• No results found

Recovery of valuable elements from municipal solid waste incineration ashes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Recovery of valuable elements from municipal solid waste incineration ashes"

Copied!
5
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Recovery of valuable elements from municipal solid waste incineration ashes

Emil Vainio1, Minna Siekkinen1, Patrik Yrjas1, Liang Wang2, Michael Becidan2, Daniel Lindberg3

1Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, Åbo Akademi University, Biskopsgatan 8, 20500 Åbo, Finland

2SINTEF Energy Research, Sem Sælands vei 11, Trondheim, NO-7034, Norway

3Department of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering (CMET), School of Chemical Engineering Aalto University

1. Introduction

Incineration of municipal solid waste (MSW), that cannot be recycled, is an effective and established process both to reduce the volume and weight of waste and to recover energy from it. However, significant amount of solid residues are produced from the MSW incineration process, including bottom ash, fly ash, and air pollution control residues. Due to the volatility of heavy metals during waste incineration, they are enriched in the fly ash. These fly ashes are therefore regarded as hazardous waste and have to be disposed of in dedicated landfills [1]. On the other hand, municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) ashes contain several valuable elements and are an interesting secondary source of for metal recovery. Separation of hazardous elements is one treatment method to produce a less harmful residue [2]. One example is the FLUWA process in which the ash is leached with acidic effluent from the flue gas treatment to produce a zinc-rich sludge, which is further processed [3]. Antimony (Sb), that is both problematic for disposal and a valuable element for different industries is present in MSWI ashes. Most of the primary antimony comes from China, and the EU has listed Sb as an element with high supply risk and a high economic importance [4]. Antimony is used, e.g., as flame retardants, in some plastics, and as a lead-hardening agent [5], and is enriched in MSWI fly ash compared to the content in the earth crust [6]. In this work, the leaching behavior of a fly ash from a waste incinerator was studied. The goal is to develop a concept for the controlled leaching of target elements from fly ashes and at the same time produce an inert non-hazardous residue, Figure 1.

Figure 1.Schematic of leaching process to leach out valuable elements and produce an inert residue.

(2)

2. Experimental

Elemental and scanning electron microscope combined with energy-dispersive X-ray (SEM- EDX) analyses of the fly ash were performed to determine the occurrence of valuable and critical elements. Figure 2 shows the elemental composition of the studied fly ash. Of the EU’s critical elements, antimony is the most abundant (770 mg/kg ds) in the fly ash sample studied.

Figure 3 shows an SEM-EDX area analysis of the fly ash. The EDX analyses suggests that the main compounds of the fly ash are calcium and alkali chlorides and sulfates.

The leaching experiments were conducted in a flow-through reactor using various leaching agents. The leached elements were sampled every 10, 20, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240, and 1440 minutes, and were analyzed with ICP-OES. The leaching agents used were: water, HNO3, HCl, and citric acid. Three concentrations of the acids were used: 0.1 M, 0.5 M, and 1 M. The setup consists of three flow through reactors, which enables to study three parameters or fly ashes simultaneously.

Figure 2. Elemental composition of the fly ash.

Figure 3. SEM-EDX area analysis and SEM backscatter image of the ash.

Figure 4. Experimental setup of the leaching method.

0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000

Au Tl Nb Y W Co Mo V Zr Hg Ag Ni Cd Cr Sr Mn Sb P As Sn Cu Ba Ti Fe Pb Mg Al Si Zn K Na S Ca

mg/kg (ds)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Na Mg Al Si P S Cl K Ca Ti Fe Cu Zn Pb

Atom %

(3)

3. Results and discussion

The results from leaching of water-soluble Ca, K, Na, and S is shown in Figure 5. During the first 20 minutes virtually all the Na and K was leached and most of the Ca. The initial leaching rates were significantly higher than that of sulfur and accordingly it is assumed that these elements were present as highly soluble chlorides. After the initial leaching, no K or Na was leached out anymore, while Ca continued to be soluble with about the same rate as sulfur, assumably as CaSO4. A large share of the fly ash was leached out in the water leaching.

Figure 5. Water leachable Na, K, S, and Cl.

The leaching rates of Zn, Pb, and Cu with water, 0.1, and 1 M HNO3 are shown in Figure 6. No Zn and Cu was leached out with water, however some Pb was. With 1 M HNO3, Zn and Cu were leached out during the first 60 min, while Pb was leached out at a lower rate. With 0.1 M HNO3, the leaching was significantly slower.

Figure 6. Leaching of Zn, Pb, and Cu with 0.1 M HNO3, 1 M HNO3, and water.

