4. Presentasjon av funn
4.2 Forskningsspørsmål 2: Skoleledelsens refleksjoner
4.2.1 Funn 4: Tverrfaglig team - et system for kvalitetssikring
Para futuros trabalhos apresentam-se as seguintes sugestões de pesquisa:
Replicar a presente pesquisa com uma amostra de empresas de outros setores, além dos ambientalmente mais sensíveis;
Replicar a presente pesquisa com uma amostra maior de países;
Replicar a presente pesquisa em um período de tempo superior ao utilizado neste trabalho, podendo assim compreender melhor a dinâmica das mudanças institucionais.
Replicar a presente pesquisa utilizando outros indicadores para o ambiente institucional, que medem aspectos similares aos apresentados nessa pesquisa.
REFERÊNCIAS
ABREU, M. C. S.; CUNHA, L. T.; BARLOW, C. Y.. Institutional dynamics and organizations affecting the adoption of sustainable development in the United Kingdom and Brazil. Business Ethics: A European Review, v. 24, n.1, jan., 2015.
AGUILERA, R. V.; JACKSON, G.. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, v. 28, v. 3, p. 447-465, 2003.
AHMED, K.; COURTIS, J. K.. Associations between corporate characteristics and disclosure levels in annual reports: a meta-analysis. The British Accounting Review, v. 31, n. 1, p. 35– 61, mar., 1999.
ALI, W.; RIZWAN, M.. Factors influencing corporate social and environmental disclosure (CSED) practices in the developing countries: an institutional theoretical perspective.
International Journal of Asian Social Science, v. 3, n. 3, p. 590-609, 2013.
AMAESHI, K. M. et al.. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Nigeria: western mimicry or indigenous practices? International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility
Research Paper Series, n. 39, 2006.
BALL, R.. Making accounting more international: why, how and how far will it go. Journal
of Applied Corporate Finance, v. 8, n. 3, p. 19–29, 1995.
BARBIERI, J. C.; CAJAZEIRAS, J. E. R.. Responsabilidade social empresarial e empresa
sustentável: da teoria à prática. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2.ed., 2012.
BAUGHN, C. C.; BODIE, N. L.; MCINTOSH, J. C. Corporate social and environmental responsibility in Asian countries and other geographical regions. Corporate Social
Responsibility and Environmental Management, v. 14, p. 189-205, 2007.
BEWLEY, K.; LI, Y.. Disclosure of environmental information by Canadian manufacturing companies: A voluntary disclosure perspective. In: JAGGI, B.; FREEDMAN, M. (ed.).
Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management. Emerald Group Publishing
Limited, p.201-226, 2000.
BIRD, F.; SMUCKER, J. The social responsibilities of international business firms in developing areas. Journal of Business Ethics, v.73, n.1, p.1-9, 2007.
BLOWFIELD, M.; FRYNAS, J. G.. Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, v. 81, n.3, p. 499-513, 2005.
BOLI, J.; HARTSUIKER, D.. World culture and transnational corporations: sketch of a
project. Paper presented at the International Conference on Effects of the Responses to
Globalization. Istanbul, 2001.
BOOZ & COMPANY. The rise of Corporate Social Responsibility: a tool for sustainable
<http://static.wamda.com/web/uploads/resources/BoozCo_The-Rise-of-Corporate-Social- Responsibility.pdf>. Acesso em: 03/07/2015.
BOVAIRD, T.; LÖFFLER, E.. Evaluating the quality of public governance: indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, v. 69, n. 3, p. 313-328, set. 2003.
BRAMMER, S.; JACKSON, G.; MATTEN, D. Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, v. 10, n. 1, p. 3–28, 2012.
BRANCO, M. C.; RODRIGUES, L. L.. Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 83, p. 685–701, 2008.
BROOKES, M.; BREWSTER, C.; WOOD, G. Social relations, firms and society: a study of institutional embeddedness. International Sociology, v.20, n.4, p.403-426, 2005.
