Clinical paper
Expired carbon dioxide during newborn resuscitation as predictor of outcome
Kari Holte
a,b,*, Hege Ersdal
b,c, Claus Klingenberg
d,e, Joar Eilevstjønn
f, Hein Stigum
g, Samwel Jatosh
h, Hussein Kidanto
i, Ketil Størdal
a,g,jaDepartmentofPaediatricsandAdolescenceMedicine,ØstfoldHospitalTrust,Norway
bFacultyofHealthSciences,UniversityofStavanger,Norway
cCriticalCareandAnaesthesiologyResearchGroup,StavangerUniversityHospital,Norway
dDepartmentofPaediatricsandAdolescenceMedicine,UniversityHospitalofNorthNorway,Tromsø,Norway
ePaediatricResearchGroup,FacultyofHealthSciences,UniversityofTromsø-ArcticUniversityofNorway,Tromsø,Norway
fStrategicResearchDepartment,LaerdalMedical,Stavanger,Norway
gNorwegianInstituteofPublicHealth,Oslo,Norway
hHaydomLutheranHospital,Mbulu,Manyara,Tanzania
iMedicalCollege,AgakhanUniversity,DaresSalaam,Tanzania
jDepartmentofPaediatricResearch,FacultyofMedicine,UniversityofOslo,Norway
Abstract
Aim:ToexploreandcompareexpiredCO2(ECO2)andheartrate(HR),duringnewbornresuscitationwithbag-maskventilation,aspredictorsof24-h outcome.
Methods:ObservationalstudyfromMarch2013toJune2017inaruralTanzanianhospital.Side-streammeasuresofECO2,ventilationparameters, HR,clinicalinformation,and24-houtcomewererecordedinlivebornbag-maskventilatednewbornswithinitialHR<120bpm.Weanalysedthedata usinglogisticregressionmodelsandcomparedareasunderthereceiveroperatingcurves(AUC)forECO2andHRwithinthreeselectedtimeintervals afteronsetofventilation(0 30s,30.1 60sand60.1 300s).
Results:Among434includednewborns(medianbirthweight3100g),378werealiveat24h,56haddied.BothECO2andHRwereindependently significantpredictorsof24-houtcome,withnodifferencesinAUCs.Inthefirst60sofventilation,ECO2addedextrapredictiveinformationcomparedto HRalone.After60s,ECO2lostsignificancewhenadjustedforHR.In70%ofnewbornswithinitialECO2<2%andHR<100bpm,ECO2reached2%
beforeHR100bpm.Survivalat24hwasreducedby17%perminutebeforeECO2reached2%and44%perminutebeforeHRreached100bpm.
Conclusions:HigherlevelsandafasterriseinECO2andHRduringnewbornresuscitationwereindependentlyassociatedwithimprovedsurvival comparedtopersistinglowvalues.ECO2increasedbeforeHRandmayserveasanearlierpredictorofsurvival.
Keywords:Newbornresuscitation,Bag-maskventilation,Expiredcarbondioxide,Heartrate,24Houroutcome
Abbreviations:AUC,areaunderthereceiveroperatingcurves;BMV,bag-maskventilation;BW,birthweight;bpm,beatsperminute;ECO2,expired carbondioxide;GA,gestationalage;HR,heartrate;Mbar,millibar;ROC,receiveroperatingcharacteristics;VTE,expiredtidalvolume.
* Correspondingauthorat:DepartmentofPaediatricsandAdolescenceMedicine,P.O.Box300,ØstfoldHospital,N-1714Grålum,Norway.
E-mailaddress:[email protected](K.Holte).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.018
0300-9572/©2021TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by/4.0/).
Availableonlineatwww.sciencedirect.com
Resuscitation
j our na lho me pa g e :ww w. e l s e v i e r. c om/ l o ca t e / re s usc i ta t i on
Introduction
Adequate ventilation is the key to successful resuscitation in newborns who fail to initiatespontaneous breathing at birth. An increaseinheartrate(HR)iscurrentlyconsideredthemostimportant indicator for apositiveresponse to ventilations. HR response is, however,anindirectmeasuredependentonsufficientoxygendelivery totheheart,andgivesnodirectfeedbackonlungaerationandairway patency.The2015internationalconsensusfornewbornresuscitation mentioned expired carbon dioxide (ECO2) as a potentially more sensitivemarkerofeffectiveventilation,andstatedthatmoreresearch isneededtodeterminewhetherECO2monitoringisusefultoassess responsetoresuscitation.1
Atbirthasuccessfultransitionfromplacentaltopulmonarygas exchangeiscriticalforsurvival.2ECO2mayserveasamarkerforlung aeration and pulmonary circulation.3,4 ECO2 also depends on ventilation technique, and is used by resuscitation teams to aid recognizingairwayobstruction,maskleakandcorrectendotracheal tube placement.5 9 In cardiopulmonary resuscitation after the newbornperiod,persistinglowECO2isassociatedwithdecreased survival.10 12Resultsfromclinicalstudiesinmainlypretermnew- borns suggest that ECO2 increases before HR during positive pressureventilationinthedeliveryroom.3,13,14Lindeetal.foundthat medianECO2inthefirstminuteofbag-maskventilation(BMV)atbirth waslowerinnewbornswhodiedbefore24hofagecomparedto survivors.15
TheaimsofthisstudyweretoexploreECO2asapredictorof24-h outcome(survivalvsdeath)duringnewbornresuscitationwithBMV, andtocomparethepredictiveinformationofECO2andHR.
