• No results found

Hs (m/s) Tp

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Hs (m/s) Tp"

Copied!
18
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

1- yr Contour surface

0

5

10

15

0 5

10 15 200

5 10 15 20 25 30

Hs (m/s) Tp

U w

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Hs

U w

Projection of 1-yr contour surface to 2-D

Since the responses of floating spar is less sensitive to the Tp, three cases are selected on the Uw-Hs contour line

(2)

Uw Hs Tp

CASE1 25.87 10.97 14.18

CASE2 28.43 9.53 12.90

CASE3 27.80 10.60 13.71

The significant wave height fora 1-hour simulation Hs=k2*Hs1, k2=1.09

Uw is extrapolated to the hub height with power factor 0.14, plus a 10% increase in wind speed for scaling the 1-hour average wind speed to 10-min average wind speed.

The real cases run

Uw Hs Tp Sigma

Sea state1 38.7 12.0 14.2 0.12

Sea state2 42.5 10.4 12.90 0.12

Sea state3 41.6 11.6 13.71 0.12

1- hour long simulation is run, the seed num for each 15 min wind and wave sim. Is different.

Turbulence intensity is a function of wind speed. The U

Sensitivity of the response to the blade azimuth angle position1,2,3 Case1 Standstill-feathered_wind41.7_Hs13.33Tp14.4_no direction

Motion Tp(s) f(rad/s)

Surge 115 0.055

Sway 125 0.05

Heave 31.4 0.2

Roll/pitch 32.7 0.19

Yaw 7.5 0.838

Wave freq. =0.436 rad/s

(3)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 -5

0 5 10 15

20 spar bottom displacement -y

position1 position2 position3

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

-3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000 3000

4000 Tower Bottom Shear Force -y

position1 position2 position3

(4)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 -2

-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

3x 105 tower bottom moment Mx

position1 position2 position3

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

x 109

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Tower bottom BM, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

postition1 position2 position3

Mx

Wp1=0.20 (pitch resonance), wp2=0.42(wave freq.), wp3=2.14?

(5)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 -6

-4 -2 0 2 4

6x 104 tower bottom moment My position1

position2 position3

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

x 108

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Tower bottom My, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

postition1 position2 position3

wp1=0.2 rad/s, wp2=0.94 rad/s, wp3=2.16 rad/s

(6)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 -8000

-6000 -4000 -2000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000

10000 Flapwise blade1 bending moment Mx

position1 position2 position3

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

x 106

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Feathered-Flapwise BM Blade1, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

postition1 position2 position3

Blade resonance

The variance of the total root bending moment fluctuations is equal to the sum of the resonant and background response variances.

2 2 2

1

M M MB

   It would be interesting to look at the root bending moment.

(7)

Since the lowest natural frequency of the blades in the flapwise and edgewise modes are below 1 Hz, the resonant response might be significant.

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

-4000 -3000 -2000 -1000 0 1000 2000

3000 edgewise blade1 bending moment My position1

position2 position3

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1

1.5 Tower top accer. in x dir.

position1 position2 position3

(8)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 -6

-4 -2 0 2 4

6 Tower top accer. in y dir.

position1 position2 position3

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

-10 -5 0 5 10

15 Tower Displ. in X dir.

position1 position2 position3

(9)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0

10 20 30 40 50

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Feathered-Narcelle Sway, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9M/S

postition1 position2 position3

Wp1=0.03 rad/s, close to the sway nat. freq.=0.05 rad/s Wp2=0.19 rad/s, close to the roll nat. freq.=0.192 The responses in –x directions are more sensitive to the azimuth angle of the blade.

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000

-10 0 10 20 30 40

50 Tower Displ. in y dir.

position1 position2 position3

(10)

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 0

20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Feathered-Narcelle Surge, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9M/S

postition1 position2 position3

Wp1:surge, wp2:pitch, wp3: wave freq. 0.44rad/s

Conclusion: When the blades are feathered, the responses are not sensitive to the azimuth angle.

Case2 Standstill-blade2seized_wind41.7_Hs13.33Tp14.4_no direction

Case2 Standstill-blade2seized_wind41.7_Hs13.33Tp14.4_no direction

(11)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 0

5 10 15 20 25

30 spar bottom displacement -y

position1 position2 position3

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Frequency (rad/s) S (  )[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Feathered-seized sparbottom -y, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9M/S

postition1 position2 position3

Wp1: surge wp2:pitch

(12)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 -1.5

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

3x 105 tower bottom moment Mx position1

position2 position3

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

0 5 10 15

x 109

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Tower bottom BM, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

postition1 position2 position3

(13)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Bd2Seized Sway, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9M/S

postition1 position2 position3

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

0 50 100 150 200 250

Frequency (rad/s) S()[m2 /s/rad]

Bd2Seized Narcelle Surge, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9M/S

postition1 position2 position3

(14)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7x 106

Frequency (rad/s) S()[m2 /s/rad]

Bd2Seized Flapwise BM Blade1, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

postition1 position2 position3

0 2 4 6 8 10

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

x 105

Frequency (rad/s) S()[m2 /s/rad]

Bd2Seized edgeewise BM, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

postition1 position2 position3

Comparison between feathered and seized case, p1 Spar bottom –y

(15)

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Comparison sparbottom -y, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9M/S

seized feathered

Nacelle Surge –y

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2

0 50 100 150 200 250

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Comparison Narcelle Surge, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9M/S

seized feathered

Nacelle Sway –x

(16)

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0

50 100 150 200

Frequency (rad/s) S()[m2 /s/rad]

Comparison Sway, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9M/S

seized feathered

Nacelle accer. –y

Tower bottom Mx

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

x 109

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Comparion Tower bottom Mx, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

seized feathered

Tower bottom My

(17)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

x 109

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Comparion Tower bottom My, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

seized feathered

Blade1 Mx

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

x 106

Frequency (rad/s) S (

)[ m

2

/s /r ad ]

Comparion Flapwise BM Blade1, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

seized feathered

Blade1 My

(18)

0 2 4 6 8 10 0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8x 105

Frequency (rad/s) S()[m2 /s/rad]

Comparion edgeewise BM, Hs=12.2, Tp=14.4, V=41.9

seized feathered

Blade2 Mx

Blade2 My

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

The ideas launched by the Beveridge Commission in 1942 set the pace for major reforms in post-war Britain, and inspired Norwegian welfare programmes as well, with gradual

Within the scope of the medical movement, the Permanent Medical Commision of the Ministry of Health in 1851, based on a hypothesis that leprosy was a hereditary disease, proposed

This report documents the experiences and lessons from the deployment of operational analysts to Afghanistan with the Norwegian Armed Forces, with regard to the concept, the main

Based on the above-mentioned tensions, a recommendation for further research is to examine whether young people who have participated in the TP influence their parents and peers in

From the above review of protection initiatives, three recurring issues can be discerned as particularly relevant for military contributions to protection activities: (i) the need

The implications of the Lorentz reciprocity theorem for a scatterer connected to waveguides with arbitrary modes, including degenerate, evanescent, and complex modes, are discussed..

An abstract characterisation of reduction operators Intuitively a reduction operation, in the sense intended in the present paper, is an operation that can be applied to inter-

The political and security vacuum that may emerge after conflict can be structured to be exploited by less than benign actors such as warlords, criminal networks, and corrupt