- ó
(,ll
\o\o
REFERENCE
DATE
ISBN
0-97014 MARCH
1999 82-42s-1053-9The contribution to nitrogen deposition and ozone formation in
South Norway from atmospheric
emÍssions related to the petroleum activity in the l{orth Sea
S. Solberg, S.-8. Walker, S. Knudsen, M. LazarÍdis,
H. J. Beine and A. Semb
1
Contents
Page
l.Introduction
73. Emissions 9
3.1 Updated emission estimates of VOC
from
loadingbuoys
...103.2
CorrectedVOC
speciationfor
different source categories..3.3 Lumping
of
emissionpoint sources... ...I2
3.4 Emissionsfrom
shuttle tankers during transport3.5 Emissions
from British
sector...4.
Model description
4.1 The EMEP oxidant model
4.2
The Fotoplume model4.3
The interface between the EMEP trajectory model and Fotoplume...4.4 Gaussian distribution of
initial
concenffations 4.5 Meteorological pre-processing...4.6
Deposition calculations...4.7
Mixingof
plumes11
15
r6
23 23 24 26 26 26 21 29 29 30 30 30 4.7. 1 Asymmetrical rectangles4.7
.2
One-waydiffusion
4.1
.3 Two-way diffusion
4. 8 Procedure
of
moclel calculations ...5. Results.
5. 1 Nitrogen deposition...
5.2
Ozone concentrations and exposure5.2.1
Time
seriesof
ozone at backgroundmonitoring
sites 5.2.2 Estimationof 4OT40...
5.3
Model
evaluation - comparisonwith
previous model results...6. Conclusions...
7.
Acknowledgement
578.
References...
...57Appendix A Emission tables
...6132 32 42 42 48 53 5ó
NILI] OR 5/99
Summary
On behalf of the
NorwegianOil
Producers' Association(OLF), the
Norwegian Institutefor Air
Research(NILU)
has been contractedto
evaluate the effectsof the
atmospheric emissionsfrom the oil and gas exploration activity in
theNorwegian
sectorof the North
Sea.Deposition of nitrogen and formation of
boundary
level
ozonein
Southern Norway due toNorth
Sea emissionsof
nitrogen oxides(NO*),
carbonmonoxide (CO)
andvolatile organic
compounds (VOC)have been studied. The atmospheric
processeshave been sirnuiated with
numericalmodels
developedduring the project. The study reported here is
afollow-up project
after afirst
phase previously reported by Semb et al. (1996).Both the emission clata themselves and the handling
of
the emissionsin
the rnodel sirnulationshave
beenmodified
sincethe report by
Sembet aI. (1996).
Newupdates for the VOC emissions frorn loacling buoys have been
inclucled, increasing theVOC
emission estimatefor
loading buoysfrorn
82 ktonnes/yeal to137 ktonnes/year.
The VOC
emissionsfrorn
the Norwegian petroleurn sector in theNorth
Sea were estimatedat about
179 ktonnes(VOC)/year, which is
morethan half of Norway's total VOC emissions when compared with
previousnational estimates. The national
total
should, however, bemodified
according to the upclated emission estimatesfor
theloading
buoysto
be comparable. The dataindicate a NO,,
emissionin
1992from the
Norwegianpetroleum
sectorin
theNorth
Seaof
about 45 ktonnes (NO2)/year,which
correspondsto
approximately 70Vo of the total roadtraffic
emissionsin
Norway.The most
important
changein
the handlingof
the emissionsin
the rnodel was to clistribute the emission sorücesinto
a numberof
lumped megasources and the restto
gridded area sources.The rnain individual
emission sourceswere
cornbinedinto 20
megasourcescontaining the major fraction of the emissions.
The megasources were then modelledby
the photochemical plurne rnodel Fotoplurne developedduring this
project. The restof
the ernissions(i.e.
theminor
sources)were modelled as area
sourcesusing the EMEP oxidant rnodel, which is
aEuropean scale trajectory model. The interface between Fotoplume and the EMEP
oxidant rnodel was significantly irnproved
aspart of this work. An
elaborate rnodel procedurefor
estimating the contributionsfrom
theNorth
Sea emissions, separatefrom all other influence, was
clesignedin order to avoid
"noise"introduced by incompatibilities between the nurnerical rnodels.