Methods
Studydesignandsetting
ThisdescriptiveobservationalstudyispartofSaferBirths,aresearch project on labour surveillance and newborn resuscitation in low- incomesettings.16WeuseddatacollectedbetweenMarch1st2013 andJune1st2017atHaydomLutheranHospital,aruralTanzanian referralhospitalwith3600 4600deliveriesannually.17
ThelocalprocedurefornewbornresuscitationfollowedHelping BabiesBreathe(HBB)emphasizingstimulationandearlyinitiationof BMV,excluding chestcompressions,intubationandmedication.18 Newbornresuscitation was mainlythe responsibilityof midwives.
Cord clamping was done prior to BMV. After resuscitation the midwivesdecided,basedontheclinicalcondition,whethertokeepthe newbornwiththemotherortransfertoaneonatalwardofferingbasic careincludingantibiotics,phototherapy,andintravenousfluids,butno respiratorysupportexceptsupplementaloxygenbynasalcannula.19
Datacollection
Anewbornresuscitationmonitor(LaerdalGlobalHealth,Stavanger, Norway)wasmountedonthewallaboveallresuscitationtables.20 Eachmonitorwasequippedwithaself-inflatingbag(230mlstandard or320mlUprightbag-mask,LaerdalMedical,Stavanger,Norway) and adry-electrode ECGsensor to be easilyplaced around the newborns’trunk.Sensorsforside-streammeasuresofECO2(ISATM, Masimo,Irvine,California,USA),pressure(Freescalesemiconductor,
Austin,Texas,USA)andflow(AcutronicMedicalSystems,Hirzel, Switzerland)wereplacedbetweenthemaskandbag.Themonitors starteddatarecordingautomaticallywhenused,andprovidedHR feedbackduringresuscitation.ECO2andventilationparameterswere notdisplayed.Pulseoximetrywasnotavailable.Trainednon-medical researchassistants observed alldeliveries documenting perinatal information,timeintervals,and24-houtcomes.
Weincludedalllive-bornnewbornswithinitialHR<120beatsper minute(bpm)andavailabledataforbothECO2andHR(n=434) (Fig.1).Stillborns,definedlocallyasApgarscore0atboth1and5min orgestationalage(GA)<28weeks,wereexcluded.Wealsoexcluded newbornsventilatedwithpositiveend-expiratorypressureaspartofa concurrentrandomizedtrialasthiscouldpotentiallyaffectECO2and HR.21Datafromthesamecohortofnewbornswereusedinarecently published article on predictors of ECO2 during newborn resuscitation.22
Regressionmodels
Tostudytheassociationsbetween24-houtcome(survivalvs.death) andthecovariates ECO2,HR,andexpiredtidalvolume(VTE),we performedlogisticregressionanalyses.Inthemainmodels,ECO2and HRwerestudiedindependently(unadjusted).Insecondarymodels, ECO2andHRweremutuallyadjusted,andthenadjustedforVTE. ECO2wasrecordedasmaximumpercentofexpiredairperventilation.
AllobservationsofECO2,regardlessofleakandVTE,wereincluded.
HRwassmoothedperapproximately12beatsperalgorithminthe monitor.
ExploringgraphsmadetodisplayECO2andHRbytimeinthefirst 300sofventilation(SupplementalFig.1),weselectedthreetime intervals(0 30s,30.1 60s,and60.1 300s)forfurtheranalyses.
DuetolargevariationsinespeciallyECO2(betweenventilations),we decidedtostudyboththesinglemaximumvalueandthemedianofall recordedECO2-andHR-valuespernewbornwithineachtimeinterval.
We also studied time from first delivered ventilation until ECO2
reached2%andHR100bpminsecondarymodels.Todetermine time to ECO2 2%, we used ECO2 smoothed as means per 5
Fig.1–Flowchart.
ventilations.ForVTE,themedianvaluepernewbornwithineachtime intervalwasused.
Non-linearassociationsbetweenECO2,HRand24-houtcome wereassessed bycategorical logisticregressionmodels. Dueto potentialdifferencesinpathophysiologybetweenpretermorsmallfor GAnewbornscomparedtotermnewborns,stratifiedanalysesforbirth weight(BW)2500gvs.<2500gwereperformed.
Furtheranalyses
Receiveroperatingcharacteristics(ROC)curvesgraphicallydisplay sensitivityasafunctionof1-specificityforallpossiblecutoffvaluesof thetestparametersindiagnostictestswithbinaryoutcomes.23The areaundertheROCcurves(AUC) givesameasureforthetotal predictive information of the test parameters. To estimate the classificationaccuracyofECO2andHRaspredictorsof24-hsurvival, wemadeROCcurvesandcalculatedAUCforpredictedsensitivity andspecificityofthecovariates,basedontheresultsofthemain (unadjusted) logistic regression models. We used Pearson Chi SquareteststocomparetheAUCsformaximumECO2andHRwithin eachtimeinterval.Wefurtherplottedsensitivityandspecificityfor selectedcut-offvaluesformaximumECO2(1,2and4%)andHR (60,100and120bpm)intheROCs.WealsocalculatedAUCsforthe secondary (adjusted) models to estimate the total predictive informationofallincludedcovariates.
