Trygve S. Aamlid1, Pia Heltoft1, Gudni Thorvaldsson2, Anne Mette Dahl Jensen3, Tatsiana Espevig1, Karin Juul Hesselsøe1, Wendy Waalen1, Torben Kastrup Petersen4, Trond Pettersen1, Jan Tangsveen1, Per Sørensen5, Tania Gneist5 and Bjarni Hannesson6
NIBIO REPORT | VOL. 5 | NO. 154 | 2019
SCANGREEN 2015‐18:
Turfgrass species, varieties, seed mixtures and seed blends for Scandinavian putting greens
Final results from a four year testing period
TITTEL/TITLE
SCANGREEN 2015-18: Turfgrass species, varieties, seed mixtures and seed blends for Scandinavian putting greens. Final results from a four year testing period
FORFATTER(E)/AUTHOR(S)
Trygve S. Aamlid, Pia Heltoft, Gudni Thorvaldsson, Anne Mette Dahl Jensen, Tatsiana Espevig, Karin Juul Hesselsøe, Wendy Waalen, Torben Kastrup Petersen, Trond Pettersen, Jan Tangsveen, Per Sørensen, Tania Gneist and Bjarni Hannesson
DATO/DATE:
08.01.2021
REPORT NO. /:RAPPORT NR.
5/154/2019
TILGJENGELIGHET/AVAILABILITY:
Åpen/ Open
PROSJEKTNR./PROJECT NO.:
8894
SAKSNR./ARCHIVE NO.:
19/00686
ISBN:
978-82-17-02454-5
ISSN:
2464-1162
ANTALL SIDER/NO. OF PAGES:
94
NO. OF APPENDICES / ANTALL VEDLEGG/
1
EMPLOYER / OPPDRAGSGIVER
STERF (Scandinavian Turfgrass and Environment Research Foundation)
CONTACT PERSON / KONTAKTPERSON
Maria Strandberg
KEYWORDS / STIKKORD : FIELD OF WORK / FAGOMRÅDE
English: Golf, green, seed, seed blends, seed mixtures, turfgrass variety evaluation
Urban greening and vegetation ecology
Norsk: Golf, greener, frø, frøblandinger, gras til grøntanlegg, sortsprøving
Grøntanlegg og vegetasjonsøkologi
SUMMARY / SAMMENDRAG :
This is the final report from the STERF project: SCANGREEN 2015-18 Denne tekst er sluttrapport for STERF-prosjektet: SCANGREEN 2015-18
GODKJENT /APPROVED
HÅKON BORCH
PROSJEKTLEDER /PROJECT LEADER
TRYGVE S. AAMLID
Preface
For variety testing to be relevant to the end users it is critical that the trials are conducted under realistic conditions with regard to mowing height, wear, fertilization and other management practices.
The SCANGREEN program was initiated in 2003 and involves testing of turfgrass species and varieties on sand-based golf greens at four sites in the Nordic countries. The evaluation is organized in four- year testing cycles and forms the basis for recommended variety lists at www.scanturf.org and www.sterf.org.
The present report gives a detailed account of methods and results obtained during the fourth
SCANGREEN test cycle from 2015 to 2018. Unlike previous cycles, this evaluation also included seed blends and -mixtures of special relevance to the golf industry in the Nordic countries.
As with the earlier test cycles, SCANGREEN 2015-18 was funded 10% by fees paid by the seed
companies entering varieties into the trials, and 90% by the Scandinavian Turfgrass and Environment Research Foundation (STERF). Thanks are expressed to both parties for funding and excellent
collaboration during the course of the project.
NIBIO Landvik, 08.01.21
Trygve S. Aamlid Project leader
Content
1 Introduction ... 7
2 Materials and methods ... 8
2.1 Pure species and varieties entered by plant breeders / seed companies into the project ... 8
2.2 Seed blends and mixtures added to the trials ... 9
2.3 Experimental sites and protocol ... 10
2.4 Weather conditions and implementation of protocol ... 11
2.4.1 Establishment and maintenance of the trials in 2015... 13
2.4.2 Winter 2015‐16 and management in 2016 ... 17
2.4.3 Winter 2016‐17 and management in 2017 ... 19
2.4.4 Winter 2017‐18 and management in 2018 ... 24
2.5 Assessments, statistical analyses and presentation of results ... 30
3 Results and discussion ... 31
3.1 Comparison of pure species (Table 10) ... 31
3.1.1 Agrostis stolonifera ... 31
3.1.2 Agrostis capillaris ... 31
3.1.3 Agrostis canina ... 31
3.1.4 Festuca rubra ssp. commutata ... 31
3.1.5 Festuca rubra ssp. litoralis ... 31
3.1.6 Lolium perenne ... 31
3.1.7 Poa trivialis ... 31
3.1.8 Poa annua ... 32
3.1.9 Poa pratensis ... 32
3.2 Varieties of Festuca rubra ssp. commutata (Table 11) ... 40
3.3 Varieties of Festuca rubra ssp. litoralis (Table 12) ... 40
3.4 Varieties of Agrostis capillaris (Table 13) ... 49
3.5 Varieties of Agrostis stolonifera (Table 14) ... 55
3.6 Varieties of Lolium perenne (Table 15) ... 64
3.7 Varieties of Poa trivialis (Table 16) ... 69
3.8 Seed blends of Festuca rubra subspecies (Table 17) ... 74
3.9 Poa annua, Poa trivialis or Lolium perenne as nurse grasses for A. stolonifera (Table 18) ... 74
3.10Seed mixtures of Festuca and Agrostis (Table 19) ... 84
References ... 94
Appendix 1: Protocol for Scangreen 2015‐18 ... 95
Abstract
Knowledge about and optimal choice of seed of the many new turfgrass varieties coming to the market is important for sustainable turfgrass management. The objective of SCANGREEN 2015-18 was to find species, varieties and seed blends/mixtures of Agrostis, Festuca, Poa and Lolium that are suited for pesticide-free management of putting greens in the two major climatic zones of the Nordic countries.