BUSSAB, W. O.; FERREIRA, E. C.; GOLDSZMIDT, R. G. B.. Modelos lineares hierárquicos: entendendo e explicando a margem de contribuição financeira do cliente na indústria de cartões de crédito do Brasil. In: ENCONTRO DA ASSOCIAÇÃO NACIONAL DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO E PESQUISA EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO, 31., 2007, Rio de Janeiro
Anais... Rio de Janeiro: ANPAD, set., 2007.
CAMPBELL, J. L.. Institutional analysis and the paradox of corporate social responsibility.
American Behavioral Scientist, v. 49, n. 7, p. 925-938, mar, 2006.
______. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, v. 32, n. 3, p. 946–967, 2007.
CARROLL, A. B.. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance.
Academy of Management Review, v.4, n.4, p.497-505, out, 1979.
______. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, v.34, n. 4, p.39-48, jul-ago, 1991.
______. A history of corporate social responsibility: concepts and practices. In: CRANE, A.; MCWILLIAMS, A.; MATTEN, D.; MOON, J.; SIEGEL, D. (eds.) The Oxford handbook of
corporate social responsibility. Oxford University Press: Inglaterra, p.19-46, 2008.
CARVALHO, C. A. , VIEIRA, M. M. F. Contribuições da perspectiva institucional para a análise das organizações: possibilidades teóricas, empíricas e de aplicação. IN: CARVALHO, C. A. , VIEIRA, M. M. F (org.). Organizações, cultura e desenvolvimento local: a agenda
de pesquisa do Observatório da Realidade Organizacional. Recife: EDUFEPE, 2003.
CASTRO, B. H. R.. Influência da estruturação de departamentos de P&D na inovação: um estudo na indústria de máquinas e implementos agrícolas no Brasil. RAI - Revista de
CHAUHAN, S.; AMIT. A relational study of firm's characteristics and CSR expenditure.
Procedia Economics and Finance, v.11, p. 23–32, 2014.
CHEAH, E.-T. et al.. Drivers of corporate social responsibility attitudes: the demography of socially responsible investors. British Journal of Management, v.22, n.2, p.305-323, 2011. COLLIS, J.; HUSSEY, R. Pesquisa em administração: um guia prático para alunos de graduação e de pós-graduação. 2 ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2005.
CONCEIÇÃO, S. H. et al. Fatores determinantes no disclosure em Responsabilidade social corporativa (RSC): um estudo qualitativo e quantitativo com empresas listadas na Bovespa.
, v. 18, n. 3, p. 461-472, 2011.
CONCEIÇÃO, S. H.; DOURADO, G. B.; SILVA, v ( ): x á v latina. , v. 2, n. 3, p. 17-38, set-dez, 2012. CRONBACH, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, v.16, n.8, p.297-334, 1951.
DAVIS, L.; NORTH, D.. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth: A First Step Towards a Theory of Institutional Innovation. The Journal of Economic History, v. 30, n. 1, p. 131-149, mar , 1970.
DEBRECENY, R.; GRAY, G.; RAHMAN, A.. The determinants of internet financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, v. 21, p. 371–394, 2002.
DELMAS, M. A.. The diffusion of environmental management standards in Europe and in the United States: an institutional perspective. Policy Sciences, v. 35, p. 91-119, 2002.
DHALIWAL, D. et al.. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of
Accounting and Public Policy, v. 33, p. 328-355, 2014.
DIMAGGIO, P. J.;POWELL, W. W.. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, n. 2, p. 147-160, abr, 1983.
DOANE, D.. Market failure: the case for mandatory social and environmental reporting.
Paper presented to IPPR seminar the transparent company, mar, 2002. Disponível em:
<http://www.hapinternational.org/pool/files/doanepaper1.pdf>. Acesso em: 01/07/2015. DROBETZ, W. et al. Corporate social responsibility disclosure: The case of international shipping. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, v. 71, p. 18-44, nov., 2014.
EL GHOUL, S. et al.. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal
of Banking & Finance, v. 35, p. 2388-2406, 2011.
Responsibility. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,
2004.
FERREIRA, J. M. C.; GESACA, S. F.; JERÔNIMO, H. M.. Teorias ecológicas e sociocognitivas. In: FERREIRA, J. M. C.; NEVES, J.; CAETANO, A.. Manual de
psicossociologia das organizações. Lisboa: Escolar editora, p.167-182, 2001.
