• No results found

acp-17-10651-2017-supplement.pdf (2.881Mb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "acp-17-10651-2017-supplement.pdf (2.881Mb)"

Copied!
9
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Supplement of Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10651–10674, 2017 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10651-2017-supplement

© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Supplement of

Comparison of four inverse modelling systems applied to the estimation of HFC-125, HFC-134a, and SF 6 emissions over Europe

Dominik Brunner et al.

Correspondence to:Dominik Brunner (dominik.brunner@empa.ch)

The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 3.0 License.

(2)

Since only a selection of figures could be presented in the main manuscript, additional figures are presented in this supplement for 1) prior and posterior time series, 2) prior emission fields, 3) prior uncertainty fields, 4) uncertainty reductions, and 5) country aggregated emissions.

S1 Time series 5

Figure S1: Prior simulated HFC-134a mole fractions (color lines) overlaid over observations (thick grey line) at the three sites

(3)

Figure S2: Posterior simulated HFC-134a mole fractions (color lines) overlaid over observations (thick grey line) at the three sites Jungfraujoch, Mace Head and Monte Cimone.

(4)

Figure S3: Prior simulated SF6 mole fractions (color lines) overlaid over observations (thick grey line) at the two sites Jungfraujoch and Mace Head.

Figure S4: Posterior simulated SF6 mole fractions (color lines) overlaid over observations (thick grey line) at the two sites Jungfraujoch

5

and Mace Head.

(5)

S2 Prior emission fields

Figure S5: Prior emissions of HFC-125 as represented in the four inversion systems.

Figure S6: Prior emissions of SF6 as represented in the four inversion systems.

5

(6)

S3 Absolute prior uncertainties

Figure S7: Uncertainties of prior HFC-125 emissions (experiment M1).

Figure S8: Uncertainties of prior SF6 emissions (experiment M3).

5

(7)

S4 Uncertainty reductions

Figure S9: Uncertainty reduction (1-upost/uprior) in % for HFC-125 (experiment M1). For EMPA, the reduction is shown in terms of reduction of relative uncertainties [1-(upost/xpost)/(uprior/xprior)].

5

Figure S10: Uncertainty reduction (1-upost/uprior) in % for SF6 (experiment M3). For EMPA, the reduction is shown in terms of reduction of relative uncertainties [1-(upost/xpost)/(uprior/xprior)]. Strong negative values occur in EMPA where prior emissions are extremely small.

(8)

S5 Country-aggregated emissions

Figure S11: Country-aggregated prior emissions of HFC-134a (experiment M2).

Figure S12: Country-aggregated posterior emissions of HFC-134a (experiment M2).

5

(9)

Figure S13: Country-aggregated prior emissions of SF6 (experiment M3).

Figure S14: Country-aggregated posterior emissions of SF6 (experiment M3).

5

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

FIGURE 2 Population genetic structuring among harbour seals in the UK and neighbouring localities, showing the major genetic clusters identified in STRUCTURE (thick stippled lines)

This trend was not observed in the ONLi cloud subset, potentially be- cause the differences between clean and aerosol-influenced cases were more ambiguous than in the MOONLiT

131 I concentrations from several countries in central Europe from fall 2011 were analyzed using two state-of-the-art dis- persion models, FLEXPART and HYSPLIT driven with

Figure 11 presents the prior emissions of HFC-125 esti- mated by the four model systems. Differences between these estimates reflect the uncertainty introduced by the different

3.2 Impact of different wetland emission models As noted previously, wetland emissions represent the main source of methane in the Arctic, explaining at least 48 % of the methane

Monthly atmospheric mole fractions: measurements (black solid lines with stan- dard deviations), and MOZART v4 model results using prior emissions (red dash lines) and

Figure 3 shows the in situ measurements of HFC-152a, as baseline monthly means (excluding pollution events), ob- tained from the two AGAGE stations Mace Head and Cape Grim with

The OSSE results indicate that simulated S-5P CO total column measurements during northern summer 2003 bene- fit efforts to monitor surface CO.. The largest benefit occurs over land