• No results found

Implementation of the incremental scheme for one-electron first-order properties in coupled-cluster theory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Implementation of the incremental scheme for one-electron first-order properties in coupled-cluster theory"

Copied!
10
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Implementation of the incremental scheme for one-electron first-order properties in coupled-cluster theory

Joachim Friedrich,1,a兲Sonia Coriani,2,3Trygve Helgaker,3and Michael Dolg1

1Institute for Theoretical Chemistry, University of Cologne, Greinstr. 4, 50939 Cologne, Germany

2Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Università degli Studi di Trieste, via Licio Giorgieri 1, I-34127 Trieste, Italy

3Department of Chemistry, Centre for Theoretical and Computational Chemistry (CTCC), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1033, Blindern N-0315, Norway

Received 15 July 2009; accepted 16 September 2009; published online 15 October 2009

A fully automated parallelized implementation of the incremental scheme for coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles

共CCSD兲

energies has been extended to treat molecular

共unrelaxed兲

first-order one-electron properties such as the electric dipole and quadrupole moments. The convergence and accuracy of the incremental approach for the dipole and quadrupole moments have been studied for a variety of chemically interesting systems. It is found that the electric dipole moment can be obtained to within 5% and 0.5% accuracy with respect to the exact CCSD value at the third and fourth orders of the expansion, respectively. Furthermore, we find that the incremental expansion of the quadrupole moment converges to the exact result with increasing order of the expansion: the convergence of nonaromatic compounds is fast with errors less than 16 mau and less than 1 mau at third and fourth orders, respectively

共1 mau= 10

−3ea02

兲; the aromatic compounds converge slowly

with maximum absolute deviations of 174 and 72 mau at third and fourth orders, respectively.

©2009 American Institute of Physics.

关doi:10.1063/1.3243864兴

I. INTRODUCTION

The coupled-cluster

CC

approach is capable of provid- ing highly accurate energies and properties of molecular systems1–11and is therefore frequently used for benchmark- ing more approximate methods such as those based on density-functional theory. However, given the steep scaling of the cost of the standard CC methods with respect to the size of the one-particle basis set, the application of CC theory is usually limited to relatively small molecules. For larger molecules, it becomes necessary to introduce further approximations into the CC model.12–27 One of these ap- proximations is the incremental scheme of Stoll,13,28,29which is based on the Bethe–Goldstone expansion introduced into quantum chemistry by Nesbet12,30,31more than 40 years ago.

During the past 15 years, the incremental scheme has been successfully applied to various closed-shell periodic32–36and molecular37–41 systems; extensions to open-shell systems have also been reported.42–44

Recently, we presented a fully automated implementa- tion of the incremental scheme for molecular electronic en- ergies within the framework of second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory

共MP2兲, coupled-cluster singles-and-

doubles

共CCSD兲

theory, and CCSD with a perturbative triples correction.38,39,45,46

Later, we introduced distance screening and an efficient treatment of core-valence correlation.39,47Given that CC theory provides accurate mo- lecular properties,1,3–5,7–11,48–55

the local domain approxima- tion of Pulay and co-workers14,15,56,57

was used to reduce the cost of such calculations for molecular dipole moments and

for static dipole polarisabilities,58 as well as for optical- rotation and magnetic-field parameters.59 Within the frame- work of the Bethe–Goldstone theory, Nesbet31 recognized already in 1969 how properties can be treated. Recently, Yang and Dolg60 applied this approach to optical tensors of the Ga4As4H18cluster.

In the present paper, we examine the accuracy of the incremental scheme for first-order molecular properties such as the dipole and quadrupole moments, which are important quantities characterizing the molecular charge distribution.

II. THEORY

A. The incremental scheme

In an incremental calculation, we divide the total system into domains consisting of groups of localized occupied or- bitals and then calculate the correlation energy separately for each domain. Next, to account for the nonadditivity of the domain energies, we calculate correction energies for all pairs of domains, all triples of domains, and so on, until the desired accuracy is reached. The total correlation energy is then computed according to

Ecorr=

i ⌬␧i+2!1

ij ⌬␧ij+3!1

ijk⌬␧ijk+ ¯,

⌬␧i=␧i, ⌬␧ij=␧ij−⌬␧i−⌬␧j,

共1兲

where␧iis the correlation energy of the subsystemiand␧ij

is the correlation energy of subsystemsi andjtogether. In a compact set-theory notation, Eq.

共1兲

reads

a兲Electronic mail: [email protected].

0021-9606/2009/13115/154102/10/$25.00 131, 154102-1 © 2009 American Institute of Physics

(2)

Ecorr=

X

X苸P共D兲∧兩X兩ⱕO

⌬␧X,

共2兲

where D is the set of domains, P共D兲 is the power set of domains, and Ois the order of the expansion. The summa- tion indexXin Eq.

共2兲

runs over all increments up to order O. WhenX represents the correlation energy of the unified subsystems of X, the general correlation-energy increment

⌬␧Xis given as

⌬␧X=␧X

Y Y苸P共X兲∧兩Y兩⬍兩X兩

⌬␧Y.

共3兲

For tensorial properties such as the dipole and quadrupole moments, we must express each tensor component in its own incremental expansion. The correlation contribution to the ath component of a tensorial propertyPatherefore reads

Pcorra =

X

X苸P共D兲∧兩X兩ⱕO

PXa,

4

with the general increment

PXa=PXa

Y

Y苸P共X兲∧兩Y兩⬍兩X兩

PYa.

