• No results found

APPENDIX C – HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "APPENDIX C – HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE"

Copied!
9
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Appendix to report:

SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-021

K12 - DESIGN OF MOORING AND ANCHORING

Appendix title:

APPENDIX C – HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE

Contract no: 18/91094 Project number: 5187772/12777

Document number: SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-021 App. C

Date: 15.08.2019

Revision: 0

Number of pages: 9

Prepared by: Theresa Böllmann Controlled by: Håkon S. Andersen Approved by: Kolbjørn Høyland

CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT FLOATING BRIDGE E39 BJØRNAFJORDEN

(2)

APPENDIX C – HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-021, rev. 0

Table of Content

1 INPUT ... 3

1.1 Fatigue properties ... 3

1.2 Mooring line characteristics ... 4

1.3 Current ... 4

2 CROSS FLOW SCREENING ... 5

3 LOCAL MODEL ... 6

4 MODE SHAPE EVALUATION ... 7

5 DAMAGE CALCULATION ... 8

5.1 Fibre Rope ... 8

5.2 Anchor chain ... 8

5.3 Combination of fatigue damages ... 9

(3)

1 INPUT

3

1.1 Fatigue properties

(4)

APPENDIX C – HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-021, rev. 0

4

1.2 Mooring line characteristics

1.3 Current

(5)

2 CROSS FLOW SCREENING

5

(6)

APPENDIX C – HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-021, rev. 0

6

3 LOCAL MODEL

(7)

4 MODE SHAPE EVALUATION

7

(8)

APPENDIX C – HIGH CYCLE FATIGUE SBJ-33-C5-OON-22-RE-021, rev. 0

8

5 DAMAGE CALCULATION

5.1 Fibre Rope

5.2 Bottom chain

(9)

5.3 Combination of fatigue damages

9

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

This Appendix includes results from static GeoSuite Stability calculations for the profiles shown in Figure 1-1.. The stability calculations are performed with both undrained and

Prepared by: Johannes Mydland Controlled by: Knut-Helge Bergseth Approved by: Kolbjørn Høyland. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT FLOATING BRIDGE

This Enclosure shows stability checks of the back columns and tower of the cable stayed bridge for critical construction stages and the complete states.. Reference is made to

In the following effective areas and effective wind areas (including drag factors) are calculated for the climbing formwork at the top of the axis 1E column. These parameters apply

Typical Transverse Bulkhead above Column Floating Bridge Girder K12, High Part Axis 3-8. - All measurements

The effect of the proximity of the sea surface on the aerodynamic load coefficients was investigated separately in a wind tunnel test where the deck section was set close to the

The above procedure is illustrated in the example below which pairs the aerodynamic derivatives shown in Figure 3.2 with the structural properties of Storebælt East bridge

Concept development, floating bridge E39 Bjørnafjorden. Appendix G –