FOURTH SECTION DECISION

The Deputy High Court Judge rejected the applicant’s judicial review claim on two grounds: first, that the threshold of Article 3 had not been reached in the

The Government submitted that the applicant’s detention from 27 August to 13 September 2002 had been authorised under the order of 26 June 2002 issued under Article 232 of the

On 5 January 1998 the Pazardzhik district prosecutor opened an investigation in respect of Mr Kaburov, on suspicion that during the incident of 4 November 1997

53. The orders were then confirmed by the Head of the relevant MGB Division and the Minister. The trial court examined the evidence in respect of each of the relevant

While the impugned acts had not constituted a crime against humanity under domestic law until the entry into force of the 2003 Criminal Code, it is evident from the

On 25 May 2012 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint before the Constitutional Court (Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske) relying on Article 14 of the Constitution

The Court also recalls that under certain circumstances it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a

In such circumstances, and given the absence of any “reasonable suspicion” within the meaning of Article 5 § 1(c), the Court considers that the applicant's detention