FIFKA, M. S.. Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective: a review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and
the Environment, v. 22, n.1, p. 1-35, 2013.
FISCHER, T. M.; SAWCZYN, A. A.. The relationship between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance and the role of innovation: evidence from German listed firms. Journal of Management Control, v. 24, n. 1, p. 27–52, 2013.
FORBES. The world's biggest companies. Special report the global 2000. Disponível em: <http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/18/biz_2000global08_The-Global-2000_Counrty.html>. Acesso em: 09/10/2015.
FORTIN, M.. O processo de investigação: da concepção à realização. 2 ed. Loures: Lusociência, 2000.
GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2011.
GÓIS, A. D.; DE LUCA, M. M. M.; VASCONCELOS, A. C.. Determinantes da divulgação dos indicadores de desempenho da GRI nas empresas do Brasil e da Espanha. Revista
Ambiente Contábil, v. 7, n. 1, jan/jun, 2015.
GOLOB, U.; BARTLETT, J. L.. Communicating about corporate social responsibility: a comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, v. 33, n.1, p. 1–9, 2007.
GONÇALVES, R. S.. mpresas brasileiras
de capital aberto (D á ) –
D ( ) v B B , 2011.
GOULART, S.; VIEIRA, M. M. F.; CARVALHO, C. A.. Universidades e desenvolvimento
local: uma abordagem institucional. Porto Alegre: Sagra Luzzatto, p. 23-35, 2005.
GREENE, W. H. Econometric Analysis. 5 ed. Nova Jérsei: Prentice Hall, 2002.
GRECCO, M. C.; M. FILHO, M. A.; SEGURA, L.; SANCHEZ, I. M.; DOMINGUEZ, L.. The voluntary disclosure of sustainable information: a comparative analysis of Spanish and Brazilian companies. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, v. 7, n. 17, p. 45-55, 2013. GRI. GLOBAL REPORTING INICIATIVE. Diretrizes para relatórios de
sustentabilidade, versão 3.1. 2011a. Disponível em: <
https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Brazilian-Portuguese-G3.1.pdf>. Acesso em: 19/06/2015
GRI. GLOBAL REPORTING INICIATIVE. GRI application levels. 2011b. Disponível em: <https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3.1-Application-Levels.pdf>. Acesso em: 02/07/2015
GRI. GLOBAL REPORTING INICIATIVE. ABOUT GRI. 2015. Disponível em: <https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx>. Acesso em: 19/06/2015
HANUSHEK, E.; KIMKO, D. D.. Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations.
The American Economic Review, v. 90, n. 5, p.1184–1208, 2000.
HO, L. J.; TAYLOR, M. E.. An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International
Financial Management and Accounting, v.18, n. 2, 2007.
HOFSTEDE, G.H. National cultures in four dimensions, a research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management and Organization, v. 13 n 1-2, p. 46-74, 1983
HOSSAIN, M. The Extent of Disclosure in Annual Reports of Banking Companies: The Case of India. European Journal of Scientific Research, v. 23, n. 4, p.659-680, 2008.
HOSSAIN, M; HAMMAMI, H. Voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of an emerging country: the case of Qatar. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in
International Accounting, v. 25, p. 255-265, 2009.
HUANG, S. K. The Impact of CEO Characteristics on Corporate Sustainable Development.
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, v.20, n.4, p.234-244,
2013.
IDEMUDIA, U. Corporate social responsibility and developing countries: moving the critical CSR research agenda in Africa forward. Progress in Development Studies, v.11, n.1, p. 1- 18, 2011.
IOANNOU, I; SERAFEIM, G. What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation- level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, v. 43, n. 9, p. 834-864, 2012. J v : bibliometria em artigos internacionais. In: CONGRESSO INTERNACIONAL DE CONTABILIDADE E AUDITORIA, 14., 2013. Anais... Lisboa: Iscal, 2013.
JAMALI, D.; MIRSHAK, R.. Corporate social responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 72, n. 3, p. 243-262, 2007. ______. The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: global, local, substantive or diluted? Journal of Business Ethics, v. 93, p. 181–200, 2010.