The calculated contributions show maxima of 40-50 rng (N)/rnz frorn
the Norwegiansector
and 20-30mg (N)/mz from
theBritish
sectorto the
nitlogen clepositionin
the coastal areasof
Horclalancl and Sogn og Fjordanein
1992. This makesa total contribution of
60-80mg (N)/r¡z in this
areafor Norwegian
andBritish
sector taken together. The largest relative contributionfrom
theNorth
Seais found
further
north,in
Møre og Romsdal,with
maximum valuesof I}-l3Vo for
each of Norwegian and
British
sector compared to thetotal
nitrogen clepositionin
1992including
both oxidised and reduced nitrogen. Taken together the petroleumactivity in the North
Sea thusis
calculatedto contribute
approximately 20To in this region. Note, however, that the emissionsfrom
theNorth
Seaonly
contributeNILII OR 5/99
4
to
the oxiclecl nitrogen deposition whereas the measured deposition also includes recluced nitrogen (arnrnonia).The
calculationsgive
a marked maxirnum zone inN-cleposition from the North Sea emissions along the coast, whereas
thecalculated deposition drops inland. The calculations indicate only a minor
contribution from
theNorth
Sea emissionsto
N-depositionin
the most exposed areasin
the southern part (Agder).To
evaluatethe effect of
changing meteorologyfrom
oneyear to
another, the calculations were performed alsowith
meteorologyfor
1995but with the
same emissions asfor
1992.The
calculated contributionsfrom the North
Seato
thenitrogen
deposition,using l995-meteorology gives lower
depositionvalues
ascornpared
to
1992.This
regardsparticularly the contribution from
Norwegian sector. The maximumtotal
N-depositionis
calculatedto
be 20-25mg
(N)/mzfor
emissionsfrom
eachof
Norwegian andBritish
sectorin
1995,totalling
40-50 mg (N)/rnzfrorn
the petroleum sectorof
theNorth
Sea.With
l995-rneteorology the rnaxitnutn areaof
influencefrom
the Norwegian sectoris
displaced somewhat tothe
south.The
geographicalpattern of
N-depositionof North
Sea emissionsin
1995 is, however, rather similar the one calculated
for
7992. The calculations givea tnaxitnutn
cleposition zonealong the
coastin
1995 asin
1992.As the
sarne emission clata(for
1992) were usedin
both the calculationsfor
1992 and 1995,tlie differences in the calculated North Sea contribution is purely due
to rneteololo gical differences.The rnoclel was also used to estimate the contributions to
harmful
ozone exposurelevels, using the
so-calledAOT40 index. AOT40 is defined as the
integrateclozone exposure above 40 ppb during the growth
season,ancl is
normallyexpressed
in the unit
ppbhours.In
1992the
observedAOT40 for
coniferous/meadows was high
in
South Norway peaking at 13,000 ppbhoursin
Agder, andin
the range 6000-
9000 ppbhours else.The AOT40
valuesin
1995 were lower, peaking at 5000-
6000 ppbhoursin
Agcler.In
1992 the Norwegian sectorof
theNorth
Seais
calculatedto
contributeup
to 325 ppbhours near Stad. The calculations indicate contributionsfrom
Norwegiansector of 130-200 ppbhours in a zone along the coast from Rogaland
to TrBnclelag, and lessthan
100 ppbhours else. Thecontribution from British
sectortn
1992 is less, peakingat
169 ppbhoursin
Rogalancl, and else rnostly values lessthan 100 ppbhours. The results indicate that emissions from British
and Norwegian sectol' separately contribute to less than 57o eachof
the AOT40 valuesfol
coniferous/rneadow.The calculated influence
to
theAOT40
valuein
1995is lower (in
absolute units) thanin
1992. Emissionsfrom
Norwegian sector are calatlatedto
contributewith
120-130 ppbhoursat most in
some coastal areasof Hordaland and Sogn
og Fjordane.In
other areas thecontribution from
Norwegian sectoris
calculatecl to be lessthan
100 ppbhours.The contribution frorn British
sectoris
also lessin
1995 cornparedwith
1992, andis lower
than 100 ppbhoursin all
receptor points.Relative to the observed
AOT40
the calculated percentage contributionsfrom
theNorth
Sea weresimilar using
1992 meteorologyand
1995 meteorology.This
is becauseboth the
observations anclthe
calculatedNorth
Sea contributions were lowerin
1995 compareclto
1992.NILI,I OR 5/99
The rnodel calculations
in
