormalshapeoftheabdomenasifsomeofthesegmentswereoncebrokenandthengrown
backinawrongshape
18 2ndantenna Stiff Segmentsoftheantennawerefused,almostasifovercalcificationmadethejointsgrown
together.Felt“stiff”whentouching.Difficulttoobservewhenanimalwasoutofwater
10
Fig.7. SenescentdamageinjuvenileEuropeanlobster(Homarusgammarus)observedatday93aftermultipleadministrationoftheantiparasiticdrugteflubenzuronfrom day1to7.(a)Normallobsterwithnosenescentdamages,(b)damagesinthewalkinglegs,(c)swollencarapace,(d)deformedcheliped.
lackofdifferenceinmeancumulativemortalitybetweenhighand lowdosedgroupsisreflectedinthelackofsignificantdifference inmeanconcentrationswhencomparingdeadjuvenilesfromeach doseandintheconcentrationsmeasuredin12individualsafterlast medication.
Simulating a 7-day medication period does not necessarily mimicthenaturalconditionsunderafishfarmsincelobstersinthe wildhavethepossibilitytochoosefromavarietyoffoodsources.
However,nopreferenceswerefoundinastudygivingEuropean lobsterjuvenilesthe option tochoose betweenmedicated pel- lets(teflubenzuron),non-medicatedpelletsorArtemiasp.(Jelmert, unpublisheddata).Inourstudyonlydrug-containingpelletswere offeredtothelobsters,andthedosingregimencouldberegardedas aworst-casescenario.Ontheotherhand,incontrolledexperiments itwasshownthatjuvenilesareabletocollectandstorefoodine.g.
substrateand/orshelter.Ifthisisthecaseinthewild,thenum- berofstoredandconsumedmedicatedpelletsmayevenexceed whatwasadministratedinthisexperiment.However,asoneofthe aimsofthestudywastogaininformationconcerningwhichcon- centrationsofteflubenzuroninducedmortalityinjuvenilelobster, wefoundtheexperimentalset-uplegitimatetouse.
Eliminationhalflife(t½ˇ)ofteflubenzuronafterasingledose administrationof72gwas3.4daysata temperatureof15◦C.
Noeliminationdataareavailableforteflubenzuronincrustaceans butin Atlanticsalmonmuscle,t½ ˇvalues of4.7 and2.6 days, respectively,werefoundfollowingasingleoraladministrationof 10mg/kgofteflubenzuronormultipleadministrationsof10mg/kg dailyfor7days(Anon,1999).Thesalmonwereheldat10◦C.At6◦C thet½ˇvaluefollowingamultiple-dosestudywas3.8days(Anon, 1999).Theeliminationinlobsterjuvenileswasthereforefoundto beinthesamerangeasinAtlanticsalmonmuscle.However,asthe drugcouldbedetected60days(approximately18half-lives)after medicationinlobster,itispossiblethatteflubenzuronisdistributed accordingtoatwo-compartmentmodelandthat,duetotheexper- imentalperiodofonly20days,asecondandslowerelimination pathwaywasnotrevealed.
Whencomparingresultsfromthesingleandmultipleadminis- trationsinthisstudyitisclearthatmultipleadministrationscaused abuildupofthedruginthelobsterbody.However,thediffer- encein meanconcentrations after8days comparinglow-with high-dosetreatmentwasnon-significantwhichmayindicatelower palatabilityadministeringthehighdosepelletsand/ordecreased absorptionratewithincreasingdose,processesthatpreviouslyhas beendescribedforantibacterialagentsinfish(Hustvedtetal.,1991;
Rigosetal.,1999).Furthermore,lobsters thissizewillbreakup thepelletinsmallerpieceswhileeatingandtheamountofspill isdifficulttomeasure,whichmayaccountforthelargeindividual variationsinconcentrationsthatwasobserved.
