FOURTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

Taking into account the above considerations, the evidence in the case, the fact that the terrorist act of which Aslan Maskhadov was accused had already taken

It held that the reasons stated by the Governor for his decision of 29 May 2002, even if these were understandable, given the reactions in society to the offence at issue,

The respondent Government submitted that the application should be declared inadmissible for failure to comply with the six-month rule. They argued that it had

In the original application (lodged on 16 April 2008), the applicants complained only of the failure to prosecute the then Minister of Justice and Minister for

Attorney must file an enhancement information under Title 21, United States Code [USC], Section 851, which provides as follows: ‘No person who stands convicted

The Government submitted that the applicant’s detention from 27 August to 13 September 2002 had been authorised under the order of 26 June 2002 issued under Article 232 of the

the United Kingdom (no. 46295/99, 28 May 2002, ECHR 2002-IV) the Court found a violation of Article 5 § 4 on the basis that the applicant’s continued detention under a

On 13 June 2000 the Administrative Court held that an oral hearing was manifestly unnecessary in the matter because both parties had submitted all the necessary information