thisreport
ale cotnpareclwith
the valuesgiven in
theprevious report by Semb et al. (1996). It is clear that the new version of Fotoplume in
general calculatesmuch lower contributions to the
N-deposition thanpreviously. To
checkthe reliability of the model, the model
was usecl tocalculate the overall fraction of nitrogen ernitted in the North
Seawhich
is depositedin the
receptorpoints in
SouthernNorway. The
calculations indicatethat
l3%oof the nitrogen emitted from Norwegian
sectoris
depositedin
thereceptor
points for
1992 asa total. This is slightly
lessthan
onewould
expect based on avery
sirnple considerationof wind
transport and deposition efficiency.The results
in
the previousreport by
Sernbet al.
(1996) inclicatedmuch
higherdeposition from the North
Seaemission
sources.This
showsthat the
modeidevelopment applied since the previous reporting, and in particular
the parameterisation of deposition processes, have given more realistic model results.For the ozone calculations, it is not straightforward to compare the
new calculationswith the
previous results.However, it is quite
olearthat the
newcalculations also give substantially lower contributions from the North
Sea emissionsto the AOT40 values than
calculatedpreviously. This is due to
agenerally itnproved model with regard to cleposition
processes, dynarnical processes (atmosphericmixing)
aswell
as animproved
interfaceto
the regionalEMEP oxidant model. It is, however, also to a large extent due to a
lnore sophisticatecl procedurefor
estimating theAOT40
index.NILTI OR 5/99
1
The contribution to nitrogen deposition and ozone
formation in South Norway from atmospheric emissions related to the petroleum activity in the
North Sea
1. Introduction
The
offshore petroleumactivity in
theNorth
Sea contributessignificantly to
thetotal national
atmospheric emissionsof NO' (NO, = NO+NOr), CO
(carbonrnonoxicle) ancl
VOC (volatile
organic compounds)in Norway. In
1995 the total NO,. emissionsfrom
petroleurnrelated activity in the Norwegian
sectol'of
theNorth
Sea wasonly slightly
less than the total NO" emissionsfrom all
roadtraffic in Norway
andconstitúed
257oof Norway's NO*
emissions.The
shareof
VOC etnissionswas higher, in
1995about
50Voof Norway's total VOC
etnissions stemmeclfrom
petroleumactivity in
theNorth
Sea.In addition, the
gases are emitted upwinclof Norway's main
lancl, and are thusfrequently
transported towards the coast.The
travel tirnefrom
the ernission areato
theNorwegian
coastis of
the same order as that neecledfor
theforrnation of ozone and niffates in the
atmosphere.Furthermore, transport
acrossthe
seairnplies
negligible
depositionof NO*
ancl ozone(which
bothwould
be cleposited over lancl).NO"
converted to HNO3 is absorbecl by the water surface, however.Taken
togetherthis
situation makesit irnportant to
evaluatethe effects of
theNorth
Sea emissionsfor
acid deposition ancl ozone exposurein
South Nolway.Lirnited
studies have previously been perfolrnedfor
e.g. ernissionsfrorn
theTroll platfonn (Sirnpson,
1992)and frorn the loading at Sture
(Sernband
Solberg,1993). On behalf of the Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF)
the Norwegian Institutefor Air
Research(NILU)
has developecl the numerical rnoclelFotoplume, specially
designedto improve the simulation of
ernissions and atrnospherictranspolt
and chernical transformationsof pollutants from
offshoreoil
and gas procluctionin
theNorth
Sea.NILU
also preparecl a report containing a theoretical outlineof
the chemical transformation and clepositionof
theNorth
Sea emissions (Sernbet
aI.,1995).The
calculationswith the
Fotoplurnemodel
werefirst
reporteclby
Sernbet
al.(1996), and the results were subject
to
an external reviewby Prof. Trond
Iversen at theUniversity of
Oslo. Based on his recomrnendations and the expelience andviews within the
steeringgoup at OLF and the
researchersat NILU, it
wascleciclecl
to further refine
and clevelopceltain
aspectsof
the Fotoplurne rnodel and then to rerun the previous calculationswith
an improved rnodel.As part
of
this second phase of the projectfor OLF,
Solberg etal.
