23/12/2008 FINAL JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 23 September 2008 (Application no. 2914/02) CASE OF PREPELI ŢĂ v. MOLDOVA FOURTH SECTION

As to the remaining applicant (application no. 61156/13), the Government observed that she had decided to withdraw her appeal against the Oslo City Court judgment and had

The Court notes that the applicant, in his appeals to the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, stated, inter alia, that he had been convicted solely on the basis of the

55. The Government requested the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies. They submitted that the applicant should have

The applicant complained that his detention at Budapest Prison in overcrowded cells amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment which infringed Article 3 of

Given the public interest in free expression in respect of such topics and the fact that the applicant party was an opposition parliamentary political party, the Court

The CTU acknowledged that his initial conclusions (of July 2008) had to be altered, having regard to the application lodged before the Court by the first applicant; as

The applicant complains that the Court of Cassation did not in his case apply the principle of ne bis in idem as guaranteed by the Brussels Convention, since it wrongly held thai

The applicant could not derive from his rights as a natural father a right to be heard in the proceedings for the change of his child’s surname, because his rights