The four test sites were Reykjavik GC, Iceland (64.1°N, 21.9°W, 30 m a.s.l) and NIBIO Apelsvoll (60.7°N, 10.9°E, 250 m a.s.l.) in the the northern zone, and NIBIO Landvik, Norway (58.3°N, 8.5°E, 12 m a.s.l.) and Sydsjælland GC, Denmark (55.2°N, 11.9°E, 11 m.a.s.l.) in the southern zone.
A total of 34 pure varieties (inclucing controls) and 9 seed blends/mixtures were evaluated from seeding in June 2015 until November 2018. The mowing height was 5 mm in F. rubra., Poa pratensis.
and L. perenne, and 3-4 mm in Agrostis sp., Poa trivialis and Poa annua. Fertilizers were applied at a seasonal rate of ≈10 g N m-2 in F. rubra, A. canina and A.capillaris and 15-16 g N m-2 in L. perenne.
A.stolonifera and Poa sp. The trials were mowed three times per week, subjected to wear from greens- type wear machines and otherwise managed according to good greenkeeping practice. The plots were evaluated in the growing season for visual turf quality, tiller density, leaf fineness, color, percent of plot area covered by undiseased turf of the seeded species, percent of plot area infected by disease
(identified if possible), Poa annua invasion (Landvik only) and daily height increment. Abiotic and biotic winter damage were assessed in spring and percent of plot area covered by moss by the end of the project. The data were analysed by ANOVA and species, varieties within species, and combinations witin three groups of seed blends/mixtures ranked, firstly for decreasing turf quality, secondly for increasing winter damage and thirdly for increasing infection of in-season disease.
The evaluation showed that the following varieties, in prioritized order, can be recommended for golf greens in the five Nordic countries, based on the criterion that they were ranked equal to or better than the control varieties:
Northern zone: Finland, central and
northern parts of Sweden, northern and continental parts of Norway, Iceland
Southern zone: Denmark, coastal regions of southern Sweden and southern Norway Festuca rubra ssp. commutata
Control variety: Musica Humboldt, Barchip None
Festuca rubra ssp. litoralis
Control variety: Cezanne None None
Agrostis capillaris
Control variety: Jorvik Heritage Rhinegold, Heritage
Agrostis stolonifera
Control variety: Independence Luminary, Riptide, Ignite Flagstick, Luminary, Riptide, Pure Distinction*
Lolium perenne
Control variety: Chardin Clementine Clementine
Poa trivialis
Control variety: Dark Horse Sabrena 1 Qasar, Sabrena 1
*Pure Distiction is susceptible to winter damage and disease and shall only be used in the climatically best areas
Poa annua ‘Two Put’ was tested but can not be recommended on Nordic golf courses. Poa pratensis tolerated mowing at 5 mm but produced rather course putting surface. It is not an alternative for greens except perhaps at northern sites with extreme winter stress.
Evaluation of seed blends of Festuca rubra ssp. commutata ‘Musica’ and F.rubra ssp. litoralis
‘Cezanne’ at weight ratios 75/25, 50/50 and 25/75 showed that the optimal ratio for pure fescue greens is 75/25 in the northern zone and 50/50 in the southern zone.
Evaluation of Lolium perenne ‘Chardin’, Poa trivialis ‘Dark Horse’ or Poa annua ‘Two Put’ as nurse
even in the southern zone. Inclusion of P. annua cannot be recommended in any zone and inclusion of L. perenne only in the most winter-tough areas in the northern where there is no doubt that L.perenne will not survive the first winter.
Evaluation of mixtures of F.rubra and A.stolonifera or A.canina in comparison with the more
traditional mixture of F.rubra and A.capillaris at fescue and creeping bentgrass management showed F.rubra + A.stolonifera to have certain advantages such as less disease, less Poa annua invasion and less height growth. This mixture warrants further investigation on Nordic golf courses.
1 Introduction
In-depth knowledge about turfgrass species and choice of new and improved varieties are
prerequisites for sustainable turfgrass management on golf courses. Reviews by Aamlid & Gensollen (2015) and Meyer et al (2017) documented the progress that turfgrass breeders have made and are still making, not only for aesthetic characters such as color and leaf fineness, but also for disease
resistance and abiotic stress tolerance. Surveys conducted among several hundred Nordic courses confirmed that continuus evaluation of new varieties under Nordic climate conditions is perceived as one of the most important tasks for the Scandinavian Turfgrass and Environment Research
Foundation (STERF). (Melbye 2013, 2019).