5

For example, the incremental expansion of the dipole mo- ment reads

corr=

X

X苸P共D兲∧兩X兩ⱕO

XxXyXz

.

共6兲

B. The local molecular-orbital basis

The incremental scheme requires the wave function to be expressed in a set of local molecular orbitals

共LMOs兲. To use

such a basis in combination with the current implementation of the CCSD first-order one-electron properties in DALTON, which assumes canonical molecular orbitals

共MOs兲,

48we use a pseudocanonical basis. This means that we diagonalize the Fock matrix in the LMO basis in the subspace of the domain and use the resulting transformation matrix to generate the pseudocanonical MOs from the LMOs—for details, see Refs.

45and46.

C. First-order one-electron CCSD properties

All properties considered in the present paper have been calculated using an orbital-unrelaxed scheme, in which the MOs are not allowed to adjust

共relax兲

in response to the perturbation. Instead, the response of the wave function to the external perturbation is described entirely by the CC am- plitudes. At the CCSD level of theory, for example, unre- laxed first-order one-electron properties are given by4

FIG. 1. Structure of the prism isomer ofH2O6taken form Ref.72. The geometries of LiC5H7, aniline, furan, andp-nitroaniline were optimized at the RI-BP86/SVP level of theory.

FIG. 2. RI-BP86/SVP optimized structure of benzene and octane.

(3)

O

CCSD=

pqOpqDpq,

7

whereOpqare the one-electron MO integrals for the operator associated with the given property and the CCSD density- matrix elements take the form

Dpq=

HF

+

exp

T

Epqexp

T

兲兩

HF

8

T=T1+T2=

ai

tiaEai+1 2

ai,bj

tijabEaiEbj.

共9兲

Here theEpqare excitation operators from orbitalpto orbital q, while tia and tijab are single and double excitation ampli- tudes, denoting occupied MOs by iandj, virtual MOs bya andb, and unspecified

occupied or virtual

MOs bypandq.

In a more general notation, the cluster operator is given by T=

t, wheretare the amplitudes and␶are the exci- tation operators

=␶

兩HF典. The CCSD amplitudes

t are obtained iteratively by solving the projected nonlinear CC equations

兩exp共−

T兲Hexp共T兲兩HF典= 0,

共10兲

while the Lagrange multipliers , which have been intro- duced to make the CC energy stationary with respect to

variations in the amplitudes t, are obtained from the solu- tion of the linear response equations

兩exp共−

T兲关H,

兴exp共T兲兩HF典

= −

具HF兩关H,

兴exp共T兲兩HF典. 共11兲

The density matrix in Eq.

8

is unrelaxed since the contri- butions arising from the relaxation of the canonical MOs to the external perturbation are not included—see, for example, Eq.

11

in Ref.4. InDALTON, the first-order CCSD proper- ties are formulated in terms of T1-transformed one-electron operators4

具O典

=

pq

OpqDpq.

共12兲

Here the one-electron integrals are given by1,48 Opq = exp共−T1

兲O

pqexp共T1

=

␣␤

O␣␤p pq

h ,

共13兲

p=C共1t1T

兲,

h=C共1+t1

兲 共14兲

in terms of the atomic-orbital

共AO兲

integralsO␣␤ and MO coefficients C. The density-matrix elements in Eq.

共12兲

are given by

TABLE I. Convergence of the incremental CCSD and MP2 correlation energiessdsp= 3 , tcon= 3. Basis set cc-pVDZ.

Order

CCSD MP2

Energya.u.

Errorkcal/mol

Relative%

Energya.u.

Errorkcal/mol

Relative%Aniline

1 0.617 241 251.12 60.67 0.510 440 291.45 52.36

2 1.041 444 15.08 102.36 0.959 490 9.67 98.42

3 1.017 506 0.05 100.01 0.974 373 0.33 99.95

4 1.017 251 0.11 99.98 0.974 894 0.00 100.00

Exact 1.017 419 0.974 901

Benzene

1 0.515 293 204.38 61.27 0.425 454 236.61 53.01

2 0.861 556 12.90 102.44 0.789 628 8.09 98.39

3 0.840 740 0.16 99.97 0.802 165 0.22 99.96

4 0.840 858 0.09 99.98 0.802 534 0.01 100.00

Exact 0.840 998 0.802 521

Octane

1 0.926 438 234.93 71.22 0.754 940 271.30 63.59

2 1.312 043 7.04 100.86 1.180 383 4.33 99.42

3 1.300 695 0.08 99.99 1.187 187 0.06 99.99

4 1.300 839 0.01 100.00 1.187 278 0.00 100.00

Exact 1.300 827 1.187 278

p-nitroaniline

1 0.932 523 387.30 60.17 0.780 900 465.77 51.27

2 1.586 174 22.88 102.35 1.497 365 16.18 98.31

3 1.550 246 0.33 100.03 1.522 604 0.34 99.96

4 1.549 382 0.21 99.98 1.523 191 0.03 100.00

Exact 1.549 719 1.523 149

(4)

Dpq =

具HF兩E

pq

兩HF典

+

具HF兩关E

pq,T2

兴兩HF典

+

兩exp共−

T2

兲E

pqexp共T2

兲兩HF典

,

共15兲

with the following explicit expressions:48

Dai=ai, Dab=

ckltklcbklca,

共16兲

Dij= 2␦ij

cdk

tkicdkjcd, Dia=

bj

bj

共2t

ij

abtijba

兲. 共17兲

For efficiency, the first-order properties in Eq.

