• No results found

help_08.pdf (1.699Mb)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "help_08.pdf (1.699Mb)"

Copied!
41
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)
(2)

P. Fossum, H. Bj~rke og R. Sætre Fiskeridirektoratets Havforskningsinstitutt

Postboks 1870, 5024 Bergen

SAMMENDRAG

Denne rapporten gir noen forelopige resultater fra sildelarveunder- s~kelsene på Møre i april 1986. Den behandler horisontal- og verti- kalfordeling av larvene i relasjon til det fysiske miljoet samt deres vekst og næringsopptak.

Gytefeltene kommer klart frem i fordelingen av de minste larvene.

Feltene var de samme som ble funnet i 1985. I tillegg fant det sted en mindre gyting ute

eggakanten. Hovedtrekkene i sirkulasjons- monsteret synes

å

være det samme som i 1985. Ved

å

kombinere hydro- grafiske data, larvefordeling og drivboyer ser det ut for at man kan få frem både larvenes viktigste driftsruter samt områder hvor larvene holdes tilbake i 10-15 dager.

Larvepopulasjonen i 1986 var totalt dominert av plommesekklarver.

Antall larver større enn 12

mm

var omkring 10% av det som ble funnet

i

samme periode i 1985.

1

1986 ble det også observert lavere vekst og næringsopptak hos larvene enn i 1985. Alt dette tyder på at rekrutteringen til sildebestanden i 1986 var dårligere enn i 1985.

Storstedelen av larvene ble funnet dypere enn

60 m.

Innslaget av ny-

klekkede larver Øket med dypet mens eldre larver ble hovedsaklig

funnet i de Øvre 40

m.

Forste næringsopptak ble funnet i 3-6 dagers

gamle larver. Dietten var dominert av rauåte larver.

(3)

STUDIES ON HERRING M V A E OFF CdESTERN FIORWAY E61e

1986

by

P. Fossum, H . Bjarke and R . Sætre I n s t i t u t e of Marine Research P. O . Box 1870, N-5024 Bergen

Norway

ABSTRACT

T h i s r e p o r t g i v e s some p r e l i m i n a r y r e s u l t s from a s t u d y on t h e spawning grounds of t h e Norwegian spring-spawning h e r r i n g i n A p r i l 1986. I t d e a l s with t h e h o r i z o n t a l and v e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of h e r r i n g l a r v a e i n r e l a t i o n t o t h e p h y s i c a l environment a s w e l l a s growth and d i e t .

The spawning a r e a can c l e a r l y be seen i n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of l a r v a e

<

9 mm and t h e s e were t h e same a s i n 1985. I n a d d i t i o n , a s m a l l e r spawning a r e a o f f s h o r e a t t h e c o n t i n e n t a l s l o p e was i d e n t i f i e d .

The main f e a t u r e s of t h e c i r c u l a t i o n p a t t e r n of t h e a r e a seems t o be t h e same a s i n

1985.

The combined u s e of hydrography, l a r v a e d i s t r i - b u t i o n and Argos d r i f t e r s seem a b l e t o r e v e a l both t h e l a r v a l d r i f t a s w e l l a s r e t e n t i o n a r e a s with a r e s i d e n c e time of 10-15 d a y s ,

The l a r v a l population i n 1986 was t o t a l l y dominated by yolksac l a r v a e . The number of l a r v a e

>

12 mm was about 10% of t h a t found d u r i n g t h e same p e r i o d i n 1985, I n 1986 a slower growth and a lower f e e d i n g r a t i o i n a l l l a r v a l s t a g e s was observed compared t o 1985, T h i s i n d i - c a t e poorer recruitment i n 1986 than i n 1985.

The m a j o r i t y of t h e l a r v a e were found deeper than 60 m opposed t o 1985. The percentage of newly hatched l a r v a e i n c r e a s e d with depth.

Older l a r v a e were found mainly i n t h e upper 40 m. Patchy d i s t r i b u t i o n made a comparison between l a r v a e caught a t day and a t n i g h t d i f f i c u l t . F i r s t f e e d i n g was observed i n 3-6 days o l d l a r v a e . The d i e t of t h e l a r v a e was dominated by copepods n a u p l i i . A s h r i n k a g e of 40-50% i n dryweight and

3-7%

i n l e n g t h due t o p r e s e r v a t i o n was observed.

(4)

Sampling of l a r v a e of t h e Norwegian spring-spawning h e r r i n g has been c a r r i e d o u t f o r a long period ( e . g . WLBORG 1960, DRAGESUND 1970, SELI- VERSTOV 1974 and BJØRKE 1 9 8 1 ) . The main o b j e c t i v e of t h e s e i n v e s t i g a - t i o n s has been t o l o c a t e spawning a r e a s and t o o b t a i n t h e f i r s t i n d i - c a t i o n of t h e r e c r u i t m e n t . The i n c r e a s e of t h e h e r r i n g s t o c k i n more r e c e n t y e a r s and development of new g e a r s and methods, a c t u a l i z e t h e formulation of a p r o j e c t t o s t u d y t h e r e c r u i t m e n t mechanisms.

I n

1985

a p i l o t study was c a r r i e d o u t (BJØRKE, FOSSUM and SÆTRE, 1 9 8 6 ) . The p r o j e c t was l a t e r included i n a n a t i o n a l program t o s t u d y t h e p o s s i b l e consequences on f i s h eggs and l a r v a e of o i l explo- r a t i o n on t h e Norwegian c o n t i n e n t a l s h e l f n o r t h of 6 2 ' ~ (FØYN and BJØRKE, 1986). T h i s program i s given t h e acronym HELP (Havforsknings- i n s t i t u t t e t s Egg- og Larveprogram) and i s supposed t o l a s t f o r t h e p e r i o d e 1986-90.

The o b j e c t i v e s of HELP i s t o :

-

o b t a i n d e t a i l e d knowlegde of t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n i n s p a c e and time of t h e important commercial f i s h s p e c i e s d u r i n g t h e i r e a r l y l i f e s t a g e along t h e Norwegian c o a s t ,

-

s t u d y t h e r e p r o d u c t i v e biology of t h e same s p e c i e s .