One of the suggestions from these surveys, and also from an external committee that evaluated former SCANGREEN trials, was that it should be possible to include in SCANGREEN not only new varieties, but also seed mixtures between different species and seed blends between varieties within the same turfgrass species. Based on experiences from agriculture, this suggestion is relevant as seed mixtures and blends are usually regarded to provide a more diversified plant community with greater overall resistance to diseases. While turfgrass breeding and seed companies may prefer loyal customers that purchase seed from one company only, most turfgrass managers will probably agree that the ideal solution would be to compose optimal mixtures and blends for the individual golf course by choosing species and top-ranked varieties with complementary characteristics regardless of variety owner.
Golf in the Nordic countries is played at latitudes from 55 to 70ºN and altitudes from 0 to 900 m a.s.l. Due to the variation in climatic conditions, STERF has always presented two lists of recommended varieties, one for the northern and mostly continental zone and one for the southern and mostly coastal zone (Figure 1).
These two climatic zones may also differ with regard to optimal seed blends and mixtures. Thus, in addition to the primary objective of testing new varieties of Agrostis, Festuca, Poa and Lolium for their suitability on golf course putting greens, the SCANGREEN 2015-18 test cycle also aimed at:
1. Defining the optimal ratio of slender creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra ssp. litoralis) to Chewings fescue (F. rubra ssp. commutata) in red fescue seed blends for greens in various parts of the Nordic countries. Nielsen (2010) suggested 67-75 % slender creeping red fescues and only 25-33 % Chewings fescues in blends for the Danish market, but this is probably different in more northerly areas as Chewings fescue is usually considered more winter-hardy than slender creeping red fescue.
2. Clarifying advantages and disadvantages of using fast-establishing nurse grasses such as perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), rough bluegrass (Poa trivialis) or even annual bluegrass (Poa annua) when seeding or reseeding creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) greens. This question is particularly relevant on golf courses that often have to re-establish their greens at low soil temperatures in spring after winter kill.
3. Clarifying if creeping bentgrass or velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina) can be alternative to colonial bentgrass (Agrostis capillaris) when used in mixture with red fescue on Nordic putting greens.
The combination of red fescue and velvet bentgrass was tested by Calvache et al. (2016) who found velvet bentgrass to dominate, especially at high fertilizer levels. Less is know about red fescue + creeping bentgrass mixtures, which could potentially have benefits when it comes to disease resistance and recuperative capacity. Influenced by British traditions, it is often argued that the ecological adapations of these species are too different to be compatible on greens. However, red fescue + creeping bentgrass mixtures are commonly used in Germany, and in Norway, we have sometimes seen the two species to complement each other, although at ratios varying from year to year, on golf courses trying to convert their greens from fescue to creeping bentgrass or vice versa.
An important question is if this untraditional combination of red fescue + creeping bentgrass, will be more durable and create a better putting surface when managed as fescue greens or creeping bentgrass greens ?
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Pure species and varieties entered by plant breeders / seed companies into the project
The trials included 27 candidate varieties and seven controls representing nine different species and subspecies (Table 1). Poa pratensis was included at NIBIO’s own initiative to test the species’ tolerance to low mowing, and if it could become an alternative species for greens often exposed to winter
damage.
Seeding rates were 7, 30, 40, 15 and 25 g m-2 for Agrostis sp., Festuca sp., Lolium perenne., Poa trivialis / Poa annua and Poa pratensis.
Table 1. Varieties in SCANGREEN 2015‐18 by species and breeding/seed companies. Varieties in bold are controls.
Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis capillaris
Agrostis canina
F. rubra ssp.
commuta ta
F. rubra ssp.
litoralis
Poa trivialis
Poa annua
Lolium perenne
Poa prat‐
ensis
DLF
Indepen‐
dence Flagstick
Jorvik Rhinegold
Teetop Villa1
Humboldt Wagner 1
Cezanne Aporina
Sabrena 1 Two Putt
Chardin Clemen‐
tine
Becca2
Baren‐
brug Ignite Musica
Barchip Aureline
Everris Memorial
Riptide Heritage
Germinal Borluna
Mirador
Semilas
Fito Valderrama Winter‐
way Rinovo
Svensk Jordelit
Pure Distinction Crystal Blue
PGG
Wrightson Charles
Landmark Luminary
Skånefrø Dark
Horse
Weibulls
Horto Qasar
DSV
Limou‐
sine Total
number 93 5 1 5 4 4 1 3 2
1: Agrostis canina ‘Villa’’ was included at Reykjavik, Apelsvoll and Sydsjælland, but not at Landvik due to space limitations
2: Poa pratensis ‘Becca’ was included as a fill‐in variety at Landvik only.
3: The number af varieties of A. stolonifera was extended to 16 in the trial at Landvik. The extra varieties were: ‘007’,
‘Declaration’, ‘Focus’, ‘MacKenzie’, ‘Tyee’, ‘Teeone’ and ‘Penncross’.
2.2 Seed blends and mixtures added to the trials
The seed blends were composed of the control varieties (Table 2).