______; NEVILLE, B.. Convergence versus divergence of CSR in developing countries: an embedded multi-layered institutional lens. Journal of Business Ethics, v. 102, p. 599-621, 2011.
JIA, Y; LENT, L. V.; ZENG, Y.. Masculinity, testosterone, and financial misreporting.
Journal of Accounting Research, v. 52, n. 5, p. 1195–1246, dez., 2014.
JONES, M. T. The Institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business
Ethics, v. 20, n. 2, p. 163-179, 1999.
KATZ, J.; SWANSON, D.; NELSON, L.. Culture-Based Expectations of Corporate Citizen- ship: A Propositional Framework and Comparison of Four Cultures. The International
Journal of Organizational Analysis, v. 9, n. 2, p. 149–171, 2001.
KAUFMANN, D.; KRAAY, A. Governance indicators: where are we, where should we be going? The World Bank Research Observer, v. 23, n. 1, p. 1-30, 2008.
______; ______; MASTRUZZI, M.. Governance matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators1996-2008. In: WORLD BANK. Policy research working paper
4978, jun., 2009.
______; ______; ZOIDO-LOBATÓN, P. Governance matters. In: WORLD BANK. Policy
research working paper 2196, 1999.
KHLIF, H.; HUSSAINEY, K.; ACHEK, I.. The effect of national culture on the association between profitability and corporate social and environmental disclosure: a meta-analysis.
Meditari Accountancy Research, v. 23, n. 3, p. 296 – 321, 2015.
KOLK, A.; LENFANT, F.. MNC reporting on CSR and conflict in Central Africa. Journal of
Business Ethics, v. 93, p. 241–255, 2010.
LATTERMANN, C.; KUPKE, S.; SCHNEIDER, A. M., Corporate social responsibility and the capabilities based view: a case study of a multinational enterprise. Revue de
l'Organisation Responsable, v. 2, n. 3, p. 18-29, 2007.
LEE, M. P.. A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 10, n.1, p. 53-73, mar, 2008.
LI, S. et al. Corporate social responsibility in emerging markets: the importance of the governance environment. MIR: Management International Review: Journal of
International Business, v.50, n. 5, p. 635 – 654, 2010.
LOPES FÁVERO, L P.. Dados em painel em contabilidade e finanças: teoria e aplicação.
BBR - Brazilian Business Review, v. 10, n. 1, jan-mar, p. 131-156. 2013.
MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. L.; GUARIDO FILHO, E. R.; ROSSONI, L. Campos organizacionais: seis diferentes leituras e a perspectiva de estruturação. Revista
______; GONÇALVES, S. A.. Nota técnica: a teoria institucional. In: CLEGG, S.; HARDY, C.; NORD, W. (Org.). Handbook de estudos organizacionais. São Paulo, v.1, p. 196-219, 1998.
MAROCO, J.; GARCIA-MARQUES, T.. Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questões antigas e soluções modernas? Laboratório de Psicologia, v. 4, n. 1, p. 65-90, 2006.
MATTEN, D.; MOON, J.. “ ” “ x ” : w k
comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, v. 33, n. 2, p. 404-424, 2008. MCWILLIAMS, A.; SIEGE, D. S.; WRIGHT, P. M.. Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, v. 43, n. 1 , p.1-18, jan, 2006. MEIRELES, F. R. da S.
: reflexos do ambiente institucional D
(M ) – v á
á - , Fortaleza, 2014.
MENG, X. H. et al.. The relationship between corporate environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical study in China. Journal of Environmental
Management, v. 145, n. 1, p. 357-367, 2014
MEYER, J. W.; ROWAN, B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, v. 83, n. 2, p. 340-363, set, 1977.
MICHELON, G.; PILONATO, S.; RICCERI, F.. CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2015. Disponível em: <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045235414001051>. Acesso em: 09/11/2015.
MOON, J.; SHEN, X. CSR in China research: salience, focus and nature. Journal of
Business Ethics, v. 94, p. 613–629, 2010.
