• No results found

Effect of Feed Processing on Gut Function and Health in Poultry

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Effect of Feed Processing on Gut Function and Health in Poultry"

Copied!
31
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Effect of Feed Processing on Gut Function and Health in

Poultry

Birger Svihus

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)

Effects of processing

• Heat-induced chemical changes that may affect digestibility

– Gelatinisation of starch

– Destruction of vitamins and enzymes

– (Non-digestive bond formations involving protein)

– Solubilisation of fibres

(8)

Effect of hot pelleting on broiler performance

Feed/gain AME Ileal

visco. Starch

dig. Fat

dig. Prot.

dig.

Cold-

pelleted 1.60b 12.1a 26.6b 0.96a 0.66a 0.68a Pelleted

at 90 C 1.85a 11.3b 80.8a 0.93b 0.53b 0.64a

(9)

Structure effects on digestive system

• The inner feed structure, ie the particle distribution of the particles that the pellet consist of, will affect gizzard development, digestion pattern and microflora

composition

• The outer feed structure, ie the particle

distribution of the pellets, will affect gut

function through effects on feed intake

(10)
(11)

From Hill, 1971

(12)

From Hill, 1971

(13)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

minutes30 60

minutes 90

minutes 120

minutes 150

minutes 180 minutes Time after feeding

Feed DM in g Crop

Gizzard

From Svihus et al., 2002

(14)

Percentage distribution of particles in duodenum of broilers

(Hetland et al., 2002)

05 1015 2025 3035 4045 50

0- 0.04

mm 0.04- 0.1

mm 0.1- 0.3

mm 0.3- 0.9 mm

wheat diet Barley diet Oats diet

(15)

Passage of fine and coarse oat hulls through gizzard

(Hetland et al., 2005)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Time in hours

Percentage oat hulls passed gizzard

Ground oat hulls Coarse oat hulls

(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)

Empty gizzard weight (g) of broilers slaughtered at different ages (days)

0 20 40 60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Ground wheat diet Whole wheat diet

(20)

Weight of gizzard contents (g) of broilers slaughtered at different ages

(days)

0 10 20 30

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Ground wheat diet Whole wheat diet

(21)

Percentage distribution of particles in duodenum of broilers

(Hetland et al., 2002)

05 1015 2025 30 3540 45

0- 0.04

mm 0.04- 0.1

mm 0.1- 0.3

mm 0.3- 0.9 mm

Control diet

30 % whole wheat

(22)

Effect of whole grain on performance of broilers

(Svihus et al., 2004)

Ground

wheat diet Whole

wheat diet

Weight gain, g 888 901

Feed/gain 1.43 1.40

Ileal starch digestibility 0.95 0.98 Amylase, U/g jejunal DM 117 137 Bile acids, mg/g jej. DM 9.1 10.4 Bile acids in gizzard, mg 1.5b 3.9a

(23)

Effect of oat hulls on broiler performance

(Hetland et al., 2003a)

No oat hulls Oat hulls

Weight gain, g 1463 1435

Feed/gain 1.56 1.52

Gizzard, g/kg bird wt. 20.6 26.0 Ileal starch dig. 0.97b 0.99a Pancreas, g/kg bird wt. 2.1 2.2 Amylase, U/g jejunal DM 146b 255a Bile acid, mg/g jej. DM 11.7b 18.0a

(24)

Effect of whole wheat on pH and gut microflora

(Engberg et al., 2004)

Ground

wheat Whole

wheat

Gizzard pH 3.34a 2.88b

Anaer. bact. in

gizzard, log cfu/g 7.98a 7.56b C. perfringens in

ileum, log cfu/g 6.44 5.72 Lactobacilli in

jejunum, log cfu/g 7.53b 8.28a

(25)

Mortality (%) of broilers given diets with different structure

(Branton et al., 1987)

Finely ground Coarsely ground

Wheat based 28.9 18.1

Maize based 12.6 3.4

(26)

“The present results indicate that the gizzard has an

important function as a barrier organ, one that prevents

pathogenic bacteria from

entering the distal digestive tract”

Bjerrum et al. (2005)

(27)

Effects of pelleting on performance and gut function of broilers

(Engberg et al., 2002)

Mash Pellets Feed intake 0-42 d, g 3234 3512 Weight gain 0-42 d, g 1780 2007

Feed/gain 1.81 1.75

Gizzard weight, g/kg BW 16.8 12.3 Pancreas weight, g/kg BW 2.0 1.8

Amylase, U/100 g BW 2647 1882

Lipase, U/100 g BW 29 19

Chymotrypsin, U/100 g BW 71 54

(28)

1000 200300 400500 600700 800900 1000

Pelleted

control Same diet crushed

Effect of feed form on starch digestibility (Svihus and Hetland, 2001)

Feed intake Starch dig. * 1000

a

b

a b

(29)

Proportion of birds with ileal starch digestibility in different classes

Wheat based pelleted diet

<0,50, % of birds 0,50-0,70, % of birds 0,70-0,80, % of birds 0,80-0,90, % of birds 0,90-0,94, % of birds 0,94-0,96, % of birds 0,96-0,98, % of birds

>0,98, % of birds Wheat based mash diet

(30)

Feed consumption and AME

determined on individual birds fed the same diet

y = -0,0054x + 15,317 R2 = 0,3145

12 12,5 13 13,5 14 14,5

250 300 350 400 450 500

Feed consumption, wheat diet

AME, MJ/kg

(31)

Some cereal diets (wheat)

Unpelleted Pelleted

High starch Low starch

Normal consumers Over-

consumers

Normal/high starch digestibility

Low starch digestibility

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

In April 2016, Ukraine’s President Petro Poroshenko, summing up the war experience thus far, said that the volunteer battalions had taken part in approximately 600 military

Based on the above-mentioned tensions, a recommendation for further research is to examine whether young people who have participated in the TP influence their parents and peers in

The particle size distributions were characterized by the means of a disc centrifuge, and the effect of dispersion time, power density, and total energy input, for both bath

An abstract characterisation of reduction operators Intuitively a reduction operation, in the sense intended in the present paper, is an operation that can be applied to inter-

Azzam’s own involvement in the Afghan cause illustrates the role of the in- ternational Muslim Brotherhood and the Muslim World League in the early mobilization. Azzam was a West

HTAi Board members also attend meetings of the Forum (the main discussion of the Forum is held alongside the “winter” meeting of the Board), and leading international experts

The ideas launched by the Beveridge Commission in 1942 set the pace for major reforms in post-war Britain, and inspired Norwegian welfare programmes as well, with gradual

Although, particularly early in the 1920s, the cleanliness of the Cana- dian milk supply was uneven, public health professionals, the dairy indus- try, and the Federal Department