-

s t u d y t h e r e c r u i t m e n t mechanisms of t h e Norwegian spring-spawning h e r r i n g and t h e Arcto-Norwegian cod.

-

s t u d y t h e p h y s i c a l f a c t o r s a f f e c t i n g both t h e t r a n s p o r t - d i s p e r s i o n and t h e l i v i n g c o n d i t i o n of t h e e a r l y l i f e s t a g e s of f i s h .

The p r e s e n t r e p o r t g i v e s some p r e l i m i n a r y r e s u l t s from t h e i n v e s t i - g a t i o n on t h e l a r v a e of t h e Norwegian spring-spawning h e r r i n g i n 1986.

(5)

MATERIALS AND METRODS

The s t u d y was c a r r i e d o u t during t h e p e r i o d s 29 March

- 7

A p r i l and

9 - 18

A p r i l . The southern p a r t of t h e a r e a was covered d u r i n g both t h e s e p e r i o d s ( F i g . l ) . Herring l a r v a e were sampled with a modified c o n i c a l n e t of 0.5 m* opening and

375

p m mesh s i z e (ELLERTSEN e t a l .

1984)

from 150 m ( o r

5

m above t h e bottom) t o t h e s u r f a c e . The v e r t i - c a 1 d i s t r i b u t i o n s of temperature, s a l i n i t y , n u t r i e n t s and c h l o r o p h y l l c o n t e n t s were observed by Nansen h a u l s . Five Argos s a t e l l i t t e - t r a c k e d , d r i f t i n g buoys were deployd. These were equipped with a 10 m 2 window b l i n d drogue a t t a c h e d t o t h e buoys v i a a 30 m t e t h e r l i n e .

The m a t e r i a l f o r t h e v e r t i c a l s t u d i e s was d e r i v e d from two experiments on Buagrunnen; one from 5-7 A p r i l with a Mocness l m 2 sampler(mesh 3 7 5 ~ ) (WIEBE e t a l . ) ,and one from A p r i l

5

and 6 with a opening/closing Juday n e t (mesh 375p and opening O.

5m2

)

.

Dif f i c u l t i e s i n changing of n e t s a t p r e c i s e depths arosed d u r i n g t h e Mocness experiment and t h i s caused a s l i g h t overlapping of depth i n t e r v a l s (Table 1.) About 50 m 3 was f i l t e r e d with t h e Mocness sampler w i t h i n each depth i n t e r v a l and about 1 0 m 3 with t h e v e r t i c a l n e t . To confirm abundance of l a r v a e a v e r t i c a l plankton hau1 was made between each Mocness h a u l . Bottom depth v a r i e d between 120 and 90 m d u r i n g t h e Mocness experiment.

During t h e sampling with t h e Juday n e t t h e s h i p was anchored a t a depth of 120 m .

The h e r r i n g l a r v a e used t o morphometric measurements and g u t c o n t e n t a n a l y s i s were preserved i n

4%

formalin i n 10

%.

s e a water

.

Only t h e food organisms t h a t could be recognized through t h e e p i t h e l i u m of t h e g u t were examined, because of g u t c o n t e n t voidance i n h e r r i n g l a r v a e d u r i n g c a t c h i n g and f i x a t i o n (HAU

1981).

No q u a n t i t a t i v e a n a l y s e s of t h e d i e t of t h e h e r r i n g l a r v a e was performed due t o t h e same reason.

The same procedure was followed i n 1986 a s w i t h t h e 1985 m a t e r i a l (BJØRKE, FOSSUM & SAXRE 1986) and a comparative a n a l y s i s between t h e s e two sets of d a t a could t h u s be made.

The h e r r i n g l a r v a e used t o d e s c r i b e t h e h o r i z o n t a l d i s t r i b u t i o n were measured on board. Standard l e n g t h (SL) measurements of 50 h e r r i n g l a r v a e p e r hau1 ( i f p r e s e n t ) were taken t o n e a r e s t mm below. For morp- hometric measurements i n t h e l a b o r a t o r y a m a t e r i a l of 647 h e r r i n g

(6)

l a r v a e were analysed

.

From each s t a t i o n 20 l a r v a e ( i E p r e s e n t ) were c l a s s i f i e d according t o DOYLE (1977) and ØIESTAD (1983). and measured t o n e a r e s t 0 . 1 mm below. V i s i b l e prey organisms were d i s s e c t e d o u t of t h e g u t and c l a s s i f i e d i n t o one of t h e following two groups; copepod eggs o r copepod n a u p l i i . The l a r v a e were then r i n s e d i n f r e s h w a t e r , d r i e d t o c o n s t a n t weight and weighed on a Cahn e l e c t r o b a l a n c e t o t h e n e a r e s t pg.

Because of shrinkage due t o p r e s e r v a t i o n (THEILACKER & DORSEY 1 9 8 0 ) , a r e p r e s e n t a t i v sample of h e r r i n g l a r v a e ( N = 47) from t h e whole a r e a of d i s t r i b u t i o n were s e p e r a t e d i n t o d i f f e r e n t s t a g e s when f r e s h onboard.

They were measured t o n e a r e s t O . l m m below, r i n s e d i n f r e s h water and brought t o t h e l a b o r a t o r y where they were d r i e d t o c o n s t a n t weight and weighed on a Cahn e l e c t r o b a l a n c e t o t h e n e a r e s t pg. This sample r e p r e - s e n t an e s t i m a t e of t h e t r u e s t a n d a r d l e n g t h and d r y weight i n t h e l a r v a l p o p u l a t i o n , and a comparison between t h e s e l a r v a e and t h e pre- served ones g i v e s information of t h e shrinkage d u r i n g f i x a t i o n .