MOURA-LEITE, R. C.; PADGETT, R. C.. Historical background of corporate social responsibility. Social Responsibility Journal, v. 7, n. 4, p. 528-539, 2011.
MUTTAKIN, M. B.; KHAN, A.; SUBRAMANIAM, N.. Firm characteristics, board diversity and corporate social responsibility: evidence from Bangladesh. Pacific Accounting Review, v. 27, n. 3, p. 353 - 372, 2015.
NATIS, L.. Modelos lineares hierárquicos. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, n. 3, jan./jun., 2001.
NOBES, C.. Towards a general model of the reasons for international differences in financial reporting. Abacus, v. 34, n. 2, p. 162–187, 1998.
OLIVEIRA, J. A. P.. Empresas na sociedade: sustentabilidade e responsabilidade social. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2ed, 2013.
ORLITZKY, M. et al. Unpacking the drivers of corporate social performance: a multilevel, multistakeholder, and multimethod analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, p. 1-20, ago., 2015.
ORIJ, R. Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, v. 23, n. 7, p. 868-889, 2010. QUINELLO, R.. A teoria institucional aplicada à administração. São Paulo: Novatec, 2007.
RINGOV, D.; ZOLLO, M. The impact of national culture on culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, v. 7, n. 4, p. 476-485, 2007.
ROVER, S..
no Brasil (D ) –
v , 2013.
RUFINO, M. A.; MACHADO, M. R.. Fatores determinantes da divulgação de informações voluntária social: evidências empíricas no Brasil. In: CONGRESSO USP DE CONTROLADORIA E CONTABILIDADE, 15, São Paulo, 2015. Anais... São Paulo: FEA/USP, 2015.
SAMPIERI, R. H.; COLLADO, C. F.; LUCIO, P. B. Metodologia de pesquisa. 5 ed. São Paulo: McGraw-Hill, 2013.
SCHADEWITZ, H.; NISKALA, M.. Communication via responsibility reporting and its effect on firm value in Finland. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental
Management, v. 17, p. 96-106, 2010.
SCHWARTZ, M. S.; CARROLL, A. B.. Corporate social responsibility a three-domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, v. 13, n. 4, p. 503-530, 2003.
SCOTT, W. R.. The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 32 , n. 4, p. 493-511, dez , 1987.
______. Institutions and orgazations: ideas and interests. Estados Unidos: Sage Publications, 3ed, 2008.
SELZNICK, P.. A liderança na administração: uma interpretação sociológica. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 1972.
SILVA, T. L. et al. Environmental disclosure – informações sobre resíduos sólidos divulgadas pelas empresas potencialmente poluidoras listadas na BM&FBovespa. Revista
Ambiente Contábil, v. 5, n. 2, p. 229-249, jul./dez. 2013.
STITTLE, J. UK corporate ethical reporting, a failure to inform: some evidence from company annual reports. Business and Society Review, v. 107, n. 3, p. 349–370, 2002. SONAGLIO, C. M. et al.. v z B : á
dados em painel. Economia Aplicada, v. 14, n. 4, 2010.
SULAIMAN, M.; ABDULLAH, N.; FATIMA, A. H.. Determinants of environmental reporting quality in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics, Management and
Accounting, v. 22, n. 1, p. 63-90, 2014.
TANG,L.; LI, H. Corporate social responsibility communication of Chinese and global corporations in China. Public Relations Review, v. 35, n. 3, p. 199–212, 2009.
TEMPEL, A.; WALGENBACH, P. Global standardization of organizational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other. Journal of Management Studies, v.44, n.1, p.1-24, 2007.
THE HOFSTEDE CENTRE. Cultural Tools. Country Comparison. Disponível em: <http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html>. Acesso em: 06/07/2015.
THE WORLD BANK. Data. Indicators. 2015a. Disponível em: <http://data.worldbank.org/indicator>. Acesso em: 07/07/2015.
THE WORLD BANK. Worldwide Governance Indicators. Home. 2015b. Disponível em: <http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home>. Acesso em: 07/07/2015. TOLBERT, P. S.; ZUCKER, L. G.. A institucionalização da teoria institucional. In: CLEGG, S.; HARDY, C.; NORD, W. (Org.). Handbook de estudos organizacionais. São Paulo, v.1, p. 196-219, 1998.