Firstly, we compared seed blends of Festuca rubra where the seed weight ratio of ssp. commutata to ssp. litoralis was either 75/25, 50/50 or 25/75. Our hypothesis was that the proportion of ssp.
commutata ought to be higher in the northern than in the southern test zone. These extra plots were managed as fescue greens: Mowing height 5 mm and low fertilizer inputs ( approximately 10 g N m-2 yr-1)
Secondly, we compared Lolium perenne and Poa trivialis as nurse grasses to speed up establishment of A. stolonifera. A central question was the persistence of the two nurse grasses and how they would affect the quality of the putting green. These extra plots were managed as creeping bentgrass greens:
Mowing height 3-4 mm and high fertilizer inputs approximately 15 g N m-2 yr-1.
Thirdly, we studied seed mixtures of 90% F.rubra +10% A.stolonifera and 90% F.rubra +10%
A.canina as alternatives to the traditional mixture of 90% F.rubra + 10% A.capillaris. F.rubra + A.stolonifera and F.rubra + A.capillaris were studied under both fescue and creeping bentgrass management, but F.rubra + A. canina was only under fescue management as earlier trials had shown A. canina to become too dominant under creeping bentgrass management (Calvache et al. 2017).
Table 2. Seed blends and mixtures, including seeding rates (g m‐2) of the different components
Festuca
rubra ssp.
commu‐
tata 'Musica'
Festuca rubra ssp.
litoralis
‘Cezanne'
Agrostis stolonifera
'Indep‐
endence'
Lolium perenne 'Chardin'
Poa trivialis
'Dark horse'
Poa annua
‘Two‐
Put’
Agr.
capil‐
laris
‘Jorvik’
Agr.
canina
‘Villa’
Blends of Festuca subspecies
75 % commutata, 25 % litoralis 22.5 7.5
50 % commutata, 50 % litoralis 15.0 15.0
25 % commutata, 75 % litoralis 7.5 22.5
Nurse grasses for Agrostis stolonifera
Lolium perenne 7.0 20.0
Poa trivialis 7.0 0.75
Poa annua 7.0 0.75
Agrostis sp. in mixtures with Festuca
Agrostis capillaris 13.5 13.5 3.0
Agrostis stolonifera 13.5 13.5 3.0
Agrostis canina 13.5 13.5 3.0
2.3 Experimental sites and protocol
The trials were established on USGA-spec. greens at Reykjavik GC, Iceland (64.1°N, 21.9°W, 30 m a.s.l.), NIBIO Apelsvoll (60.7°N, 10.9°E, 250 m a.s.l.) and NIBIO Landvik (58.3°N, 8.5°E, 12 m.a.s.l.), Norway, and Sydsjælland GC, Denmark (55.2°N, 11.9°E, 11 m a.s.l.). Reykjavik and Apelsvoll were considered to represent the northern, and Landvik and Sydsjælland, the southern climatic zone of the Nordic countries (Fig. 1).
Figure 1. The four trial sites of Scangreen 2015‐18. Red line indicates the border between northern and southern zone.
Soil samples taken from the substrates at the four greens in the seeding year showed between 1 and 2
% organic matter at all sites. The soil pH and content of magnesium and calcium was higher at Sydsjælland, and especilly at Reykjavik, than at the two Norwegian sites (Table 3)
Table 3. Soil analyses of substrates at seeding.
Ignition loss, %
pH (H2O)
Plant available nutrinets in AL extracts (0.1 M NH4 lactate + 0.4 M acetic acid)
(mg (kg dry soil)‐1)
P K Mg Ca
Reykjavik GC 1.9 8.1 <20 200 120 2600
NIBIO Apelsvoll 1.5 6.4 38 26 21 390
Sydsjælland GC 1.3 7.6 42 26 55 950
NIBIO Landvik 1.5 6.3 33 26 16 340
The trials were established according to a split-plot designs with three blocks (replicates), species on main plots and varieties on subplots. This allowed different management of the various species. Plot size was 1.0 m x 1.0 m.
The protocol has been included in Appendix 1. Most importantly, there was no use of pesticides or
week – Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The mowing heights and annual fertilizer rates varied among speices as shown in Table 4. There were some deviations from these prescriptions, especially in conjunction with recovery after winter damage; these deviations will be described in later sections of this report.
Table 4. Mowing height and annual fertilizer rates to main plots with different species.
Mowing height low,
3 (‐4) mm
Mowing height high, (5 mm) Fertilizer rate low
≈ 10 g N m‐2 yr‐1
Agrostis capillaris
Agrostis canina Festuca rubra Fertilizer rate high
≈ 15 g N m‐2 yr‐1
Agrotis stolonifera Poa trivialis
Poa annua
Lolium perenne Poa pratensis
2.4 Weather conditions and implementation of protocol
The mean monthly temperatures were mostly higher than the 30 year reference (normal ) period (1961-90) at all sites (Table 5). May-July 2018 were exceptional with record-high temperature at Sydsjælland and even more so at the two Norwegian sites. Together with low rainfall, this resulted in unusually high irrigation requirements in the last evaluation year. At Landvik, the need for extra irrigation was strengthened by the need to reseed all plots after nearly 100 % winter kill caused by a
‘late winter’ with lower-than-normal temperature and snow and ice cover well into March (Photo 1)
Photo 1. Experimental green at Landvik on 20 March 2018.