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Hydrography

Surface temperatures ( F i g . 2 ) and s a l i n i t i e s ( F i g . 3 ) were

4.5

O - 6 . 5 ' ~ and 33-35%. r e s p e c t i v e l y . The n o r t h e r n p a r t of t h e a r e a was c l e a r l y i n f l u e n c e d by A t l a n t i c Water masses while i n t h e s o u t h e r n p a r t C o a s t a l Water was dominant. The same p a t t e r n could be s e e n i n t h e s u r f a c e d i - s t r i b u t i o n of n i t r a t e and s i l i c a t e ( F i g s . 4-5) with high v a l u e s i n t h e n o r t h e r n and low v a l u e s i n t h e s o u t h e r n p a r t . The s u r f a c e d i s t r i b u t i o n of c h l o r o p h y l l g ( F i g .

6 )

showed very low v a l u e s i n t h e n o r t h e r n a r e a . The h i g h e s t c o n c e n t r a t i o n s were found along t h e s h e l f break i n t h e c e n t r a l a r e a .

Fig.

7

shows t h e t y p i c a l v e r t i c a l hydrographic s t r u c t u r e from t h e s o u t h e r n (SECTION A ) , t h e c e n t r a l (SECTION B ) and t h e n o r t h e r n (SECTION C ) p a r t of t h e i n v e s t i g a t e d a r e a . The l o c a t i o n of t h e s e c t i - ons appear i n Fig. 1. C o a s t a l Water ( S

<

3 5 % . ) covers t h e upper 100 m i n t h e s o u t h e r n and c e n t r a l s h e l f a r e a . I n t h e northernmost s e c t i o n

(SECTION C ) water of c o a s t a l o r i g i n i s seen a t t h e outermost s t a t i o n s . T h i s i s probably a r e s u l t of t h e s p l i t t i n g of t h e Norwegian C o a s t a l

(7)

Current f u r t h e r south a l s o i n d i c a t e d i n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of s u s f a c e s a l i n i t y ( F i g . 3 ) . According t o LJØEN and NAli(KEN

(1969)

t h e Norwegianr C o a s t a l Current s p l i t s i n t o two branches between

63' and 6 4 ' ~ ~

The main branch run p a r a l l e l and c l o s e t o t h e c o a s t on t h e e o a s t a l s i d e of Haltenbanken (Area F, F i g .

1 7 ) .

The o t h e r branch follows t h e edge of

t h e c o n t i n e n t a l s l o p e on top of t h e A t l a n t i c water.

SECTION A was c a r r i e d o u t twice;

31

March and

16

A p r i l ( F i g , 71, The a n g l e of t h e s l o p i n g i n t e r f a c e between t h e C o a s t a l and t h e A t l a n t i c Water have decreased d u r i n g t h e f i r s t p a r t of A p r i l r e s u l t i n g i n a more seaward e x t e n t i o n of t h e C o a s t a l Water. There i s a pronounced r e - d u c t i o n of t h e n i t r a t e c o n t e n t i n t h e upper l a y e r s from t h e end of March t o mid-April i n d i c a t i n g t h a t a phytoplankton blsom

has

occurred between t h e o b s e r v a t i o n s . During t h e same p e r i o d e t h e c o n t e n t s of c h l o r o p h y l l g i n t h e upper 30 m of t h e s e c t i o n i n c r e a s e d from 0 - 1

-

0 . 3 t o

1 . 5 - 4.5

mg/m3 ( F i g .

8 ) .

Though t h e s u r f a c e c h l o r o p h y l l v a l u e s

9-18

A p r i l i n t h e n o r t h e r n a r e a i s low ( F i g .

G),

reminiseences of a precedent phytoplankton bloom a r e seen i n SECTION C ( F i g ,

8 ) .

F i g .

9

shows t h e d r i f t i n g t r a c k s from t h e Argos kuoys. The bottom topography of t h e a r e a i s r a t h e r complica.ted and t h i s i n f l u e n c e s t h e c i r c u l a t i o n p a t t e r n . There a r e f o u r major shallow banks i n t h e a r e a : Buagrunnen ( C ) , F r ~ y a b a n k e n (D ) , Haltenbanken ( F ) and Sklinnabanken

( E ) . The l o c a t i o n of t h e s e a r e seen i n F i g .

17.

Around t h e s e banks t h e topographic s t e e r i n g of t h e c u r r e n t favour an a n t i - c y c l o n i c e i r c u - l a t i o n . North of Buagrunnen and of F r ~ y a b a n k e n th e water mainly flows eastwards and merge i n t o t h e channel between Haltenbanken

a d

t h e c o a s t . This seems t o be t h e main r o u t e f o r t h e northward d r i f t i n g l a r v a e . The c u r r e n k speed of t h e upper l a y e r of t h i c a r e a i s between 30 and 60 cm/s which means

7-15

n a u t i c a l miles/day, OE t h e two Argos buoys which were d r i f t i n g f u r t h e r northward. one ended up a t

66'~ 26

May and t h e o t h e r one c l o s e t o 6 9 ' 3 0 ' ~ a t

18

June ( F i g , L O )

H o r i z o n t a l l a r v a e d i s t r i b u t i o n

The h a t c h i n g of h e r r i n g l a r v a e s t a r t e d i n t h e southernmost a r e a around

15

March and a t Buagrunnen (Area C , F i g .

17)

around L A p r i l , A t both l o c a t i o n s t h e maximum h a t c h i n g occurred i n mid-April (BJØRKE, HANSEN and MELLE,

1987) .

(8)

The h o r i z o n t a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of h e r r i n g l a r v a e of t h r e e d i f f e r e n t l e n g t h groups from t h e f i r s t coverage 29 March

- 7

A p r i l i s shown i n F i g s .

11-13.

The d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e youngest l a r v a e ( F i g . l i ) i n d i - c a t e t h r e e s e p a r a t e d spawning a r e a s ; Buagrunnen, c l o s e t o t h e s h o r e i n t h e southernmost a r e a and a t t h e s h e l f break around 6 3 ' ~ . A s can be seen t h e r e a r e very few l a r v a e

L

12 mm ( F i g .

1 3 ) .

During t h e second coverage (9-18 A p r i l ) t h e t o t a l number of l a r v a e

< 9

mm i s h i g h e r ( F i g .

1 4 ) .

