l~N-MADE MINElliL FIBRE SURVEY AT ELKEM-ROCKWOOL A/S, MOSS
BY
GRETE EDHOLM, BJØRN GYLSETH AND DAVID G. NICHOLSON
HD 780/78
INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, BOX 8149, DEP, OSLO I
~
. ..
- l -
CONTENTS : PAGE:
I _ INTRODUCTION. . . .' 2
I I. METHODS... 3
I I IRESULTS . . . .. 5
Tables L - 10... 6 - 14
Figures L - 4. . . .15 - 18
- 2 -
I INTRODUCTION
The question as to whether occupational exposure to Man-
made-mineral-fibres (MMF) is harmful is of current interest;
especially as these materials are being increasingly used as substi tutes for asbestos. The Joint-European Medical Research Board (JEMBR) has ini tiated an ambi tious progra~~e wi th the view to establishing the consequences of such expo-
sures. An integral part of this programre consists of working out a strategy, and analytical methods, for recording
present total dustjfibre concentrations in the working atmos- pheres in a number of European MMF producing plants. The organisation responsible for this aspect of the study is the Insti tute of Occupational Medicine (10M), Edinburgh.
One of the countries actively participating in this
programre is Norway, where there are six W-~F plants. Four of these were considered suitable subjects for the programre because they keep detailed medical records of workers.
Due to slightly differing methods of sampling and analysis
. . ile
i t was considered of interest to compare procedures used by the two insti tutes. Such a comparison was carried out during the 10M investigations at Elkem-Rockwool AjS at Moss and Larvik. The results from the YHI~survey at Moss are presented in this report.
. ~
- 3 -
I I METHODS
The dust samples were collected on 37 mmØ, O, 8 ~m Millipore membrane fil ters using CaselIa personal air samplers wi th
an adjusted flow of 2 ljmin. The flow was checked wi th a
calibrated external flowmeter be fore and after
sampling . Before saiapling the upper part of the fil ter
moni tor was removed, thus leaving the whole fil ter area exposed to air. Then the moni tors were mounted in the workers breathing zones. The workers carried the air
samplers for 6 - 8 hours of the shift, including the lunch
period.
A new fil ter was used eve ry day. Before and after use
the filters were desiccated for 24 hours in a desiccator and weighed wi th an accuracy of + O, L mg.
After the total dust determinations a segment from each
fil ter was cut and placed dust-side up onto a clean standard
microscope slide. The slide was exposed to acetone vapour in order to render the fil ter transparent, a few drops of triacetine added and a cover glass placed over the
specimen. Fibre concentrations were recorded in a Zeiss
binocular microscope with positive phase-contrast optics at 500x magnification. This microscope was equipped wi th a Ph 2 40jO, 75 objective with green filter and Kohler
illumination. The specimens were surveyed by scanning inter- mi ttently across the fil ter. Some of the samples were
counted by two persons using graticule A. All samples were
alsocounted twice by one person using different graticules.
Graticule A is a 200 ~m x 200 ~m grid divided into 10 ~m squares .
. ~
- 4 -
Graticule B. Circular graticule, 100 ~mØ, recommended by 10M (l). In this way one could establish potential personal as well as instrumental differences. The counting proceedures described as below.
Graticule A. All fibres completely wi thin the field were
counted. Two adj acent field sides were defined as "counting
sides" and all fibres crossing these sides were included.
No other fibres were considered .
Graticule B. As specified by rOM (l).
For each sample 40 fields or 100 fibres were counted.
Random samples from each working place were chosen for
fibre size evaluations and fibre concentration determination in the scanning electron microscope.
The fibre size evaluations were performed by mounting a
piece of the membrane fil ter on a standard scanning electron micriscope (SEM) brass stub. The fil ter piece was fastened to the stub with carbon cement or silver paint and thereafter covered wi th a thin layer of carbon or gold by evaporating
to make them conducti ve.
The fibre concentrations were recorded in the SEM at 1500x magnification. Hundred fields were surveyed (O, ios mm2) . Fibre size evaluations were made at 1500x (length) and 15000x
(diameter) magnification respectively. At least 50 fibres in each sample were evaluated.
(l) W. H. Wal ton and S. T. Beckett.
Ann. Occup. Hyg. 20 (1977) 19 - 23.