Photo: Trygve S. Aamlid
a) Reykjavik Apelsvoll Landvik Sydsjælland
2015 2016 2017 2018 30yr 2015 2016 2017 2018 30yr 2015 2016 2017 2018 30yr 2015 2016 2017 2018 30yr
Jan. 0.3 1.3 ‐0.5 ‐0.5 ‐7.7 ‐4.2 ‐4.9 ‐7.4 ‐3.4 1.7 0.9 ‐1.6 ‐0.3 0.4 2.3 ‐0.1
Feb. ‐0.8 2.8 ‐ 0.4 ‐2.8 ‐3.8 ‐6.7 ‐7.0 1.2 0.4 ‐2.0 ‐1.9 2.0 1.6 ‐1.2 0.0
Mar. 2.6 1.6 2.2 0.5 1.3 0.7 ‐5.4 ‐2.5 3.4 3.4 ‐1.2 1.0 3.3 4.5 0.1 2.5
Apr. 4.2 3.0 4.8 2.9 3.9 3.7 3.5 2.3 6.1 6.5 6.7 5.1 6.1 6.2 8.7 6.3
May 6.6 8.6 5.9 6.3 10.7 10.1 15.1 9.0 12.3 11.9 14.9 10.4 13.1 12.1 14.6 11.5
June 9.2 11.0 10.0 8.9 9.0 12.6 15.1 13.5 16.0 13.7 13.9 15.8 15.5 17.0 14.7 13.0 16 15.2 17.1 15.0 July 11.3 12.5 11.6 10.7 10.6 14.8 15.8 15.0 20.7 14.8 15.8 16.4 16.1 20.3 16.2 16.0 16.7 15.4 20.0 16.2 Aug. 11.0 11.9 10.7 ‐ 10.3 14.6 14.2 13.7 14.7 13.5 16.2 15.5 15.1 16.1 15.4 17.6 16.3 16.4 18.4 16.3 Sep. 9.2 8.6 9.5 7.0 7.4 10.8 13.6 10.3 11.1 9.1 12.9 15.1 13 12.9 11.8 13.3 16 13.2 14.5 13.3 Oct. 5.2 7.8 6.6 3.7 4.4 5.6 4.2 5.4 5.4 4.6 8.5 7.6 9.4 8.7 7.9 9.4 8.4 11.0 10.3 9.5 Nov. 1.9 3.3 ‐0.4 3.9 1.1 1.4 ‐1.2 ‐0.7 1.6 ‐1.3 5.6 2.7 3.5 5.5 3.2 7.0 3.6 5.7 5.5 5.0 Dec. ‐0.5 3.7 ‐1.3 2.3 ‐0.2 0.1 ‐0.9 ‐4.9 ‐3.4 ‐5.3 4.8 3.7 1.7 2.0 0.2 5.9 4.0 3.4 3.9 1.8
Mean ‐ 6.0 5.3 ‐ 4.4 ‐ 5.5 4.9 5.6 3.6 ‐ 8.0 8.2 8.5 6.9 ‐ 8.8 8.8 9.5 8.1
b) Reykjavik Apelsvoll Landvik Sydsjælland
2015 2016 2017 2018 30yr 2015 2016 2017 2018 30yr 2015 2016 2017 2018 30yr 2015 2016 2017 2018 30yr
Jan. 67 74 ‐ 76 46 8 60 37 149 65 221 113 41 12 75 46
Feb. 88 123 ‐ 72 18 22 31 26 85 138 143 73 47 42 11 31
Mar. 115 42 36 82 42 21 18 29 117 117 48 85 43 56 48 38
Apr. 55 176 67 58 75 33 40 32 103 66 66 58 59 41 34 38
May 24 93 150 44 66 59 23 44 97 61 40 82 11 28 16 43
June 20 47 72 89 50 39 30 58 56 60 65 110 117 76 71 55 110 54 8 49
July 35 29 57 48 52 116 59 59 27 77 106 101 99 21 92 44 106 77 14 62
Aug. 65 38 ‐ 20 62 52 109 144 59 72 185 122 125 76 113 51 93 67 122 59
Sep. 117 80 ‐ 67 67 164 21 64 85 66 322 36 291 213 136 53 52 106 17 56
Oct. 186 258 ‐ 133 86 2 39 67 46 64 72 117 346 56 162 41 72 90 39 52
Nov. 73 53 143 132 48 64 26 60
2.4.1 Establishment and maintenance of the trials in 2015
Details from the four trials are shown in Table 6. Seed of Agrostis stolonifera ‘Valderrama’ arrived late and was therefore seeded 2-3 weeks after the the other varieties at all sites except Sydsjælland.
Turfgrass establishment was uniform in Reykjavik (Photo 2) and at Apelsvoll (Photo 3) but for unknown reason, some of the bentgrass plots established poorly and had to be reseeded twice at Landvik (Photo 4). Presumably due to inadequate irrigation, this was also the case for several plots of small-seeded species at Sydsjælland (Photo 5) Most of these problems were resolved in August and early September, and after that, all trials were assessed monthly for coverage and visual turf quality
Photo 2. Trial in Reykjavik on 30 July 2015, about six weeks after seeding. In this trial, mowing was very lenient in the seeding year.