Two of t h e apparent spawning a r e a s a r e t h e same a s on t h e previous coverage. A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e r e seems t o be a minor spawning n e a r FrØyabanken (Area D, Fig. 1 7 ) . The number of l a r v a e

L

12 mm ( F i g . 1 6 ) i s only about 10% of t h a t found d u r i n g t h e same p e r i o d i n

1985

(BJØRKE, FOSSUM and SÆTRE, 1 9 8 6 ) . T h i s may i n d i - c a t e t h a t t h e recruitment success i n 1986 was c o n s i d e r a b l y lower than i n

1985.

Off t h e southernmost c o a s t a l spawning a r e a (Area A , Fig.

17)

a s w e l l a s a t Buagrunnen t h e Argos d r i f t e r s i n d i c a t e r e t e n t i o n a r e a s of t h e l a r v a e with a recidence time of t h e water of 10-15 days. Fig.

17

i s an attempt t o summarize t h e information on t h e l a r v a l d r i f t . It i s based on l a r v a e d i s t r i b u t i o n , t h e t r a c k s of t h e Argos d r i f t e r s and on hydrography. The d r i f t i n g time from t h e spawning a r e a s t o t h e p a s s i n g of t h e 6 5 ' ~ l a t t i t u d e seems t o be 40-50 days from t h e southernmost spawning a r e a and 20-30 days from Buagrunnen. A s a s i t g n l f i c a n t pso- p o r t i o n of t h e l a r v a e p o p u l a t i o n i s below t h e drogue depth of t h e Argos buoys and a s d i s p e r s i o n mechanisms i s n o t c o n s i d e r e d , t h e c a l - c u l a t e d d r i f t i n g times is probably underestimates.

V e r t i c a l l a r v a e d i s t r i b u t i o n .

Table 1 shows t h e number of l a r v a e p e r m 2 s u r f a c e s a p l e d d u r i n g t h e Mocness experiment. Larvae without yolk s a c and without t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of s t a g e 2a d e s c r i b e d by DOYLE (1977) a r e o m i t t e d from t h e t a b l e . Although t h e Mocness sampling w i t h i n t h e a r e a was l o c a t e d by abundance of l a r v a e i n v e r t i c a l n e t - h a u l s , some of t h e Mocnes tows were without any l a r v a e . This i n d i c a t e patchy d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e l a r v a e

.

(9)

Table 1. Number of l a r v a e p e r m 2 s u r f a c e s m p l e d d u r i n g t h e Mocness experiment.

Date

5

A p r i l 6 A p r i l

Hour

18

20 21 23 24 02 04 06 07 09 12 14 15

Dep t h

t a b l e continued:

Date 6 A p r i l

7

A p r i l

Hour 16 17

19

20 21 22 23 00 02 03 04 05 07

Dep t h

t a b l e continued:

Date 7 A p r i l

Hour 08

O9

10 11 12 13

14

15 16 17 20 T o t a l

Depth

(10)

F i g .

18

shows t h e v e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of l a r v a e when a l l depth i n - t e r v a l s above 80 m were sampled. Nearly 60 % of t h e l a r v a e were found i n t h e 80-56 m depth i n t e r v a l . Most of t h e s e l a r v a e were newly h a t - ched, i . e . s t a g e l a . The percentage of t h e s e l a r v a e i n c r e a s e d with depth and only few were found i n t h e upper 20 m . The percentage of t h e o l d e r s t a g e s , however, i n c r e a s e d i n t h e upper l a y e r s and s t a g e 2a were found only i n t h e s u r f a c e l a y e r .

F i g .

19

shows t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n d u r i n g broad d a y l i g h t i . e . between 09 and 15 h r s . GMT. More than

55%

of t h e l a r v a e were found i n t h e 80-65 m i n t e r v a l . F i g . 20 shows t h e v e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e l a r v a e d u r i n g darkness i . e . between 21 and 02 h r s . GMT. S t i l l most of t h e l a r v a e were found i n t h e 80-85 m i n t e r v a l and s t a g e I b was dominating. The number of l a r v a e caught a t n i g h t were much lesser t h a n t h a t caught a t d a y l i g h t . T h i s i s probably caused by a patchy d i s t r i b u t i o n of l a r v a e

(Table 1 ) . T h i s i s most probably a l s o t h e reason f o r t h e absence of l a r v a e i n t h e deepest hau1 a t n i g h t . Because of t h e patchy d i s t r i b u t i - on of t h e l a r v a e i t i s d i f f i c u l t t o make any comparison between s t a g e d i s t r i b u t i o n of l a r v a e caught a t d a y l i g h t and i n d a r k n e s s .

Table 2. Number of l a r v a e p e r m 2 s u r f a c e sampled d u r i n g t h e c l o s i n g n e t experiment.

Date

5

A p r i l 6 A p r i l

Hour

Og

11

13 14 17 19

21 23 01 03 05 07 T o t a l

Dep t h

Table 2 shows t h e number of l a r v a r p e r m 2 s u r f a c e d u r i n g t h e c l o s i n g n e t experiment. Larvae without yolk s a c and w i t h s u t t h e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of s t a g e 2 a d e s c r i b e d by DOYLE (1977) a r e omitted from

(11)

t h e t a b l e . F i g . 21 shows t h e v e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e l a r v a e

Fn

Table 2. Most of t h e l a r v a e were found i n t h e 100-81 m i n t e r v a l and t h e m a j o r i t y of t h e s e were i n s t a g e l b . During t h i s experiment newly hatched were recorded i n a l l depth i n t e r v a l s without any c l e a r p a t - t e r n . Older l a r v a e , however, were mainly found i n t h e upper l a y e r s .

