z
E o
P
(JJ
\¡
È=
{
NILU
REFERENCE
DATE
ISBN
oR37t97 0-8916 JUNI
1997 82-425-0892-5Atmospheric corrosion
tests along the Norwegian-Russian
border
Part II
Jan F. Henriksen and
Alexandre A. Mikhailov
NILU
REFERENCE
DATE
ISBN
oF-37/97 0-8976
JTJNI 199782-425-0892-5
Atmospheric corrosion tests along the Norwegian-Russian border
Part II
Jan F. Henriksen* and Alexandre A. Mikhailov**
Norwegian Institute
for Air
Research P.O.Box
100, N-2007Kjeller,
Norway{<*
Institute of Physical ChemistryRussian Academy
of
Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation*
3
Contents
Page
Summary.
...51. Purpose of the
bilateral
exposureprogramme...
...72.The main
results of thefirst part
of the programme...7 3.Description
of the second exposurepart
of thebilateral
programme ...
...94.
Experimental
results anddiscussion
...9 4.1 Temperature, relative air humidity, timeof
wetness...4.2 Sulphur dioxide and
wind
...104.3
Precipitation
... 11...9
Annex A
TablesAnnex B
Tables.25 .37
5
Summary
A bilateral
exposure programme hasbeen carried out along the
Norwegian- Russian borderin 1990-1991,1992-1993
and 1993-1994,in
orderto provide
aquantitative evaluation of the effect of sulphur pollutants on the
atmospheric corrosion of important materialsin
sub-arctic climate.The results
of
the corrosion testsof
metal materials have shown that alsoin
sub-arctic climate the metal
corrosionis
dependentof the
atmosphericcorrosivity, which is
causedby
man-made emissions.Dry
depositionof
sulphuris the
main reasonfor
the accelerated atmospheric corrosionof
metalsin
the region along the Norwegian-Russian border.Dry'deposition of Cl
makesits own contribution
to the processesof
corrosion atViksjgfjell
and Karpdalen. Sea-salt aerosols are the importantCl
source.The kinetics of corrosion
of
steel and zinc as a functionof
time were characterizedby
the reductionof
the corrosion ratewith
60-:70Vo at the less polluted areas andonly with
20-50Voin an
atmosphereof sulphur dioxide and chlorides or in significantly
SO2-polluted areas.The
secondyear
corrosion rateof
copper was characteized by the reduction of corrosion ratewith
60-80Vo at all test sites.The
time of
wetnessis
an important parameterfor
the predictionof
atmospheric corrosionof
metals evenfor a
regional scale.For monitoring
purposes andfor
trend-effect analysisit
is most importantto
determine thecorrosivity of
SO2 as afunction of time
of
wetness, either by the average corrosion rate causedby
SO2 or by the average total corrosion rate during the period.The yearly
corrosion rates(C) of
steel and zinc are best describedby the
dose/response functions which combined the effects
of
SO2 and time of wetness(TOW)
C =Ar
+ A2 [SO2]TOV/
C =
(Ar
+ A2 [SO2])TOV/
In
accordancewith
dose/response functions obtained, the yearly corrosion ratefor
steel and zinc are higher
for
the areaswith
higher contentsof
dry depositionof Cl
thanfor
areaswith
similar climate, but only SO2 containing atmosphere.The
temperaturelimit for time of
wetnessfound on the
basisof the data of monthly
programmeis below
0oC.For defining
more precise temperaturelimits for the
corrosion processeson a yearly
basis,it is
necessaryto
havea
largerdatabase
from
a larger region where the differencesin
thetime of
wetnesslinked
to temperature are larger.1
Atmospheric corrosion tests along the Norwegian- Russian border
Part II
1. Purpose of the bilateral exposure programme
The purpose
of
the prograÍrmeis
to evaluate quantitatively the effectof
sulphur pollutants on the atmosphericcorosion of
important metalsin
sub-arctic climate.The programme is based on a bilateral exposure programme at test sites along the Norwegian-Russian
border and was carried out in
co-operationbetween
theNorwegian Institute for Air
Research(NILU) and the Institute of
Physical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences.2. The main results of the first part of the programme
The
first
partof
the bilateral exposure programme has been carriedout
along the Norwegian-Russian borderin
1990-1991 andthe
results obtained publishedin
Henriksen et al. (1992) and Henriksen et al. (1995).The results
of
the corrosion testsof
metal materials have shown that alsoin
sub- arctic climate the metal corrosion is dependentof
the atmosphericcorrosivity.
The monthly corrosion rate (C)of
steel was best describedby
dose-response functions which combined the effects of SO2 and time of wetness (TOW)C = (ar + a2 [SO2]u3) [Tow]u¿
where the exponential terms â3 and aa
did not differ
greatlyfrom
1.The
yearlycorrosion rate of
metalslike
steel,galvanized
steel,zinc, "aIuzinc" and
steel coatedwith "galfan"
and aluminium were described by the simple equationC = âr + az [SOz]
with
good correlation. The timeof
wetness factor lostits
importance because thetemperature wetness characteristics at the different sites as well as
theprecipitation on them differed insignificantly. To obtain
a more universal dose- response function the time of wetness must be included.Dry deposition of Cl at the test
sites increasedin the
sequenceViksjpfiell
>Karpdalen > Svanvik and the
Cl/lVIgratio
measuredhas shown that
sea-salt aerosolsare the important Cl source. Dry deposition of Cl made its
own contributionto
the processesof
atmospheric corrosion atViksjøfiell
andpartly
at Karpdalen.Accordingly the corosion rates at Viksjøfjell and
Karpdalen were higher than expected compared to the restof
the test sites. Figure 1 shows the test sites"8
I I
¡
I I I II I I
t 1I
a I
aol
I, ViksjøtjelltI t I
I I
I I
I I
I I I
a
,
at
t I I
oar
I
1
,
I a¡t
Norge
I Karpdalent t t
1
I Penche
Finland
aO^.