Thereareveryfewdataavailabledescribingthemortaleffectof flubenzurons,particularlyonnon-targetmarinecrustaceansand afteroraladministrationofthedrug.WhileLC50valueshavebeen establishedforanumberofterrestrialinsectsandalsosomeaquatic crustaceanswhenexposedtothedrugsdissolvedinwater(summ- arisedin Langford, 2011), studiesinvolving theeffect of orally administereddrugsaresparse.ScottishEnvironmentalProtection Agency(SEPA)haveconsideredtheecotoxicityofteflubenzuron when usedas an anti sea-liceagentin aquaculture and setan EnvironmentalQualityStandard(EQS)valueforteflubenzuronin marinesedimentto2ng/g(dryweight).ThedefinedEQSvaluewas basedonaNoObservableEffectConcentration(NOEC)valueforthe amphipodCorophiumvolutatorafterachronicexposurefor28days andasafetymarginof10(SEPA,1999).Unfortunatelynodetailed informationwasgivenabouttheexperimentalset-upandfindings, excludingadirectcomparisonofresults.
Thisstudyshowedthatindividualssurvivedmoulting3weeks afterthe last medicationand witha concentration of 350ng/g
teflubenzuron. In contrast,11 individuals died withconcentra- tionsof82ng/gorless,thelowest14ng/g.Thisdemonstratesthe variationinsensitivitybetweenindividualsandmadeitdifficult todetermine a break point, where higher concentrations most likelywouldinducemortalityandlowerconcentrationsmostlikely wouldnot.Ontheotherhand,thestudyrevealsthelowercon- centration range that induces mortalityin lobster juvenile and consequentlyindicatestheconcentrationrangethatmighthave effecton othernon-target crustaceans, providing similarsensi- tivity. In two field studies the concentrations of teflubenzuron weremeasuredincrustaceanstrappedinthevicinityoffishfarms duringandshortlyaftermedication(Langford,2011;Samuelsen, unpublishedresults).Langford(2011)foundminorresiduesofthe drug(between0.2and11.3ng/g)indeepwaterprawns(Pandalus borealis)collectedbytrawl1–5km awayfrom thefarmsand a maximumof185.7ng/ginbrowncrab(Cancerpagurus)caughtby trapsatadistanceof100–300mfromthefarms.Inthestudyby Samuelsen(unpublishedresults)crustaceansweretrappedwithin anareaof 300mfromacommercialfarmundertreatmentand drugresidueswerefoundinallexaminedspecies.Themaximum concentrationswere200ng/gin deepwaterprawns,319ng/g in Norwaylobster (Nephrops norvegicus), 393ng/g in squatlobster (Munida sp.) and 865ng/g in King crab(Lithodes maja) indicat- ingthattheconcentrationsofteflubenzuronindefinedindividuals werehighenoughtoinducemortalityifmoultingwasimpending.
Lobsteriscoveredbyanexoskeletonthatneedstobeshedin ordertogrow.Sinceteflubenzuronreduceschitinsynthesis,itis assumedthatmortalityinallthemedicatedindividualswascon- nectedwithecdysis.Theexoskeletonisdividedintothreelayersall consistingofchitin,protein,calciumandmagnesiumsalts,phos- phatesandafewothercomponents,butwherethecomposition variesinthedifferentlayers(Bobelmannetal.,2007;Romanoetal., 2007;Al-Sawalmihetal.,2008;Sachsetal.,2008;Fabritiusetal., 2009;Kunkeletal.,2012).Moultinginlobsterisacomplexprocess anditmightbethatchitinisformedduringashortperiodduringthe moultingprocess,andvulnerabilityishigherduringthisstage.The workingmechanismofflubenzuronsinblockingthechitinsynthe- siswillaffectformationofthenewexoskeletonleadingtoathinner andweaker structure. Thecauseofdeathmaybedisruptionof bloodvesselsintheprocessofliberationfromtheoldexoskeleton.
Noexaminationofthethicknessandstratificationoftheexoskele- tonwere,however,performedinthisstudybutanongoingstudy aimsatrecordingthechangesthattakeplaceintheexoskeleton inlobsterjuvenilesduringamoultingperiod,andrevealinghow teflubenzuronisaffectingtheprocess.
Thisstudyisthefirsttoreportaconsiderablenumberofjuve- nilelobsterswithdifferentabnormalitiesfollowingadministration ofteflubenzuron.Neverthelessasimilareffectwasreportedalready in1981onthecopepod,A.tonsabyTesterandCostlow(1981)who foundthatthehatchingviabilitywasless than50%aftera12-h exposureto1g/Lofdiflubenzuronandlessthan5%after24-h exposureto10g/L.Thosethathatchwereabnormallyshapedand failedtomoultatthenextstageofdevelopment.Incontrast,juve- nilelobsterswithabnormalitiesinourstudywereabletomoult successfullyandstartregeneratingthedamagedparts.However, sincethedeformitiesmostlikelywillaffecttheabilitytolocate andconsumefood(antenna,clawandwalkinglegs),respiration (carapace)andability tomove/swim(walking legs, tailfan and abdomen)thepossibilitythattheywillsurviveinthewildissmall.
