• No results found

Our study highlights specific advice for organizations that have diversity and inclusion high on the agenda. According to our results, organizational attention to increasing diversity promise fulfillment would be well advised. Diversity management has the potential to increase affective commitment through increased levels of diversity promise fulfillment, and this study indicates that this may be especially important for those who identify as minority group members. One way organizations could potentially increase diversity promise fulfillment would be through the alignment of diversity management with the contextual factors of a mastery climate. Since both put great emphasis on the collaborative work environment and the inclusion of different perspectives for the sake of learning and development (Ames, 1992; Nerstad et al., 2018; Li et al., 2019), an internal alignment would create beneficial outcomes (cf. Dwertmann et al., 2016).

From a practical standpoint, the results we have presented indicate that both organizations and employees can benefit from a mastery climate. Managers might be essential in achieving so by navigating what Paauwe (2004) referred to as the twin challenge; focusing on the effectiveness and performance of the workforce, while at the same time preserving the family atmosphere that employees may be more interested in. Direct supervisors and/or line managers can play an important role in promoting and facilitating the motivational climate through, e.g., goal-specific communication and convincing goal relevance (Boselie, 2014). For instance, managers could facilitate a mastery climate by communicating the importance of a collaborative work atmosphere and encourage mastery of skills through failing and learning. As a result, employees could adopt the desired behaviors and perspectives that can collectively lead to a more diverse and inclusive work environment with a mastery climate as a framework. Our results present a clear picture of the benefits of a mastery climate in terms of employee outcomes and a way to aid in meeting the organization's strategic goals.

Furthermore, our results alert organizational practitioners about the significant difference in perceptions of organizational factors between the majority and minorities. Additionally, the different expectations the identity groups have of their

diversity management and the perceived fulfillment of those should be taken into consideration (Li et al., 2019). Therefore, we encourage organizations to include measures in their annual surveys that are related to diversity promise fulfillment and that they compare the results of the majority to the minorities. Since most organizations are prohibited from collecting sensitive personal information (i.e., ethnicity, abilities, sexual orientation) due to GDPR restrictions (OECD, 2018), we encourage them to include the question of which social identity group they identify with (i.e., majority or minority). This will ensure that they do not exclude certain characteristics that might be relevant in this context. Data collected through such surveys can be tracked over time and give the organization valuable intel regarding their progress on diversity matters.

6.0 CONCLUSION

This study presented the potential moderating role of the motivational climate in the relationship between diversity promise fulfillment and the employee outcomes;

affective commitment and turnover intention. Our study highlights the paramount importance of effective diversity management that provides results that are perceived as successful by both minority- and majority employees. Effective diversity management that fulfills the diversity promises can expect employees that are emotionally attached to their organization. While a motivational climate was not found to moderate any relationship, the results shed light on the beneficial role of a mastery climate in terms of employee outcomes and HR practices such as diversity management.

7.0 REFERENCES

Abrahamsen, F. E., Roberts, G. C., & Pensgaard, A. M. (2008). Achievement goals and gender effects on multidimensional anxiety in national elite sport.

Psychology of Sport and Exercise,9(4), 449-464.

Ali, M., Metz, I., & Kulik, C. T. (2015). Retaining a diverse workforce: the impact of gender‐focused human resource management.Human Resource Management Journal,25(4), 580-599.

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of educational psychology,84(3), 261.

Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1984). Systems of student and teacher motivation: Toward a qualitative definition.Journal of Educational Psychology,76: 535-566 Ames, C, & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students'

learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.

Armstrong-Stassen, M. (2008). Organizational practices and the post- retirement employment experience of older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(1), 36–53.

Ashikali, T., & Groeneveld, S. (2015). Diversity management in public organizations and its effect on employees’ affective commitment: The role of

transformational leadership and the inclusiveness of the organizational culture.Review of Public Personnel Administration,35(2), 146-168.

Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., Wilson, D. C., & Tonidandel, S. (2007). Unequal

attendance: The relationships between race, organizational diversity cues, and absenteeism.Personnel Psychology,60(4), 875-902.

Avery, D. R., McKay, P., & Wilson, D. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 235– 249.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497.

Blau, P. M. (1964).Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley

Boselie, P. (2014).Strategic human resource management: A balanced approach (2nd ed). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Buch, R., Nerstad, C. G., & Säfvenbom, R. (2017). The interactive roles of mastery climate and performance climate in predicting intrinsic motivation.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports,27(2), 245-253.

Buttner, H. E., Lowe, K. B., & Billings-Harris, L. (2010a). Diversity climate impact on employee of color outcomes: Does justice matter?,Career Development International, 15(3), 239-258.