TheECO2andHRthresholdsof2%and100bpm,respectively, werestudiedinmoredetail.AmongnewbornswithinitialECO2<2%
andHR<100bpm,wecomparedtimeintervalsfromfirstventilation untilECO22%andHR100bpm.Weperformedposthocanalyses usingWilcoxonranksumteststoassessfordifferencesininitialHR, Apgar scores, BW and ventilation factors (VTE and mask leak) dependingonwhichthresholdwasreachedfirst.
Data processing and analyses were performed using Matlab (MathWorks,Natick,MA,USA)andStataSEversion16(StataCorp., Texas,USA).Significancelevelwassettop<0.05.
Ethicalconsiderations
EthicalapprovalwasgrantedbytheNationalInstituteforMedical Research in Tanzania (Ref. NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol.IX/1434) and the
Regional Committee for Medical andHealth Research Ethicsfor WesternNorway(Ref.2013/110).Allwomenwereinformed.Consent wasnotconsiderednecessarybytheethicalcommittees.
Results
Among 434 live born newborns who received BMV, with first registeredHR<120bpmandcompletedata,378survivedto24h, 56(12.9%)died(Fig.1).SurvivorshadsignificantlyhigherBWand Apgar scoresthan deaths andwereventilated for ashortertime (Table1).
ECO2andHRaspredictorsforsurvival
Both ECO2and HR increased during BMV, withhigher levels in survivorscomparedtodeaths(Fig.2andSupplementalFig.1).Odds ratiosfor24-hsurvivalincreasedsignificantlywithhigherlevelsof ECO2andHR(Table2).InthefirstminuteofBMV,maximumECO2
and HR were both significant predictors for survival in adjusted models,indicatingindependenteffects.Afterthefirstminute,ECO2
lost significance when adjusted for HR. Adjusting for VTE non- significantlyincreasedtheoddsratiosforsurvivalbyECO2.
Whenstudiedindependently,wefoundnosignificantdifferences inAUCsformaximumECO2comparedtoHR(Fig.3).Thoughnot significant,maximumECO2gaveslightlylargerAUCswithinthefirst minuteofBMV.Afterthefirstminute,AUCforHRwaslargest.AUCs weresimilarusingmedianscomparedtomaximumspertimeinterval forbothECO2andHR(Table2).
Sensitivityandspecificityforselectedcut-offsofmaximumECO2
andHR withintimeintervalsareplottedin ROCcurvesin Fig.3.
ReachingECO22%withinthefirst30sofventilationhadahigher sensitivitytopredict24-hsurvivalthanHR100bpm(80%versus 68%).Afteroneminuteofventilation,ECO22%hadslightlylower sensitivitythanHR100bpm(94%versus99%).
In categoricalmodels,we foundno non-linear associationsto support decreased survival with high levels of ECO2 or HR (Supplemental Table 1). Thepredictive information ofECO2 and HRonsurvivalwereweakerinnewbornswithBW<comparedto 2500g(SupplementalTable2).
Table1–Comparisonofdemographicanddeliveryroomdatabetweensurvivorsanddeathsat24h.
Survivors Deaths
n n p-value
Birthweight(grams) 378 3100(2780,3450) 56 3000(2500,3200) 0.01
Birthweight<2500g,n=60(14%) 46 12% 14 25% 0.01
Gestationalage(weeks) 356 38(37,40) 47 38(36,39) 0.46
Gestationalage<37weeks,n=97(22%) 85 21% 12 22% 0.86
Female,n=169(39%) 146 41% 23 39% 0.73
CaesareanSection,n=215(50%) 182 59% 33 48% 0.13
Timefrombirthtocordclamping(seconds) 376 22(12,57) 55 18(13,49) 0.37
Apgarat1min 378 7(5,7) 56 4(3,5) <0.001
Apgarat5min 378 10(8,10) 56 7(4,10) <0.001
TimefrombirthtofirstBMV(seconds) 375 125(84,160) 54 111(77,158) 0.49
TimefromfirsttolastBMV(seconds) 378 162(71,317) 56 624(227,1358) <0.001
Dataaredisplayedasmedians(IQR)ornumbers(%).P-valueswerecalculatedbyWilcoxonsranksumtestorPearsonsChi2testasappropriate.
HR=heartrate,BMV=bag-maskventilation.
Timetothresholds
Thetime toreach ECO2 2% andHR 100 bpm,in analyses includingonlynewbornswithinitialmeasuresbelowthethresholds, wassignificantlylowerinsurvivorscomparedtodeaths(Table3).
Oddsratio(95%CI)forsurvivalperminuteincreaseintimetoreach ECO22%was0.83(0.71,0.97)comparedto0.56(0.40,0.78)per minute before HR reached 100 bpm. Thus, 24-h survival was reducedbyapproximately17%perminutebeforeECO2reached2%
and44%perminutebeforeHRreached100bpm.