'. ~
- 5 -
ILL RESULTS
Table L - 5 contains filter numbers, working places (in English/Norwegian), total dust concentrations (mgjm3), fibre concentrations as determined by optical microscopy
(fibres ~ 3~m and / 3~m in diameter) and finally; the total fibre concentration determined by SEM at 1500x magnifi-
cation.
No statistically significant difference (p ~ O, 05) between the mean values for the two series (A and B) was observed for the two different graticules, nei ther for fibres ~ 3~m in diameter nor for the total fibre concentration.
A statistically significant difference between the two coun- ters were observed both for fibres thinner than 3 ~m and for the total fibre concentrations using graticule A. These
resul ts are shown in Table 6 and 7.
In table 8 and 9 the fibre diameter and length from the SEM
size evaluation are given. ,Table 10 contains mean distribution, standard deviation and range respectively. These results
are further illustrated in Figures L and 2. The relation
between fibre concentration per unit area and magnification
is demonstrated in Figure 3. Finally the correlation between the SEM and the OM is given in Figure 4.
ELKEM-ROCKWOOL AlS, MOSS T ab L e IOptical microscopy( f ibres jml ) SEM Optiske mikroskop
Fil tei
Working placejPrøvestedTotal
F ibre conc.Fibre conc.Total fibre
No.dust conc. j
jfiber konsen-jfiber konsen-conc. jtotaltotalstØv
trasjon Ø/3~mtrasjon Ø~3~mfiber konsen- mgjm3trasjon (fibres jml)
PRE-PRODUCTIONjFØR PRODUKSJON 26SpinnermanjOvnsrep. -
N.Gustavsen 2,8 0,05 0,02 0,89
216,7 0,07 0,04
44BindermanjBlandingsmiddel - 1,4 0,02 -
G.Kristoffersen
l, O0,02
O, Ol0,56
PRODUCTIONjPRODUKSJON 39Packing manjOperatør ved1,3 - -
49sager på enden av linjen -3, L0,04
O, OL 24J. Wetten2, L0,03
O, Ol0,55
2ForemanjFormann 3,4 0,06 0,02 0,39
12S. Kristoffersen 0,06 0,04
6Gen. foremanjFormann
l, O0,03 0,02
:. -- 28Operator cavi ty woolj 2,9 0,07 0,02 0,55
5Stationary pumpjStasjonær1,9 0,05
O, Ol 76.2,2 0,08 0,02
0'
ELKEM-ROCKWOOL AlS, MOSS T ab L e 2Optical microscopy
(fibresjml)
SEM Optiske mikroskopFilter
Working placejPrøvestedTotal
F ibre conc.F ibre,xonc .Total fibre
No.dust conc.jjfiber kqnsen-jfiber konsen-conc . jtotaltota~støv
trasjon Ø).3~mtrasjon Ø~3~mfiber konsen- mgjmtrasjon (fibres jml)
PRODUCTIONjPRODUKSJON 27Line end manjOperatør ved2, L0,08 0,04 0,88
sager på enden av linjen - 16S. JØraholmen2,2 0,12 0,02
SECONDARY PROCESSjETTER- BEHANDLING 33Sewing machine, thermal 0,8 0,11 0,05 0,99 isulationjsymaskin, tekn.
13matter -
T. Askerød2,8 0,14 0,06
38Packing manjOperatør på5,8 - -
Lpakkemaskin - R.Halonen 6,5 0,14 0,04
201,9 0,08 0,04 1,13
, 43Pipe cuttingjKutting skåler-
4,6 0,08 0,04
:. 47O.Fredriksen 1,2 0,13 0,05 0,43
'-
ELKEM-ROCKWOOL AlS, MOSS Table 3Optical microscopy
(fibresjml)
SEM.optiske mikroskop Filter
Working place/PrØvestedTotal
F ibre conc.F ibre conc.Total f ibre
No.dust conc.jjfiber konsen-jfiber konsen-conc . jtotaltotalstØv
trasjon Ø/3~mtrasjon Ø~3~mfiber konsen- mgjm3trasjon (f ibres jml)
SECONDARY PROCESSj ETTERBEHANDLING 31Sewing machine, thermal 1,9 0,12 0,06 0,88.