Buttner, E. H., Lowe, K. B., & Billings-Harris, L. (2010b). The impact of diversity promise fulfillment on professionals of color outcomes in the USA,Journal of Business Ethics,91(4), 501-518.

Cachat-Rosset, G., Carillo, K., & Klarsfeld, A. (2019). Reconstructing the Concept of Diversity Climate – A Critical Review of Its Definition, Dimensions, and Operationalization. European Management Review, 16(4), 863-885.

Carberry, E. J., & Meyers, J. S. M. (2017). Are the “best” better for every- one?

Demographic variation in employee perceptions of Fortune's “Best companies to work for.”Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 36(7), 647–669.

Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity.Academy of Management Journal,57(1), 172-192.

Chen, C., & Tang, N. (2018). Does perceived inclusion matter in the workplace?.

Journal of Managerial Psychology.

Chrobot‐Mason, D. L. (2003). Keeping the promise.Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(1), 22-45.

Chrobot‐Mason, D. and N. P. Aramovich. (2013). The psychological benefits of creating an affirming climate for workplace diversity,Group and

Organization Management, 38: 659–689.

Cummann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D., & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organisational Assessment Questionnaire, University of Michigan.Ann Arbor, MI.

Cortina, J. (1993). What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications.Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.

Cox, V., E. Gouri, G. Rexford and H. D. Nathan. (2009). Focusing on communication strategy to enhance diversity climates,Journal of Communication

Management, 13: 6–20.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

Psychometrika16, 297–334.

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1-19.

Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040– 1048.

Dwertmann, D. J. G., Nishii, L. H., & van Knippenberg, D. (2016). Disentangling the fairness and discrimination and synergy perspectives on diversity climate:

Moving the field forward,Journal of Management, 42: 1136– 1168.

Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2010). Exploring the relative and combined influence of mastery‐approach goals and work intrinsic motivation on employee turnover intention.Personnel review 39(5).

Ellingrud, K., Krishnan, M., Krivkovich, A., Robinson, N., Yee, L., Kukla, K., Mendy, A. and Sancier-Sultan, S. (2021). Diverse employees are struggling the most during COVID-19—here’s how companies can respond.McKinsey.

Epitropaki, O. (2013). A multi‐level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: Testing a moderated–mediated model.Journal of Organizational Behavior,34(1), 65-86.

Eurostat (2021, May 4). Labour market in the light of the COVID 19 pandemic -quarterly statistic. Eurostat Statistics Explained. https://bit.ly/3bvwvBQ Felfe, J., Schmook, R., Schyns, B., & Six, B. (2008). Does the form of employment

make a difference?—Commitment of traditional, temporary, and self‐employed workers.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(1), 81–94.

Gonzalez, J. A. and A. S. Denisi. (2009). Cross‐level effects of demography and diversity climate on organizational attachment and firm effectiveness,Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30: 21– 40.

Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium.Journal of management,26(3), 463-488.

Harwood, C. G. , Keegan, R. J. , Smith, J. M. , & Raine, A. S. (2015). A systematic review of the intrapersonal correlates of motivational climate perceptions in sport and physical activity.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,18, 9–25.

Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change:

Extension of a three-component model.Journal of applied psychology,87(3), 474.

Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups.

Administrative science quarterly,44(4), 741-763.

Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies.American Sociological Review, 71, 587-617

Khatri, N., Budhwar, P. and Chong, T. F. (2001). ‘Explaining employee turnover in an Asian context.Human Resource Management Journal, 11, 54–74.

Kopelman, R. E., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1990). The role of climate and culture in productivity. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp.

282–318). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kopperud, K. H., Nerstad, C. G., & Dysvik, A. (2020). Should I Stay or Should I Go?

The Role of Motivational Climate and Work–Home Spillover for Turnover Intentions.Frontiers in Psychology,11, 1107.

Kuenzi, M. , & Schminke, M. (2009). Assembling fragments into a lens: A review, critique, and proposed research agenda for the organizational work climate literature.Journal of Management,35(3), 634–717.

Kulik, C. T. (2015). Spotlight on the context: How a stereotype threat framework might help organizations to attract and retain older workers.Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(3), 456–461.

Kulik, C. T., Perera, S., & Cregan, C. (2016). Engage me: The mature‐age worker and stereotype threat.Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2132– 2156.

Li, Y., Perera, S, Kulik, C. T., & Metz, I. (2019). Inclusion climate: A multilevel investigation of its antecedents and consequences.Human Resource Management,58(4), 353–369.

Lo, S. & Aryee, S. (2003). Psychological Contract Breach in a Chinese Context: An Integrative Approach.Journal of Management Studies 40, 1005–1020.

MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect.Prevention science,1(4), 173-181.