AT¡
¡ SvanvikQ
aear
a-, It ot
Nikel
lrr-.-a)
c3
O
'c2
a
t a
Zapoljarnij
a I
a
.ߨ
LT.2
a,' {¿ tÍ\
I ::, .'
¡.1-rnïb
Noatun tß{
LLw
O
,c1
Russland o Air qual¡ty
r Meterology
A Corrosion
a a
,
a N+
A0 5
10kmI aI
a
Figure 1:
Map of the test sites and the type of measurements performed at the sites.Because
of the
temperaturerange found in the sub-arctic, the
importanceof
defining the real time of
wetnesson the
surfacewill
increase.The
common approximationof
assuming thetime of
wetness to be definedby
relativehumidity
above 80Vo and temperatures above OoC workswell in
temperature climate,but
a more detailed and refineddefinition is
neededin
sub-arctic climate, where long periodswith
temperatures close to OoC are more frequent.9
3. Description of the second exposure part of the bilateral programme
The second part
of
the bilateral exposure programme has been carriedout
along the Norwegian-Russian borderin
1992-1994.This part of the
progranìmeinvolved the 1 and 2
year exposuresof the flat
samples (10x
15cm) of carbon steel, zinc and copper at the sites
Svanvik,Viksjøfjell (Norway)
andCl, C2
andC3
(Russia). The same materials were also usedin the first part of the
programme.The
steel usedfollows the
Swedish standard SIS 141316.The panels were facing south
with
a 45" angle.The mass loss determinations were carried out in one laboratory
(NILU).
The regular air
pollution
measurementsin
this period were carried out at the sites Svanvik, Viksjøfjell,
Karpdalen,Nikel
and C2.4. Experimental results and discussion
4.1 Temperature, relative air humidity, time
of wetnessThe temperature and relative
humidity in
the air were measured atViksjøfjell
and Svanvik. Themonthly
and yearly datafor
temperature,relative air humidity
andtime of
wetness(TOW: RH
>807o andT
>0oC,T >-2C
andT >-4"C) for
the period L992-1,994 are given in AnnexA,
TablesA1-43.
Yearly values fortime of
wetness
for the period of
oneyear of
exposurein 1990-199I, 1992-1993
and L993-1994 aregiven in Table
1. The results show that the temperature wetness datain
the regiondiffer significantly from
yearto
year andfor
thedifferent
testsites for the
sameperiod. The yearly
valuesof time of
wetness obtainedfor different
temperaturelimits
alsodiffer for
the same test sites.In
most cases the dependenceof TOV/I = f(Tri*it)
are stronglylinear. The
slopeof
curvesdid
notdiffer
greatly, see Annex B, Figure81.
Table
l:
Time of wetness (TOW =RH
>807oandT >0"C,
T>-2"C andT >- 4"C)
at Svanvik andViksj@fjell.1)
For the periods 06-07/90, and 01/91 the TOW data of Svanvik were used for PeriodSvanvik Viksjøfjelll)
TOW, hour/year RH >80% and
T
>0"c
T>-2"c
T >-4.CTOW, hour/year RH >80% and
T
>0"C
T>-2'C
T >-4"C1 990/1 991
1 992/1 993
1 993/1 994
1752 2279 1718
2101 2716 2140
2417 3086 2448
1 691 2627 2176
2086 3339 3122
2551 4091 3829
10
4.2 Sulphur dioxide and wind
The
SO2levels at the test sites are
dependingon the
emissions, speed anddirection of the wind, as well as the
distancefrom the
sources.The wind
conditions are responsible alsofor
transferof
aerosols, containedCl-ions, which
has corrosive impact on metals.Average
monthly
and average maximumdaily
SO2levels,
Vg/m3,from
August 1992 up toJuly
1994 arc givenin
AnnexA,
Table44. Annual
averuge SO2 levelsfor
thefirst
and second periodsof
exposure of materials are givenin
Table 2.The
highest annual average SO2 levels were measured atNikel, which
has the main sourcefor
SO2 emissionsin the
area: 66Fg/m: for
1992-1993 and 57¡rg/ml for 1993-1994. At the Norwegian sites the
SO2levels
decreasedin
1993-1994compared
to the period I990-l99L
The decreaseat Viksjøfjell,
Karpdalen and Svanvik were 347o,33Vo and36Vo respectively. The decreaseof
SO2 at the site C2in
1992-1993 was insignificant.Table
2:
Annual average SO2levels, pg/m3, in 1990-1991, 1992-1993 and 1993-1994.The NO* pollutant level is
low in
this region. Therefore the measurementsof
NO2 were not included in the programme.The wind
parameters(wind speed and wind direction) were
measured atViksjøfjell
and at Svanvik.The
distributionof wind
direction andwind
speedin 1992-1994 is given in Annex A,
TablesA5 and 46. The wind conditions
atViksjgfjell in this period were
charactenzedby the prevailing 210"-240"
directions during the period from
Octoberto May. In the period from
June to September winds prevailedof
the 30'-180oand 360" directions,Relatively
strongwinds (>
6mis)
prevailedduring
this period. Calm conditions didpractically
not occur.The wind
conditions atSvanvik
were characterizedby
theprevailing 180'-240' directions during 9-10
months(from
Augustto April-May). In
theperiod from May to
September thewind
directions 30o-60o and 360" also prevailed. The calm periods during 8 months accountedfor
l0-327o of the time.On the whole the
wind
conditionsin
1992-1994 were approximately the same asin
1990-1991.Period
c2 c3
Viksjøfjell Karpdalen Svanvik c1 Noatun1 990-1 991
1 992-1 993
1 993-1 994
56.9 54.8
43.1 37.1
25.6 24.4
21.3 15.5 14.3
13.0 10.6 8.3
9.9 5.9
11
4.3 Precipitation
Precipitation has been
measuredregularly at Svanvik and Karpdalen.