inslilatiopjSymaskin ,tekn. 22rna t ter-
A.Bakke 1,2 0,07 0,06
29Sewing machine, thermal 1,2 0,08 0,04
3insulatio~/Symaski~ , tekn. 1,7 0,06 0,03 1,54
25matter - J. V.Johansen 0,8. 0,07 0,02
, 37Pipe lagging mjc man,5, O- - liningjSkåler, rulling
77-
A.GrØnvold 1,2 0,09 0,06 0,96
.. 40PipepackjPakking, skåler 0,8 0,07
O, 03 48-
G.Frantzen 0,9 0,09 0,02
190,9 0,06 0,03 0,87
:co
ELKEM-ROCKWOOL AjS, MOSS Table 4Optieal mieroseopy
(fibresjml)
SEM Optiske mikroskop.Fil ter
Working plaeejprøvestedTotal F ibre eone. F ibre eone. Total fibre
No.dust eone. j
jfiber konsen-jfiber konsen-eone . jtotaltotalstØv
trasjon Ø/3~mtrasjon Ø~3~mfiber konsen- mg jm 3trasjon ( fibres jml)
MAINTENANCEjVEDLIKEHOLD 46Eleetr i e ianjE lek tr iker 1,5 0,06 0,04 0,85
14J.
H. Olsen1,4 0,04 0,02
34Mai ntenanee/Vedl ikeho Id1,4 0,06 0,03 1,00
9T. Johansen2,6 - -
41Main tenaneejVedl ikehold2, O0,04 0,02
7T. Pederseni,9 0,09 0,06 1,35
QUALITY CONTROLj KVALITETSKONTROLL 8Quali ty eontrolj Kvali tets-0,8 0,04 0,02 kontroll -
R. Ahlsen'"
ELKEM-ROCKWOOL AjS, MOSS Table 5Optieal mieroseopy
(fibresjml) Optiske. mikroskop
SEM'Filter
Working plaeejPrøvestedTotal F ibre eone.
Fibre eone.Total f ibre
No.dust cone.jjfiber konsen-jf iber konsen-
eone . jtotaltotalstØv
trasjon Ø/3~mtrasjon Ø~3~mfiber konsen- mgjm3trasjon
( f ibresjml)
D I STRIBUT ION jLAGER 42DistributionjLager 0,9 0,04 0,03
50- P. Lauri tzen 1,4 0,06
O, ol 111,5
.0,07 0,02 0,89
30DistributionjLager 2,7 0,06
,0,04
4-
V.Larsen
l, O0,07 0,02 0,62
171,6 0,07 0,03
POLYSTYRENE PLANTj POLYSTYREN AVD. 35Isopore , polystyrene
4, O0,03 0,02
45-
R. Vinberg0,8
O, OlO, Ol0,18
,f-
o
- 11 -
t-val ue
at
95%
eonf.
95%eonf.
n =degrees of
T ab L e 6 Mean AtOJ L imi t s Mean B
(o)
L imi t sfreedom'
Fibres
~3~mØ0,074 0,062-0,088 0,071 0,060-0,084 t
=-0,3166
n = 84
.
Total f ibre 0,105 0,089-0,126 0,105 0,088-0,124 t
=-0,0752
eoneen tra tion n = 84
T ab L e 7 COUNTER L COUNTER 2
t-va lue
at
95%
eonf.
95%eonf.
n =degrees of
Mean
limi ts
Meanlimits freedom
Fibres "~3~mØ
0,081 0,060-0,100 0,044 0,035-0,052 t
=4,1075
n = 56
Total fibre 0,113 0,092-0,140, 0,079 0,064-0,097 t
=2,4382
eoneentration
,n = 56- -~,
\
i:::
o
p:o u
::,,
ri ZH8
::H:s
l!
M
M
r-
- 12 -
l!
""''INNINI I""NI""NIIII I
r-
"' '- o co co co o '" N '" CO '" "' "' "' CO "' "' '"
i- i- i- i- N i- i- i- i- i-
o '" O CO CO CO CO CO N "' CO CO "' '" "' "' O "' CO
r- M l! M L! "' "' "' N""'' "' L! "' '" "' '- N L!
.. co "' CO "' CO O N O CO CO "' N CO '- "' O "' '- "'
N N M i- N i- N ~i- N N i- i- i- N i- "' N
s
;:i-
I
L!
..
