1. EH., A., Treatment of malocclusion of the teeth. 7thed. Philadelphia: S. S. White Denta, 1907: p. 60-87.
2. I., M.N.V.T.J., Estudo Cefalométrico Comparativo das Alterações noPerfi
l Mole Facial Pré e Pós-tratamento Ortodôntico comExtrações de Pré- molares. J Bras Ortodon Ortop Facial 2004; 9(50): p. 109-19
3. Bishara, S.E.J., J. R.;HESSION, T.J.; Treder, J.E. , Soft tissue profile
changes 5 to 45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998.
114: p. 698-706.
4. RIVERA, S.H., J.; DOLCE, C.; BAYS, R.; VAN SICKEL, S. J.; RUGH, J. ,
Patients' own reasons and patient-perceived recommendations for orthognathic surgery. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop., St. Louis, Aug.
2000. 118(2): p. 134-141.
5. Broadbent, B.H., A new x-ray technique and its application to
orthodontia. angle orthodontis, 1931. 1: p. 45-66.
6. Pereira, C.B.a.C.G., Pioneiros da cefalometria radiográficaortodôntica. Revista do odontologo moderno, 1983. 1983: p. 47-53.
7. Cogan, T., The works of the late professor camperon the conexion
between the science of anatomy and the arts of drawing. painting,
satatuary london, 1974.
8. Roth, R., The wits appraisal-its skeletal and dento-alveolar background. Eur j. orthod, 1982. 4(1): p. 21-8.
9. Riedel, R., The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion
and normal occlusion. angle orthod, 1952. 22: p. 142-5.
10. Ishikawa, H., et al.,, Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw
relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.
am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2000. 67(2): p. 125-38.
11. Broadbent, B.H., A New X-Ray Technique and Its Application to
Orthodontia - the Introduction of Cephalometric Radiography. Angle
Orthodontist, 1981. 51(2): p. 93-114.
12. Richardson, M., Measurement of dental base relationship. Eur J Orthod, 1982. 4(4): p. 251-6.
13. Camper, P. and T. Cogan, The works of the late Professor Camper, on
the connexion between the science of anatomy and the arts of drawing, painting, statuary ... Illustrated with seventeen plates. A new ed. 1821,
London,: Sold by J. Hearne etc. xxiii, 1 , 175 p.
14. Allen, W.I., Historical Aspects of Roentgenographic Cephalometry. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1963.
49(6): p. 451-&.
15. Ferreira A.P., S.C., Análise Facial Morfovolumétrica sociedade portuguesa de ortopedia dento-facial, 2002. VII nº 1: p. 54 e56.
16. Arnett, G.W. and R.T. Bergman, Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and
treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1993.
103(4): p. 299-312.
17. Negreiros PE, S.V., o efeito da alteração da posição da cabeça (PNC)
sobre as medidas cefalométricas. Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial,
2004. 9(3): p. 59-76.
411.
19. V, G.V.C.M.E.T.M.S.V.C., Estudo comparativo entre avaliações
esqueléticas e do perfil tegumentar utilizadas no diagnóstico ortodôntico sagital Rev. Dent. Press Ortodon. Ortop. Facial 2007. 12(4).
20. CHRISTENSEN, G.J., Current paradigm shifts in dentistry. Dent Today, Feb. 2007. 26(2): p. 90,92,94.
21. Reis S. B., A.J., Filho L. C.,Claro C. A., Análise Facial Subjetiva. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial, 2006. 11(5): p. 159-172.
22. Holdaway, R.A., A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in
orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod, 1984. 85(4): p. 279-
93.
23. CAPELOZZA FILHO, L., Diagnóstico em Ortodontia. Maringá: Dental Press, 2004.
24. Arnett GW, J.S.J., Jone Kim, David R Cummings, Anne Beress, C MacDonald and B.C. Worley, and Robert Bergman. , Soft Tissue
Cephalometric Analysis; Diagnosis and Treatment Planning of Dentofacial Deformity. . Am J Orthod, 1999. 116: p. 239-53.
25. SEKIGUCHI, T.S., B. S., Variability of cephalometric landmarks used for
face growth studies. Am J Orthod, 1972. v. 61, no. 6,: p. 495-500.
26. Richardson, M., Measurement of Dental Base Relationship. European Journal of Orthodontics, 1982. 4(4): p. 251-256.
27. Cooke, M.S. and S.H. Wei, The reproducibility of natural head posture: a
methodological study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1988. 93(4): p.
280-8.
28. V., S., A roentgenographic cephalometric analysis of cephalo-facial-
denta relationships. Am J Orthod 1955. 41: p. 735-764.
29. M, B., Sur lesprojections de la tête et sur un nuveau procédé de
céphalométrie Bull de la société d' Anthopologie de Paris,. 1962. 3: p.
514-544.
30. Von Baer, W.R.B.u.d.Z.e.A.L., Leopold Voss, The primary role of
functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod,, 1961. 55: p. 466-577.
31. Silva C., F.A., Leitão P.,, Autilização do cefalostato como instrumento de
diagnóstico sociedade portuguesa de ortopedia dento-facial, 2002. VII
nº1: p. 7-10.