During a s i m i l a r experiment i n 1985 i n t h e same a r e a (BJØRKE, FOSSUM and SÆTRE 1986) more than 65% of t h e l a r v a e were caught i n t h e upper 60 m . I n c l u d i n g t h e l a r v a e omitted from Table l and Table 2 t h e per- centage of l a r v a e i n t h e upper 60 m were 12% d u r i n g t h e Mocness ex- periment and

14%

d u r i n g t h e c l o s i n g n e t experiment i n 1986. I n 1985 t h e h i g h e s t abundance of l a r v a e were found i n t h e middle of t h e pyc- n o c l i n e . I n 1986 t h e pycnocline was less pronounced than i n

1985

( F i g . 7 S e c t i o n A ) . I n 1985 few newly hatched l a r v a e ( 1 a r v a e

<

9mm)were found. These two f a c t s might e x p l a i n t h e h i g h e r abundance of l a r v a e i n t h e deeper i n t e r v a l s observed i n 1986.

Lengthlstage d i s t r i b u t i o n of f i x e d l a r v a e .

Table

3

shows t h e l e n g t h d i s t r i b u t i o n of f i x e d h e r r i n g l a r v a e caught i n 1986 c l a s s i f i e d according t o DOYLE (1977) and ØIESTAD (1983). Fig.

24 shows t h e frequency d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e s e l a r v a e .

93%

of t h e l a r v a e were measured t o t h e mearest mm below, while t h e rest were measured t o t h e n e a r e s t 1/10 mm (Table

4 ) .

36

%

of t h e l a r v a e

< 9

mm i n Table

3

were i n s t a g e l a i . e . t h r e e days o l d o r younger, and of l a r v a e

< 8

mm, 46

%

were i n s t a g e l a . The spawning grounds f o r h e r r i n g can t h u s be more p r e c i s e l y l o c a t e d by mapping d i s t r i b u t i o n of f i x e d l a r v a e s m a l l e r than

8

mm. On t h e o t h e r hand only 16

%

of t h e l a r v a e i n Table 3 were s m a l l e r than

8

mm while

43 %

of t h e l a r v a e were s m a l l e r than

9

mm, By mapping d i s t r i b u t i o n of f i x e d l a r v a e s m a l l e r than

8

mm one might thus l o o s e information of spawning grounds because of low abundance of such l a r v a e . I n a d d i t i o n , 64

%

of t h e l a r v a e i n s t a g e l a a r e omitted from t h e mapping because they a r e e q u a l t o o r l a r g e r than

8

mm. F i g . 11 and F i g .

1 4

which shows t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of f r e s h l a r v a e

< 9

mm g i v e s t h u s a reasonable good l o c a t i o n of t h e spawning grounds of h e r r i n g when only l e n g t h d a t a of t h e l a r v a e a r e a v a i l i a b l e . Mapping of l a r v a e i n s t a g e l a w i l l , however, g i v e a b e t t e r l o c a t i o n of t h e spawning grounds of Norwegian spring-spawning h e r r i n g .

(12)

Table

3.

Length/stage d i s t r i b u t i o n of f i x e d h e r r i n g l a r v a e caught i n

1986.

Length (mm)

la

l b 1c 1 d 2a TOT

...

005

l 1

006 167 38 8 70 283

007 515 353 71 271

1210

008 749 1049 158 515 2471

009 400 1547 474 617 3038

010

57 761 712 397

2

19-29

011

24 6

1

87 25 197

012 1

7 31 9 48

013 4 3 7

014

2 2

015

1 1

...

TOT

1888 3774 1491 1995 39 9187

Shrinkage of h e r r i n g l a r v a e

I n Table

4

t h e d a t a of shrinkage due t o formalin f i x a t i o n i s given.

Table

4.

P e r c e n t shrinkage d u r i n g formalin f i x a t i o n

S t a g e Nos of l a r v a e Shrinkage i n Shrinkage i n Fixed Unfixed l e n g t h

(g)

d r y weight%)

(13)

The t a b l e shows t h a t t h e s h r i n k a g e both i n l e n g t h and weight i s r e h - t i v e l y c o n s t a n t between t h e d i f f e r e n t s t a g e s . The shrinkage i n l e n g t h i s r e l a t i v e l y moderate, while t h e shrinkage i n weight i s very l a r g e and t h e weight i s almost halved d u r i n g t h e f i x a t i o n p e r i o d . The d i f - f e r e n c e s i n mean l e n g t h of t h e same s t a g e s between t h e l a r v a e i n Table

4

and t h e ones r e p r e s e n t e d i n Fig. 24 might be due t o more a c c u r a t e measurements of t h e l a r v a e i n Table

4.

Condition of h e r r i n g l a r v a e

The m a t e r i a l i n t h i s examination was sampled d u r i n g t h e second covera- ge and c o n s i s t s of 647 h e r r i n g l a r v a e of s t a n d a r d l e n g t h 6.2-14.5 mm.

The bulk of t h e l a r v a e belonged t o t h e yolk s a c s t a g e s l a - l d . Few l a r v a e had s t a r t e d t o develope t h e d o r s a l f i n , s t a g e 2 a , and t h e deve- lopment of t h e l a r v a l population was delayed compared t o t h e 1985 s e a s o n , when most of t h e l a r v a e sampled i n t h e same area and a t t h e same time were i n t h e 2a s t a g e (BJØRKE

,

FOSSUM & SÆTRE 1 9 8 6 ) .

The mean s t a n d a r d l e n g t h , d r y weight and number of l a r v a e i n each s t a g e a r e shown i n Table

5.

Table

5.

The l a r v a l m a t e r i a l sampled i n 1986.

Substage Nos. of Mean s t a n d a r d Mean d r y

l a r v a e l e n g t h (mm) SD weight (ligl SD

(14)

The mean h a t c h i n g weight cmd t h e mean weight of t h e Larvae I n

the

dif- f e r e n t y o l k s a c s t a g e s was unchanged compared t o t h e 1985 m a t e r i a l

(BJØRXE

,

FOSSUM & SÆTRE 1986)

.

The delayed development of t h e l a r v a l population i n 1986 compared t o 1985, seemes t o be due t o t h e l a t e h a t c h i n g t h i s y e a r . Mastirnum bat- ching was observed i n mid A p r i l

,

(BJØRKE, HANSEM and MELLE 1987) a d l a r v a e hatched e a r l i e r i n t h e season a r e probably vanished.

