FINAL 07/09/2011 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

The Constitutional Court was of the view that abrogating the authorisation requirement would, on the one hand, expose persons interviewed by the press to the risk of

Indeed, according to the decision of 20 July 2004 (see paragraphs 54-61 above), while establishing, with reference to the relevant laws and by-laws, that it was

75. The applicant maintained that at the time of the events there had been a practice of placing accused persons in pre-trial detention automatically, without

The Court therefore finds that there has been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention in respect of the two applicants as regards their right to correspondence

raised objections (Vorstellung) to the setting aside of the decision, arguing, inter alia, that the Municipal Council should have obtained data on the noise emissions

The Government invited the Court to strike the case out of its list of cases pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention on the ground that the applicant no longer ran any

The applicants in the instant case are the father, mother, son and daughter of the late Mr Vitaliy Vulakh, who was allegedly declared guilty after his death

In the instant case the Government did not dispute that following an inquiry by the Government’s representative at the Court, the prosecutor’s office of Velikiye Luki