This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision. STRASBOURG 21 September 2016 (Striking out) JUDGMENT (Application no. 38030/12) CASE OF KHAN v. GERMANY GRAND CHAMBER

The aim of this study was to identify obstacles to optimal function of the polio eradication program in high risk districts in Pakistan, with the specific objective of finding health

In that judgment, the Court, interpreting Article 3, established that the Convention does not prohibit the imposition of a life sentence; nonetheless, in order to

Furthermore, the Court notes that in the judgment in question the Constitutional Court found that the applicants’ choice to become parents and found a family with

36. but had understood that they concerned only the demonstrators. The court found it established that the police actions had been legal and that the applicant had been aware

“40 iii) Whilst I agree of course that the CACD does not ordinarily address the question of guilt or innocence, but only the safety of the conviction, those cases where

131. The Court notes at the outset that the child T.C. was born from an embryo obtained from an ova donation and a sperm donation provided by unknown donors, and was

However, in my view the Grand Chamber should have continued the examination of the application under Article 37 § 1 in fine because there are special circumstances

75. The applicant maintained that at the time of the events there had been a practice of placing accused persons in pre-trial detention automatically, without