A s t a n d a r d l e n g t h l d r y weight p l o t of t h e p r e s e n t m a t e r i a l i s shown i n F i g . 22. There i s no s t r i c t r e l a t i o n s h i p between t h e s t a n d a r d l e n g t k and t h e dry weight, i n d i c a t e d by a e x p o n e n t i a l c o r r e l a t i o n c o e f f e s c i - e n t r 2 = 0 . 4 0 , i n c o n t r a s t t o t h e E985 m a t e r i a l with a corresponding c o r r e l a t i o n c o e f f i s c i e n t r 2 =0.81.

There seemes t o be s i g n i f i e a n t l e s s growth of t h e h e r r i n g l a r v a e i n i986 than i n 1985, with a d e c r e a s e of t h e growth parameter ( s l o p e ) from 0 . 1 8 t o 0.11. The same p r e s e r v a t i o n procedure was followed both i n 1985 and 1986, and t h i s i n d i c a t e t h a t t h e l a r v a l population i n 1986 was exposed t o more marginale food c o n d i t i o n s than i n t h e previous y e a r .

Some of t h e v a r i a t i o n i n t h e d a t a may be introduced through t h e pre- s e r v a t i o n , a s t h e r e i s a s t r o n g e r l e n g t h l weight r e l a t i o n s h i p i n t h e p l o t of t h e l a r v a e n o t exposed t o Eormalin ( F i g . 2 3 ) . Therefore t h e n e c e s s i t y of a comparable p r e s e r v a t i o n procedure and t o s t u d y t h e l e n g t h

/

weight r e l a t i o n s h i p of unpreserved and presesved l a r v a e muct be s t r e s s e d .

F i g . 24 shows t h e l e n g t h frequency d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e l a r v a e i n t h e d i f f e r e n t s t a g e s . The jump i n s t a n d a r d l e n g t h from s t a g e La t o l b Is probably due t o t h e s e n s i t i v e n e s s of t h e newly hatched l a r v a e t o band- l i n g . They a r e e a s i l y exposed t o shrinkage d u r i n g c a t c h i n g . Exeept f o r t h i s t h e l e n g t h frequency d i s t r i b u t i o n of t h e y o l k s a c l a r v a e seemes t o be comparable t o t h e one from t h e previous y e a r .

The d i e t of t h e l a r v a e d u r i n g S t a g e s l a - 2 a , r e p r e s e n t i n g a t i m e span e s t i m a t e d t o be 23 days (BJØRKE, FOSSUM & SÆTRE 1986) i s shown i n Fig. 25. The dominating food organism through t h i s p e r i o d was copepod

(15)

a a u p l i i which contributec!

80 %

t o t h e g t t c c a n t e - a t , Tkie only o t h e r food orgmism found was copepod e g g s (20%j, The youngest l a r v a e found with g u t c o n t e n t were

3-6

days o l d . I n t h i s period copepod eggs and copepod n a u p l i i were of e q u a l importmce

,

S u t e r on t h e d i e t was dominated o*

copepod n a u p l i i . No copepod e g g s were found i n Larvae o l d e r t h m

11

days. There i s a pronounced reduction i n t h e f e e d i n g r a t i o (number of food organisms p e r l a r v a l lut) i n a l l ctagec from 298"o 1986,

The reduced f e e d i n g r a t i o and growth parameter t o g e t h e r with t h e t o t a l dominance of yolksac Larvae a s Late a s mid A p r i l , i n d i c a t e

1986

a s a y e a r with poor r e c r u i t m e n t of t h e Norweglan cpring- spawning h e r r i n g , L n v e s t i g a t i o n s c a r r i e d o u t i n May gave a d d i t i o n a l information of t h l s (Nedseaas p e r s , comm,), a d t h e O-group Index e s t a b l i s h e d l a t e i n t h e autumn confirmed t h a t t h i s y e a r c l a c s was a poor one ( R a t t i n g e n p e r s * comm. ) ,

CONCEUCIONS

The spawning a r e a can c l e a r l y be seen i n t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of l a r v a e

<

9

mm and t h e s e were t h e same a s i n

2985.

I n a d d i t i o n a s m a l l e r spaw- n i n g a r e a o f f s h o r e a t t h e c o n t i n e n t a l s l o p e was i d e n t i f i e d ,

The main f e a t u r e s of t h e c i r c u l a t i o n p a t t e r n of t h e a r e a seems t o be t h e same a s i n

198s.

The combined use of bydrography, l a r v a e d i s t r i b u - t i o n and Argos d r i f t e r s ceem a b l e t o r e v e a l b o t h t h e Larval d r i f t as welI a s r e t e n t i o n a r e a s with a r e s i d e n c e t i m e of

10-15

days,

The l a r v a l population i n l986 was t o t a l l y dominuted by yolksac l a r v a e . The number of l a r v a e

>

L2 mm woc about 18% of t h a t found d u r i n g t h e same p e r i o d i n

1985, In

1986 a slower growth a d a lower f e e d i n g r a t i o i n a l l l a r v a l s t a g e s was observed compared t o 2985, T h i s i n d i c a t e poorer r e c r u i t m e n t i n 1986 t k m i n

1985,

The m a j o r i t y of t h e l a r v a e weie found deeper than 60 m a s opposed t o

1985.

The percentage of newly hatched Earvae I.ncreased with depth.

Older l a r v a e were found mainly i n t h e upper 40 m , Patchy d i s t r i b u t i o n made a comparison between l a r v a e caugbt a t day and a t n i g h t d i f f i c u l t .

Mapping of t h e e a r l i e s t s t a g e of l a r v a l development i n s t e a d of tlie s m a l l e s t l a r v a e groups g i v e s a b e t l e r Xocation of the spawning

(16)

grounds ,

F i r s t f e e d i n g was observed i n 3-6 days o l d l a r v a e . The d i e t of t h e l a r v a e was dominated by copepod n a u p l i i . A shrinkage of 40-45% i n dry- weight and

3-7%

i n l e n g t h due t o p r e s e r v a t i o n was observed.

