• No results found

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT FLOATING BRIDGE E39 BJØRNAFJORDEN

N/A
N/A
Info
Nedlasting
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT FLOATING BRIDGE E39 BJØRNAFJORDEN"

Copied!
2
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Last ned nå ( 2 sider )

Fulltekst

(1)

Appendix to report:

SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-022 MARINE GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN

Appendix title:

APPENDIX C: STATIC SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS

Contract no: 18/91094 Project number: 5187772/12777

Document number: SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-022 App. C

Date: 15.08.2019

Revision: 0

Number of pages: 2

Prepared by: Knut-Helge Bergset Controlled by: Gunhild Hennum Approved by: Kolbjørn Høyland

HEYERDAHL ARKITEKTER AS

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT FLOATING BRIDGE E39 BJØRNAFJORDEN

(2)

APPENDIX C: STATIC SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-022, rev. 0

2

1 APPENDIX C: STATIC SLOPE STABILITY CALCULATIONS

1.1 Introduction

This Appendix includes results from static GeoSuite Stability calculations for the profiles shown in Figure 1-1. The stability calculations are performed with both undrained and drained parameters.

>

Figure 1-1: Overview showing the profiles calculated in GeoSuite stability. The map

show contours every 10 m, and the Isopach map is plotted in the background.

>

Table 1-1: Stability calculations for the profiles are shown in the following appendices

Profile G1 A-A G2 A-A G4 A-A G4 B-B G4 C-C

Appendix C.1 C.2 C.3 C.4 C.5

Referanser

Last ned nå ( PDF - 2 sider - 452.33 KB )

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden Appendix L – Enclosure 1

This Enclosure shows stability checks of the back columns and tower of the cable stayed bridge for critical construction stages and the complete states.. Reference is made to

Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden Appendix L – Enclosure 3

In the following effective areas and effective wind areas (including drag factors) are calculated for the climbing formwork at the top of the axis 1E column. These parameters apply

Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden Appendix E – Enclosure 1

The effect of the proximity of the sea surface on the aerodynamic load coefficients was investigated separately in a wind tunnel test where the deck section was set close to the

Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden    Appendix E – Enclosure 7

The above procedure is illustrated in the example below which pairs the aerodynamic derivatives shown in Figure 3.2 with the structural properties of Storebælt East bridge

K12_07_SC_windsea_screening_100yr_rose_plots July 3, 2019

Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden. Appendix G –

K12_07_SC_s_1yr_rose_plots July 6, 2019

Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden. Appendix G –

Torsional moment

Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden. Appendix G –

Long-term wave response Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden

The comparison between Wasim and Wadam analyses showed that wave-current interactions may have a significant effect on wave excitation loads beyond a pure frequency (Doppler)