FINAL 24/04/2012 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision

The Constitutional Court was of the view that abrogating the authorisation requirement would, on the one hand, expose persons interviewed by the press to the risk of

Turning to the present case, the Court notes that the wording of Article 70 of the Constitutional Court Act 1993 (see paragraph 13 above, in particular Article 70 § 2

Indeed, according to the decision of 20 July 2004 (see paragraphs 54-61 above), while establishing, with reference to the relevant laws and by-laws, that it was

raised objections (Vorstellung) to the setting aside of the decision, arguing, inter alia, that the Municipal Council should have obtained data on the noise emissions

The Government invited the Court to strike the case out of its list of cases pursuant to Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention on the ground that the applicant no longer ran any

The applicants in the instant case are the father, mother, son and daughter of the late Mr Vitaliy Vulakh, who was allegedly declared guilty after his death

On 15 July 1998 the Karlovac Police Department Disciplinary Court declared the request inadmissible, finding the fact that the criminal proceedings against the applicant

In the instant case the Government did not dispute that following an inquiry by the Government’s representative at the Court, the prosecutor’s office of Velikiye Luki