Photo: Gudni Thorvaldsson.
Photo 3. Trial at Apelsvoll on 31 July 2015. All plots established nicely.
Table 6. Green type seeding dates and management in the seeding year 2015.
Reykjavik Apelsvoll Landvik Sydsjælland
Type of green USGA‐spec. USGA‐spec. USGA‐spec. USGA‐spec.
Year of construction 2007 2003 2003 2006
Type of organic matter in rootzone
Soil 3‐30 cm: Composted
garden waste
0‐3 cm: Peat 4‐30 cm: Composted
garden waste
Sphagnum peat Seeding date
22 June Ca 10 July:
Valderrama
19 June 6 July: Valderrama
6‐9 June 12 June: Mirador 7 July: Valderrama
Reeseeding of problem plots: 23
July and 11 Aug.
24 June 26 Aug: Reseeding of all
Agrostis sp. + Poa trivialis + mixtures
Preplant fertilizer
Type
Everris Pre‐seeder
18‐22‐5
Grønn 8K dried chicken manure + bonbe meal
Marihøne 8‐5‐4 Plus dried chicken manure + bone meal
‐ N / P / K, g m‐2 9.0 / 4,8 / 2.1 5.0 / 1.9 / 3.1 5.0 / 3.1 / 2.5 ‐
Plots covered by tarp after seeding / days
Yes/11 days No Yes / 12 days
Yes (plots covered both after seeding and
reseeding )
Ferti‐
lization after seeding
Fertilizer type(s)
Everris 18‐22‐05, Everris 19‐19‐5, Angus 12‐3‐9 and
6‐5‐11
Andersson 13‐2‐13 Arena Golf NK 13‐15 Scotts Zero Phosphate
14‐0‐10
Andersson 13‐2‐13 Greenmaster 14‐0‐10
Wallco 5‐1‐4
G‐Boost 20‐0‐4, G‐Beast 6‐6‐6, G Kalimax 21‐0‐17 +Bionutria Ca + micro First application after seeding 30 June 6 July 25 June Ca 20 July Last application before winter
29 Sept. 28 Sept. 27 Oct. Last N: Wk 41. Last: K,
Mg, S and Micro: wk 48
Number of applications 16 9 13 9
Total rate of N, P and K, to A.stolonifera, Poa sp., L.perenne, and high input mixtures, g m‐2
9.6/4.5/7 25 / 6 / 17
29 / 6 / 211 + 12 / 5 / 7 (on plots
reseeded many times)
8.2 / 2.1 / 10.9 + preplant Samme rate to all
species Total rate of N, P and K, to F.
rubra, A.capillaris, A.canina, and low input mixtures g m‐2
6,7‐3,2‐4,9 17 / 5 / 11 20 / 5 / 14
Mowing
Type of mower
Walk‐behind Walk – behind Walk – behind
Rotary mower in Aug.
before reseeding.
Sep‐ Oct: Triplex First mowing after seeding
3 July 16 July 24 June 10 Aug (Only fescue
and Lolium plots)
Height of cut at first mowing 15 mm 9 mm 11 mm ‐
Lowest height in Agrostis sp.,
Poa annua and Poa trivialis 7 mm 4 mm 4.5 mm ‐
Lowest height in
Festuca/Lolium/Poa pratensis 7 mm 6 mm 6 mm ‐
Last mowing before
winter / height 29 Sept.: /7mm 12 Oct.: 4 / 6 mm 2 Nov.: 4.5 / 6 mm ‐
Top‐
dressing
Type of sand Pure sand, grain size 0‐1 mm
Pure sand, grain size 0.2 – 0.7 mm
Pure sand, grain size
0.2 – 0.7 mm ‐
Number of applications 4 4 13 ‐
Total height 4‐5 mm 1.7 mm 2.8 mm ‐
Verticutting, aeration None None None None
Photo 4. SCANGREEN trial at Landvik on 31 July. A few plots of Agrostis have been reseeded and are covered by white, permeable tarp.
Photo: Trygve S. Aamlid.
Photo 5. Seeding the SCANGREEN trial at Sydsjælland GK on 25 June 2015.
Photo: Anne Mette Dahl Jensen.
Photo 6. : SCANGREEN trial at Sydsjælland on 31 July 2015. Plots of Agrostis sp. and Poa trivialis had established poorly due to inadequate irrigation / poor seed-soil contact and therefore had to be
reseeded in August.
Photo: Anne Mette Dahl Jensen.
Photo 7. SCANGREEN trial in Reykjavik on 24 Sept. 2015. Establishment was better than in earlier SCANGREEN trials on Iceland.
Photo: Gudni Thorvaldsson.
2.4.2 Winter 2015‐16 and management in 2016
The ice cover in winter 2015-16 was long in Reykjavik and at Apelsvoll. Lolium sp. and Poa annua had to be reseeded in Reykjavik (Photo 8). Due to the reseeding and a following dry period in July, the trial received a lot of irrigation this year.
At Apelsvoll all species were reseeded in the beginning of June (Photo 9). At Landvik and Sydsjælland there were few winterdamages and no need for reseeding. At Landvik Poa annua ‘Two Put’ had severe injuries from microdochim patch (Photo 10), but it recovered without reseeding.