Someimportant corrosion
parametersof precipitation are given in Table 47.
The amount of precipitationin
1992-1993 was higher thanin I990-199L
This may be the reasonfor
increasing valuesof
thetime of
wetness at the test sitesin
1992- 1993.The three months' pH
valueswere all below 5. The precipitation
was charucterizedby
increasing acidification and sulphur concentration whenmoving from the
southto
the northin the
area.According to
the results obtainedin
aninternational research programme carried out under UN/ECE Convention on long- range transboundary
air pollution, the wet
deposition(total
amountof [H+] in precipitation) is one term in the
dose/responsefunctions for
unsheltered zinc,copper and
calcareous stones(Kucera et al., 1995; Kucera and Fitz,
1995).However, as
it
was concluded in the first partof
the work,it
isdifficult
to evaluate the quantitativerole of acidity of
the precipitation on coffosion dueto
theminor
differences in the pH values for test sites.The concentration
of Cl in
precipitation at Karpdalen was usually a factorof 2-3 higher than at Svanvik
and sometimesit
even increasedabruptly. The
Cl-ions accelerate the corrosion processes atViksjØfjell
and Karpdalen, and the corrosion is shown to have better correlationwith
dry thanwith
wet deposition of Cl.The concentration
of
NO3- was generallylow,
and increasedinsignificantly with
increasing concentration of sulphate.
4.4
Analysisof corrosion data
The results
of
the corrosion tests duringtwo
yearsof
exposurein 1992-1994
are givenin
Table 3. The mass lossesof
metals atall
sites except Svanvik decreasedin
the order steel-+
zinc+
copper.At
Svanvik mass losses of copper were higherthan zinc. The
mass lossesof all
metalsduring the
secondyear of
exposure decreased comparedto
thefirst
year, especiallyfor
copper, AnnexB, Table 81.
The most significant reduction
of corosion
rate (on 60-70Vo) was observed at the lesspolluted
test sites (Svanvik and C1). The reductionof
the corrosionrate of
steel and zinc the second year
in
presenceof
SO2 and Cl-ions(Viksjøfjell)
and at thesignificantly
polluted test sites (C2 and C3) are only 20-50Vo. The second yearcorrosion rate of copper was
reducedon 60-807o at all test sites. The low
corrosion rateof
copper at the test siteC2
and the large reductionof
the corrosion ratefor
the second year (by SOVo) werc unexpected, becauseof
high concentrationof
SO2 (54.8pgim:)
at the site.The
resultsof
the yearly corrosionof
metalsduring
exposurein 1992-1993
andl99O-199I
aregiven in
Table4.
Theyearly
mass lossesof
steelin
1992-1993 increasedat all test
sites comparedwith the period 1990-199I, in spite of
thedecrease of SO2 levels. The yearly mass losses
of
zinc decreased atViksjgfjell
and at Svanvik, increased at the test sitesCl
andC2
and did not change at the test siteC3. The
explanationfor this
phenomenonmay be
obtainedon the
basisof
the analysis of the results of the two year exposures.Material
Viksjøfjell Svanvik c1 C2 c3
1 2 1 2 1 2
12
1 2Steel Zinc Copper
347 18.0 12.1
539 26.8 16.4
145 7.1 10.1
206 9.5 12.8
163 8.3 8.2
220 11.2
306 21.3
8.9 466 33.4 10.7
264 15.1
392 27.1
t2
Table
3:
Mass losses of steel, zinc and copper, g/m2,ajler
one (8/92-7/93) and tow years (8/92-7/94) of exposure.Table
4:
Mass losses of steel and zinc, g/m2, after yearly exposure in1990-
l99l
and 1992-1993.Period Material Viksjøfjell Karpdalen Svanvik Noatun c1 c2 c3
1990/91 1992193
Steel 308
347
180 108
145
78 93
163 261 306
214 264
1 990/91 1992/93
Zinc 24
18
12 9.6
7.1
5.4 6.4
8.3 19 21
15 15
In
accordancewith the
resultsof the UNÆCE ICP
Programme (Kuceraet
al.,1995; Kucera and Fitz, 1995), the
dose/responsefunctions (DRF) for
an unsheltered4
year exposureof
weathering steel and zincin
absenceof
significant amountof
aerosolswith
Cl-ions can bewritten
as:MLnr"t MLzn
= at *
azTOWISOz][Os] + ajTOW
= ar t
azTOWISOz][Os] + ai [Rain][H+]
(1) (2)
where ML
mass loss;TOW -
time of wetness = RH )80Vo,T
>0"C;[SOz] and
[O¡] -
average annual concentrations;Rain
amount of precipitation;[H+]
annual concentrations;àràt -
constant terms.For
urban andindustrial
areasin
the UNÆCEICP
programme the annual ozone concentration has been estimatedby the [NOz]
concentrationin
accordancewith
the equation:
[os] = at exp(l
azl[Noz])