REFERENCES

BJØRKE, H . 1981. D i s t r i b u t i o n of f i s h eggs and l a r v a e from Stad t o Lofoten d u r i n g A p r i l 1976-80. Pp 583-603

& I

Roald Sætre and Martin Mork (Eds.) The Norwegian Coastal Current. U n i v e r s i t y of Bergen

1981: 895

p.

BJØRKE, H . , P. FOSSUM and R . SÆTRE, 1986. D i s t r i b u t i o n , d r i f t and c o n d i t i o n of h e r r i n g l a r v a e o f f western Norway i n 1985. Coun

.

Meet. i n t . Coun. Explor. Sea, (H:39):

1-15.

BJØRKE, H., K . HANSEN and W. MELLE,

1987.

S i l d e k l e k k i n g og s e i g y t i n g på More i

1986.

I n s t i t u t e of Marine ~ e s e a r c h ' s Egg- and Larvae Program (HELP)

,

Report 1987, No.

4.

DOYLE, M . J .

1977.

A morphological s t a g i n g system f o r t h e l a r v a l devel- opment of t h e h e r r i n g , (Clupea harengus L . ) . J . mar. b i o l . A s s . ,

51:

859-867.

DRAGESUND, 0 . 1970. F a c t o r s i n f l u e n c i n g y e a r - c l a s s s t r e n g t h of Nor- wegian s p r i n g spawning h e r r i n g . FiskDir. Skr. S e r . HavUnders.,l5

:

381-450.

ELLERTSEN, B . , P. FOSSUM, P. SOLEMDAL, S. SUNDBY and S. TILSETH,

1984.

A c a s e s t u d y on t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n of cod l:.rvae and a v a i l a b i l i t y of prey organisms i n r e l a t i o n t o p h y s i c a l p r o c e s s e s i n Lofoten.

I n : E. DAHL, D.S. DANIELSEN, E . MOKSNESS and P . SOLEMDAL ( E d s . ) , The Propagation of Cod Gadus morhua L. F l ~ d e v i g e n r a p p o r t s e r . ,

L:

453 - 477.

(17)

FØYN, L , and K . BJØRKE,

1986,

S t r a t e g i e s i n assescment of p o t e n t i a l o i l p o l l u t i o n e f f e c t s on t h e f i s h r e s o u r c e s . Coun. Meet. i n t . Coun. Explor. Sea, (E:34).

HAY, D.E.

1981.

E f f e c t s of c a p t u r e and f i x a t i o n on g u t c o n t e n t s and body s i z e of P a s i c i c h e r r i n g l a r v a e . Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons.

perm. i n t . Explor. Mer,

a:

395-400.

LJØEN, R . and 0 . NAKKEN, 1969. On t h e hydrography of t h e s h e l f water o f f Møre and Helgeland. F i s k D i r . Skr. S e r . HavUnders

. , 15:

285

-

294.

SELIVERSTOV, A.S.

1974.

V e r t i c a l migrations of l a r v a e of t h e A t 1 a n t ~ - Scandian Herring (Clupea harengus L . ) P. 253-262

&

BLAXTER, J . H . S. e d . The e a r l y l i f e h i s t o r y of f i s h . Springer-Verlag. B e r l i n .

THEILACKER, G. and DORSEY, K . 1980. Larval f i s h d i v e r s i t y , a summer of l a b o r a t o r y and f i e l d r e s e a r c h . I O C Workshop Report no. 28:

105-142.

WIBORG, K.F. 1960. I n v e s t i g a t i o n s on eggs and l a r v a e of commercial f i s h e s i n Norwegian c o a s t a l and o f f s h o r e waters i n

1957-58.

F i s k . - D i r . Skr. S e r . HavUnders., 12

( 7 ) :

1-27.

WIEBE, P.H., BURT, K . H . , BOYD, S.H. and MORTON, A.W., 1976. A m u l t i p l e opening/closing n e t and environmental s e n s i n g system f o r sampling zooplankton. J . Mar

.

Res.

, 34:

313-326.

ØIESTAD, V . 1983. Growth and s u r v i v a l of h e r r i n g l a r v a e and f r y (Clupea harengus L . ) exposed t o d i f f e r e n t f e e d i n g regimes i n experimental ecosystems; outdoor b a s i n s and p l a s t i c bags. Ph. d , t h e s i s : l - 2 9 9 . U n i v e r s i t y of Bergen.

(18)

F i g . l . Grid o f s t a t i o n s , 29 March - 1 8 A p r i l 1986. B a t h y m e t r i c c o n t o u r s f o r each 100 m a r e i n c l u d e d . I n s e r t e d map shows t h e l o c a t i o n o f t h e s t u d i e d a r e a .

(19)
(20)

Fig. 3 . S u r f a c e c a l i n i t y 9-18 April 1986.

(21)

F i g . 4 . S u r f a c e v a l u e s of n i t r a t e 9-18 A p r i l 1 9 8 6 .

(22)

F i g . 5 . S u r f a c e v a l u e s of s i l i c a t e 9-18 A p r i l 1 9 8 6 .

(23)

Fig. 6. Surface values of chlorophyll a 9-18 April 1986.

(24)

.

l

SECTION A 16 APRIL 1986

14 APRIL 1986

F i g . 7 . Hydrographic s e c t i o n A , B and C . L o c a t i o n of t h e s e i s i n d i c a t e d i n F i g . l .

(25)
(26)

Ei DEPLOYMENT POSITION A RECOVERY POSITION

F i g . 9. T r a c k s o f t h e d r i f t i n g Argos buoys drogued a t 30 m depth.

(27)

Fig. 10. T r a c k s o f two o f t h e Argos buoys f u r t h e r n o r t h .

(28)

F i g . 11. D i s t r i b u t i o n o f h e r r i n g larvae < 9 mm ( ~ / m 2 ) , 29 March-7 April 1986.

(29)

2 F i g . 1 2 . D i s t r i b u t i o n of h e r r i n g l a r v a e between 9 a n d 11 mm (N/m ) ,

29 March - 7 A p r i l 1 9 8 6 .

(30)
(31)

F i g . 14- D i s t r i b u t i o n o f h e r r i n g l a r v a e < 9 mm (N/m 2 ) 9-18 A p r i l 1 9 8 6 .