(1998) pleparecla report
presentingan
evaluationand valiclation of the rnodel
baseclon
coffì- parisonwith
observations, ancl also containing proposalsfor
model clevelopments.NILII OR 5/99
The present report is the
final
reportin
this second phase,giving firstly
an outiineof
the moclel development, ancl, secondly, the calculated nitrogen deposition and ozone exposurewith
the updated model.During the
same tirneperiod,
the Fotoplumemodel
has been appliedin
several environmental impact assessment studies, e.g.for
petroleum related emissions at Haltenbanken (Knudsen etal.,
1996a),for
a planned gas powet plant at Kollsnes (Knudsenet al.,
1996b) andfor future
emissions at the Norwegian sectorof
the North Sea (Solberg et a1., 1999).2. Background
A
cornprehensiveoutline of
the physical ancl chemical processes leaclingto
aciclcleposition ancl ozone formation
is
not inclucledin
the present repoft. For this, thereadel is
referreclto the
backgrounclreport by
Sernbet al. (1995). A
short descriptionof
the most basic processes is given below.In
thesunlit
atrnosphere, hydrocarbons ancl nitrogen oxides enterinto
nurnerous photochemical reactionswhich
gradually convert the hydrocarbons to oxygenatecl compoundsancl eventually to carbon dioxide. The nitrogen oxides are
not consumeclin this
process,but
areonly
cycled between nitrogen monoxide (NO) and nitrogen clioxide (NOz). Each cycle generates one ozone molecule. Thus, the amountof
procluced ozone dependson how
many cycles the nitrogen oxides go through before they are ultirnately lost through other processes. Usually the ozone productionpotential for
eachNO*
moleculeis
between2
and6. The
dominant loss processfor NO"
(NO+NO2)is by
reactionwith free
radicalswhich
convertsNO" to
gaseousnitric acid.
Gaseousnitric acid rnay
subsequentlydissolve in
water clropletsor be
convertedto nitrate
particles.Both nitric acid
andnitlate
particles may then belost
byprecipitation
and thus be depositecl as nitrateto
theground, the
so-calleclwet
cleposition.Nitric acid is very
water-solubleand
is therefore reaclily absorbed by the sea sulface and by precipitation. The clepositionvelocity
over the sea varieswith
thewind velocity,
butis typically of
the orclerof
0.5 crn/s, corresponcling to a loss
in
the ailborne concenffations of about 2Volh.During night-tirne,
nitrogen dioxicleis
conveltedto nitric
acicl anclto nitrate
in particlesby reaction with
ozone.This
reactionis slower
than the reactionwith
hych'oxyl raclicalsin sunlight. During
sulmner, however,high
concentr'ationsof ozone
ancllong periods of sunlight
causenitrogen oxides ernitted frorn oil
exú'actionactivities to be
convertedto nitric
acicland nitrates before the
air reachesthe Norwegian
coast. These emissions therefore contributelittle to
the concentrationlevel
of nitrogen oxicles at the Norwegian mainland.The deposition of nitrogen oxide
anclnitrogen clioxide to the
sea surface isnegligible. Dry deposition to the ground is, however, effective for
nitrogen dioxicle aswell
asnitric
acid andniffate
particles. Deposition ratesof nitric
acicl andparticulate nitrate
are increasedover land, mainly
becauseof
the increasecl surface aerodynamic roughness.NILrr 0R _5/99
9
3. Emissions
Figure
1 shows the influence area usedin
the calculations. Thegrid is
the EMEP 50krn x
50km
gricl systern ancl theblack
dots, placedin
the rnicldleof
the glicl squaresat the
Norwegian soast, arethe
receptorpoints
used.The small
squaresymbols mark the monitoring sites used for comparison with the
rnodel calculations, and are,following the
coastfrom North to
South,Kårvatn,
Voss, Skreådalen, Birkenes and Langesund.\'.'