共12兲

are cal- culated as

具O典

=

␣␤O␣␤D␣␤, D␣␤ =

pq ppqhDpq

共18兲

following a backtransformation of the density matrix to the AO basis.

III. COMPUTATIONAL DETAILS A. Incremental calculations

In our implementation, the one-electron properties are calculated in the following manner. First, we solve the Hartree–Fock equations for the full system with DALTON

共Ref.

61兲and extract the canonical MOs and the dipole inte- grals in the AO basis. Next, we localize the orbitals with the

Boys localization,62 using a sequence of orthogonal 2⫻2 rotations as introduced by Edmiston and Ruedenberg.63The resulting localized occupied orbitals are grouped into disjoint sets of occupied orbitals as described in Ref.38. This com- putational step is controlled by two input parameters: the domain-size parametersdsp, which is a rough measure for the number of LMOs belonging to each of the domains, andtcon, which is a distance parameter for the connectivity of a pair of occupied orbitals.38 The incremental calculations are finally performed with a version of theDALTONprogram package61 modified to compute automatically the correlation contribu- tion to the given property. In all calculations, all electrons were correlated.

B. Geometries

Unless otherwise stated, the geometries were optimized with the RI-BP86/SVP gradient-corrected Kohn–Sham method,64,65 as implemented in the TURBOMOLE 5.10

共Refs.

66–69兲 quantum-chemistry package. All stationary points were characterized by analyzing the Hessian matrix.70 Note that the goal of the current work is not to derive accurate structural data for the compounds investigated, but rather to obtain reasonable geometrical parameters for the subsequent incremental calculations of energies and properties.

TABLE II. Convergence of the incremental CCSD and MP2 correlation energiessdsp= 3 , tcon= 3.

Order

CCSD MP2

Energya.u.

Errorkcal/mol

Relative%

Energya.u.

Errorkcal/mol

Relative%Furan, aug-cc-pVDZ

1 0.478 388 188.50 61.43 0.398 073 224.28 52.69

2 0.792 792 8.79 101.80 0.743 029 7.82 98.35

3 0.779 215 0.27 100.06 0.755 068 0.26 99.94

4 0.778 794 0.00 100.00 0.755 469 0.01 100.00

Exact 0.778 786 0.755 485

Furan, cc-pVDZ

1 0.466 064 178.42 62.11 0.386 055 212.16 53.31

2 0.763 408 8.16 101.73 0.712 647 7.22 98.41

3 0.751 118 0.45 100.10 0.723 757 0.25 99.94

4 0.750 380 0.01 100.00 0.724 144 0.01 100.00

Exact 0.750 398 0.724 158

LiC5H7, 6-31Gⴱⴱ

1 0.560 360 120.29 74.51 0.480 111 141.56 68.03

2 0.755 812 2.36 100.50 0.702 470 2.03 99.54

3 0.752 052 0.00 100.00 0.705 641 0.04 99.99

4 0.752 052 0.00 100.00 0.705 699 0.00 100.00

Exact 0.752 056 0.705 700

H2O6, aug-cc-pVDZ

1 1.360 829 15.72 98.19 1.315 832 16.97 97.99

2 1.386 000 0.08 100.01 1.342 853 0.01 100.00

3 1.385 865 0.01 100.00 1.342 869 0.00 100.00

4 1.385 875 0.00 100.00 1.342 869 0.00 100.00

Exact 1.385 875 1.342 869

(5)

C. Hardware

The calculations were performed on a cluster of Intel Core2Quad Q6600 PCs with 2.4 GHz processors, 8 Gbytes random-access memory, and 160 Gbytes disk space per node.

The PCs are connected with a 1 Gbit ethernet.

IV. APPLICATIONS

To obtain a sufficiently broad set of data, we considered a set of chemically relevant systems of different natures, such as a water cluster, an organolithium compound, various aromatic systems

aniline, furan, p-nitroaniline, and ben-

TABLE III. Convergence of the incremental dipole momentsin a.u.for the dipolar molecules in Fig.1. The parameterstcon= 3 andsdsp= 3 were used except forH2O6, wheresdsp= 5 was used to get a water molecule as a fragment. The cc-pVDZ basis was used except for LiC5H7andH2O6, where the 6-31Gⴱⴱ basis and the aug-cc-pVDZ basis sets were used, respectively. The RMS deviation of the three dipole components and the MA deviation are used as a measure for the convergence.