(32)

4" 5 O 6" 7 - '8 9 O 10- 11' l z O

I l l

30i 300 200

500 LOG LOC

i : 3 0 8

. . .

6 5'-

300

. . . . . .

6 1 0

.

e . .

HERRING LARVAE -

9 m m 5 (Nlrn2) < 12mm 9 - 18 APRIL 1986

F i g . 1 5 . D i s t r i b u t i o n o f h e r r i n g l a r v a e between 9 and 11 mm ( ~ / m 2 )

,

9-18 A p r i l 1986.

(33)

F i g . 1 6 . D i s t r i b u t i o n o f h e r r i n g l a r v a e > 11 mm (N/m 2 ) , 9-18 A p r i l 1986.

(34)

F i g . 1 7 . Observed spawning a r e a s , ( c i r c l e s ) and t e n t a t i v e l a r v a l d r i f t r o u t e s . The i n d i c a t e d d r i f t i n g time i s u n t i l p a s s i n g t h e 65 o N l a t i t u d e .

(35)

VERTICAL OISTRI3UTION m s s

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION

m 5 5 FIAGE

r I

IERTiCAL CICTRIEUTION

mNES5

t . . . r I . . n ~ I . 9 5 x 8 . . . . i . r . * l . . - - r

0 1 0 2 0 3 0 w 5 0 m

PER CENT

F i g . 18. V e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n o f l a r v a e ; number, s t a g e and p e r c e n t a g e f o r t h e Mocness m a t e r i a l .

(36)

VERTICAL OISTRIBUTION

W3PeSf DAY VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION

ICEPESS OAY STAGE

VERTICAL OISTRIBUTION

iUSESS DAY

F i g . 19. V e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n of l a r v a e ; number. s t a g e and percentage f o r the Mocness m a t e r i a l during day time.

(37)

YERTIChL DISTRIBUTION

t C M 3 3 N I C F T

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION

KUES-3 N1W STAGE

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTIOM

FPXXZSS N I W

z I

F i g . 20. V e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n o f l a r v a e ; number, stage and p e r c e n t a g e f o r t h e Mocness m a t e r i a l d u r i n g n i g h t .

(38)

VERTICAL OISTRIBUTION

-ING NET

l

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION

CLOSINS HET STAGE

VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION

=OS ING NE7 s I

PER CENT

F i g . 2 1 . V e r t i c a l d i s t r i b u t i o n o f l a r v a e ; n u m b e r , s t a g e and.

p e r c e n t a g e f o r t h e c l o s i n g n e t .

(39)

STANDARD LENGTH

(M

F i g . 22. The l e n g t h / d r y w e i g h t p l o t o f t h e p r e s e n t h e r r i n g l a r v a e m a t e r i a l .

I

DRY WEIGHT (PLI)

STANDARD LENGTH

(MM)

F i g . 2 3 . The l e n g t h / d r y w e i g h t p l o t o f t h e l a r v a e n o t exposed t o f o r m a l i n f i x a t i o n .

(40)

F i g . 2 4 . The p e r c e n t l e n g t h d i s t r i b u t i o n o f t h e d i f f e r e n t s t a g e s .

I

FEEOING RATIO

-COP NAUPLII

I

t--*[OF! EGG

0.2

r

I

DAYS POST HATCHING

I

F i g . 25. The d i e t o f t h e l a r v a e i n t h e p e r i o d 3-23 days p o s t h a t c h i n g .

(41)

Denne rapport serien har begrenset distribus j on, Opplysninger

om

programmet og rapportene kan rettes til

Programledelsen for RELP

Fiskeridirektoratets Havforskningsinstitutt Postboks 1870

5024 Bergen

1987 r

l

P,Solemdal og P,Bratland: KLekkeforlØp for lodde

i

Varangerfjorden 1986,

Nr.

2 , T,Waug

og SeSundby: Kveitelarver og milj8, UndersGkelser på gytefeltene ved SGrØya.

r

3

B,BjØrke, KaHansen og S.Sundby: Postlarveunder- sØkelser i 1986.

Nr, 4 , H,Bj@rke, K,Hansen og @,Melle: Sildeklekking

og

seigyting på MØre 1986,

Nr.

5 ,

H,BjØrke and SeSundby: Abundance indices for the Arcto-Norxqegian cod in 1979-1986 based on larvae investigations.

Nr. 6, P,Fossum: Sult under larvestadiet - en viktig

rekrutteringsmekanisme

?

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Leiravsetningene i strandsonen er ofte dekket av grovere masser, noe som kan gi et falsk inntrykk av grunnforholdene!.. Ofte komplekse med «uryddige» lag med løse friksjonsmasser

Hun er overlege ved Avdeling for vaksineforebyggbare sykdommer, Folkehelseinstitu et, og medlem av Skandinavisk verifiseringskomité for eliminasjon av meslinger og rubella.. Forfa er

Det kan hende data med veldig høy romlig oppløsning fra NGUs studieområ- der kan brukes, men det kan også være behov for å se nærmere på data fra andre områder for

The Museum of Jurassic Technology (MJT) iir ett mycket litet museum som liggerpa Venice Boulevard i Los Angeles, mitt i det anonyma bilgatulivet, omgardat av kafler och

De to viktigste elementene av samtalens innhold var prognose og håp. Når det gjaldt prognose ble det trukket frem fire viktige elementer. 1) Ønsket om å få informasjon om

Hun er overlege ved Avdeling for vaksineforebyggbare sykdommer, Folkehelseinstitu et, og medlem av Skandinavisk verifiseringskomité for eliminasjon av meslinger og rubella.. Forfa er

fjorden utenfor Bergen for om mulig å se eventuelle forskjeller mellom nordlige og sørlige felter. Hydro- grafiske målinger vil også bli tatt. Rusefisket etter ål

Lengden av larvene tydet på at få av larvene som var klekket under første dekningen overlevde frem til den andre.. gangen ble det funnet en liten konsentrasjon