(3)For the investigated region the level
of
NO2is low
andall
test sites exceptNikel
are locatedin rural
areas. Therefore we can assume that [O3] = constantfor all
test sites.If
we takeinto
account that the differences between[H+] in
precipitation isinsignificant, we can also
assumethat [Rain][H*] =
constant.In this
case the equations(1,2)
canbewritten
asML ML
= At *
A2TOW ISOz] +ü
TOW= At *
A2TOW [SO2]T3
(4) (5)
(7)
From the first part of this
programme (Henriksenet
aL, 1992; Henriksenet
al.,1995) the dose/response function (DRF) observed can be
written
as:ML,t,"r = (at +
az ISOz]+
as[CI]) .TOW
(6)Dry deposition of Cl makes its own contribution to the corrosion rate
atViksjøfiell and
Karpdalen.However, dry
depositionof Cl was not
measured during the second exposureof
materials, therefore the statistical evaluationin
this report is made on the basisof
SO2 andTOW
data assuming thatdry
depositionof Cl
atViksjpfjell during the
1992-1993 exposure was approximatelythe
same asfor the
1990-1991exposure.In
this caseit
is possible to transform equation (6) to equation (7)ML = (At
+ A2 [SO2]).fOW
It
is obvious, that for constant TOW equations(4,5,1)
transform to equationML = Bt *
B2 [SO2] (8)which
was usedin
thefirst
partof
thework for
the statistical evaluationof
yearly mass losses of metals.The plan for
statistical evaluation has beento
investigate equations(4, 5, 7)
aspossible dose/response functions
for
steel and zinc. The regression analysis was made fortwo
different sets of test sites:A) Noatun, Cl, Svanvik,
Karpdalenand Viksjpfjell (1990/91), Svanvik
and Viksj øfjell
(1992t 93) ;B)
Noatun,Cl,
Svanvik, C2 and C3 (1990191), Svanvik andCZ (1992/93).Set
(A)
contain test siteswith
higher contentof dry
depositionof Cl (Viksjøfjell
and Karpdalen).The results
of
the statistical evaluation are shownin
Tables 5 and 6. A1l equations are characterizedby high
valuesof
R2. However,for
equation(4) the
constant term A1for
steel and the term A3for
zinc are negative. The main reasonfor
this phenomenonis that for
the researchregion the time of
wetnessdid not
change greatly and ahigh
(negative) correlation between A1 andTOV/ is
observed(in
all cases R2>
0.9).It
means that oneof
the terms (41 or A3TOW)
is unnecessary to usein
the regression, and equation(4)
can be transformedto
equation(5) or
(7).Both
equations, (5) and (7), predictwell
the yearly corrosion rateof
steel and zinc (see Tables 5 and 6). These are illustrated also on Figures2-7.
t4
Table 5 Equation constants
for
the calculation of yearly corrosion ratesof
carbon steel vs. SO2 in
air
and time of wetness:A)
for
test sites: Noatun,Cl,
Svanvik, Karpdalen and Viksj@fjell( 1 9 9 0/9 1 ), Sv anv ik and Víksj Qfj ell ( I 992/9 3 ) ;
B)
for
test sites: Noatun,Cl,
Svanvik, C2 and C3 (1990/91), Svanvik and C2 (1992/93).TOW: RH >80% A1 Az As R2
ML =
Al
+ A2 TOW[SO2] + A3 TOWA
T>
0T
>-2 T>-4
-27.0 -15.2 -6.0
40.0 31.0 24.7
230 167 134
0.994 0.994 0.993
B
T>
0T>-2 T>-4
9.8
-1.9 -27.3
16.3 13.5 11.6
293 292 337
0.985 0.988 0.991 ML = Ar + Az TOWISOTI
A
T>
0T>-2 T>-4
16.4 22.5 27.5
41.7 32.5 26.5
0.990 0.989 0.989
B
T>
0T>-2 T>-4
70.0 69.7 69.1
16.8 14.1 12.2
0.976 0.976 0.974 ML = (Ar + Az [SOz]) TOW
A
T>
0T>-2 T>-4
97 91 105
40.1 32.0 25.4
0.989 0.989 0.989
B
T>
0r>-2
T>-4
326 268 235
16.7 14.0 12.0
0.986 0.989 0.988 ML = g/(mzyear), SO2
-
þg/m3, TOW-
time fractionThe regression analyses ofequations (5) and (7) for yearly steel and zinc corrosion
for
three variantsof time of
wetness(RH
>80% andT
>OoCor T >-4'C)
givesapproximately the
same R2for both
metals.This is in contradiction with
the resultsfrom
the monthly test programmein
this region and in thetown
Sulitjelmain Norway
reported earlier (Henriksen, 1989; Henriksen etal.,
1992; Henriksen etal.,
1995). However, when we takeinto
consideration that on the yearly basis the variationin
thetime of
wetness is between5-l5Vo for
the three variantsof
TOW',while
thevariation in
the monthly values can be ashigh
as a factorof
500, theseresults are easier to
accept.To define
temperaturelimits for the
corrosion processeson
a yearly basis we need a larger databasefrom
a larger region where the differencesin
the time of wetness is higher. For the monthly values the sizeof
the region
is very well
suitedfor
defining the temperaturelimits.