I
l.
è
:..'
¡.
t,
^ |\ ¡'.t \
l.
:\
7
àl.
\'
.1' ... V
\ (
( ù \ î(
x V
,.Àì SI
'r
I
II
,É.\
q 4l I )
I \
T
\ \
\ K
..:,1-l
\
\,
t\ )
( \ íl ry
t¿2
t ,\ .\\ \
\
\
r(
',I\
_\\
:l'( t *l
Map showing the model domctin used
in
the calculations and the corresponding 50 kmx 50 lcrngrid
squares.The dots mark the receptor points, and the square symbols mark the Norwegian background monitoring sitesKårvatn,
Voss, Skreådalen, Birkenes and Langesundlistedfrom
north to southeast.Figure I
NILII OR.5/99
A
cornpletelisting of
the ernission data usedin this work
is givenin Appendix
A.A
surnmaryof the
emission datais given in Table
1. These data showthat
the ernissionsfrorn the petroleum
sectorin the North
Sea representa
consiclerablecontlibution to
the nationaltotal
ernissionsfor Norway.
The NO*-emissionfrorn
the Norwegian petroleum sectorin
1992 was almost 707oof
the NO"-emissionsfrom
roadtraffic in Norway (in
1995).A
largepart of Norway's
VOC-emissions sternsfrom
petroleum related emissionsin
theNorth
Sea.Table
1 indicates that more thanhalf
the nationalVOC
emissions arefrom
the petroleum sectorin
theNorth Sea. As the
numbersin Table 1 are taken from
separate sourcesof inforrnation,
they may not bedirectly
comparable. The indicated total NorwegianVOC is too low
accordingto
the updatedVOC
emission datafor loading
buoys givenin
the table below.Table
I
Emissions of NO* and VOCin
1992from
Norway as a u,hole,from
Nonuegian roadtrffic
in 1995andfrom
the Norwegian andBritish
petroleum sectorin
theNorth
Seain
1992.NO¡-emissions
(1 000 tonnes (NOr)/vear)
VOC-emissions (1000 tonnes VOC/vear)
National total for Norway 1992') 216 oaa
Total road traffic, Norway, 1995 b) 67 64
Norwegian petroleum sector, North Sea, 1992 45 179
British petroleum sector, North Sea, 1992 89 16
EMEP MSC-W (1998)
'') Data for 1995 from Central bureau of Statistics Norway
The emission data in this work were
basedon the
samedata as
previously,including
emissionsof NO*, CO
andVOC
specifiedfor a total of 488
single sourcesfor the British and the Norwegian sector of the North
Seafor
1992.Several modifications and corrections have been carriecl out on the
model, however.3.1 Updated
emission estimatesof VOC from loading
buoysSince
the previous study
was performed,it had
been discoveredthat the VOC
ernissionsfrom loading
buoys were substantially underestimateclin
the previous data. TheVOC
ernissionsfrom
ioading therefore hadto
be changed according to new estimates. Table2
shows the olcl and the new, updatedVOC
emissionsfrom
the loading buoys.Table 2 VOC emissions (tonnes VOClyear) used previously as
well
as the new estimates appliedin
the present calculations.Platform installation Loading buoy Old VOC emission estimate ltlv)
New VOC emission estimate ltlv) Statfjord
Statfjord Statfjord Gullf aks Gullf aks
OLS.A OLS-B SPM-C SPM-1 SPM-2
23293 23293 23293 631 0 631 0
34067 34067 34067 17275 17275
SUM 82499 1 36751
NILII OR 5/99
11
3.2 Corrected VOC
speciationfor different
source categoriesThe VOC
speciation,i.e. the relative clistribution profile used to clefine
the emissionrate of the
rnodelsindividual VOC
species (ethane, etheneetc.)
was rnodifiecl comparedto
thepreviously
useclprofiles.