A majority of newborns (159/226, 70%) who reached both thresholds,crossedECO22% beforeHR100bpm.Thiswas evenly distributed between thegroups (131/188 (70%) survivors comparedto28/38(74%)deaths,p=0.62).Newbornswhoreached HR100bpmfirsthadlowermedianVTE(3.9(1.0 8.2)vs.5.6(2.9 10.1)ml/kg,p=0.007)andahigherleak(64(35 83)vs.45(22 71)%, p= 0.005)in ventilations priorto reachingthethreshold comparedtonewbornswhoreachedECO22%first.Timetoreach HR100bpmwasindependentofwhichthresholdwasreachedfirst (31(21 61)s),buttimetoreachECO22%wassignificantlylongerin newbornswhocrossedHR100bpmfirst(12(5 29)vs.67(39 120)s,p<0.001).WefoundnodifferencesininitialHR,Apgarscore orBWdependingonwhichthresholdwasreachedfirst.
Discussion
AssociationbetweenHRandoutcomeinnewbornresuscitationiswell established,andacornerstoneforrecommendationstoventilateifHR is<100bpm.15,19,24 27
NewinthisstudyisthatECO2measured duringBMVatbirthcanalsoserveasapredictorofsurvival.Wefound ECO2tobeanearliermarkerof24-hsurvivalthanHR.Afterthefirst
minuteof ventilation,ECO2addedno extrapredictiveinformation comparedtoHR.
ThemainfindingofhigherlevelsofECO2asapredictorofsurvival is similar to results from cardiopulmonary resuscitation after the newbornperiod.11,12However,newbornsinneedofpositivepressure ventilationatbirtharerarelyincardiacarrest.Inarecentstudyof apnoeicnewborns,thefirstrecordedHRwasdistributedintwopeaks around60and165bpm.25Thus,anincreaseinECO2duringnewborn resuscitation,isusuallynotasignofreturnofspontaneouscirculation, but may be seen as a marker for established pulmonary gas exchange.
MeasuredvaluesofECO2duringmaskventilationwillgenerallybe lowerthaninintubatednewbornsduetodilutioninalargerdeadspace andoccurrenceofleakandobstructedairway.Noexclusionscanbe donewheninterpretingmeasuredvaluesduringongoingresuscita- tion,andtheventilationtechniqueispotentiallyrelevantforsurvival.
Wethereforedecidedtoretainallobservations.Thismayexplainthe largevariationinECO2betweenventilations,andalowermedian ECO2inourresultsthaninstudieswhereexclusionsofventilations withlowVTEorhighleakweredone.3,4,28,29
As ECO2 during BMV is highly dependent on ventilation parameters, especially VTE,6,22 inadequate ventilation cannot be ruledoutasacontributingexplanationforlowECO2innon-surviving newborns.However,weproposethatthereasonforlowerECO2in deaths compared to survivors was mainly a more severely compromisedclinicalconditionatbirth.Priorstudiesfromthesame studysitehaveestimatedthataround60%of24-hnewborndeaths wereduetointrapartumrelatedevents(birthasphyxiaandmeconium aspirationsyndrome).30,31 Despiteapresumptivelargerimpactof ventilationtechniqueonmedianscomparedtomaximums,wefound maximumECO2withintheselectedtimeintervaltopredictsurvivalas good as medians. If newborn death was often associated with inadequateVTE,wewouldexpectadjustmentforVTEtoreduceOR andAUCinmodelswithECO2.However,adjustingforVTEinour analyses non-significantly increased the predictive information, especially of median ECO2. This suggests against inadequate ventilation as a major cause of death, but rather points to low ECO2withsimultaneouslyhighVTEasasignofamorecompromised clinicalcondition.
Threepriorsmallerstudiesofmainlypretermnewbornsinhigh resourced settings have shown a significant increase in ECO2
preceding HR response during mask ventilation in newborn resuscitation.3,13,14 Different from these studies, our study was performed in a larger sample of mainly term newborns in rural Tanzania.Inconcordancewiththepreviousstudies,wefoundthat among newborns who reached both predefined thresholds, 70%
crossedECO22%beforeHR100bpm.ThisunderpinsECO2as anearliermarkerfortreatmentresponsethanHR.Wealsofounda groupwhoreachedHR100bpmbeforeECO22%.AlowerVTE
and higher leakin thisgroup,suggest suboptimalventilations as explanation for theslowerrise in ECO2. Becausethere were no differencesintimetoHR100bpmforthosewhoreachedHR100 bpm first compared to those who reached ECO2 2% first, we speculatethatthesenewbornswerelikelylessseverelyasphyxiated, despitethelowinitialHR,andmayhavehadsome spontaneous breathingandintactreflexes.ThedelayfrombirthuntilBMVwas startedmayhavecontributedtoincreaseddifferencesinECO2and HRbetweenmildandseverelycompromisednewborns.
SlightdifferencesinpredictivevalueofECO2andHRinnewborns withBW<2500gcomparedto2500g,maybeduetoahigherriskof Fig.2–ECO2andHRbytimeinsurvivorscomparedto
deathsinthefirst60sofbag-maskventilation.
ECO2increased before HR in amajority ofnewborns, survivorshadhigherlevelsofECO2andHRthandeaths.