SO2 andtime of
wetness are the
only
factors we need to take into consideration andwith
thefairly
high corrosion rates observed during thewinter,
a temperaturelimit
below0'C
is obvious.15
Table 6 Equation constants
for
the calculation of yearly corrosion ratesof
zinc vs. SOz inair
and time of wetness:A)for
test sites: Noatun,Cl,
Svanvik, KarpdalenandViksjþfjell
( 1 99 0/9 I ), Sv anv ik and V iksj þfj ell ( I 9 92 /9 3 ) ;
B)for
test sites: Noatun,Cl,
Svanvik, C2 and C3 (1990/91), Svanvik and C2 (1992/93).TOW A1 Az A.q p2
ML = Ar + Az TOWISOzI + A:r TOW A
T>
0T>-2
T
>-4
12.0 12.5 12.7
3.0 2.5 2.0
-54.0 -47.0 -40.3
0.977 0.977 0.981
B
T>
0T
>-2 T>-4
8.1 7.7 7.5
1.3 1.1 0.9
-17.7 -13.8 -11.0
0.981 0.981 0.979 ML = Ar + Az TOWISOzI
A
T>
0T>-2 T>-4
1.6 2.0 2.4
2.6 2.0 1.6
0.891 0.878 0.879
B
T>
0T>-2 -r>-4
4.4 4.4 4.4
1.2 1.0 0.9
0.975 0.976 0.976 ML = (Ar + Az [SOz]) TOW
A
T>
0T>-2
T
>-4
1.2 2.1 3.6
3.0 2.4 1.9
0.915 0.900 0.886
B
T>
0T>-2 T>-4
24.0 20.0 17.4
1.2 1.0 0.8
0.962 0.964 0.963 ML = g/(¡2year), SO2
-
U9/ms, TOW-
time fraction.The
temperature wetness parametersin
regional areasmay differ from
year to year.Time of
wetness, which determine the durationof dry
depositionof
sulphurand the possibility of electro-chemical
processeson metal
surfaces,is
animportant parameter
for
the predictionof
atmosphe.ric corrosion evenin
regional areas.The
results obtained showthat
the yearly mass lossof
metals, especially steel, is practically linearwith
the sulphur dioxide concentrationmultiplied by
the timeof
wetness (see Figures2,
48, 5 and 7B).On the other hand, during exposure period 1992-1993 the
average hourlycolrosion
rates during thetime of
wetness at the test sites decrease compared to1990-199l
exposure and arein
a good agreementwith
the decreaseof
the yearly mean SO2 concentrationin
air (see Figures3,4^,6
and7A).
I6
Figure 2:
400
100
o
350 300
n)
2 0
00 30
2 N
E C¡
,n Uto
)
U)a o
0
4 12
tQl*TOW,
ug7'm3.(trmefroction of o
yeor)ó)
3 50
50 2
200
(\
E c'l
!;
U)o
J
u't U)o
oa0
50
0 5 10
15
20ion of o
yeor)$QI*TOW,
ug/mJ*(time
froctYearly corrosion rate
for
carbon steel vs. the yearly meanconcentration of sulphur dioxide multiplied
with
the yearly timeof
wetness in terms of time
fraction:
1)
TOW:RH
>807oandT >0"C;
2)
TOW: RH >807oandT >-2"C;
3)
TOW:RH
>807oandT >-4"C;
A) for
test sites: Noatun,Cl,
Svanvik, Karpdalen and Viksiøfiell( 1 990/9 1 ), Svanvik and Viksi øfi
ell
( I 992/9 3 ) ;B) for
test sites: Noatun, CL, Svanvik, C2 and C3 (1990/91), Svanvik and C2 (1992/93).r00
n
0.05 ol
_c
N Ë
Ct, o,
c .q
U)
O
o.20
t7
A)
A 3
o
20 SO2,
u9/m3
40
0.r6
B)o
0.00
0 40
lirl,
11r¡,,,'nl560
Corrosion ratu
for
carbon steel per hour of wetness vs. theyearly
mean concentration of sulphur dioxide:1)
TOW:RH
>807oøndT >)oC;
2)
TOW:RH
>807oandT >-2"C;
3)
TOW:KH
>80VoandT >-4"C;
A) for
test sites: Noatun, C1, Svanvik, KarpdalenandViksiøfiell
( 1 9 9 0/9 1 ), Sv anv ik and Viksi ØÍi
ell
( I 9 92/9 3 ) ;B) for
test sites: Noøtun, CL, Svanvik, C2 and C3 (1990/91), Svanvik 0 q2
0
0.00
o 1
OB
0.04 n
0 fo -c* Nç
o,
o
C
.9U'
o (Jo
o
I
A02 3
,U
Figure
3oo
O
o
O
(¡
O
C¡
\
OA
s :ssex i þ
S ÞÊì.Y S'È ÈÀ
iÈËÈ=*ìsi q
FÐ;xnsÈs B !
HsÈsxÈe$: ?