The reasonfor this
was that the VOCprofile
previously used was not considered to be appropliatefor
sorneof the
ernission source categories.This
regardedin particulal the
loacling buoys,where
107o, 57o, andl57o previously
weredistributed
as ethene, propene and xylenes, respectively.Table 3 gives the VOC distribution for different
source categories usedin
the present calculations.Table 3 Updated VOC distribution functions used
in
the present calculations.All
numbers refer to weight percent.Loading buoys Flare Turbines Transport*
czHe c¿Hro czH'¿
cgHe ceHro HCHO CH3CHO CH30H CzHsOH
34 66
12.50 12.50 6.25 18.75 37.50 7.50 5.00
18.75 25.00 12.50 12.50 25.00 3.75 2.50
q7
18.0 12.0 4.6 10.6 5.9 4.0 aôt
SUM 100 100 100 100
lncludes diesel engines, helicopter traffic, supply ships and stand by ships
The distribution
functionsin
Table3
were constructedfrom
clifferent sourcesof inforrnation. The loading buoys give only
alkanes, andthe weight
distributionshown in Table 3 was
baseclon emission
measurementsat Sture in
1993performed by Det Norske Veritas, DNV (Olsen et al., 1993). The
rnodel chemistry necessarily hasto
besimplified
and thusall
alkanes are representecl bythe two
compouncls ethane ancl n-butane.Emissions of
ethaneand
propane,reported by DNV, were allocated to the model as
ethane, whereasall
other alkanes were allocatecl to the model as n-butane.The
VOC
emissiondistribution for flaring
and turbines was kept constant, exceptthat a
shareof
20o/o,previously
allocatedto
methane,now
was distributed ontothe VOCs
shownin Table 3. The
reportedtotal VOC
emissionsdo not
inclucle rnethane.The
VOC
emissiondistribution for
transport, givenin
Table 3, was adoptecl frorn theprofile
usedin
the standard trajectoryEMEP
modelfor UN-ECE
category 8,"Other Mobile Transport" ("other"
as comparedto
categoryJ - road traffic)
which includes ernissionsfrorn
ships.In
aclditionto
the source categories givenin Table 3, the
three categories"cold vent", "fugitive",
ancl"other
sources" weregiven in the original
ernission data.NILI.I OR 5/99
These source categories were given the same
VOC distribution
as loacling buoys(for "cold vent"
and"fugitive")
andtraffic (for
"other sources").3.3 Lumping of
emissionpoint
sourcesCompared
to
the emission data useclpreviously,
thelumping of
indiviclualpoint
sources were changed.In
the previous calculations,all inclividual
sources were groupedinto
so-callecl megasources accordingto
installation numbers.The
ideawas to represent each installation by one
megasourcein the
Fotoplurnecalculations. A lurnping of the individual
sourceswas obviously
needed.Originally the
emission data consistedof a total of 488
sourceswhen both
the Norwegian anclBritish
sector were included, as shownin
Figure2.
Manyof
tiiese sources were close to each other and impossible to resolve asindividual
stacks in the rnoclel. This previously applied lumping reduced the numberto
approxirnately120 rnegasources.
In
the present calculations, an alternative approash was applied where the originalindividual
sources were groupecl accordingto
their location and internal distance.Based
on
theoriginal
emission data,a
setof
megasources was constructedwith
the constraint that no indiviclual source should be more than 6km
awayfrorn
anyof
the other stacks allocated to that megasource. 6km
may seem as a rather large scale compared to the very detailed ancl fine-structuredoriginal
emission data.However,
this
scaleis
representativeof
the plume dimensions after afew
hours,and was chosen as the best value both
with
regard to themixing of
plurnes ancl toretain the fine resolution
comparedto the underlying 50 km resolution in
theemission grid cells
for
the trajectory model.Furthennore, compaled to the previously reportecl calculations (Sernb et al., 1996) the procedures
for
the rnodel calculations were changed. Based on the experiencewith
the clifferent rnodel advantages ancl disadvantages, the ernissions were split into two parts.A
sorting according toNO*
emission rates showed that neafly 80o/oof
tlre emissionfrom
Norwegian sectorin the North
Sea sternrnedfrorn
the 20 largest megasources (lumpedon a
6km
resolution).Thus, the
numberof
largepoint
sources(LPS) rnodelled by Fotoplurne was
reducedto these 20
point sources. Dueto
thelumping of
theoriginal
single stacks, these20
megasources also containedthe
dominantVOC
sources,which
meansthat the loading
buoys were includecl. The lemaining emissionsfrom
Norwegian sector aswell
asall
theBritish
emissionswere
clistributeclto their
corresponcling 50km x
50km
gridsquare, and their contribution was calculated by the EMEP oxiclant rnoclel.
