• No results found

EUROGRAPHICS 2017: Education Papers Frontmatter

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "EUROGRAPHICS 2017: Education Papers Frontmatter"

Copied!
5
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

The European Association for Computer Graphics 38thAnnual Conference

EUROGRAPHICS 2017

Lyon, France April 24th – 28th, 2017

Organized by

EUROGRAPHICS THEEUROPEANASSOCIATION

FORCOMPUTERGRAPHICS

Education Papers

Education Program Co-Chairs

Jean Jacques Bourdin, University of Paris 8, France Amit Shesh, Northeastern University, USA

Published by

The Eurographics Association ISSN 1017-4656

DOI: 10.2312/eged.20172001

(2)

Preface

One of the most innovative aspects of the annual Eurographics conference is its Education track. This track aims to disseminate research and experience about education related to computer graphics and computer graphics education. Each year attracts papers and presentations from a wide array of topics, underscor- ing the relevance and application of computer graphics education to a diverse set of domains. The actual session during the conference has historically attracted a unique audience of people specifically inter- ested in pedagogical issues related to computer graphics. The track is unique in encouraging publications and discussions related not only to principled research in education, but also practical experiences and resources.

This year we expanded the scope of this track and invited submissions on additional topics that are relevant to today’s pedagogical challenges, as applied to computer graphics. This included designing and teaching online and hybrid courses in graphics, classroom challenges in graphics courses, incorporating modern technology (e.g. Virtual Reality, 3D printing, etc.) in computer graphics courses and bringing graphics research into the classroom. We also continued the tradition of recognizing exceptional student projects.

This year’s Education track is divided into three sessions comprising of 8 paper presentations and two panel discussions. The first session is dedicated to the teachings and assessments for beginners, with presentations of first courses in Computer Graphics, an interesting assignment and a course for art stu- dents. The second session consists of tools to improve our teaching, pedagogy and the use of VR as a teaching medium. The third session presents two panels and discussions, one on how a class in Virtual Reality should be held and one on CGEMS. We do think these sessions will provide both interesting and meaningful material for educators.

We thank all the reviewers for their hard work, and hope that these papers add to the growing body of research that enriches the classroom experience for the computer graphics teacher and student.

Jean Jacques Bourdin and Amit Shesh

(3)

Committee Members

Anderson, Eike Baranoski, Gladimir Dischler, Jean-Michel Domik, Gitta

Gallo, Giovanni Ganovelli, Fabio Gossett, Nathan Hansmann, Werner Johnson, Mark Joshi, Alark Kjelldahl, Lars Maddock, Steve Magana, Alejandra Navazo, Isabel Orr, Jenny Papaleo, Laura Peters, Christopher Sousa Santos, Beatriz Stuetzle, Christopher Wolfer, James Zara, Jiri

(4)

Table of Contents

Freshmen and CG

What we are teaching in Introduction to Computer Graphics . . . 1 Dennis G. Balreira, Marcelo Walter, and Dieter W. Fellner

Designing a Computer Graphics Course for First Year Undergraduates . . . 9 Neil A. Dodgson and Andrew Chalmers

Generating ASCII-Art: A Nifty Assignment from a Computer Graphics Programming Course . . . 17 Eike Falk Anderson

Visage de L’Autre - Fluidity and Shifting Boundary of Digital Sculpting Education . . . 19 Wu Wei Chen

Techniques and Pedagogy

bRenderer: A Flexible Basis for a Modern Computer Graphics Curriculum . . . 27 Benjamin Bürgisser, David Steiner, and Renato Pajarola

Accessible GLSL Shader Programming . . . 35 Antoine Toisoul, Daniel Rueckert, and Bernhard Kainz

Using Activity Led Learning for Teaching Computer Graphics Principles Through Augmented Reality . . . 43 Fotis Liarokapis

Virtual Reality to teach anatomy . . . 51 Marta Fairén, Mariona Farrés, Jordi Moyés, and Esther Insa

VR and CGEMS

What Should a Virtual/Augmented Reality Course be? . . . 59 Beatriz Sousa Santos and Paulo Dias

The New CGEMS - Preparing the Computer Graphics Educational Materials Source to Meet the

Needs of Educators . . . 63 Eike Falk Anderson, Andrew Duchowski, Fotis Liarokapis, and Adam Redford

(5)

Author Index Anderson, Eike Falk . . . 17, 63

Balreira, Dennis G. . . 1

Bürgisser, Benjamin . . . 27

Chalmers, Andrew . . . 9

Chen, Wu Wei . . . 19

Dias, Paulo . . . 59

Dodgson, Neil A. . . 9

Duchowski, Andrew . . . 63

Fairén, Marta . . . 51

Farrés, Mariona . . . 51

Fellner, Dieter W. . . 1

Insa, Esther . . . 51

Kainz, Bernhard . . . 35

Liarokapis, Fotis . . . 43, 63 Moyés, Jordi . . . 51

Pajarola, Renato . . . 27

Redford, Adam . . . 63

Rueckert, Daniel . . . 35

Santos, Beatriz Sousa . . . 59

Steiner, David . . . 27

Toisoul, Antoine . . . 35

Walter, Marcelo . . . 1

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

The programme is divided into three sessions and includes papers on teaching computer graphics, on using graphics in education, and a panel discussion of the Computer Graphics

James Tompkin, Harvard University Ruo-Feng Tong, Zhejiang University Xin Tong, Microsoft Research Asia Changhe Tu, Shandong University. Nobuyuki Umetani, Disney Research Zurich

2017 The Author(s) Computer Graphics Forum c 2017 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd..c. Berkiten

We have surveyed 20 introductory computer graphics undergraduate courses from higher level educational institutions from around the world.. Our source of information was purely

Based on the recommendations of the reviewers, five submissions were accepted as Eurographics 2017 STARs and are published in this special issue of Computer Graphics Forum..

21 Andreas-Alexandros Vasilakis, Konstantinos Vardis, Georgios Papaioannou, and Konstantinos Moustakas.. Discovering New Monte Carlo Noise Filters with

Published in Eurographics Symposium on Rendering 2017 / Computer Graphics Forum 36(4) This document presents a comparison for different synthesis methods for every

Enrico Puppo, Università di Genova Riccardo Scateni, Università di Cagliari Alberto Signoroni, Università di Brescia Davide Spano, Università di Cagliari Michela Spagnuolo,