>- È' * Ë ìç È S ñ
c,È s ,s :- S S $\" S
:i:*È$å$ å :*:F:SFå i
ISî'..$* SËS È $S
Èa
ÈuÈ 3Ès * i
,,i'' S i S eq
oc a Ðl
s * tìÈS s
s q Ès.Èe k È
à¡È Ëv sq 3
."zt.
o
I
\o-¡
IU
I
o
I o
O
Corrosion
role,
g/(m2*hour)O
o o
o
(¡ O (¡N
è
O O(/]O O
Moss Loss, g/mZ
N)O O
N)
o
Of\)
\,/1
o
IJ
@c
3
L,J è
@
Þ
Þ Þ
OO)
t9
_'5 A)o
3
0
20
ô.t E cñ u;u'l
)
o aU)o
0
E
0
I
o
E
0
4 12
S02+TOW,
ug/mJr(time froction of o
yeor)25 B)
l0
15
. 0 5 10 15
20'.:,íJ_.TOW,
ug//mJ+(time froction of o
yeor)Yearly corrosion rate
for
zinc vs. the yearly mean concentrationof
sulphur dioxide times the yearly time of wetness in terms of time
fraction:
1)
TOW:RH
>80VoandT >0"C;
2)
TOW:RH
>807oandT >-2"C;
3)
TOW:RH
>807oandT >-4"C;
A) for
test sites: Noatun,Cl,
Svanvik, KørpdalenandViksjøfiell
( 1 990/9 1 ), Svanvik and Viksj Øfi
ell
( I 992/9 3 ) ;B)
0
E ol) U;
U)o J
U)Ø
2
J
crog
c¡0 U
5
ñ'
0
Figure 5
20
Fígure 6:
0.01 5
a
lc
otc.l E
. Ctt q,
o c .9
U)o
()
oA)
20 SO2, ug/m3
30 40
o
A
0
0.01 0
005 0
0.000
a
3
0
o
0 10
0.0
!:
B)
.fO
c
,:¡ 0.008c
.clì
,i,
o
!
o.oo+Øo
,J
o
a0
,1 0
o
3
0.000
o
2oror, rn, "n3o
60Average corrosion røte
for
zinc per hour of wetness vs' the yearly mean concentratíon of sulphur dioxide:RH
>807oandT >)oC;
1)
TOW: RH >80VoandT >)oC;
2)
TOW: RH >80VoandT
>-2oC;3)
TOW:RH
>807oandT >-4"C;
A)
.t'or test sites: Noatun,Cl,
Svanvik, Karpdalen and ViksiQfjell( 1 9 90/9 1 ), Sv at wik and Viksj øÍi eII ( I 992/9 3 ) ;
B) for
test sites: Noatun,CI,
Svanvik, C2 and C3 (1990/91), Svanvik and C2 (1992/93).0.01 6
2l
0.000
A)
SO2,
ug/m3
o
0
L
ol
-ct N Ë olt
o')
o
C
.9lt)
oL
Oo
o.o12
8
0.004
A
o0 2
o
0 20 60
25
20
B)"
A
o
2
a 5
0
(\
E
cr¡
u;
U)o
)
aa o
5
o 10 15
5Ql*TOW, ug/m3*(time froction of o
yeor)Figure 7:
Average corrosionratefor
zinc per hour of wetness vs. the yearly rnean concentration of sulphur dioxide (A) and yearly corrosion ratefor
zinc vs. the yearly mean concentration of sulphur dioxide times theyearþ
time of wetness in terms of timefraction
(B)for
TOW:RH
>80Vo
andT >)oC;
1) for
test sites: Noatun,CI,
Svanvik, KarpdalenandViksiþfiell
( I 990/9 I ), Svanvik and Viksj Øfj
eil
( I 992/9 3 ) ;2) for
test sites: Noatun, CL, Svanvik, C2 and C3 (1990/91), Svanvik22
Thus two corrosion characteristics are important:
1)
general atmospheric corrosivity-
the total yearly corrosion rate;2)
atmosphericcorrosivity of
SO2.This
characteristic canbe
determinedfrom
thetwo
dose/response functions as the average corrosion rate causedby
SO2during
the periods were coffosion canoccur (time of
wetness)in the
sameway
asfor the
determinationof
acceptable SO2levels
(Kuceraet al.,
1995;Kucera and
Fitz,
1995 ;UNÆCE,
1996):(¡rtt - ¡.\
A2lSO2l= #
from equation (5)TOW ,
ation(5)
(9)trlsorl=
# ^,
from equation
(7)
(10)or
as afirst
approximationfor
local region, the averagetotal
corrosion rate duringthe period divided with time of
wetness(+\. The
determinationof
the\row )
corrosivity of
SO2will
thereforebe the most important factor for
corrosion monitoring andfor
trend-effect analysis.The
dose/response functions obtained can be recommendedfor
the predictionof yearly
corrosion rateof
carbon steel and zincin
sub-arctic climatein
absenceof significant dry
depositionof Cl by
using data-setB.
The dose/response functions are obtainedfor
the rangeof
SO2:5-57 pglml,
andfor
the rangeof TOIV
(RH )8OVo,T
>0"C):
0.19-0.26 time fraction of a yearBz
Mlsteer =
70+
16.8 [SOz]TO\ry 0976 ML.t""r =
(326+
16.1 [SOz])TOW
0.986 ]V4L7in"=
4.4+
1.2 [SO2]TOV/
0,975Ml-zin" =
(24.0+
1.2 [SO2])TOW
0.962The dose/response functions obtained by using data-set
(A),
contain test siteswith
higher content ofdry
deposition ofCl (Viksjgfjell
and Karpdalen) and can be usedonly for
this regionwith
the assumption thatdry
depositionof Cl
doesnot differ greatly from
one yearto the
next. The dose/response functions obtainedfor
the rangeof
SO2:5-37
pglrrÊ, andfor
the rangeof TOW (RH
>80%,T
>OoC):0.19-
0.30 time fraction
of
a yearMlsteer =
16.4 +41'7
[SO2]TOV/
ML.t""r =
(97+
40.1[SOz]) TOWMLz¡n" =
1.6 + 2.6 [SOz]TOW
ll{Lzin =
(1.2 + 3.0 [SOz]) TO]VBz 0.990 0.898 0.891 0.915
23
The R2 values for zinc for the
data-set(A) are lower than for set (B).
