• No results found

Figure captions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Figure captions"

Copied!
6
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Figure captions

Fig.1. Weather data from March to August 2014 (Red vertical lines show start and end date of the two experiments described).

Fig. 2. Chemical composition of grazed sward from Exp 1 and trends over each grazing week: panels “A”= crude protein (g/kg DM); “B”= neutral detergent fiber (g/kg DM); “C”= estimated NEL20 (MJ/kg DM); and “D”=estimated AAT20 (g/kg DM). Treatments: broken line = 7 days rotational grazing (7RG); dotted line = daily strip grazing (1SG) and solid line = daily forward grazing (1FG). [Black dot on day 1 indicate pregraze adaptation week samples where triplicate composite samples were analyzed for all groups regardless of treatments; days 8 to 14 stand for measurement week 1; days 15 to 21 stand for measurement week 2]

Fig. 3. Chemical composition of grazed sward from Exp 2 and trends over each grazing week: panels “A”= crude protein (g/kg DM); “B”= neutral detergent fiber (g/kg DM); “C”= NEL20 (MJ/kg DM); and “D”= AAT20 (g/kg DM).

Treatments: broken line = 5 days roational grazing (5RG); dotted line = daily strip grazing (1SG) and solid line = daily forward grazing (1FG). [Black dot on day 1 indicate pregraze adaptation week samples where triplicate composite samples were analyzed for all groups regardless of treatments; days 10 to 14 stand for measurement week 1; days 15 to 19 stand for measurement week 2]

Fig. 4. Grazing behaviour of cows. Time spent (min/h) on: (a) eating/grazing and (c) rumination during Exp 1 (7RG = 7 days rotational grazing; 1SG = daily strip grazing; and 1FG = daily forward grazing); (b) eating/grazing and (d) rumination during Exp 2 (5RG = 5 days rotational grazing; 1SG = daily strip grazing; and 1FG = daily forward grazing). Vertical broken lines demarcate sunrise and sunset to highlight duration of day length during each experiment: Exp1= 17:59:09 h and Exp 2= 15:43:48 h.

Fig.5. Trends in mean energy corrected milk yield of cows during Exp 1 (7RG = 7 days rotational grazing; 1SG = daily strip grazing; and 1FG = daily forward grazing) and Exp 2 (5RG = 5 days rotational grazing; 1SG = daily

(2)

Fig. 1.

(3)

Fig. 2.

(4)

Fig. 3.

(5)
(6)

Figure 5

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

The phenylhydrazine group had significant differences after 14, 21, and 28 days; all samples were significantly different from the initial in the dimethyl sulfoxide group, while

The manual water samples were taken throughout February. Wet samples were collected on February 10 th , while dry water samples were collected on February 24 th. The water samples

Samples of category C were not analysed using gas chromatography, as the samples were not used for shotgun sequencing or protein analysis.. All samples were dominated by acetic

In order to confirm that DCM did not have an impact on the growth of bacteria and spores in a mixed sample potentially containing both chemical and biological agents, we

Også dette året har arbeidet med saker som vedkjem havbruk teke mykje av arbeidskapasiteten ved kontoret, men sidan havbrukskon- sulenten vart tilsett frå juni

kr~fter og den konserverende eller bremsende effekt på disse som tapet av vann medfører. For å oppnå den rette kvalitet. Meteorologiske forhold som tempera- tur,

Treated and untreated wood samples were exposed in different dimensions and at different test sites in Moss harbour, see Figure 4.. All treated and untreated wood samples

Brown bear samples from Sweden were analyzed at Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine (LECA) in France, while the samples collected in Norway were analyzed in the DNA laboratory