Thegraphsaresmoothed localpolynomial plotsofall measured values for ECO2 and HR in all included newborns.
ECO2=expiredCO2,HR=heartrate.
deathbyothercausesthanbirthasphyxiainnewbornswhowere pretermorsmallforGA.30
Toourknowledge,thisisthefirststudytocompareECO2andHR measured in the delivery room as predictors of 24-h survival in newbornswhoreceiveBMVatbirth.Theuniqueresearchinfrastruc- turecomprisingbothcontinuousprospectiveobserver-monitoredand automaticallyrecordedbiomedicalsignal-dataofalargecohortof newbornsisamajorstrength.Data werecollectedinarurallow- incomesettingwithhighmorbidity,longtransportandpotentialdelay forcomplicateddeliveriestobeassisted,representativeforwhere most newborn deathsoccur.32 The local resuscitation procedure followedHBB.18 Advancedneonatal careand respiratory support after initial resuscitation, including continuous positive airway pressure therapy, were not available. This likely affected 24-h survival,andthustheresultsmaynotbegeneralizabletoallsettings.
Variation in clinical condition between included newborns and experience between providers will naturally occur in all studies performed in real life situations. This make the results more representativefornewbornsinneedforrespiratorysupportatbirth,
but is also alimitation assome newborns may have had some spontaneous breathingand some mayhavereceived suboptimal care.
Largebreath-to-breathvariationmakesECO2measuredduring BMV potentially difficult to interpret in clinical situations. Finding maximumECO2togiveasgoodpredictiveinformationasmedian values,wesuggestusingthehighestobservedvalueswithintime intervalsifECO2shouldbeutilisedasprognosticinformationduring newbornresuscitation.
Plottingselectedcut-offvaluesformaximumECO2andHRinROC curves,we foundthatchoosinglowercut-offswould giveamore sensitive,butlessspecificpredictivetestforsurvivalthanhighercut- off values. ECO2 2% is approximately equivalent to a partial pressureof15mmHgor2kPa,whichisthelimitforcolourchangein colorimetricECO2-sensors.14Thismaybeareasonablechoiceto indicate successfullungaerationandfavourableprognosisduring BMVofasphyxiatednewborns.
ThedualnatureofECO2asbothamarkerforseverityoftheclinical condition and of ventilation quality,22 makes ECO2-monitoring Table2–Logisticregressionmodelsandareaunderreceiveroperatingcharacteristicscurves(AUC)for24-h survivalbymaximum(upperpanel)andmedian(lowerpanel)expiredCO2andheartratepernewbornforthethree selectedtimeintervals.
Mainmodels Secondarymodels
Unadjusted Mutualadjustment
ECO2/HR
Adjustedfor ECO2/HRandVTE
a
MaximumECO2andHR n OR(95%CI) AUCb OR(95%CI) AUCc OR(95%CI) AUCc
0 30sofBMV 422
ECO2 Per1ppincrease 1.31(1.17,1.46)d 0.72 1.24(1.10,1.39)d 0.73 1.27(1.12,1.44)d 0.74 HR Per10bpmincrease 1.18(1.09,1.28)d 0.67 1.10(1.00,1.20)f 1.10(1.00,1.20)f
30.1 60sofBMV 363
ECO2 Per1ppincrease 1.26(1.13,1.40)d 0.69 1.17(1.04,1.32)e 0.69 1.18(1.02,1.22)f 0.69 HR Per10bpmincrease 1.18(1.09,1.28)d 0.66 1.11(1.02,1.22)f 1.12(1.02,1.22)e
60.1 300sofBMV 354
ECO2 Per1ppincrease 1.18(1.07,1.32)e 0.62 1.06(0.95,1.19) 0.64 1.07(0.95,1.20) 0.68 HR Per10bpmincrease 1.28(1.17,1.40)d 0.64 1.25(1.13,1.38)d 1.27(1.14,1.41)d MedianECO2andHR
0 30sofBMV 422
ECO2 Per1ppincrease 1.43(1.17,1.74)d 0.65 1.31(1.08,1.60)e 0.71 1.46(1.16,1.83)d 0.74 HR Per10bpmincrease 1.28(1.13,1.45)d 0.68 1.23(1.09,1.40)d 1.22(1.07,1.38)e
30.1 60sofBMV 363
ECO2 Per1ppincrease 1.27(1.08,1.49)e 0.65 1.15(0.97,1.37) 0.67 1.21(0.99,1.47) 0.67 HR Per10bpmincrease 1.16(1.07,1.25)d 0.65 1.11(1.02,1.22)f 1.12(1.02,1.22)f
60.1 300sofBMV 354
ECO2 Per1ppincrease 1.20(1.02,1.40)f 0.61 1.00(0.84,1.21) 0.63 1.07(0.88,1.29) 0.67 HR Per10bpmincrease 1.20(1.11,1.29)d 0.63 1.19(1.09,1.31)d 1.20(1.09,1.32)d
ECO2=expiredCO2,HR=heartrate,OR=OddsRatio,pp=percentpoint,bpm=beatsperminute,VTE=expiredvolume,BMV=bag-maskventilation,AUC=area underthereceiveroperatorcurve.