Ordertot兩 兩tot%corrRMS MA

H2O6, 6 domains 1 0.9982 100.1 0.0519 0.0014 0.0007

2 0.9965 99.9 0.0536 0.0004 0.0005

3 0.9972 100.0 0.0529 0.0000 0.0000

4 0.9972 100.0 0.0530 0.0000 0.0000

Exact 0.9972 100.0 0.0530

LiC5H7, 6 domains 1 2.2601 102.2 0.0219 0.0275 0.0467

2 2.2419 101.3 0.0041 0.0170 0.0277

3 2.2148 100.1 0.0265 0.0015 0.0025

4 2.2127 100.0 0.0283 0.0001 0.0001

Exact 2.2126 100.0 0.0284

Aniline, 8 domains 1 0.6247 90.5 0.0724 0.0645 0.0877

2 0.7300 105.7 0.1227 0.0329 0.0484

3 0.7194 104.2 0.1057 0.0244 0.0327

4 0.6869 99.5 0.0667 0.0052 0.0080

Exact 0.6903 100.0 0.0704

Furan, 6 domains 1 0.2047 107.9 0.0890 0.0163 0.0244

2 0.1946 102.6 0.1025 0.0193 0.0333

3 0.1818 95.9 0.1069 0.0046 0.0078

4 0.1905 100.4 0.0982 0.0007 0.0009

Exact 0.1897 100.0 0.0990

p-nitroaniline, 11 domains 1 2.7887 106.4 0.2269 0.0968 0.1673

2 2.6090 99.5 0.4113 0.0345 0.0583

3 2.6135 99.7 0.4021 0.0052 0.0077

4 2.6309 100.4 0.3847 0.0055 0.0096

Exact 2.6214 100.0 0.3942

TABLE IV. Convergence of the incremental dipole momentsin a.u.for the nondipolar molecules in Fig.2tcon= 3 , sdsp= 3. The RMS deviation of the three dipole components and the MA deviation are used as a measure for the convergence. Basis set cc-pVDZ.

Ordertot兩 兩corrRMS MA

Benzene, 7 domains 1 0.0429 0.0428 0.0247 0.0353

2 0.0537 0.0537 0.0310 0.0474

3 0.0131 0.0130 0.0075 0.0130

4 0.0033 0.0032 0.0019 0.0031

Exact 0.0000 0.0000

Octane, 10 domains 1 0.0125 0.0125 0.0072 0.0120

2 0.0052 0.0052 0.0030 0.0047

3 0.0012 0.0012 0.0007 0.0010

4 0.0003 0.0003 0.0001 0.0002

Exact 0.0000 0.0000

(6)

zene兲, and octane. The molecules with a permanent dipole moment are given in Fig. 1 and the molecules without a permanent dipole moment are given in Fig.2. Note that for a meaningful study, the compounds must not be too small since the incremental scheme would then yield the exact re- sult by construction—that is, the highest-order increment would require the full calculation.71

A. Energies

TablesIandIIshow the convergence of the incremental CCSD and MP2 energies for the molecules in Figs.1and2.

In agreement with earlier findings for energies, the conver- gence of the incremental series is fast. For all systems, the third-order expansion is sufficient to obtain chemical accu- racy

共with respect to the exact CCSD and MP2 values兲, with

an error less than 1 kcal/mol in the total energy. Conversely, the second-order expansion does not provide chemical accu- racy except for the rapidly convergent water cluster. As re- ported elsewhere,46 the inclusion of diffuse basis functions does not significantly change the energy convergence—see the cc-pVDZ and aug-cc-pVDZ results for furan in TableII.

We note that whereas the first-order MP2 error is always larger than the corresponding CCSD error, the second-order MP2 error is always smaller than the corresponding CCSD error.

The MP2 correlation energies were obtained from the canonical energy expression. Therefore, the convergence of the incremental MP2 energy is a measure of the performance of the pseudocanonical basis. Noting that the MP2 correla- tion energy converges rapidly for all molecules in this study, we conclude that the pseudocanonical orbitals can be safely used in combination with an implementation based on ca- nonical orbitals.

B. Dipole moments

In Tables III and IV, we compare the incremental and exact CCSD dipole moments for the polar and nonpolar mol- ecules, respectively. The tables contain the magnitude of the total dipole moment at a given order in the incremental expansion

共兩

␮ជtot

兩兲, the magnitude of the total dipole

moment relative to the CCSD exact value

关兩

␮ជtot

%= 100⫻

共兩

␮ជtot

/

␮ជexact

兩兲, only for the polar molecules兴,

and the magnitude of the correlation contribution to the di- pole moment

共兩

␮ជcorr

兩兲. As error measures, we have included

the root-mean-square

RMS

deviation of the three dipole components and the maximum absolute

MA

deviation from the exact CCSD values.

Considering the incremental second-order dipole mo- ments in TablesIIIandIV, the largest errors are observed for the aromatic systems, with RMS deviations of 35 and 33 mau

共1 mau= 10

−3ea0

forp-nitroaniline and aniline, respec- tively. By contrast, octane and the water cluster converge rapidly, with second-order RMS deviations of only 3 and 0.4 mau, respectively. At third order, all molecules have RMS deviations of around or less than 5 mau, except aniline, which has a large remaining deviation of 24 mau. Finally, at fourth order, the largest RMS deviations are 5–6 mau for aniline and p-nitroaniline, while the remaining molecules have deviations of 2 mau or less.

To investigate the importance of diffuse functions and, in particular, the performance of the incremental scheme for such functions, we have calculated the dipole moment of furan in the larger aug-cc-pVDZ basis—see TableV. Com- paring TablesIIIandV, we find a change in the dipole mo- ment from 190 to 245 mau when diffuse functions are added.

This change is more than one order of magnitude larger than

TABLE V. Convergence of the incremental dipole momentsin a.u.for furan using the aug-cc-pVDZ basisFig.1. The RMS deviation of the three dipole components and the MA deviation are used as a measure for the convergence.

