• No results found

CM_2004_D_08.pdf (143.6Kb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CM_2004_D_08.pdf (143.6Kb)"

Copied!
6
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

ICES Resource Management Committee ICES CM 2004/D:08, Ref. ACFM, ACE, G

Report of the

Study Group on Multispecies Assessment in the North Sea [SGMSNS]

By Correspondence

This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council.

(2)

International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer

Palægade 2–4 DK–1261 Copenhagen K Denmark Telephone + 45 33 15 42 25 · Telefax +45 33 93 42 15

www.ices.dk · info@ices.dk

(3)

Contents

1 PARTICIPANTS, AUGUST 2003... 5 1.1 Future terms of reference ... 5 1.2 Progress in 2004... 5

(4)
(5)

1 Participants, August 2003

E. D. Bell, (Co-Chair) UK

W. Dekker Netherlands

H. Dobby UK

J. Floeter Germany

A. Kempf Germany

S. Mackinson UK

J.K. Pinnegar UK

A. Temming Germany

D.W. Skagen Norway

W. Vanhee Belgium

M. Vinther (Co-Chair) Denmark

1.1 Future terms of reference

It is requested that there be one further meeting of Study Group on Multispecies Assessment in the North Sea (SGMSNS), to be held in spring (March) 2005. This will permit two years of additional data (2002 and 2003) to be incorporated into a revised, and ‘definitive’, 4M model key-run. By holding the meeting in March, this will also allow findings and recommendations to be considered at the spring meeting of ACFM in 2005.

During the Study Group on Multispecies Assessment in the North Sea (SGMSNS), 2003 the following Terms of References was proposed:

The Study Group on Multispecies Assessment in the North Sea [SGMSNS] (Co-Chairs: Morten Vinther, Denmark and Ewen Bell, UK) should meet at ICES Headquarters/ Charlottenlund Castle, Copenhagen for 5 days during March 2005 to:

a) prepare a ‘definitive’ and fully revised 4M model key-run, incorporating any revisions in consumption rates or other available data;

b) re-evaluate the importance of mackerel as an MSVPA predator in the North Sea;

c) incorporate the biomass data, consumption rates and diet compositions provided by WGSE and WGMME for marine mammals and seabirds. Evaluate the importance of newly introduced predators (e.g. harbour seals), and whether these affect 4M outputs;

d) re-examine the issue of whether 0-group fish can adequately be modelled using the 4M or other multispecies modelling approaches;

e) address ‘applied’ and specific questions posed by ICES;

f) perform a data fitting exercise using the North Sea 1991 EwE model. The fitting exercise will require input (survey CPUE) and output data (MSVPA estimated biomasses) from the updated 4M key-run (TORa);

g) examine the need within ICES and develop a strategy for multispecies stock assessment and subsequent multispecies advice on management issues. Consider whether a new ICES study or working group needs to be created and if so, what appropriate terms of reference might be and what geographic area it might focus on;

h) No major objections have been made against the TOR, which are considered valid for the meeting in 2005. A date has yet to be finalised for the 2005 meeting.

1.2 Progress in 2004

A large focus of multispecies research within European countries in 2004 has been the start up of the EU funded, Framework IV project BECAUSE (Critical Interactions BEtween Species and their Implications for a PreCAUtionary FiSheries Management in a variable Environment - a Modelling Approach). Within this 3-year project there is a case study specifically investigating Multispecies assessment and projection tools for the North Sea and many of the members of this Study Group are participants within the project. Although the case study is focussing on sandeel dominated food webs, it covers all aspects of the upper tropic levels, including seabirds, seals and cetaceans as well as

ICES SGMSNS Report 2004 5

(6)

ICES SGMSNS Report 2004 6

fish species. The project will also see the further development of the 4M model and a new stochastic multispecies model SMS.

With specific regard to ToR c), the Working Group on Seabird Ecology (WGSE) and the Working Group on Marine Mammal Ecology (WGMME) were ask in their TORs for their 2004 meeting to provide data on consumption of different prey by seabirds and marine mammals. This task is also included in the BECAUSE project, which seems to cause some confusion whether this TOR was still of immediate importance for ICES. The WGSE has not delivered any data but seems happy to work on this TOR intersessionally (ICES CM 2004/C:05). WGMME (ICES CM

2004/ACE:02) has provided a literature overview on the topic and has initiated the data collation of diet data for marine mammals, however no data set is available yet.

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

There had been an innovative report prepared by Lord Dawson in 1920 for the Minister of Health’s Consultative Council on Medical and Allied Services, in which he used his

The ideas launched by the Beveridge Commission in 1942 set the pace for major reforms in post-war Britain, and inspired Norwegian welfare programmes as well, with gradual

Although, particularly early in the 1920s, the cleanliness of the Cana- dian milk supply was uneven, public health professionals, the dairy indus- try, and the Federal Department

11 See also Conolly and Kohler (2004) for a further description and use of a comparable model. The effects of Norges Bank’s communication are more difficult to model than the

1.5 The Report of the Multispecies Assessment Working Group The report of the Multispecies Assessment Working Group was briefly discussed and it was noted that,

11 See also Conolly and Kohler (2004) for a further description and use of a comparable model. The effects of Norges Bank’s communication are more difficult to model than the

For example, in analysis of welfare, game theory, choice under uncertainty and dynamic choice, models are formulated in terms of (time independent) utility of total income

In the following we briey describe a data structure for the MT as proposed in [Pup96,KK97]. The fragments encode localized renement steps and consist of two small sets of