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

g/kg ash

Time (min)

S Ca Na K Ca

S Na

K

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

mg/kg ash

Time (min)

H2O 0.1 M 1 M 1M

0.1M Zn

H2O

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

mg/kg ash

Time (min)

H2O 0.1 M 1 M 0.1M

Pb 1M

H2O

H2O

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

mg/kg ash

Time (min)

H2O 0.1 M 1 M

0.1M Cu

1M

H2O

H2O

(4)

The leaching results for antimony are shown in Figure 7. Antimony was leached out more slowly than, e.g., Zn and Cu. The leaching rate was much faster using HNO3 and HCl with 0.5 M and 1 M acids. The leaching was even faster with the stronger citric acid. Interestingly, the yield with 0.1 M citric acid was much better than for 0.1 M HCl and HNO3. Most of the Sb was leach out from the ashes with the stronger acids and even with the 0.1M citric acid. The results support the previous study by Fabienne [7], who reported that Sb can be efficiently leached with citric acid up to pH 3.

Figure 7. Leaching of Sb with HCl, HNO3, and citric acid.

4. Conclusion

In this work, the leaching behavior of metals in a MSWI fly ash was studied. A leaching method was built, in which flow through reactors are used. The sampling was done with certain intervals to obtain leaching rates of various elements. Using a flow through reactor gives the maximum leaching rate, compared to batch reactors where solubility and pH play a significant role.

In the experiment with water as leaching agent, Ca, K, and Na chlorides where quickly leached out, while calcium sulfate leached out more slowly. Water leaching prior to an acid leaching step would make the recovery of acid leaching elements more effective and simple. The acid concentration had a significant effect on the leaching rates of metals. Antimony leaching with citric acid lead to a high recovery degree even with a 0.1 M citric acid solution. A multi-step, controlled leaching to recover specific elements of interest appears possible, which would greatly contribute to the concept of circular economy.

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

mg/kg ash

Time (min)

0.1M 0.5M 1M

Sb, HCl

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400

mg/kg ash

Time (min)

0.1 M 0.5 M 1 M Sb, HNO3

(5)

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the WtE 2030 project. The WtE 2030 project is co-funded by the Research Council of Norway, Enova and industry partners.

References

[1] O. Hjelmar, Disposal strategies for municipal solid waste incineration residues, J. Hazard.

Mater., 47 (1–3) (1996), pp. 345-368

[2] T. Sabbas, A. Polettini, R. Pomi, T. Astrup, O. Hjelmar, P. Mostbauer, G. Cappai, G. Magel, S. Salhofer, C. Speiser, S. Heuss-Assbichler, R. Klein, P. Lechber, Management of municipal solid waste incineration residues, Waste Manage., 23 (1) (2003), pp. 61-88

[3] Bühler A., Schlumberger S., Recovering Heavy Metals from Fly Ash: Acidic Fly AshScrubbing ’FLUWA’, a Trendsetting Procedure in Waste Incineration, Swiss Federal Office for theEnvironment (FOEN), Bern

[4] Study on the review of the list of critical raw materials, EU Commission (2017), ISBN 978- 92-79-47937-3

[5] David Dupont, Sander Arnout, Peter Tom Jones, Koen Binnemans, Antimony Recovery from End-of-Life Products and Industrial Process Residues: A Critical Review, J. Sustain.

Metall. (2016) 2:79–103

[6] Inge Johansson, Eskil Sahlin, Bo von Bahr, Johanna Björkmalm, Jelena Todorovic Olsson, The content of critical elements in residues from Swedish waste-to-energy plants, Project WR- 56, 2013.

[7] Vannay Fabienne, Antimony in secondary sources - Sb recovery from fly ash, Master thesis, Environmental technologies, University of Applied Sciences and arts Nortwestern Switzerland

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

[r]

Municipal wastewater treatment and waste management companies are important actors in several segments of the biogas value chain, especially collection and transport

Considering the fact that the CO 2 concentration is probably slightly lower in the case of a municipal solid waste incineration plant compared to a coal-fired power plant,

Key words: Household waste management, municipal solid waste, outsourcing, supplier selection criteria, award criteria, tender evaluation processes, public-

Refuse derived fuels (RDF) is the general term used to describe the shredded or pelletized fraction of municipal solid waste after removing non-combustible materials (glass,

In order to improve the understanding of optimal policies for paper and plastic waste reductions we compare the costs of the four alternatives recycling, incineration, landfill based

Together with XRF analysis, the SEM-EDX analysis revealed that the primary deposits are probably formed due to deposits of fused sulfates and chlorides on the heat transfer

With the present composition of incinerated waste (50% fossil on energy basis), specific greenhouse gas emissions from waste incineration based district heating are comparable