Table
4
shows the emission numbersfor NO*,
CO andVOC from
the 20 mega- sourcesin the Norwegian
sector.As
indicateclby Table 4, the
megasources contribute 78o/oof
the total NO* emissionfrorn
Norwegian sector and 98t/oof
the VOC ernission. Figure 3 shows the locationof
the 20 Norwegian megasources.NILII OR.5/99
Figure
2: Location
of the 488 indívidual emission sourcesin
the North Sect(British
and Norwegian sector).t3
\
A
I
t,
7
{ /
)
1
v
I \(
( / \
Yt
\ -{
I / \
t
ì {)
a a!
¡
ar
I
) I F
å --L
,/
I )
v
I
'¡
ao
K
't at
t aa
'ì
/(
Y
\-\\)
1' \ ?
lt
>l/-) r )
I
t\\
a
aa
\
( ,
\
--\\ :l a
L==rNIL{I OR 5/99
Figure
3: Location
of the 20Noruegían
megasources usedin
the Fotoplume calculations.30 29
\ z ()
A
27 )
t,
26
25 7
24
IJ
,/
22
)
21'
1 v
{(
20
(
à \
\ -1
19
( tl /
1B aa
-ì
'.'\)
17 I
)a
r
I16
I )
I F
15
å --L
7)
14
¿
13 {
12
1'1
10
r
9
B
I
Y f\
\)
('
4\ 4
lt
I/_) \- )
3
/
,\À
2
\\ I
/=!.\
1 2 .J 4
,a'
{ \
xB\ '-I I
10 11 12 1J ':t4-7
to ,t / 1B 192L -l
21(NILII OR 5/99
15
The procedure
of splitting
the emissions isjustified by
the fact that the advantageby an LPS model, as Fotoplume, is the capability to
simulatethe
ffansport,cliffusion, and photochemical reactions taking place within single
emission plumes.A
regionwith
severallow
and moderate, nearby sourcesis,
on the other hand,in practice not
possibleto
simulatewith a
photochemicalpuff-trajectory model, and in reality requires
somesort of
adaptivegrid model (Eulerian
or Lagrangian). Besides, the basisfor
developing the Fotoplume modelin
thefirst place
wasto take
accountfor non-linear
differencesin the
rnodel calculations between an Eulerian(grid point)
modelwhich
smoothsall
emissionsto
a certain resolution and apuff
trajectory model. The non-linear effectsfrom
not incluclingall
the smallerpoint
sourcesin
the Fotoplume rnodelwill
probabiy beof
rninor importance.3.4
Emissionsfrom shuttle tankers during transport
In the
previous calculationsall
emissionsfrorn
shuttle tankersduring Íarlspolt
between the place of loacling and unloacling were allocated to the place
of
loading.These emissions conffibutes
significantly to the NO*
ernissions andthe
former procedureis a simplification which
leadto too high
emissions allocateclto
the loading platforms.In the present
stuclythe
emissionsfrom shuttle ships during ftansport
were distributedto the
50km x
50km grid
squares along assumed ship tracks. Data regarding frequencyof
thedifferent
ship routes were used to construct sirnplified area emissionfields.