McKay, P. F., & Avery, D. R. (2015). Diversity climate in organizations: Current wisdom and domains of uncertainty. In M. R. Buckley, J. R. B. Halbesleben,

& A. R. Wheeler (Eds.),Research in personnel and human resources management, p. 191–233. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.

McKay, P. F., Avery, D. R., & Morris, M. A. (2008). Mean racial‐ethnic differences in employee sales performance: The moderating role of diversity climate.

Personnel psychology, 61(2), 349-374.

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment.Human resource management review,1(1), 61-89.

Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization.

Journal of applied psychology,78(4), 538.

Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A

Meta-Analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences,Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.

Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops.Academy of management Review,22(1), 226-256.

Mor Barak, M. E. (2015). Inclusion is the key to diversity management, but what is inclusion?,Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership &

Governance,39(2), 83-88.

Mor Barak, M. E. (2016).Managing diversity: Toward a globally inclusive workplace. Sage Publications.

Mor Barak, M. E., Cherin, D. A., Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: Ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,34: 82-104.

Mor Barak, M. E., Findler, L., & Wind, L. H. (2016a). Diversity, inclusion, and commitment in organizations: International empirical explorations.Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management,2(2), 813.

Mor Barak, M. E., Lizano, E. L., Kim, A., Duan, L., Rhee, M. K., Hsiao, H. Y., &

Brimhall, K. C. (2016b). The promise of diversity management for climate of inclusion: A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Human Service

Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance,40(4), 305-333.

Nerstad, C. G., Dysvik, A., Kuvaas, B., & Buch, R. (2018a). Negative and positive synergies: On employee development practices, motivational climate, and employee outcomes.Human Resource Management,57(5), 1285-1302.

Nerstad, C.G., Roberts, G.C., & Richardsen, A.M. (2013). Development and validation of the MCWQ.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,43:

2231-2250.

Nerstad, C. G., Searle, R., Cerne, M., Dysvik, A., Skerlavaj, M., and Scherer, R.

(2018b). Perceived mastery climate, felt trust, and knowledge sharing.Journal of Organizational Behavior,39, 429–447.

Nerstad, C. G., Wong, S. I., & Richardsen, A. M. (2019). Can Engagement Go Awry and Lead to Burnout? The Moderating Role of the Perceived Motivational Climate.International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(11), 1979.

Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.Psychological Review, 91 (3), 328–346.

Nunnally, J.C. and I.H. Bernstein. (2007), Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn., New York:

McGraw-Hill.

Paauwe, J. (2004).HRM and performance: Achieving long-term viability. Oxford University Press.

Pensgaard, A. M., & Roberts, G. C. (2000). The relationship between motivational climate, perceived ability and sources of distress among elite athletes.Journal of sports sciences,18(3), 191-200.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.

Annual review of psychology,63, 539-569.

Poortvliet, P. M., & Giebels, E. (2012). Self-improvement and cooperation: How exchange relationships promote mastery-approach driven individuals' job outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21 Annu. Rev. Psychol.63, 539–569.

Roberson, Q. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations,Group and Organization Management, 31:212– 236.

Schneider, S. K., & Northcraft, G. B. (1999). Three social dilemmas of workforce diversity in organizations: A social identity perspective. Human Relations, 52(11), 1445-1467.

Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., &

Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research.Journal of management,37(4), 1262-1289.

Smith, E. L. B., & Nkomo, S. M. (2003).Our separate ways: Black and white women and the struggle for professional identity. Harvard Business Press.

Smith, J. W., & Calasanti, T. (2005). The influences of gender, race and ethnicity on workplace experiences of institutional and social isolation: An exploratory study of university faculty.Sociological Spectrum,25(3), 307-334.

Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover.Journal of applied psychology, 69(4), 673.

Tajfel, H. (1982).Social identity and intergroup relations.Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.),Psychology of intergroup relations, p.

7–24. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

Tekleab, A. G., Takeuchi, R., & Taylor, M. S. (2005). Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations.Academy of Management journal, 48(1), 146-157.

Triana, M. D. C., García, M. F., & Colella, A. (2010). Managing diversity: How organizational efforts to support diversity moderate the effects of perceived racial discrimination on affective commitment.Personnel Psychology,63(4), 817-843.

Triana, M. C., Wagstaff, M., & Kim, K. (2012). That's not fair! How personal value for diversity influences reactions to the perceived discriminatory treatment of minorities.Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 211–218.

Turnley, W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (1999). The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Human relations, 52(7), 895-922.

Walton, G. M., Murphy, M. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2015). Stereotype threat in organizations: Implications for equity and performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 523–550.