Management of the four trials in 2016 was mostly according to the protocol except that wear treatements were not conducted after reseeding at Apelsvoll (Table 7).
Photo 8. SCANGREEN trial in Reykjavik on 12 June 2016. Plots with Lolium perenne (back row) and Poa annua (three plots in central row) ) had to be reseeded.
Photo: Gudni Thorvaldsson.
Photo 9. Reseeding all plots at Apelsvoll on 1-3 June 2016.
Table 7. Winter weather 2015‐16 and green management of in 2016.
Reykjavik Apelsvoll Landvik Sydsjælland
Snow cover during winter
Duration of snow or ice
cover 61 days Snow: 90 days
Ice: 60 days
6 periods with snow
56 days in total 9 days
Soil frozen under snow or
ice 49 days From 25 Dec to 10
Apr.
Frozen only 21 days
(mainly March) 9 days Re‐seeding Species that had to be
reseeded
Lolium perenne Poa annua
All species None None
Reseeding, date June 23 1‐3 June -
Ferti‐
lization
Fertilizer type(s)
N‐xt 9‐5.5 Ammonium‐sulfate
Potassium‐nitrate Angus 12‐3‐9
Iron sulfate
Arena Start 15‐5‐7 Arena Fairway 15‐3‐8
Scotts 12‐0‐9 Fe Arena Golf 13‐0‐15
Wallco 5‐1‐4 (liquid) Greenmaster 14‐0‐10 (granular) Andersson 13‐2‐13
(granular), Mn‐sulfate
G Boost 20‐0‐4 G Beast 6‐6‐6 G Kalimax 21‐0‐
17 Mg‐sulfate Mn‐sulfate
Cu sulfate First application in spring About 10 June 15 June (2 weeks
(after reseeding) 6 April 4. April Last application before
winter About 1 Oct. 7. Oct. 1 Nov. 23 Oct.
Number of applications 13 9 17 15
Total rate of N, P and K, to A.stolonifera and Poa spp., kg /100 m2
12.5 / 1.5 / 9.8 24.5 / 3.3 / 16.3 15.8 / 1.8 / 12.4
25.9 / 2.3 / 23.8
Total rate of N, P and K, to A.capillaris, A.canina and F.rubra, g m‐2
7.8 / 0.9 / 6.1 16.5 / 2.3 / 1.08 10.3 / 1.2 / 8.1
13.0/1.2/11.9
Mowing
Type of mower Walk‐behind Walk‐behind Walk‐behind Triplex
First in spring:
Date / height 25 April / 5 mm. 14 June 8 April / 6.5 mm all
species 6 mm
Lowest height in Agrostis
sp. / P. tivialis / P.annua 4 mm 4 mm 3 mm 4.2 mm
Lowest height in Festuca
/Lolium/Poa pratensis 5 mm 6 mm 5 mm 5 mm
Last before winter:
Date / height 7 Oct. 7 Oct., 4mm /
7 mm
28 Oct, 3 mm / 7 mm
3. Nov./ 6 mm Irrigation
Number of times 93 (due to reseeding)
35 30 6
Total quantity 372 mm 300 mm 460 mm ‐
Top‐
dressing
Type of sand Pure sand Pure sand Pure sand Green Mix light
(0.8 % OM)
Number of applications 15 6 23 10
Total height ‐ 3 mm 7.5 mm ‐
Veriti‐
cutting
No of times, Agrostis 4 0 0 0
No of times, other species
2 0 0 0
Slicing, 5 cm
depth No of times, Agrostis 0 2 8 0
No of times, other species
0 2 8 0
Spiking, 6
mm tines No of times, Agrostis 5 0 4 5
No of times, other species
5 0 4 0
Deep aeration
Date ‐ 2. Nov ‐ Dot machine
Equipment, depth ‐ Digging fork, 10 cm ‐ 16 cm
Rolling with wear machine
Number of passes
35 (11700 rounds of
golf)
0
63 (21000 rounds of
golf)
32 (16700 rounds of
golf)
Photo 10.: Four species in SCANGREEN trial at Landvik on 6 May 2016. The only variety with severe winter injury (caused by microdochium patch) was Poa annua ‘Two Put’.
Photo: Trygve S. Aamlid.
2.4.3 Winter 2016‐17 and management in 2017
The duration of snow in Reykjavik and at Apelsvoll during the winter 2016-17 was not as long as the year before (Table 8). No species had to be reseeded in Reykjavik. At Apelvoll there was long-lasting ice cover (Photo 11), but it was crushed three times in January and February and never became very compact. In March we also spread granules of LECA to melt the ice at Apelsvoll (Photo 12). Despite this, all varieties of Lolium sp., Poa trivialis and Poa annua, as well as A. stolonifera ‘Pure
Distinction’ and Agrostis capillaris ‘Charles’ were dead and had to be reseeded in the beginning of June (Photo 13).
The second winter at Landvik was mild, and there was only some snow mold damage (Photo 14) . At Sydsjælland there were few winter damages and no need for reseeding, but the plots with Poa trivialis did not thrive and produced a dark purple color (Photo 15).
Table 8. Winter‐weather 2016‐17 and green management in 2017.