"' CO O CO "' "' '" '- CO CO CO "' O N CO CO N '" N
i- i- i- N i- i- "' N i- i- i- N N i- N i- o
p:ri
E-ri
:a
,,
HO
::
E-H :s
l!
o
r-I
o
r-
o I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Z
~O l-
,,
U) i: ::O :s ~U)=
H
,,
:: ZU) U) i: H
rL . Z :s
z
-- ri Z i: :; l-H Z N
..
~ U) p: ~
l- ri E- Z "- i:
"-
U) H ri O Z =Z p: E- Z
0 ZOri
O
ri ::
O Z ri H ::H O ,, l- H I E- E-
8
ri l-,,
~ri ,, "-
,, i:-
::u
Z E- rLl-
,,
HU)Z:: Z Z i:
l-"-H= 00
U)Ori00Z "- "- l- :: ririZZZ
Q)
ZHUHZ~ ZZZOU U Z,, HH
U
HE-ZE-H ZO~OO~ ZriH80
rO ::i:::~ ~H H:S""
,, p: U8 0
i-O-
Z~HriH.:Z UriU:;0 l- a: z a: u c. E- E- Z:;H::,: riE-P:Ul-
:$ P:
E-P:i:Hri::Z::E-Z=
8 U) E-~
H~P:E-ZE-ri~OOZOHH
p: ri U) H U) i: u Z O H O :; :sZ:;Uriri H l- ri i: i:
O
O::H~HHi:HP:i:P:i:ri
~O l- H H8=
rz80 Oi:i:a:i:U)i:UU) i: ri i: i:
CO ' .,
ri HQ)
l- .L
a: r- o N M "' r- i- 0' O M "" '" r- CO i- M "' L! '- r- r-
,,
.i- O i- i- N N N N N N M M M "' "' "' r-8
rz Z0\0 V I
- 13 -
o o
i- ""'''-N'' 1\
N i- i- i- i- i- i- i- i-
"'''NN'-''NN "'N '- "'N '-o
Oi-
o
L!i:::
O¡:
o u ::
,,
ri ZH::
E-H
8=
o
L!o
No
N.. O S i-
;:::
E-
o
Zri l- ::E-
H:s i-
o
L!
Lr
0\0
vi
Q)
U
i-rO
P.
~
H O 8=0'
ril- .:r+
8
H
Q)
.L i- o
.i- O
rz Z
N O "' CO CO '" '" '" "' N N '- O N O N O O "' N i- i- N i- N N i- M N M i- M i-
'- "' CO CO '- '" N N O CO "' O CO CO O N O "' O N N N M N L! "' M i- M "' M M "' M i- M "' "'
N N""'' O CO "' CO '" "" '- O "' O O O O O O N "' M M N i- i- N L! i- i- M i- N N "' N M N
'- O '" CO N""'' CO '- 00 N"''' '" O N N '"
N r- i- N i- i- M N i- i- i- N i- i-
I I I I I I I NN I"' I I
Z
~
O (J l-
,, 8= i:::
O ,, :ä(J=
l- (J:: z
(J i: Hri Z :s
Z..ri Z ,,:;l-
H ZN i: (J¡:~
l- ri8 Z ~ "-i:""
"- (JH ri OZ¡:=
Z p:¡: Z 0 ZOri
O ri:: O Z riH::
H Oi: l- H E-E-
E- ri l- i: ~ ri,, "-
i: i:- :: U ZE-ri
l- ,, H(JZ
::Z Z i: l-"-H
(JOri00Z "- "-l-::=
ZHUHZ,, ZZZOU HE-Z8H:äZO~00~
Zl-~~~a0~~¡:~8=
,,i:HriHi:ZP:UriU:;c.
:ä ~ ¡: E- ¡:. i: H ri :: Z :: E- Z
ri p: E- Z E- ri ~ O O Z O H H=
¡:ri(JH(Ji:UZOHO:;8=
O::H,,H Hi:H¡:i:
¡:i:ri
rz E- O :ä O i: i: a: i: (J i: U (J
N
NN""
ririZZZ
o c.U Z,, H H
ZriH80
,,¡:UE-0
Z:;H::i:
riE-¡:Ul-
E- (J E-
z:; U ri ri
H l- ri i: i:
,, O l- H H
~ i: rL i: i:
N M "' r- i- 0' O M "' '" r- CO i- M "' L! '" r- r- i- i- N N N N N N M M M "' "" "' r-
" ,
TABLE io .---~ DIAMETER(~m)~ L0,1 - 0,50,5 - LL - 3
3- 5
'. ;; 5-
MEAN(% )-
17',721,5 47,8 10,8 1,5
STANDARD DEVIATION + (SD)( % )- 10,3 8,6 12,2
5, L1,9
RANGE( % )-
4 - 488 - 4622 - 702 - 20o - 6 LENGTH(~m)~ 55 - ioio - 2020 - 5050 - 100). 100 -
MEAN(% )l, o14,3 25,9
,33,5 16,4
~ - g, 3 STANDARD DEVIATION ~ (SD)(% )1,4 8,7 11,3 11,5 9,2
- 6,5 RANGE(% )o - 42 -' 3814 - 56io - 484 - 302 - 24f- .¡- 15 -
z:
o
ç:
(/
..
