• No results found

Forecasts of mainland GDP and inflation for 2001 and 2002

In document Norges Bank Watch 2001 (sider 33-36)

5. Evaluating the forecasts and instrument/policy changes of Norges Bank from June 2000 to August 2001

5.2 Forecasts of mainland GDP and inflation for 2001 and 2002

A forecast is the best prediction of future outcomes at a given point of time. To make a wrong forecast might be unfortunate, but is not necessarily a reason for critique if the forecast was based on the best current knowledge at the time when made.

GDP forecasts

In figure 5.3 and 5.4 we have plotted the forecast of mainland GDP and 12 month change in the CPI for 2001 made by Norges Bank, Statistics Norway (SSB), the Ministry of Finance and Consensus Forecasts.19 As we see there are trends in both forecasts: the estimate of GDP has tended downwards, and the estimate of CPI has tended upwards as time has passed. In figure 3 and 4 we have the same presentation of the forecast for 2002. With the exception of a substantial downward revision of expected GDP growth early in 2000 these forecasts have not been adjusted much over the last year.

With regard to projections of inflation for 2002 there seems to be a considerable discrepancy between Norges Bank and Statistics Norway (currently 0.75 percentage points). This is mainly due to the fact that Norges Bank factors out the effect of a change in the VAT on food, effective in July 2001.

19 Norges Bank forecasts are published in the Inflation Report, previously four times a year (at present three times). Statistics Norway publishes forecasts four times a year. The Ministry of Finance publishes forecasts for one year ahead in the National Budget, issued in October, and the Revised National Budget, issued in May. Consensus Forecast is a monthly report containing the views of a number of private sector economists. We report the average values. Note that the forecasts of Statistics Norway are also included as one of the forecasts in the Consensus Report.

Figure 5.3

GDP growth 2001

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

jan.00 apr.00 jul.00 okt.00 jan.01 apr.01 jul.01 SSB Ministry of Finance Norges Bank

Consensus forecasts

Figure 5.4

GDP growth 2002

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

mar.00 jun.00 sep.00 des.00 mar.01 jun.01 Consensus forecasts

Norges Bank SSB

For GDP in 2001 Norges Bank made the same forecast in June 2001 as it made in December 1999: an expected GDP growth of 1.5 per cent. The development between these two points of time does however show how forecasts change as information changes. In a short period in the spring of 2000 Norges Bank adjusted its forecast upwards to 2 per cent. The Bank then adjusted it down to a low of 1.25 per cent. Over all the adjustments have been fairly minor, and no substantial revision has been made of expected growth in 2001 over this period. We see that Norges Bank, while in periods slightly more pessimistic than the other three, is generally well in line with other forecasters in the market. The international downturn so far in 2001 has not been reflected in the Banks expectations for the Norwegian economy.

Inflation forecasts

The predictions of inflation for 2001 have changed more markedly. Norges Bank has increased their forecast with 1.5 percentage points over this period, see figure 5.5.

Why have the forecasts of inflation changed from the end of 1999?

Figure 5.5

CPI forecasts 2001

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

jan.00 apr.00 jul.00 okt.00 jan.01 apr.01 jul.01

Norges Bank

SSB Ministry of Finance

Consensus forecasts

In the Inflation Report 2/00 expected inflation is adjusted up by 0.5 percentage points.

In a press statement Norges Bank argues that

“[t]he upward revision primarily reflects higher labour costs and a weaker krone exchange rate, but a slightly stronger external inflationary impetus is also a contributing factor.”

The downward revision in expected GDP growth at the same time is explained by reduced supply of labour due to additional vacation days. The Bank further states that

“[t]he risk of a pronounced downturn over the next two years is limited.”

Expected inflation for 2001 is further revised up by 0.25 percentage points in Inflation Report 3/00, mainly due to effects of the surge in oil prices.

Expected inflation for 2002 is revised downwards by 0.25 percentage points, as the effect of increasing oil prices is expected to fade over time. See figure 5.6

Figure 5.6

CPI forecasts 2002

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

mar.00 jun.00 sep.00 des.00 mar.01 jun.01

Norges Bank

SSB Consensus forecasts

Which interest rates, exchange rates should be used when inflation is forecasted?

In Inflation Report 4/00 expected inflation for 2001 is further adjusted up by 0.25 percentage point because of the interest rates used in the projection were lowered. At that time Norges Bank used the implied forward rates, which had experienced a pronounced fall. This shows the problem of using forward rates in central bank forecasting when the market and Bank do not share the expectations of future monetary policy.

In Inflation Report 2/01 Norges Bank changed the technical assumptions of the future interest rate. The Bank now assumes current rates to be unchanged for two years before the rates fall gradually to the forward curve. This change in the projection of interest rates had little effect for the 2001 inflation forecast, which is adjusted up by 0.25 percentage points from Inflation Report 1/01. This time it is due to an increase in the cost of electricity. Forecasts of core inflation for 2002 and 2003 is set to 2.5 per cent, slightly higher than in the previous report. This is due to “somewhat higher cost inflation than previously anticipated.” (Inflation Report 2/01)

In their forecasts Norges Bank uses as a technical assumption that the exchange rate will remain at the average level of the last three months. In the current situation, with a high (and increasing) differential between Norwegian and other European interest rates the exchange rate might add an extra uncertainty to the projections of future inflation. Norges Bank should discuss implications of different assumptions of the nominal exchange rate.

5.3 Assessing changes in monetary policy instruments

In document Norges Bank Watch 2001 (sider 33-36)