Korpa Apelsvoll Landvik Sydsjælland
Snow cover during winter
Duration of snow or ice
cover 40 days Snow:Feb‐Mar.
Ice:1 Dec‐15 Mar.
16 days in Feb. +
10 days in March 11 days (snow) Soil frozen Only a few days 1 Dec‐15 Mar 16 days in Feb. 11 days Re‐seeding Species / varieties / seed
mixtures that had to be reseeded
None
Poa trivialis (all) Lolium perenne (all)
Pa: ‘Two Put’, Ast:
‘Pure Distiction’, Acap: ‘Charles’
Mixture: Pa + Ast
None None
Reseeding, date ‐ 1 June ‐ ‐
Fertilization
Fertilizer type(s) PionerGreen 18‐2‐15 Ammonium‐sulfate
Potassium‐nitrate Angus 12‐3‐9
Iron sulfate
Arena Høst Extra, Greenmaster 14‐0‐
10, Arena Golf N, Proturf 12‐5‐20
Proturf 18‐0‐7
Wallco 5‐1‐5 (liquid) Greenmaster
Cold Start Greenmaster 14‐
0‐10 (granular)
G Boost 20‐0‐4 G Beast 6‐6‐6
G Kalimax 21‐0‐17 Mg‐sulfate Mn‐sulfate Cu‐ sulfate
First application in spring 3 May 19 May 5 April 3 April
Last application
before winter 6 Oct. 1 Oct. 31 Oct. 18 Nov.
Number of applications 15 11 16 17
Total rate of N, P and K, to A.stolonifera and Poa spp., g m‐2
15.4 / 1.9 / 11.5 15.4 / 2.4 / 18.7 14.6 / 1.63/ 9.93 30.4 / 3.4 / 26.0 Total rate of N, P and K,
to A.capillaris, A.canina and F.rubra, kg /100 m2
9.6 / 1.2 / 7.2 10.0 / 1.6 / 12.2 9.5 / 1.1 / 6.5 17.5 / 2.3 / 14.1
Mowing
Type of mower Walk Behind Walk behind Walk behind Triplex
First in spring:
Date, height 3 May, 6 mm 19 May, 6mm 3 April , 5 / 7 mm 4 April, 6 mm Lowest height in Agrostis
sp., P. annua, P. trivialis 4 mm 4 mm 3 mm 4.2 mm
Lowest height in
Festuca/Lolium/P.pratnsis 5mm 6 mm 5 mm 5 mm
Last before winter:
Date / height 19 Oct. 18 Oct., 4 / 6mm 3.Nov., 3 / 7 mm 16 Nov./ 6 mm
Irrigation Number of times 36 60 23 6
Total quantity, mm 176 mm 600 mm 450 mm ‐
Top‐dressing Type of sand Pure Sand Pure sand 0.3‐0.5 mm Green Mix
light, 0.8 % OM
Number of applications 8 9 31 8
Total quantity 8 mm ‐ 7,75 mm ‐
Veritcal mowing
No of times, Agrostis 4 0 0 0
No of times, other
species 2 0 0 0
Slicing, 5 cm depth
No of times, Agrostis 0 0 10 0
No of times, other
species 0 0 10 0
Spiking, 6 mm tines
No of times, Agrostis 2 9 1 5
No of times, other species
2 1 0
Deep aeration,
Date 24 okt ‐ Dot machine
Equipment, depth 20cm ‐ 16 cm
Photo 11. SCANGREEN trial at Apelsvoll on 3 January 2017. The ice was 2-5 cm thick but porous.
Photo: Pia Heltoft.
Photo 12. SCANGREEN trial at Apelsvoll on 3 April 2017, shortly after snow and ice melt. First row comprises Poa pratensis ‘Limousine’ (green) and three varieties of Lolium perenne (all dead). Black
granules (LECA) had been spread to melt the ice.
Photo: Pia Heltoft.
Photo 13. Photo taken from a drone over the SCANGREEN trial at Apelsvoll on 4 May 2017.
Photo: Maximilian Pircher
Photo 14. SCANGREEN trial at Landvik on 23 March 2017: Some snow mold, but no severe winter damage.
Photo: Trygve S. Aamlid
Photo 15: SCANGREEN trial at Sydsjælland in June 2017. Nearest row with brown plots are Poa trivialis.
Photo: Per Sørensen.
Photo 16. SCANGREEN trial at Korpa GC, Reykjavik, on 10 Oct. 2017.
Photo: Gudni Thorvaldsson.
2.4.4 Winter 2017‐18 and management in 2018
The winter 2017-18 resulted in severe damages due to ice and melting water at Landvik. The damages were worse than at Apelsvoll, and all plots had to be reseeded in spring (Photos 17-21). For that reason and due to the dry summer the irrigation at Landvik in 2018 was twice as high as the preceding years (Table 9).
At Apelsvoll the snow was removed until mid January (Photo 22). The winter was more stable than at
Landvik, and reeeding was limited to the same species, varieties and seed blends as the year before (Photo 23).
Photo 17. Landvik, 7 January 2018. High winter precipitation and fluctuating temperature resulted in ice and water damage.
Photo: Trygve S Aamlid
Photo 18. Ice-encased SCANGREEN-trial at Landvik, early March 2018. The snow had been removed