Paper B:
Reservoir Characterization
during underbalanced drilling (UBD): Methodology and
Active Tests
Erlend H. Vefring, SPE, IRIS Petroleum, Gerhard Nygaard, Telemark Uni- versity College, Rolf Johan Lorentzen, Geir Nævdal, SPE and Kjell K˚ are Fjelde, SPE, IRIS Petroleum
This paper (SPE 81634) was first presented at the 2003 SPE Underbal- anced Technology Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 25-26 March, and revised for publication. Original manuscript received for review 26 August 2003. Revised manuscript received 26 May 2005. Paper peer approved 29 November 2005. Published in SPE Journal, Vol. 11, in June 2006.
115
Reservoir Characterization During Underbalanced Drilling (UBD):
Methodology and Active Tests
Erlend H. Vefring,SPE,Gerhard Nygaard, Rolf Johan Lorentzen, Geir Nævdal,SPE, andKjell Kåre Fjelde,SPE, IRIS
Summary
Two methods for characterizing reservoir pore pressure and res- ervoir permeability during UBD while applying active tests are presented and evaluated. Both methods utilize a fast, dynamic well fluid-flow model that is extended with a transient reservoir model.
Active testing of the well is applied by varying the bottomhole pressure in the well during the drilling operations.
The first method uses the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm to estimate the reservoir parameters by minimizing the difference between measurements from the drilling process and the corresponding model states. The method is applied after the drill- ing process is finished, using all the recorded measurements. The second method is the ensemble Kalman filter, which simulates the drilling process using the dynamic model while drilling is per- formed, and updates the model states and parameters each time new measurements are available. Measurements that usually are available while drilling are used, such as pump rates, pump pres- sure, bottomhole pressure, and outlet rates.
The methods are applied to different cases, and the results indicate that active tests might improve the estimation results. The results also show that both estimation methods give useful results, and that the ensemble Kalman filter calculates these results during the UB operation.
Larsen and Nilsen (1999) focused on the importance of reser- voir influx prediction while drilling and presented models for cal- culating the inflow based on penetration rate and knowledge of the ratio of vertical-to-horizontal reservoir permeability. The influx predictions using these models were compared to influx predic- tions calculated by a numerical reservoir simulator, giving accept- able results.
A paper by Hunt and Rester (2000) focused on the importance of having a reservoir model that accounts for the change in well length as the drill bit penetrates into the reservoir. They also pre- sented a history-matching method for identifying the reservoir per- meability in a single-layer reservoir. In a followup study, Hunt and
Copyright © 2006 Society of Petroleum Engineers
This paper (SPE 81634) was first presented at the 2003 SPE Underbalanced Technology Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 25–26 March, and revised for publication. Original manuscript received for review 26 August 2003. Revised manuscript received 26 May 2005.
Paper peer approved 29 November 2005.
181 June 2006 SPE Journal