TSCHOPP, D.; WELLS, S.; BARNEY, D.. The institutional promotion of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, v. 12, 2012.
UNDP. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Reports. Human
Development Index (HDI). Disponível em:
<http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdi_series_cartagena.xlsx>. Acesso em: 07/07/2015. VAN DER LAAN, S.. The role of theory in explaining motivation for corporate social : v y v ‘ ’ Australasian Accounting
Business and Finance Journal, v. 3, n. 4, p. 15-29, 2009.
VISSER, W. Corporate Social Responsibility in developing countries. In: CRANE, A.; MCWILLIAMS, A.; MATTEN, D.; MOON, J.; SIEGEL, D. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook
of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 473-499, 2008.
WARTICK, S. L.; COCHRAN, P. L.. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, v.10, n. 4, p. 758-769, out, 1985.
WEF. WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. SCHWAB, K.; SALA-I-MARTIN, X.. The global
competitiveness report 2015-2016. World Economic Forum, 2015
WELCH, B. L. On the comparison of several mean values: an alternative approach.
Biometrika, v.38, n.3/4, p.330-336, 1951.
systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
______. How national are business systems? The role of different state types and complementary institutions in constructing homogenous systems of economic coordination and control. Workshop on National Business Systems in the New Global Context, Oslo, 2003.
YANG, H. H.; GRAIG, R.; FARLEY, A.. A review of Chinese and English language studies on corporate environmental reporting in China. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, v. 28, p. 30-48, maio, 2015.
YOUNG, S.; MARAIS, M.. A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: the implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance: An
International Review, v. 20, n. 5, p. 432–450, 2012.
ZUCKER, L. G.. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American
ANEXO A - Dados do ambiente institucional do Brasil e do Canadá
País Ano VOAC* ETBPO* EFIGO* QLREG* ESTDI* CONC* FIN EDU TRA
Brasil 2007 0,60 0,42 0,46 0,49 0,41 0,48 0,68 0,36 0,60 Brasil 2008 0,60 0,44 0,48 0,51 0,43 0,50 0,66 0,39 0,62 Brasil 2009 0,60 0,53 0,48 0,52 0,46 0,48 0,61 0,43 0,60 Brasil 2010 0,61 0,50 0,49 0,53 0,50 0,50 0,56 0,45 0,58 Brasil 2011 0,59 0,47 0,48 0,53 0,50 0,53 0,61 0,43 0,60 Brasil 2012 0,59 0,51 0,48 0,52 0,48 0,49 0,58 0,42 0,61 Brasil 2013 0,57 0,44 0,48 0,51 0,48 0,48 0,55 0,43 0,59 Brasil 2014 0,58 0,50 0,47 0,49 0,48 0,42 0,52 0,39 0,53 Canadá 2007 0,78 0,69 0,85 0,82 0,86 0,90 0,78 0,75 0,69 Canadá 2008 0,79 0,70 0,85 0,83 0,86 0,90 0,73 0,80 0,70 Canadá 2009 0,79 0,72 0,85 0,84 0,86 0,92 0,67 0,82 0,70 Canadá 2010 0,78 0,68 0,86 0,84 0,86 0,92 0,67 0,81 0,71 Canadá 2011 0,78 0,71 0,86 0,84 0,85 0,90 0,71 0,77 0,72 Canadá 2012 0,79 0,72 0,85 0,84 0,85 0,89 0,69 0,77 0,72 Canadá 2013 0,79 0,71 0,85 0,84 0,85 0,87 0,67 0,75 0,70 Canadá 2014 0,79 0,74 0,85 0,87 0,88 0,86 0,70 0,75 0,71
Fonte: The World Bank (2015b) e WEF (2015).
Nota: VOAC: Voz e Accountability; ETBPO: Estabilidade Política; EFIGO: Eficiência Governamental; QLREG: Qualidade Regulatória; ESTDI: Estado de Direito; CONC: Controle de Corrupção; FIN: Financing through local equity market; EDU: Quality of the education system; TRA: Cooperation in labor-employer relations.