Ordertot兩 兩tot%corrRMS MA

sdsp= 3, 6 domains

1 0.2955 120.7 0.0501 0.0387 0.0476

2 0.2275 93.0 0.0992 0.0324 0.0510

3 0.2408 98.4 0.0659 0.0024 0.0039

4 0.2453 100.2 0.0614 0.0004 0.0005

sdsp= 4, 4 domains

1 0.2587 105.7 0.0658 0.0245 0.0411

2 0.2439 99.6 0.0845 0.0291 0.0501

3 0.2408 98.4 0.0659 0.0023 0.0040

4 0.2448 100.0 0.0620 0.0000 0.0000

Exact 0.2448 100.0 0.0620

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

2 3 4

abs.dev.ofµiinmau

Order

FIG. 3. Absolute deviations of the individual Cartesian dipole-moment components from the corresponding exact CCSD values,iCCSDiinc., with respect to the order of the incremental expansion for all molecules in Figs.1 and2.

(7)

the third-order errors in the incremental expansion, which are 8.0 and 4.1 mau for the cc-pVDZ and the aug-cc-pVDZ basis sets, respectively. At fourth order, the dipole moment is con- verged to an error less than 0.5% in both basis sets. For furan, therefore, the convergence of the incremental dipole- moment expansion is less sensitive to the basis set than is the value of the dipole moment itself.

Concerning the convergence of

␮ជtot

for furan withsdsp

= 4, we note that the norm of the dipole moment is accurately reproduced at the second order of the expansion, with an error of only 0.4%, compared to an error of 1.6% at third order. The small second-order error is fortuitous and reflects an error cancellation between the different components of the dipole moment, noting that the correlation contribution to the dipole moment converges smoothly and monotonically to- ward the exact result, if the RMS and the MA deviation are used as measure.

Figure3 contains the absolute deviations of all dipole- moment components in this study and illustrates the overall improvement in the description of the dipole moment with increasing order of the incremental expansion. Figures4and 5present the convergence of the incremental dipole moments for the same molecules using MA and RMS deviations, re- spectively. In both figures, the aromatic systems

benzene, aniline, and p-nitroaniline

have the largest errors at third and fourth orders. As expected, the smallest error is observed for the water cluster, with the water molecules as domains

sdsp= 5

.

Comparing our results with those of Koronaet al.,58we find that an incremental third-order expansion yields similar

maximum relative errors of about 5%. Note that a fourth- order expansion yields a maximum relative error of only 0.5%. Analyzing the differences in the relaxed to the unre- laxed dipole moments in Ref.11, we find a maximum differ- ence of 27 mau. Comparing this deviation with the RMS deviations of 24 and 6 mau at the third- and fourth-order expansions, respectively, we find that the contribution from orbital relaxation to the dipole moment is typically as large

TABLE VI. RMS and MA deviations for the quadrupole momentin a.u.兲 共tcon= 3 , sdsp= 3. Basis set cc-pVDZ, unless otherwise specified.

Order RMS MA

H2O6,a,b6 domains

1 0.0316 0.0571

2 0.0046 0.0088

3 0.0004 0.0004

4 0.0000 0.0000

Aniline, 8 domains

1 0.1504 0.2931

2 0.1206 0.2294

3 0.0135 0.0206

4 0.0086 0.0157

Furan,b6 domains

1 0.1294 0.2157

2 0.0285 0.0473

3 0.0116 0.0240

4 0.0011 0.0020

Benzene, 7 domains

1 0.1599 0.2860

2 0.1163 0.2208

3 0.0443 0.0743

4 0.0026 0.0039

LiC5H7c, 6 domains

1 0.3061 0.5893

2 0.0585 0.1162

3 0.0058 0.0130

4 0.0004 0.0006

Furan, 6 domains

1 0.0921 0.0818

2 0.0823 0.1547

3 0.0082 0.0140

4 0.0013 0.0026

p-nitroaniline, 11 domains

1 0.3050 0.5967

2 0.4002 0.7275

3 0.0946 0.1743

4 0.0365 0.0724

Octane, 10 domains

1 0.0685 0.1195

2 0.0801 0.1593

3 0.0085 0.0161

4 0.0006 0.0009

asdsp= 5.

baug-cc-pVDZ.

c6-31Gⴱⴱbasis.

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

2 3 4

max.abs.dev.ofµiinmau

Order LiC5H7 Benzene (H2O)6 Octane p-nitroaniline Aniline Furan

FIG. 4. MA deviations of the dipole-moment components of each molecule in Figs.1and2with respect to the order of the incremental expansion.

0 10 20 30 40

2 3 4

RMSofµiinmau

Order LiC5H7 Benzene (H2O)6 Octane p-nitroaniline Aniline Furan

FIG. 5. RMS deviations of the three dipole-moment components of each molecule in Figs. 1 and2. with respect to the order of the incremental expansion.

(8)

as the third-order contribution in the incremental scheme. We conclude that the incremental scheme can be applied to cal- culate molecular dipole moments with sufficiently high ac- curacy.

C. Quadrupole moments

Table VI presents the RMS and MA deviations of the components of the

共traceless兲

quadrupole moment ⌰ij as a measure of the convergence of the incremental series; the full data set is given in the supplementary material.73 The RMS was calculated from six components of the quadrupole tensor. Figures6–8present various plots of the data in Table VI to illustrate the potential accuracy of the incremental scheme for molecular quadrupole moments.