Wilson, T., Cockett, J., Papoutsaki, D., & Takala, H. (2020). Getting back to work:

Dealing with the labour market impacts of the Covid-19 recession. Institute for Employment Studies. Contract No.: Report,54.

8.0 APPENDICES

Appendix A - Research Questionnaire

PART 1 (first wave)

Q1 The statements below concern your identification with, involvement in, and emotional attachment to your organization. On a scale from 1 (=strongly disagree) to 5 (=strongly agree), to what extent do you agree with the following statements:

1. I would be very happy to spend the rest of my career with this organization.

2. This organization has a great deal of personal meaning for me.

3. I really feel as if this organization's problems are my own.

4. I do not feel a strong sense of “belonging” to my organization (reverse coded).

5. I do not feel “emotionally attached” to this organization (reverse coded).

6. I do not feel like “part of the family” at my organization (reverse coded).

Q2 The statements below concern your perception of the motivational climate regarding your experience and understanding of what kind of behavior is valued, expected and rewarded at work, in terms of a) performance, and b) mastery.

A.On a scale from 1 (=strongly disagree) to 5 (=strongly agree), to what extent do you agree with the following statements:

1. In my department/work group, it is important to achieve better than others.

2. In my department/work group, work accomplishments are measured based on comparisons

with the accomplishments of coworkers.

3. In my departments/work group, an individual’s accomplishments are compared with those of

other colleagues.

4. In my departments/work group, rivalry between employees is encouraged.

5. In my departments/work group, one is encouraged to perform optimally to achieve monetary

awards.

6. In my departments/work group, only those employees who achieve the best results/accomplishments are set up as examples

7. In my departments/work group, internal competition is encouraged to attain the best possible

results.

8. In my departments/work group, there exists a competitive rivalry among the employees.

B.On a scale from 1 (=strongly disagree) to 5 (=strongly agree), to what extent do you agree with the following statements:

1. In my departments/work group, one is encouraged to cooperate and exchange thoughts and ideas mutually.

2. In my departments/work group, each individual’s learning and development is emphasized.

3. In my departments/work group, cooperation and mutual exchange of knowledge

are

encouraged.

4. In my departments/work group, employees are encouraged to try new solution methods

throughout the work process.

5. In my departments/work group, one of the goals is to make each individual feel that he/she

has an important role in the work process.

6. In my departments/work group, everybody has an important and clear task throughout the work process.

Q3 What gender do you identify as?

1. Female

Q5 In terms of diversity , do you identify yourself as a part of the majority or minority in your organization?

1. Majority 2. Minority

PART 2 (second wave)

Q1 The statements below concern your assessment of your organization’s actual consequences of its diversity management. On a scale from 1 (=strongly disagree) to 5 (=strongly agree), to what extent do you agree that:

1. This organization has successfully achieved diverse representation in the workforce.

2. In this organization, input from minority group members is considered at all levels.

3. Different opinions, ideas, and perspectives are valued here.

4. Cultural and racial biases and prejudice have been eliminated here.

5. This organization provides support for the unique issues faced by minority employees

Q2 The statements below concern to what degree you believe that you will continue working in your current organization, or whether you consider to

leave/change employer. On a scale from 1 (=strongly disagree) to 5 (=strongly agree), to what extent do you agree with the following statements:

1. I often think about quitting my present job

2. I may quit my present job during the next twelve months 3. I will probably look for a new job in the next year

4. I do not see many prospects for the future in this organization 5. I will likely actively look for a new job within the next three years Q3 Please state your employment status.

1. Permanent worker 2. Casual/temporary worker Q4 Please specify your ethnicity.

1. Caucasian

2. African-American 3. African

4. Latino or Hispanic 5. Asian

6. Native American

7. Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 8. Two or More

9. Other/Unknown 10. Prefer not to answer

Appendix B - Exploratory Factor Analysis,Pattern Matrix

Component

Variables 1 2 3 4 5 6

Mastery_3 .851

Mastery_4 .839

Mastery_1 .821

Mastery_2 .781

Mastery_5 .727

Mastery_6 .609

AC_5 .913

AC_4 .882

AC_2 .831

AC_6 .777

AC_3 .724

AC_1 .583

Turnover_3 .962

Turnover_2 .937

Turnover_5 .823

Turnover_4 .694

Turnover_1 .821

DPF_1 .882

DPF_2 .831

DPF_4 .827

DPF_5 .769

DPF_3 .533

Performance_8 .863

Performance_7 .764

Performance_4 .755

Performance_6 .502

Performance_5 .424

Performance_3 .890

Performance_2 .865

Performance_1 .528

Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Rotation Method: Promax with Kaiser Normalization a. Rotation converged in 6 iterations.