ThemainmodelspresentunadjustedORof24-hsurvivalforbothECO2andHRindependently.ThesecondarymodelspresentORof24-hsurvivalfor1)ECO2and HRwhenmutuallyadjustedand2)ECO2andHRwhenadjustedforeachotherandforthemedianVTEwithineachtimeinterval.TheAUCvaluesdisplayed,were calculatedbasedontheresultsofthecorrespondinglogisticregressionmodels.Newborns(n)withavailabledataforbothECO2andHRwithineachtimeinterval wereincluded.
aMedianVTEturnedsignificantwithnegativeimpactonsurvival30sandbetween60.1 300sofventilationinmodelswithmedianECO2andbetween60.1 300 sinmodelswithHR.MedianVTEwasnotassociatedwithsurvivalinunadjustedmodels.
bReceiveroperatingcharacteristicscurvesandAUCwith95%confidenceintervalsformaximumECO2andHRintheunadjustedmodels,andstatisticalteststo assessfordifferences,aredisplayedinFig.3.
cAUCreportedforadjustedmodelsdescribesthecombinedpredictiveinformationofalltheincludedparametersinthemodel.
dp<0.001.
ep<0.01.
fp<0.05.
potentiallyusefulduringresuscitationforprognosticinformationandto helpimproveventilations.However,thedualityalsoimpliespitfallsfor theinterpretation.ProvidersmustbeawarethatlowECO2mayhave severalcauses,includinghighleak,airwayobstruction,unaerated lungsorcompromisedpulmonarycirculation.3,4,6,22Theresultsofthis studyindicatethatpersistinglowECO2may,likepersistinglowHR,be usedtosupportdecisionstodiscontinueresuscitation.ECO22%or HR100shouldencouragefurtherefforts,eveninseeminglynon- viablenewborns.However,wefoundlowspecificitiesofECO2orHR used as tests to predict survival, and strongly advice against
dependingon thisalone.Theinformationmustbe combinedwith thorough considerations taking the quality of given ventilations, clinical responses, duration of resuscitation and availability of advancedneonatalcareintoaccount.
Importantly,HRwastheonlydisplayedparameterinthisstudy, andthusthemidwivescouldnotadjustventilationtechniqueasa response to changes in ECO2. A feedback on ECO2 may help providersimproveventilationtechnique,whichmayfurtherimprove prognosisandthepredictiveinformationbyECO2.Wedonotthinkthat ECO2shouldreplaceHRforprognosticinformationduringnewborn Fig.3–ReceiveroperatingcharacteristicscurvesformaximumECO2andHRwithintimeintervalsaspredictorsfor24- hsurvival.
ThegraphsdisplayROCcurvesformaximumECO2andHRwithinthethreeselectedtimeintervalsafterstartof ventilation(A:0 30s,B:30.1 60s,andC:60.1 300s)aspredictorsfor24-hsurvival.Sensitivityandspecificityfor selectedcut-offvaluesofmaximumECO2(leftpanel;ECO21,2,and4%)andHR(rightpanel;HR60,100,and120 bpm)areplotted.
ComparisonofAUCforECO2andHR(PearsonsChi2-test).
A:AUCformaximumECO2=0.72(0.65,0.79),AUCformaximumHR=0.67(0.58,0.76),p=0.21.
B:AUCformaximumECO2=0.69(0.60,0.78,AUCformaximumHR=0.66(0.56,0.76),p=0.56.
C:AUCformaximumECO2=0.62(0.53,0.71),AUCformaximumHR=0.64(0.54,0.64),p=0.74.
ECO2 =expired CO2in percent ofexpired air, HR = heartrate inbeats per minute, ROC= Receiver Operating Characteristics,AUC=areaundertheROCcurves.
resuscitation.However,beinganearlierandmoredirectmarkerof effective ventilation, ECO2 may add useful information. In low resourced settings, colorimetric end-tidal CO2-detectors may be moreeasilyavailablethanHRmonitoring.14Furtherclinicaltrialswith ECO2-feedbacktotheproviderareneededtoaddressthepractical valuebeforeECO2-monitoringduringBMVinnewbornresuscitation couldberecommendedforroutineclinicaluse.
Conclusions
ECO2duringBMVinthedeliveryroomcanpredict24-hsurvival.ECO2
increasedbeforeHRinmostcases.ECO2mayserveasanearly markerforseverityofclinicalcondition,ventilationquality,treatment responseandprognosisduringnewbornresuscitation.
Funding sources
ThestudywassupportedbytheLaerdalfoundationandtheResearch Council of Norway through the Global Health and Vaccination Program (GLOBVAC), project number 228203. Dr. Holte was supportedbytheSouth-EasternNorwayRegionalHealthAuthority.
Financial disclosure
Theauthorshavenofinancialrelationshipsrelevanttothisarticleto disclose.Theexternalfundingsourceshadnoroleinstudydesign, datacollection,dataanalysis,datainterpretation,writingofthereport, orinthedecisiontosubmitthepaperforpublication.