Figure6shows the deviations of the components of the quadrupole moments for the molecules in this study, illustrat- ing the reduced spread of errors with increasing order of the incremental expansion. In Figs. 7 and8, the MA and RMS deviations of the quadrupole-moment components are plot- ted as functions of the expansion order. The slow conver- gence for p-nitroaniline illustrated in these plots is under- standable since we use a local correlation approach to calculate the electric properties of this push-pull system. As for the dipole moment, the aromatic systems converge slowly and the fastest convergence is observed for the water cluster. Concerning the absolute accuracy, we find that the third-order expansion is sufficient to converge the MA devia- tion of the quadrupole-moment components to an error less than 16 mau

1 mau= 10−3ea02

for nonaromatic compounds.

For the aromatic compounds, we find third-order MA deviations of 174, 74, and 21 mau for p-nitroaniline, ben- zene, and aniline, respectively; at fourth order, the corre- sponding errors are reduced to 72, 4, and 16 mau. At fourth order in the expansion, the maximum deviation of the non- aromatic compounds is less than 1 mau. In contrast to the incremental energy expansion, we observe a slower conver- gence for the quadrupole moment for aromatic compounds compared to the nonaromatic systems.

Comparing the errors introduced by the incremental scheme for furan in cc-pVDZ and aug-cc-pVDZ basis sets, we observe no significant change in the convergence. Com- paring the change in the correlation contribution of⌰11 due to the change in the basis, we find a difference of 196 mau—

much larger than the MA deviation of the third-order incre- mental values of 14 and 24 mau. In this sense, we can obtain higher accuracy for large systems with the incremental scheme, if the conventional calculation is only possible in a smaller basis set.

Slow convergence can be avoided by increasing the do- main sizes. From our experience in incremental energy cal- culations this improves the speed of the convergence.

V. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND COMPUTATIONAL PERFORMANCE

To get an impression of the overall performance of the incremental scheme, we have collected in TableVIIthe RMS and the MA deviations for the entire set of dipole- and quadrupole-moment components of all molecules in this study. Since the quadrupole tensor is symmetric, we have used six symmetry-independent tensor components for each system in the calculation of the RMS deviations.

At third order, the statistical RMS and MA deviation of the dipole-moment components are 10 and 33 mau, respec- tively; at fourth order, they are converged to 3 and 10 mau, respectively. We conclude that the incremental expansion can be used to calculate dipole moments to a sufficiently high accuracy for molecules similar to those in the present study.

The quadrupole moments are more difficult to converge.

The MA error is completely determined by p-nitroaniline, which shows by far the worst convergence for the quadru- pole moment

共vide supra兲. The RMS deviations, which are

also strongly affected by the slow p-nitroaniline conver- gence, are 40 and 14 mau at third and fourth orders, respec-

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

2 3 4

abs.dev.ofΘijinmau

Order

FIG. 6. Absolute deviation of the components of the QPM兩⌰ijCCSDijinc.with respect to the order of the incremental expansion for the molecules in Figs.1and2.

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

2 3 4

max.abs.dev.ofΘijinmau

Order

LiC5H7 Benzene (H2O)6 Octane p-nitroaniline Aniline Furan

0 25 50 75 100 125 150

3 4

max.abs.dev.ofΘijinmau

Order

FIG. 7. MA deviation of the quadrupole-moment components with respect to the order of the incremental expansion for the molecules in Figs.1and2. The figure on the right-hand side shows in detail the accuracy at higher orders.

(9)

tively. We conclude that the quadrupole moment can be ob- tained at reasonable accuracy.

Concerning the performance of the incremental scheme, we note that our current, pilot implementation is not efficient with respect to CPU time. However, the goal of the present work was to examine the convergence of the expansion in Eq.

共4兲

for one-electron first-order properties rather than to attempt the implementation of an efficient production code.

From a technical point of view, Eq.

共4兲

is appealing since it inherently parallelizes the computation with very little com- munication, making it possible to use inexpensive clusters of standard PCs connected by a standard network to evaluate CC energies or properties. If a finite-field approach is used as in Ref.11, the evaluation of the dipole moment reduces to a set of energy calculations, which within the incremental scheme can be carried out very efficiently as discussed in Refs.45and46; in some cases, the incremental scheme was in fact necessary to make the energy calculations at all feasible.74 In the present work, we have abandoned the finite-field approach and instead pursued an analytic ap- proach to first-order one-electron properties, opening the route to other first-order properties such as molecular gradi- ents and subsequently to higher-order properties.

VI. CONCLUSION

We have extended the fully automated implementation of the incremental scheme of CC theory to first-order one- electron properties—in particular, molecular dipole and quadrupole moments. We have found that the incremental scheme provides accurate correlation contributions to the di- pole and quadrupole moments at low orders of the expan- sion. The convergence of the incremental expansion of the

dipole and quadrupole moments has been analyzed in terms of the RMS and the absolute maximum deviation of the com- ponents. Based on these characteristics, we observe a fast convergence for nonaromatic systems, whereas some aro- matic compounds are more difficult to treat. Typically, the errors introduced by a truncation of the expansion at third order are already smaller than the changes observed upon extension of the basis sets from cc-pVDZ to aug-cc-pVDZ quality. Thus, since low-order incremental calculations allow the use of larger basis sets, better overall results are achiev- able with the incremental scheme than with the standard scheme.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation

DFG

through the priority program 1145 and the SFB 624 and from the Norwegian Research Council through the CoE Center for Theoretical and Compu- tational Chemistry

共CTCC兲 共Grant No. 179568/V30兲. Part of

this work was carried out during a visit of J.F. at the CTCC, financed by the CTCC.