+1I-
::
çq
..
e:
l-
V)
..
q
O:w
l- il
~
G.c:
..
i:
il
c:Ç.
..
lL
, i
¡,l,
¡.l..' ,,.
r
~l l
r¡~
~
fl.'
ri
1./ :'ì ir:
/ J ¡
/ I l
/ J / 'c
./ I / J
/ / I
.\.
-- -- -- -
-- -
-- -- -- --
-- -- --
.-1 wc.
:: o
LL
.. .. ..
.. ....
.. .. .. .. ....
...
./ ,/./
,/,/,/ ./
,/./,/,/
,/ ,/
,/ ,/./
.. " " ..
" ..
" ""
"" " "
\ \
\"
\ \
\
\\.l
i- .- -I
~~l
~4l'~ RI
-
o
CJo o
CJo
t.~ lD Ui -. ~l\ (-.
ri
, .,
\ \
\ \
~~ /~
,.
""'.: ~ --
-.
c:W
I-W
0:-"
""
~ i:
v a
..U'\
r;
t~
"r
CJ..
L!ì
I
CJ..
~:i t
¡ CJ
ri)..
CJI
..
r-'¡
CJ..
ri
I
Uì
ei
..;"ì
C
..r-':
c.
..r-l CJ
\J
- 16 - /,
...""
=- :i l-
Z
2.o
o
I
w-i I-
::
i:
~.æ ~
l- e/
ijCf +1 l
c:
:cI-
t
V
8 Z
.~G
w.
I c;
.-:I
i
w
i
c.
I
i: I
r,u,.
I
~ "I I C
N
.//
"i L'1"":./ /
iW
./ C
c. ./
/
U \::
tD./ ./ / /
./ /
LL /'
./ / /
./ /
./
./ / C
./
/
Lti\
I\ \ \
CJC'..\ \ \ \
\ \
\ \
\ \ O
\ \
('-.\ U
I"- .-:
"-
\
"-
\
"-"-"-
\ \
"-"-
\ \
"-
\
~
C
r-.;\
"" I" " " " \ \
L:'i" " \
"" " \ \
"
"-\
\
L:ì"-
".'l
V
c:i
O O
CJ CJ~-- Liì j.i
N
'-,1.' ._,
,~~ "7 FIGURE .). FIBRES / nri2 x 103 15 12 () u Ll
f(ELATION BEnlEEN FIBRE CONCENTRATION PR. UNIT AREA AND MAGNIFICATION IN SEM. i- '-
2 io
~";i:"':i~";~r.".~i:~";'.'Ti"'~.;-r~"-:"~""~Yí''''''-~'''~'':;'.'':-~L~''''.'.:'~' .::....!\-,.,... ';~:v-i~-;~it,."1'1'1.~''.J'~~-'l.~
12 x 1000 MAGNIFICATION
4G() u- 18 -
Â
I ~l
~-""
-. l.
i-
Cfz ::
OU
Wc:
çq LL
.:
CJ"
O
Il
c:
~ ~
C/
w
-=
c.
WC/
z
r:c:
\., .
l
l~
i.;:i~ o
~ j
z
w wi-
wÇQ
'\ €t
" Uì
.fl- ;
r-.
z o
i-
c:-i
w c:e:u
Ci
\
,\
$
we:
::
19-t\
L,
~'~
,
lJ.
.' . c
"O .-:
Ð
e
fi.
o"
,,\
\
o
~ (¡ ~
ti L'ì fl. "
o
fJ
\ \
Ð~
'!'" ~..~
i ii~-i o
Uìc.
Uì., N ri
.-,C
""
~ "-
" .," " "