Conflicts of interest
JoarEilevstjønnisanemployeeatLaerdalMedical.Theotherauthors havenopotentialconflictsofinteresttodisclose.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Holtedesignedthestudy,carriedouttheanalyses,anddraftedthe initialmanuscript.ErsdalandKlingenbergcontributedtostudydesign, analysis and writing. Ersdal also planned and supervised data collection,andistheprincipalinvestigatoroftheSaferBirthsstudy group.Eilevstjønndesignedtheequipmentusedfordatacollection, gavetechnicalsupport,extractedandprocesseddataandcontributed to analysingthedata.Stigumwas thestudystatistician providing supervisionandqualitycontrolofthestatisticalanalyses.Kidantoand Jatoshcoordinatedandsuperviseddatacollection.Størdalconcep- tualizedanddesignedthestudytogetherwiththefirstauthor,and contributedconsiderablytodataanalysesandinthewritingprocess.
Allauthorsreviewedandrevisedthemanuscriptcritically,approved thefinalmanuscriptassubmittedandagreetobeaccountableforall aspectsofthework.
Acknowledgements
We want to thank all contributors to the study, especially the participants - mothers and childen andall midwives, research assistantsandresearchnursesatHaydomLutheranHospital.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary materialrelatedtothisarticlecanbefound,inthe onlineversion,atdoi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.
018.
REFERENCES
1.PerlmanJM,WyllieJ,KattwinkelJ,etal.Part7:Neonatal Resuscitation:2015Internationalconsensusoncardiopulmonary Table3–ComparisonoftimetoexpiredCO22%andheartrate100bpmbetweensurvivorsanddeathsat24h.
Survivors Deaths p-value
ExpiredCO2(ECO2)
TimefromfirstBMVuntilECO22%(seconds)a 16(6,47) 37(11,93) 0.06d
TimefrombirthuntilECO22%(seconds)b 137(95,197) 149(119,280) 0.12d
NumberofnewbornswithECO22%infirstBMV 109(29%) 4(7%) 0.001e
NumberofnewbornswhodidnotreachECO22%whilemonitoredc 15(4%) 8(14%) 0.001c
Heartrate(HR)
TimefromfirstBMVuntilHR100bpma 27(19,50) 47(24,127) <0.001d
TimefrombirthuntilHR100bpmb 151(110,209) 185(125,274) 0.02d
NumberofnewbornswithHR100bpmatstartofBMV 108(29%) 4(7%) 0.001e
NumberofnewbornswhodidnotreachedHR100bpmwhilemonitoredc 4(1%) 8(14%) <0.001e
aNewbornswithECO2<2%(254survivorsand44deaths)orHR<100bpm(266survivorsand44deaths)atorafterstartofBMVwereincluded.
bThetimesgivenarebasedonavailabledata.ECO2-datawasnotavailablebeforeinitiationofBMV,HR-datadependedonplacementoftheHR-sensoraround thenewborn’strunk.ECO2>2%and/orHR>100bpmmayhaveoccurredbetweenbirthandinitiationofBMVinsomenewborns.
cThetimeintervalwithmonitoringvariedbetweennewbornsandcouldbeshorterthan5mininnewbornswithfastclinicalimprovement,andlongerinnewbornsin needforprolongedventilation.
dWilcoxonsranksumtestECO2=ExpiredCO2,BMV=bag-maskventilation,HR=heartrate.
ePearsonsChi2-test.
resuscitationandemergencycardiovascularcaresciencewith treatmentrecommendations.Circulation2015;132:S204 241.
2.tePasAB,DavisPG,HooperSB,MorleyCJ.Fromliquidtoair:
breathingafterbirth.JPediatrics2008;152:607 11.
3.HooperSB,FourasA,SiewML,etal.ExpiredCO2levelsindicate degreeoflungaerationatbirth.PLoSOne2013;8:e70895.
4.MurthyV,O’Rourke-PotockiA,DattaniN,etal.Endtidalcarbon dioxidelevelsduringtheresuscitationofprematurelyborninfants.
EarlyHumDev2012;88:783 7.
5.FinerNN,RichW,WangC,LeoneT.Airwayobstructionduringmask ventilationofverylowbirthweightinfantsduringneonatal
resuscitation.Pediatrics2009;123:865 9.
6.vanOsS,CheungPY,PichlerG,AzizK,O’ReillyM,SchmolzerGM.
Exhaledcarbondioxidecanbeusedtoguiderespiratorysupportinthe deliveryroom.ActaPaediatrica2014;103:796 806.
7.LeoneTA,LangeA,RichW,FinerNN.Disposablecolorimetriccarbon dioxidedetectoruseasanindicatorofapatentairwayduring noninvasivemaskventilation.Pediatrics2006;118:e202 204.
8.AzizHF,MartinJB,MooreJJ.Thepediatricdisposableend-tidal carbondioxidedetectorroleinendotrachealintubationinnewborns.J Perinatol1999;19:110 3.
9.HawkesGA,O’ConnellBJ,LivingstoneV,HawkesCP,RyanCA, DempseyEM.EfficacyanduserpreferenceoftwoCO2detectorsinan infantmannequinrandomizedcrossovertrial.EurJPediatr 2013;172:1393 9.
10.BergRA,ReederRW,MeertKL,etal.End-tidalcarbondioxideduring pediatricin-hospitalcardiopulmonaryresuscitation.Resuscitation 2018;133:173 9.