1T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen,Molecular Electronic-Structure TheoryWiley, New York, 2004.

2T. Helgaker, W. Klopper, K. L. Bak, A. Halkier, P. Jørgensen, and J.

Olsen, inUnderstanding Chemical Reactivity: Quantum-Mechanical Pre- diction of Thermochemical Data, edited by J. CioslowskiKluwer, Dor- drecht, 2001, Vol. 22, pp. 1–30.

3J. Gauss, inEncyclopeadia of Computational Chemistry, edited by P. von Ragué Schleyer, N. L. Allinger, T. Clark, J. Gasteiger, P. A. Kollman, H.

F. Schaefer III, and P. R. SchreinerWiley, Weinheim, 1998, pp. 615–

636.

4A. Halkier, H. Koch, O. Christiansen, P. Jørgensen, and T. Helgaker,J.

Chem. Phys. 107, 8491997.

5A. Halkier, S. Coriani, and P. Jørgensen,Chem. Phys. Lett. 294, 2921998.

6S. Coriani, D. Marchesan, J. Gauss, C. Hättig, T. Helgaker, and P. Jør- gensen,J. Chem. Phys. 123, 1841072005.

7H. Sekino and R. J. Bartlett,J. Chem. Phys. 98, 30221993.

8J. Gauss and J. F. Stanton,J. Chem. Phys. 102, 2511995.

9S. Coriani, A. Halkier, D. Jonsson, J. Gauss, A. Rizzo, and O. Chris- tiansen,J. Chem. Phys. 118, 73292003.

10K. Hald and P. Jørgensen,Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 52212002.

11T. Korona and B. Jeziorski,J. Chem. Phys. 125, 1841092006.

12R. K. Nesbet,Phys. Rev. 155, 511967.

13H. Stoll,Chem. Phys. Lett. 191, 5481992.

14C. Hampel and H.-J. Werner,J. Chem. Phys. 104, 62861996.

15M. Schütz, G. Hetzer, and H. J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 56911999.

TABLE VII. RMS and MA deviations for the entire set of Cartesian com- ponents of the dipole and quadrupole moments of the molecules in Figs.1 and2in a.u..

Order

i ij

RMS MA RMS MA

1 0.0485 0.1673 0.1917 0.5967

2 0.0256 0.0583 0.1686 0.7275

3 0.0099 0.0327 0.0403 0.1743

4 0.0030 0.0096 0.0142 0.0724

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

2 3 4

RMSofΘijinmau

Order

LiC5H7 Benzene (H2O)6 Octane p-nitroaniline Aniline Furan

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

3 4

RMSofΘijinmau

Order

FIG. 8. RMS of the quadrupole-moment components with respect to the order of the incremental expansion for the molecules in Figs.1and2. The figure on the right-hand side shows in detail the accuracy at higher orders.

(10)

16M. Schütz,J. Chem. Phys. 113, 99862000.

17M. Schütz and H.-J. Werner,J. Chem. Phys. 114, 6612001.

18W. Li and S. Li,J. Chem. Phys. 121, 66492004.

19N. Flocke and R. J. Bartlett,J. Chem. Phys. 121, 109352004.

20D. G. Fedorov and K. Kitaura,J. Chem. Phys. 123, 1341032005.

21J. E. Subotnik and M. Head-Gordon,J. Chem. Phys.123, 0641082005.

22J. E. Subotnik, A. Sodt, and M. Head-Gordon, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 0741162006.

23A. Auer and M. Nooijen,J. Chem. Phys. 125, 0241042006.

24V. Weijo, P. Manninen, P. Jørgensen, O. Christiansen, and J. Olsen,J.

Chem. Phys. 127, 0741062007.

25M. Kobayashi and H. Nakai,J. Chem. Phys. 129, 0441032008.

26T. F. Hughes, N. Flocke, and R. J. Bartlett,J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 59942008.

27W. Li, P. Piecuch, and J. R. Gour,AIP Conf. Proc. 1102, 682009.

28H. Stoll,Phys. Rev. B 46, 67001992.

29H. Stoll,J. Chem. Phys. 97, 84491992.

30R. K. Nesbet,Phys. Rev. 175, 21968.

31R. K. Nesbet,Adv. Chem. Phys. 14, 11969.

32K. Doll, M. Dolg, P. Fulde, and H. Stoll,Phys. Rev. B 55, 102821997.

33K. Rosciszewski, B. Paulus, P. Fulde, and H. Stoll, Phys. Rev. B 60, 79051999.

34A. Shukla, M. Dolg, P. Fulde, and H. Stoll, Phys. Rev. B 60, 52111999.

35H. Stoll, B. Paulus, and P. Fulde,J. Chem. Phys. 123, 1441082005.

36E. Voloshina and B. Paulus,J. Phys. Chem. 124, 2347112006.

37B. Paulus,Int. J. Quantum Chem. 100, 10262004.

38J. Friedrich, M. Hanrath, and M. Dolg,J. Chem. Phys. 126, 1541102007.

39J. Friedrich, M. Hanrath, and M. Dolg, J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 98302007.

40J. Friedrich, M. Hanrath, and M. Dolg,Chem. Phys. 338, 332007.

41J. Friedrich, M. Hanrath, and M. Dolg,Chem. Phys. 346, 2662008.

