FOURTH SECTION CASE OF J. AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA (Application no. 58216/12) JUDGMENT
Fulltekst
RELATERTE DOKUMENTER
Were the deportation of an alien to be held to constituteinterference with the exercise of his right to respect forhis private and family life, within the meaning of Article
The Government submitted that the present application is inadmissible as regards the applicant’s complaints about the alleged violation of Article 2 of the
“When the county social welfare board issues an adoption order under section 4- 20, it shall, if any of the parties have requested it, at the same time consider whether there shall
Turning to the main legal issue raised by the present case, that is to say, whether the State fulfilled its positive obligation under the Convention to take all necessary
The Government invited the Court to strike the case out of its list of cases pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention on the ground that the applicant no longer ran any
In that case it found, inter alia, that even though a final judgment in a taxation case, in which tax surcharges had been imposed, prevented criminal charges
This is the situation in the instant case in so far as Article 181 § 3 of the Austrian Civil Code (Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch) provides that “at the request of one of the
On 4 March 2010 the Court invited the applicants and the Government to submit any materials which they considered relevant to assessing the 1974 market value of