Thisindicates the need for taking into account in
dose/responsefunctions
other environmental parameters, in particular the dry deposition of Cl.In
accordancewith
dose/response functions obtained, the yearly corrosion ratesof
steel and zinc were higher
for
the areaswith
higher contentsof dry
depositionof Cl (Viksjgfjell
and Karpdalen). This can be shown by plots ofcorosion
versus the term [SO2] (see Figures 4 and 7).The
dose/responsefunctions
obtainedcan be
usedfor the
assessmentof
thecorrosivity
andfor
mapping of the corrosion ratesof
steel and ztnc and acceptable SO2 levelsin this
regionin
accordancewith
methodology elaborated (Kucera etal.,1995; Kucera
andFitz,1995)
and recommended by the UNÆCE (1996).5. Conclusion
The
resultsof
corrosion testsof
metals alongthe
Norwegian-Russianborder in I99O-I991and in
1992-1994 show:1. Dry
depositionof
sulphuris
the main reasonof
the accelerated atmospheric corrosionof
metalsin
theregion
along the Norwegian-Russian border.Dry
depositionof Cl
makesits own
contributionto
the processesof
corrosion atViksjgfjell
and Karpdalen. Sea-salt aerosols are the importantCl
source. Thecorrosivity of
acid precipitationis
certainbut not
possibleto
represent as afunction in our
study dueto
the small differences observedin
thepH
valuesfor
the different test sites.2. The kinetics of
corrosionof steel, zinc
and copper arecharacteized by
areduced corrosion rate after one year
of
exposure atall
test sites.The
mostsignificant
reductionof the
corrosionrate (by
60-:707o) are observedat
the lesspolluted
areas(test
sitesC1
andSvanvik), while the reduction of
the comosion rateof
steel and zincin
a presenceof
SO2 and Cl-ions(Viksjpfjell,
theC2
and C3), areonly
20-50Vo. The second year coffosion rateof
copper was reducedby
60-807o at all test sites.3. Time of
wetnessis
an important parameterfor
the predictionof
atmosphericcorrosion of metals even for a regional
scale.Therefore for monitoring
pulposes andfor
trend-effect analysisit is
most importantto
determine thecorrosivity of
SO2, either asthe
average corrosion rate causedby
SO2or
asthe average
total
corrosion rate during the period,with time of
wetness. The dose/responsefunctions for the yearly
mass lossesof steel and zinc
are obtained on the basisof
average annual SO2 concentrationin
the air and timeof
wetness. These dose/response functions can be written in the general form:ML -
A1 + A2 [SO2]TOW
ML = (Ar
+ A2 [SO2])TOV/
24
In
accordancewith
dose/responsefunctions
obtained,the yearly
corrosion ratefor
steeland zinc
are higherfor the
areaswith
higher amountsof
dry depositionof Cl (test
sitesViksjgfjell and
Karpdalen)than for
areaswith
analogous but
only
SO2-containing atmosphere.6. References
Henriksen, J.F. (1989) Corrosion by SO2
in
Sulitjelma, a copper mining townin
Norway. Proceedings.In: I Lth Scandinavian Congress. Stavanger,Hpgskolesenteret
i
Rogaland. (Paper F48).Henriksen, J.F.,
Mikhailov, A.A.
andMikhailovski, Y.N.
(1992) Atmospheric corrosion tests along the Norwegian-Russian border. Lillestrpm, Norwegian Institutefor Air
Research(NILU
OR 54/92).Henriksen, J.F.,
Mikhailov, A.A.
andMikhailovski, Y.N.
(1995) Atmospheric corrosion tests on metals along the Norwegian-Russian border. Protectionof
Metals,
31,5-15.
Kucera,
V.,
Tidblad, J., Henriksen, J.F., Bartonova,A.
andMikhailov, A.A.
(1995) Statistical analysis of -year materials exposure and acceptable
deterioration and
pollution
levels. Stockholm,1995 (UNÆCE International Co- operative Programme on Effects on Materials, including Historic and Cultural Monuments. ReportNo.
18).Kucera,
V.
andFitz,
S. (1995) Direct and indirect airpollution
effects on materials including cultural monuments. Proceedings.In:
5th International Conference onAcidic Deposition
Ggteborg, Sweden, 1995. Water,Air
SoilPoll.,85,
153- 165.United Economic Commission for Europe (UNÆCE) (1996) Manual on
methodologies and criteria for mapping
critical
levels/loads and geographical areas where they are exceeded. Convention on Long-Range TransboundaryAir
Pollution. Preparedby
the Task Force on Mappingwith
the assistance of the Secretariat of UNÆCE.Acknowledgement
The authors
will
express their thanks to Thor Ofstadfor
carrying out the controlof
samples and the
pickling in
the most satisfactory way.Annex A
Tables
25
21
Table
AI:
Monthly temperature, relative humidity and time of wetness resultsfor
the period January-December 1992 at Svanvik and Viksjþfjell.