42M. Mödl, M. Dolg, P. Fulde, and H. Stoll,J. Chem. Phys. 106, 18361997.

43V. Bezugly and U. Birkenheuer,Chem. Phys. Lett. 399, 572004.

44J. Friedrich, M. Hanrath, and M. Dolg,J. Phys. Chem. A 112, 87622008.

45J. Friedrich and M. Dolg,J. Chem. Phys. 129, 2441052008.

46J. Friedrich and M. Dolg,J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 2872009.

47J. Friedrich, K. Walczak, and M. Dolg,Chem. Phys. 356, 472009.

48K. Hald, A. Halkier, P. Jørgensen, S. Coriani, C. Hättig, and T. Helgaker, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 29852003.

49T. Helgaker, T. A. Ruden, P. Jørgensen, J. Olsen, and W. Klopper, J.

Phys. Org. Chem. 17, 9132004.

50T. A. Ruden, T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen,J. Chem. Phys.121,

58742004.

51T. A. Ruden, T. Helgaker, P. Jørgensen, and J. Olsen,Chem. Phys. Lett.

371, 622003.

52F. Pawlowski, A. Halkier, P. Jørgensen, K. L. Bak, T. Helgaker, and W.

Klopper,J. Chem. Phys. 118, 25392003.

53F. Pawlowski, P. Jørgensen, J. Olsen, F. Hegelund, T. Helgaker, J. Gauss, K. L. Bak, and J. F. Stanton,J. Chem. Phys. 116, 64822002.

54C. Puzzarini, S. Coriani, A. Rizzo, and J. Gauss,Chem. Phys. Lett. 409, 1182005.

55C. Puzzarini, M. Heckert, and J. Gauss,J. Chem. Phys. 128, 1941082008.

56P. Pulay and S. Saebø,Theor. Chim. Acta 69, 3571986.

57S. Saebø and P. Pulay,J. Chem. Phys. 86, 9141987.

58T. Korona, K. Pflüger, and H.-J. Werner,Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 20592004.

59N. J. Russ and T. D. Crawford,Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 33452008.

60J. Yang and M. Dolg,J. Chem. Phys. 127, 0841082007.

61DALTON, a molecular electronic structure program, Release 2.0, 2005, see:

http://www.kjemi.uio.no/software/dalton/dalton.html.

62J. M. Foster and S. F. Boys,Rev. Mod. Phys. 32, 3001960.

63C. Edmiston and K. Ruedenberg,Rev. Mod. Phys. 35, 4571963.

64A. D. Becke,Phys. Rev. A 38, 30981988.

65J. P. Perdew,Phys. Rev. B 33, 88221986.

66R. Ahlrichs, M. Bär, H.-P. Baron, R. Bauernschmitt, S. Böcker, M. Ehrig, K. Eichkorn, S. Elliott, F. Furche, F. Haase, M. Häser, H. Horn, C. Huber, U. Huniar, C. Kölmel, M. Kollwitz, C. Ochsenfeld, H. Öhm, A. Schäfer, U. Schneider, O. Treutler, M. von Arnim, F. Weigend, P. Weis, and H.

Weiss, TURBOMOLE 5.10, Institut für Physikalische Chemie, Universität Karlsruhe, 2008.

67O. Treutler and R. Ahlrichs,J. Chem. Phys. 102, 3461995.

68K. Eichkorn, O. Treutler, H. Oehm, M. Haeser, and R. Ahlrichs,Chem.

Phys. Lett. 240, 2831995.

69K. Eichkorn, F. Weigend, O. Treutler, and R. Ahlrichs,Theor. Chem.

Acc. 97, 1191997.

70P. Deglmann, K. May, F. Furche, and R. Ahlrichs, Chem. Phys. Lett.

384, 1032004.

71J. Friedrich, “Implementation of the incremental scheme for highly effi- cient correlation methods,” Ph.D. thesis, Universität Köln, 2007.

72P. Day, R. Pachter, M. S. Gordon, and G. N. Merrill,J. Chem. Phys.112, 20632000.

73See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3243864 for the full data set of the QPM.

74J. Friedrich, M. Hanrath, and M. Dolg, “Fully automated implementation of the incremental scheme for correlation energies,” Z. Phys. Chem.ac- cepted.

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

In April 2016, Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko, summing up the war experience thus far, said that the volunteer battalions had taken part in approximately 600 military

This report documents the experiences and lessons from the deployment of operational analysts to Afghanistan with the Norwegian Armed Forces, with regard to the concept, the main

The AUTODYN-2D simulations have been found to give results that are in good agreement with the experiment, whereas the cavity expansion theory shows poor agreement with the

Based on the above-mentioned tensions, a recommendation for further research is to examine whether young people who have participated in the TP influence their parents and peers in

Overall, the SAB considered 60 chemicals that included: (a) 14 declared as RCAs since entry into force of the Convention; (b) chemicals identied as potential RCAs from a list of

An abstract characterisation of reduction operators Intuitively a reduction operation, in the sense intended in the present paper, is an operation that can be applied to inter-

Azzam’s own involvement in the Afghan cause illustrates the role of the in- ternational Muslim Brotherhood and the Muslim World League in the early mobilization. Azzam was a West

There had been an innovative report prepared by Lord Dawson in 1920 for the Minister of Health’s Consultative Council on Medical and Allied Services, in which he used his