32. LUNDSTROM, A.L., F., Natural Head Position as a basis for
cephalometric analysis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.,, março 1992.
101(nº3): p. 244-247.
33. ÖZBECK, M.M.K., A. Natural cervical inclination and craniofacial
structure. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop.,St. Louis, 1993. 106(nº6):
p. 584-591.
34. Holdaway RA. apud Steiner CC. KrausBS, R.R., A consideration of the
soft tissue outline for diagnostic and treatment planning.Cephalometrics as a clinical tool. Paper readbefore the Angle Society, Pasadena,
1957.,Vistas in orthodontics. Philadelphia: Lea & Febige 1962: p. 131-61. 35. Freeman, R.S., Adjusting A-N-B angles to reflect the effect of maxillary
position. . Angle Orthodontist, 1981. 51(2): p. 162-71.
J Orthod, 1983. 83: p. 382-390.
37. LEWIS, A.B.R., A. F.; WAGNER, B.,, Pubertal spurts in cranial base and
mMandible. angle orthodontis Appleton, 1985. 55(1): p. 17-30.
38. McNamara, J.A., Jr., , The analisys of errors in orthodontics
measurements Am J Orthod, 1984. 86(6): p. 449-69.
39. Proffit, W., Comtemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed A.H.H.S St. Louis: Mosby, Inc, 2000. Company.
40. Ricketts, R.M., The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth
and development. Angle orthodontis, 1960. 30(3): p. 103-33.
41. Ricketts, R.M., The evolution of diagnosis to computerized
cephalometrics. Am J Orthod, 1969. 55(6): p. 795-803.
42. Philippe, J., Ricketts (technic :the fine square wire). Orthod Fr,, 1969. 39: p. 535-43.
43. Beatty, E.J., A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationship. Am J Orthod, 1975. 68(3): p. 303-15.
44. Langlade, M., Diagnostic Orthodonthique. ed.M.SA.ED Paris, 1981. 45. RM., R., Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an
estimate of its growth. AngleOrthod 1957. 27 (1): p. 14-37.
46. Ricketts, R.M., Esthetics enviroment and the law of lip relation. . Am J Orthod, St. Louis, Apr. 1968. 54(4): p. p. 272 – 289, Apr.
47. Ricketts, R.M., Analysis - The Interim. Angle Orthod, Appleton. Apr. 1970. . 40(2): p. 129-137.
48. STEINER, C.C., Cephalometrics as a clinical tool. In:Riedel RA.Vistas in orthodontics: presented to Altan W.Moore:Philadelphia:Lea e Febiger 1962.
49. McNAMARA JR., J.A.B., E.W.; RIOLO, M.L. , Soft tissue evaluation of
individuals with an ideal occlusion and a well-balanced face. In: McNAMARA JR., J.A. (Ed.). Esthetics and treatment of facial form. Center for Human Growth and Development, craniofacial Growth Series.
Univ. Michigan: Ann Arbor,, 1993. 28: p. 115-146.
50. McNamara, J.A., Jr.,, Amethod of cefhalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod, 1984. 86(6): p. 449-69.
51. Scheideman G.B., B.W., Legan HL,Finn RA, Reisch JS. , Cephalometric
analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod, 1980. 78(4): p. 404-20.
52. ML., M., The primacy of the functional matrices in oro-facial growth. Dent Pract,, 1968. 19: p. 65-73.
53. ML., M., The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod, 1969. 55: p. 466-77.
54. Silva, C.A., Análise geométrica individualizada da harmonia facial. porto:Facies-Centro de Estudos harmonia Facial, 2005. 1: p. 28-34. 55. KASAI, K., oft tissue adaptability to hard tissues in facial profiles. am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998. 113: p. 674-84.
56. Arnett GW, J.J., Kim J,Cummings DR,Beress A, Worley M, et al, Soft
tissue cephalometric anaysis: Diagnosis and tretment planning of dentofacia defomity.am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 116(3): p. 238-53.
57. ZHANG, X.H., M.G.; GRAHAM, G. KIRCHNER, H.L. REDLINE, S.,
Correlations between cephalometric and facial photographic measurements of craniofacial form. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.,
58. HALANOZETIS, D.J.-., 2007, Morphometric correlation between facial
soft tissue profile shape and skeletal pattern in children and adolescents.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 2007 132: p. 450-7
59. SCAVONE JR., H.T., H; GARIB, D.G.; FERREIRA, F.V., Facial profile
evaluation in Japanese-Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well- balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop., 2006. 129(5): p. 1-
721.
60. DIMAGGIO, F.R.C., V.; SFORZA, C.; FERRARIO, V.F,, Photographic
softtissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop., 2007. 132: p. 475-80.
61. SCAVONE JR., Z.-S., W.; VALE-COROTTI, K.M.; NAHÁS, A.C.R., Soft
tissue profile in White Brazilian adults with normal occlusions and well- balanced faces. Angle Orthodontist,, 2008. 78(1): p. 58-63.
62. Grossi V. C. , M.Ê.T., Siqueira V.C. V., Estudo comparativo entre
avaliações esqueléticas e do perfil tegumentar utilizadas no diagnóstico ortodôntico sagital. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial, 2007. 12(4): p.