FIFTH SECTION DECISION

Relying on Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life), the applicants complained about the authorities’ decisions to place their children in care and keep them there

In their observations to the Court following communication to the parties of a question under Article 6 § 1 about the overall length of the proceedings,

of reformatio in peius in the reopened proceedings which had been commenced due to the fact that the Supreme Court had found, on the basis of the applicants’ application,

1 to create a welfare or pension scheme, the Court has held that if a Contracting State does decide to enact legislation providing for the payment as of right of a

On 13 March 2006 the Berlin Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's appeal against the Regional Court's decision of 23 February 2006 refusing to appoint him a counsel

The Court, however, considers that it is necessary to examine first whether the applicant company is entitled to make an application under Article 34 of the

On 17 March 2004 the applicants requested the Court of Criminal Inquiry to suspend the trial pending a decision from the European Court of Human Rights.. In an order of

The Court notes that both parties to the case accept that there was an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for correspondence under Article 8 of the Convention