• No results found

MANAGEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT PENSION FUND GLOBAL

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "MANAGEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT PENSION FUND GLOBAL"

Copied!
27
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Trondheim, 25 September 2020

DEPUTY GOVERNOR JON NICOLAISEN

MANAGEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT

PENSION FUND GLOBAL

(2)

THE GPFG’S ROLE IN ECONOMIC

POLICY

(3)

From natural resources to financial wealth

Sources: The Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, Ministry of Finance and Norges Bank 3

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

1997 2007 2017 2027

Continental shelf The fund

(4)

A fund owned by the Norwegian people

Governance model

(5)

Governance structure

The Storting

Ministry of Finance

The Executive Board - Norges Bank

Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM)

5

Delegation of powers and responsibilities

Reporting

results and

risk

(6)

Central government budget

The petroleum fund mechanism

Transfer

Non-oil revenues

Expenditure Government Pension

Fund Global (GPFG)

Fiscal rule Petroleum revenues and

return on investments

(7)

Petroleum revenue spending

-5 0 5 10 15 20 25

1970 1990 2010 2030 2050

Government petroleum revenues

Government petroleum revenue spending 3% path

Percentage of trend mainland GDP

Sources: Ministry of Finance and Norges Bank 7

Spending – 2020 (?)

(8)

INVESTMENT STRATEGY

(9)

The objective is high long-term return

Section 2 Government Pension Fund Act (from 1 January 2020)

9

The objective of investment in the Government Pension Fund

shall be to achieve the highest possible return within the limits

of acceptable risk. Within this framework, the Fund shall be

managed responsibly.

(10)

A large fund – NOK 10 400 billion

-2 000 0 2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 12 000

1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019

Fund value

Cumulative. In billions of NOK

1)

Government’s net cash flow

Return

Non-oil budget deficit

Krone exchange rate

(11)

The benchmark is important

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

Portfolio Benchmark

Index

Sources: Bloomberg Barclays Indices, FTSE and Norges Bank 11

(12)

5.9 percent return since 1998 1)

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30

1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019

Annual return

Accumlated returng Annual return in terms of the GPFG’s currency basket. Percent

Annualised return. Percent

2019 19.95

Past five years 7.05 Past 10 years 7.83

Since 1998 6.09

(13)

Investment strategy

13

Invest globally

Diversify investments

Exploit the fund’s characteristics

Diversify risk and return by global investments across asset classes

Protect international purchasing power and take part in global value creation

Create return by exploiting the fund’s long-

term perspective and large size

(14)

Evolution of strategy over time

0 1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000 7 000 8 000 9 000 10 000

1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2020

40% equities Government

bonds only 60% equities

70%

equities First real estate

investment All emerging equity

markets

Ethical guidelines Bonds – extended

investment universe

More companies

GPFG. In billions of NOK

(15)

Asset allocation

Actual portfolio

1

Strategic benchmark index

70

30 Equities

Fixed income 69,6

27,6 2,8

Equities

Fixed income Real estate investments

1) At 30 June 2020. 15

Source: Norges Bank

(16)

Invested in more than 9 000 companies in 73 countries

1)

North-America 44%

3%

Rest of the world Europe 34%

Asia and Oceania 19%

(17)

The fund’s five largest equity investments 1)

1) At 30 June 2020. 17

Source: Norges Bank

(18)

RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENTS

(19)

The objective is high long-term return

Section 2 Government Pension Fund Act (from 1 January 2020)

19

The objective of investment in the Government Pension Fund

shall be to achieve the highest possible return within the limits

of acceptable risk. Within this framework, the Fund shall be

managed responsibly.

(20)

A chain of measures

Responsible investment

Ethical decisions

Establishing principles

Exercising ownership

Investing sustainably

Observation Exclusion

“The fund should not be invested in companies that violate

fundamental ethical norms.”

“Long-term return depends on sustainable growth, well-

functioning markets and good

corporate governance.”

(21)

Principles: Expectations and positions

Social Environmental

Governance

21

(22)

Ownership: Voting and dialogue - 2019

Three categories of company dialogue We vote at all shareholder meetings

Dialogue on strategic topics

Sustainability Governance Dialogue on incidents

Corporate actions Risk incidents

Dialogue on ethical guidelines

 3 412 meetings with 1 474 companies

 11 518 shareholder meetings

 116 777 resolutions

(23)

Environmental mandates and divestments

 Environment-related mandates

– Long-term investment opportunities in companies that contribute to more environmentally friendly economic activity

 Divestments

– Reduce the Fund’s exposure to unacceptable risks

• Ethical exclusions based on conduct or products

• Risk-based divestments – companies that impose substantial costs on other companies or society as a whole and are not sustainable in the long term

23

(24)

Ethical exclusions – guidelines

Product-based

 Thermal coal mining or coal- based power production

 Tobacco

 Specific weapon types

Conduct-based (examples)

 Severe environmental damage

 Greenhouse gas emissions

 Human rights violations

 Gross corruption

“The fund should not be invested in companies that violate fundamental ethical norms.”

 Decisions on conduct-based exclusions are taken by the Executive

 Established by the Ministry of Finance, on behalf of the Storting:

(25)

Return effects of ethical exclusions

-3.00 -2.00 -1.00 0.00 1.00

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020

Conduct-based exclusions Total

Product-based exclusions

Equities. Percentage points

1)

1) At 31 December 2019. 25

Source: Norges Bank

(26)

Return effects of risk-based divestments

-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3

2011 2013 2015 2017 2019

Total

Climate change Human rights

Water management Anti-corruption Other

Equities. Percentage points

1

(27)

Trondheim, 25 September 2020

DEPUTY GOVERNOR JON NICOLAISEN

MANAGEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT

PENSION FUND GLOBAL

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Can the Norwegian Government Pension Fund - Global investment portfolio be optimized if the portfolio, was diversified in more geographical regions, by using

An example is the Singapore Government Investment Corporation (GIC), where the country’s finance ministry also formulates a mandate with a benchmark portfolio and investment

Over the whole period since 1998 when Norges Bank established Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), the annual return has been 0.25 percentage point higher than the return on

Expected nominal rate of return on German 5-year government bonds 5 years ahead and equity instruments..

In addition to serving as advisor on investment strategy to the Norwegian Government Pension Fund, Dr Sung is currently investment advisor to Singapore’s Min- istry of Finance,

Based on considerations relating to the overall return and risk of the Government Pension Fund – Global, the Strategy Council recommends that the Fund’s benchmark portfolio for

In the Government Pension Fund 2019 white paper, the Ministry of Finance announced a review of the framework and benchmark for GPFG equity investments, including the geo-

Norges Bank’s report on the management of the Government Pension Fund – Global in 2008 points out that the negative excess return last year was significantly greater than the