Interestingly,ourstudyrevealednonegativeeffectongrowthof juvenilesthatsurvivedmedicationwithoutdeformities,compared withcontrols.
Ithasbeenshownthatflubenzuronsarepresentinthesediment andsedimentdwellingorganismsforanextendedtimeaftermed- icationofafarm(Langford,2011;Selviketal.,2002,Samuelsen, unpublishedresults). Furtherresearch shouldtherefore include
long-termexposureofjuvenilelobsterstolowerdrugconcentra- tionsandfurthermoretoincludeotherimportantcrustaceanlike crabs,shrimpsand crayfish.Suchdataaredeemednecessaryin ordertoevaluatetheenvironmentaleffectsofflubenzuronswhen usedinaquaculture.
Acknowledgements
ThetechnicalassistanceofthestaffatParisvannetFieldStation ishighlyappreciated.TheprojectwasfundedbyNorwegianMin- istryofFisheriesandCoastalAffairs,NationalInstituteofNutrition and Seafood Research, Bergen, Norway and Instituteof Marine Research,Bergen,Norway.
References
Anon,1999.TheEuropeanAgencyfortheEvaluationofMedicalProducts(EMEA), VeterinaryMedicinesEvaluationUnit, TeflubenzuronSummary Report(2), EMEA/MRL/547/99-FINAL.
Al-Sawalmih,A.,Li,C.,Siegel,S.,Fabritius,H.,Yi,S.,Raabe,D.,Frazl,P.,Paris,O., 2008.Microtextureandchitin/calciteorientationrelationshipinthemineralized exoskeletonoftheAmericanlobster.Adv.Funct.Mater.18,3307–3314.
Branson,E.J.,Rønsberg,S.S.,Ritchie,G.,2000.Efficacyofteflubenzuron(CalicideR) forthetreatmentofsealice,Lepeophtheirussalmonis(Krøyer1838),infestations offarmedAtlanticsalmon(SalmosalarL.).Aquacult.Res.31,861–867.
Bobelmann,F.,Romano,P.,Fabritius,H.,Raabe,D.,Epple,M.,2007.Thecomposition oftheexoskeletonoftwocrustacean:theAmericanlobsterHomarusamericanus andtheediblecrabCancerpagurus.Thermochim.Acta463,65–68.
Burridge,L.,Weis,J.S.,Cabello,F.,Pizarro,P.,Bostick,K.,2010.Chemicaluseinsalmon aquaculture:areviewofcurrentpracticeandpossibleenvironmentaleffects.
Aquaculture306,7–23.
Burka,J.F.,Fast,M.D.,Revie,C.W.,2012.LepeophtheirussalmonisandCaligusroger- cresseyi.In:Woo,P.T.K.,Buchmann,K.(Eds.),FishParasites–Pathobiologyand Protection.CABI,Wallingford,UK,ISBN978-1-84593-806-2,pp.350–370(Chap- ter22).
Campbell,P.J.,Hammell,K.L.,Dohoo,I.R.,Ritchie,G.,2006a.Randomizedclinical trialstoinvestigatetheeffectivenessofteflubenzuronfortreatingsealiceon Atlanticsalmon.Dis.Aquat.Org.70,101–108.
Campbell,P.J.,Hammell,K.L.,Dohoo,I.R.,Ritchie,G.,2006b.Historicalcontrolclinical trialstoassesstheeffectivenessofteflubenzuronfortreatingsealiceonAtlantic salmon.Dis.Aquat.Org.70,109–114.
Costello,M.J.,2006.Ecologyofsealiceparasiticonfarmandwildfish.TrendsPara- sitol.22,475–483.
Costello,M.J.,2009.Howsealicefromsalmonfarmsmaycausewildsalmonid declinesinEuropeandNorthAmericaandbeathreattofisheselsewhere.Proc.
R.Soc.Lond.B:Biol.Sci.276,3385–3394.
Fabritius,H.O.,Sachs,C.,Romano,P.T.,Raabe,D.,2009.Influenceofstructuralprin- ciplesonthemechanicsofabiologicalfiber-basedcompositematerialwith
hierarchicalorganization:theexoskeletonofthelobsterHomarusamericanus.