Svanvik T RH RH > 80% and
T
>0'c
RH > 80% and T >-2"C
RH > 80% and T >-4'C
oc o/to in hours in hours in hours
January February March April May June July August September October November December
10 -8 -4 -6 5 10 9
I
7 -8 12 -6
80 82 78 71 68 66 80 81 89 87 86 85
48
1
53 14 131 173 426 416 576 106 14 43
63 22 108 14 179 177 431 429 580 144 55 122
114 105 173 38 193 182 431 429 581 188 108 194
Year 1 79 2001 2324 2736
Viksjøfjell T RH RH > 80% and
T
>0'c
RH > 80% and T >-2"C
RH > 80% and T >-4'C
"c
ôl/o in hours in hours in hours JanuaryFebruary March April May June July August September October November December
-7 -6 -5 -6 3 7
I
7 7 -6 -9 -5
90 93 90 85 79 75 86 86 93 94 93 92
80 3 22 40 217 342 515 531 643 106 7 33
127 24 166 58 295 367 515 531 650
167 34 144
201 121 306 83 318 367 515 531 650 246 104 259
Year 1 88 2539 3078 3701
28
Table
A2: Monthly
temperature, relative humidity and time of wetness resultsfor
the
period
January-December 1993 at Svanvik andViksj@fjell.Svanvik T RH RH > 80% and
T
>0'c
RH > 80% and T >-2'C
RH > 80% and T >-4"C
"c
o//o in hours in hours in hours JanuaryFebruary March April May June July August September October November December
-10 -10 -9 -4 2 5 12 10
1
-3 -5 -11
82 78 80 75 78 84 82 85 91 83 81 80
0 5 13 16 176 445 469 538 310 134 16 0
17 26 31 61 308 474 469 541 418 228 64 23
62 41 94 107 339 474 469 541 493 279 't21
31
Year -2 82 2122 2660 3051
Viksjøfjell T RH RH > 80% and
T >0"C
RH > 80% and T >-2"C
RH > 80% and T >-4'C
"c
o//o in hours in hours in hours JanuaryFebruary March April May June July August September October November December
-B -8 -7 -5
1
3 10
I
1
-4 -6 10
91 91 89 87 86 91 83 87 89 94 93 94
1
4 9 62 197 522 512
581 341
90
1
0
19 43 46 150 397 646 512
581 587 237 41 0
115 115 118 241 554 646 512
581
602 369 157 30
Year -2 90 2320 3259 4040
29
Table
A3:
Monthly temperature, relative humidity and time of wetness resultsfor
the period January-December 1994 at Svanvik and Viksjþfjell.
Svanvik T RH RH > 80% and
T
>0'c
RH > B0% and T >-2"C
RH > 80% and T >-4"C
"c
o//o in hours in hours in hours JanuaryFebruary March April May June July August September October November December
-17 -11 -7
0 2 8 13 12 6 0 -7 -5
80 78 75 75 69 74 69 73
0 6 0 130 69 288 227 273
0
I
5 210 136 288 227 281
1
33 35 231 168 288 227 281
Year 1 74 993 1 156 1264
Viksjøfjell T RH RH > 80% and
T >0'C
RH > 80% and T >-2"C
RH > B0% and T >-4'C
oc ol
/o in hours in hours in hours
January February March April May June July August September October November December
-11 -10
-7 -1 -1 5 10 10 4 -3 -7 -6
93 92 92 87 85 85 80 79 88 93 94 95
0 19 0 149 119 473 394 325 517 106 6 0
0 43 10 389 291 549 394 325 565 265 42 11
1
87 70 465 524 549 394 325 567 438 104 150
Year 1 89 21 08 2884 3674
30
Table
A4:
Average monthly and average maximum daily SO2levels in pg/msfrom
August 1992 to July 1994.too few values for an average calculation.
Month/Year
Viksjøfjell Svanvik Karpdalen Nikel C2
Aver.
Max.Aver.
Max.Aver.
Max.Aver.
Max.Aver.
Max.8/92 9/92 10/92 11/92 12192 1/93 2193 3/93 4193 5/93 6/93 7/93 8/93 9/93
1 0/93
1 1/93 12/93 1/94 2194 3194 4194 5194 6194 7194
22 24 10 57 35 31 34 41 24 16 4
I
18 15 29 42 25 45 13 36 34
11 7 18
100 132 159 227 158 186 174 210 133 117 47 60 121 83 304 141 76 234 96 187 202
62 25 141
8 5 4 31 3 3 2 23 14 7 10 17 8 3 2 3 19 10 2
11
10
11
13
I
56 42 36 288 23 36 21 155 113 64 54 103 59 27 20 37 172 151 21 126 130
86 64 89
o 12 7 44 21 16 10 37 12 8 5 5 11 5 6 14 33 22
I
32 14 4 6 15
43 92 162 208 189
70 83 152 84 51 44 20 56 62 54 89 149 108 119 137 68 65 42 52
72 102
67 99 13 22 24 31 40 58 148 136 139 27 44
I
30 38 23 24 22 90 149 94
350 727 354 698 163 124 229 '175 609 665 656 652 1127
127 452 81 246 197 243 162 '194 377 440 378
32 42 61
142
182 313
552 596
75 66 110 32 17 4 22 41 51 86
280 376 563 134 126 21 181 188 256 389
25 52
321 111 266