FIRST SECTION CASE OF KRISTIANSEN AND TYVIK AS v. NORWAY (Application no. 25498/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 2 May 2013

The latter was bound by the administrative authorities' findings of fact, except where there was a procedural defect within the meaning of section 42(2),

The Government submitted that the present application is inadmissible as regards the applicant’s complaints about the alleged violation of Article 2 of the

84. The Government submitted that in some of the cases about which the applicants complained there had been no interference with their rights under Article 11 of the Convention.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that an EU Member State decision to deprive an individual of citizenship, in so far as it implied the loss of

The United States’ Department of Justice has given no indication of where the applicant would or could be held, although it has advised that if he consents to his

The Court will therefore examine whether the information provided by the applicants in the present case to the domestic authorities on 11 July 2002, suggesting the involvement

The Court notes in this respect that at the time the Frankfurt am Main Regional Court's judgment against the applicant's co-suspects was rendered, preliminary

Turning to the main legal issue raised by the present case, that is to say, whether the State fulfilled its positive obligation under the Convention to take all necessary