Adv.Mater.21,391–400.
Eisler,R.,1992.Diflubenzuronhazardstofish,wildlife,andinvertebrates:asynoptic review.USFishandWildlifeService,ContaminantHazardReviews,ReportNo.
25,ISSN:0163-4801.
Fisher,S.A.,Hall,L.W.,1992.Environmentalconcentrationsandaquatictoxicitydata ondiflubenzuron(Dimilin).Crit.Rev.Toxicol.22,45–79.
Haya,K.,Burridge,L.E.,Davis,I.M.,Ervik,A.,2005.Areviewandassessmentofenvi- ronmentalriskofchemicalsusedforthetreatmentsofsealiceinfestationsof culturedsalmon.Hdb.Environ.Chem.5,305–340.
Hustvedt,S.O.,Salte,R.,Kvendset,O.,Vassvik,V.,1991.Bioavailabilityofoxolinic acidinAtlanticsalmon(SalmosalarL.)frommedicatedfeed.Aquaculture97, 305–310.
Langford,K.,2011.Environmentalscreeningofveterinarymedicinesusedinaqua- culture,diflubenzuronandteflubenzuron.Reportno.1086/2011.Norwegian ClimateandPollutionAgency(Klif).
Kunkel,J.G.,Nagel,W.,Jercinovic,M.J.,2012.MineralfinestructureoftheAmerican lobstercuticle.J.ShellfishRes.31,515–526.
Kutti,T.,(Ph.D.Thesis)2008.Regionalimpactoforganicloadingfromasalmonid farm.Dispersal,sedimentationratesandbenthicfaunaresponse.Universityof Bergen,Norway.
MacKinnon,B.M.,1997.Sealice:areview.WorldAquacult.25,5–10.
Marsella,A.M.,Jaskola,M.,Mabury,S.A.,2000.Aqueoussolubilities,photolysisrates andpartitioncoefficientofbenzoylphenylureainsecticides.Pest.Manage.Sci.
56,789–794.
Pike,A.W.,Wadsworth,S.L.,1999.Sealiceonsalmonids:theirbiologyandcontrol.
Adv.Parasitol.44,232–237.
Romano,P.,Fabritius,H.,Raabe,D.,2007.TheexoskeletonofthelobsterHomarus americanusasanexampleofasmartanisotropicbiologicalmaterial.ActaBio- mater.3,301–309.
Rigos,G.,Alexis,M.,Nengas,I.,1999.Leaching,palatabilityanddigestibilityofoxy- tetracyclineandoxolinicacidincludedindietsfedtoseabassDicentrarchus labraxL.Aquacult.Res.30,841–847.
Ritchie, G., Rønsberg, S.S., Hoff, K.A., Branson, E.J., 2002. Clinical efficacy of teflubenzuron(Calicide®)forthetreatmentofsealice,Lepeophtheirussalmo- nis,infestationsoffarmedAtlanticsalmonSalmosalaratlowtemperatures.Dis.
Aquat.Org.51,101–106.
Sachs,C.,Fabritius,H.,Raabe,D.,2008.Influenceofmicrostructureondeformation anisotropyofmineralizedcuticlefromthelobsterHomarusamericanus.J.Struct.
Biol.161,120–132.
Selvik,A.,Hanssen,P.K.,Ervik,A.,Samuelsen,O.B.,2002.Thestabilityandpersistence ofDiflubenzuroninmarinesedimentsstudiedunderlaboratoryconditionsand thedispersiontothesedimentunderafishfarmfollowingmedication.Sci.Total Environ.285,237–245.
SEPA,1999.Calcide(teflubenzuron)-authorisationforuseasaninfeedsealicetreat- mentinmarinecagesalmonfarms.Riskassessment,EQSandrecommendations.
SEPAPolicyno.29.
Tester,P.A.,Costlow,J.D.,1981.EffectofinsectgrowthregulatorDimilin(TH6040) onfecundityandeggviabilityofthemarinecopepodAcartiatonsa.Mar.Ecol.
Prog.Ser.5,297–302.
Wagner,G.N.,Fast,M.D.,Johnson,S.C.,2008.PhysiologyandimmunologyofLep- eophtheirussalmonisinfectionsofsalmonids.TrendsParasitol.24,176–183.