11.MaconochieIK,AickinR,HazinskiMF,etal.Pediatriclifesupport:
2020Internationalconsensusoncardiopulmonaryresuscitationand emergencycardiovascularcaresciencewithtreatment
recommendations.Resuscitation2020;156:A120 55.
12.SoarJ,BergKM,AndersenLW,etal.Adultadvancedlifesupport:
2020Internationalconsensusoncardiopulmonaryresuscitationand emergencycardiovascularcaresciencewithtreatment
recommendations.Resuscitation2020;156:A80 A119.
13.MizumotoH,IkiY,YamashitaS,HataD.ExpiratoryCO2asthefirst signofsuccessfulventilationduringneonatalresuscitation.PediatrInt 2015;57:186 8.
14.BlankD,RichW,LeoneT,GareyD,FinerN.Pedi-capcolorchange precedesasignificantincreaseinheartrateduringneonatal resuscitation.Resuscitation2014;85:1568 72.
15.LindeJE,PerlmanJM,OymarK,etal.Predictorsof24-houtcomein newbornsinneedofpositivepressureventilationatbirth.
Resuscitation2018;129:1 5.
16.ErsdalHL,MdumaE,SvensenE,PerlmanJM.Earlyinitiationofbasic resuscitationinterventionsincludingfacemaskventilationmayreduce birthasphyxiarelatedmortalityinlow-incomecountries:aprospective descriptiveobservationalstudy.Resuscitation2012;83:869 73.
17.StordalK,EilevstjonnJ,MdumaE,etal.Increasedperinatalsurvival andimprovedventilationskillsoverafive-yearperiod:an
observationalstudy.PLoSOne2020;15:e0240520.
18.AmericanAcademyofPediatrics.HelpingBabiesBreathe.http://www.
helpingbabiesbreathe.org/.(AccessedMarch232021).
19.MoshiroR,PerlmanJ,KidantoH,KvaløyJ,MdoeP,ErsdalH.
Predictorsofdeathincludingqualityofpositivepressureventilation duringnewbornresuscitationandtherelationshiptooutcomeatseven daysinaruralTanzanianhospital.PLoSOne201813(e0202641).
20.LindeJE,EilevstjonnJ,OymarK,ErsdalHL.Feasibilityofaprototype newbornresuscitationmonitortostudytransitionatbirth,measuring heartrateandventilatorparameters,ananimalexperimentalstudy.
BMCResNotes2017;10:235.
21.HolteK,ErsdalH,EilevstjonnJ,etal.Positiveend-expiratorypressure innewbornresuscitationaroundterm:arandomizedcontrolledtrial.
Pediatrics2020146:.
22.HolteKEH,EilevstjønnJ,ThallingerM,etal.Predictorsforexpired CO2inneonatalbag-maskventilationatbirth:observationalstudy.
BMJPaediatricsOpen2019;2019:1 9,doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/
bmjpo-2019-000544e000544.
23.ZouKH,O’MalleyAJ,MauriL.Receiver-operatingcharacteristic analysisforevaluatingdiagnostictestsandpredictivemodels.
Circulation2007;115:654 7.
24.DawesG,ed.Birthasphyxia,resuscitationandbraindamage.Foetal andneonatalphysiologyyearbook.1968.p.141 59.1968.
25.EilevstjonnJ,LindeJE,BlacyL,KidantoH,ErsdalHL.Distributionof heartrateandresponsestoresuscitationamong1237apnoeic newbornsatbirth.Resuscitation2020;152:69 76.
26.WyllieJ,BruinenbergJ,RoehrCC,RudigerM,TrevisanutoD, UrlesbergerB.Europeanresuscitationcouncilguidelinesfor resuscitation2015:Section7.Resuscitationandsupportoftransition ofbabiesatbirth.Resuscitation2015;95:249 63.
27.WyckoffMH,AzizK,EscobedoMB,etal.Part13:Neonatal Resuscitation:2015AmericanHeartAssociationGuidelinesUpdate forCardiopulmonaryResuscitationandEmergencyCardiovascular Care.Circulation2015;132:S543 560.
28.BlankDA,GaertnerVD,KamlinCOF,etal.Respiratorychangesin terminfantsimmediatelyafterbirth.Resuscitation2018;130:105 10.
29.SchmolzerGM,HooperSB,WongC,KamlinCO,DavisPG.Exhaled carbondioxideinhealthyterminfantsimmediatelyafterbirth.J Pediatrics2015166:844-849e841-843.
30.MoshiroR,PerlmanJM,MdoeP,KidantoH,KvaloyJT,ErsdalHL.
Potentialcausesofearlydeathamongadmittednewbornsinarural Tanzanianhospital.PLoSOne2019;14:e0222935.
31.ErsdalHL,MdumaE,SvensenE,PerlmanJ.Birthasphyxia:amajor causeofearlyneonatalmortalityinaTanzanianruralhospital.
Pediatrics2012;129:e1238 1243.
32.GlobalBurdenofDiseaseChildMortalityCollaborators.Global, regional,national,andselectedsubnationallevelsofstillbirths, neonatal,infant,andunder-5mortality,1980-2015:asystematic analysisfortheGlobalBurdenofDiseaseStudy2015.Lancet 2016;388:1725 74.