Thetotal
emission was evenly distributedin
space and tirne along each track. Annual average ernission ratesin
the gricl squares crossecl by theship tracks were then calculated ancl usecl in the EMEP oxidant
moclel calgulations.Compared to the previous method where
all
shuttle ship emissions were allocatedto the loading platform, the new procedure will reduce the effect of
these ernissions. The reasonfor
thisis
obvious-
when the ernissions are spreacl over alarge area the
contribution to
acid cleposition and ozone formationis
also spread over a large area comparedto
allocatingall
ernissionsto
single stack closeto
the receptor region.The ernission rates from the shuttle tankers cluring transport
anclfrorn
all retnaining sources (allocateclto
thegrid
squares)in
the Norwegian sectofis
also shownin
Table 4.NILI,I OR 5/99
Table 4 The emissions
from
Norwegian sector applied in the model calculations, showing the annual emissionsfrom
each of the20 megasources (explained
in
the text), the shuttle ships (during transport), and the totalfrom all
other sources. The x and y indexes refer to thegrid
numbering given inFigure
3.3.5
Emissionsfrom British
sectorThe airn
of
the project was to estimate the contributionto
nitrogen deposition andozone exposure from emissions in the Norwegian sector. However,
thecontlibution from British
sector is interestingfor
comparison and was includedin the previous report by
Sembet al. (1996). In the
present calculationsof
the contributionfrom
emissionsin
the Norwegian sectorto
acicl deposition and ozoneformation, all British
emissions were allocatedto
50km x
50krn grid
squares.The effect
of
theBritish
emissions was taken careof
as aÍea sourcesin
the EMEP oxiclant moclel, not aspoint
sources.Ernission sourca type
No x v NO" emissions (tonnes (NOz)/vear)
CO emissions (tonnes CO/vear)
VOC ernissions (torures VOC/vear)
Megasources
1
2 3 4
-5
6 7
I
9 10 I1 t2 t3 t4
1-5
l6
T7 18 19 20
13 6 6 8 6 6 1 t4
6
t6 t9
8 8 8 13
t2 7 8 6 8
10
t7
18
I7
T7 T7
t7
9 18
9 8
I7 I7
1-5
9 10
t7
1-5
18 T6
1895
4n4
4049 2478 2082 1878
L3l0
1255 t2z6 t113
1 155 1100 891 811 734 687 619 472 463 459
2373
tr2l
1,041 573 s38 494 378 303 293 3t7 312 294 288 258 200 t78
186
t23 r39 138
1438 68485 34812
198 68353 123 1,39
2L0 138 249 254
t2r
62 453 342 102
44
t5l
5.1 -1J
Sum 35076 9550 175809
Shuttle ships Sum 6658 2234 1332
Other sources Sum 2998 904 1454
Total sum 44732 12688 178595
NIL{.I OR 5/99
t7
Due
to
excessive computertime
required,it
wasnot
possibleto perform
rnodel calculationswith
a large number of Norwegian andBritish
point sources together.The effect
of
theBritish
emissions was therefore estimated separately,in
the sameway
asfor
the Norwegian emission sources.A
6km lumping into
megasourceswas applied for the British individual point
sources,as explained for
theNorwegian
sources.The 20
sffongestNO* emitters
among these megasources were calculatedwith
Fotoplume, whereas therest of
theBritish
ernissions were taken careof
as area sourcesin the EMEP oxidant
rnoclel.Table 5
shows the emission numbersfor NO", CO and VOC frorn the 20
megasoulcesand all
rernaining sources (allocatecl to the gricl squares)in
theBritish
sectol.Tahle 5 The emíssions
from British
sector appliedin
the model calculatiotts, showing the annuaL emissionsfrom
each of the 20 megasources (explainedin
the text), and the totalfrom all
other soLtrces. Thex
and y indexes refer to thegrid
numbering given in Figure 3.This procedule gives an
estirnateof the
separatecontribution from the British
emissionsif
there were no Norwegian ernissionsin
the North Sea.It
isdifficult
toEmission sourcg type
No. x v NO, emissions
(tonnes (NO2)/year)
CO emissions (tonnes CO/year)
VOC ernissions (tonnes VOC/ve¿u)
Megasources
I
2
3 4
-5
6 1 tÌ r) 10 11
t2
13
t4
15 16
t7
18
t9 20
6 10
9 8 8 6
_5
6 9
t2
8
t6
-5
10 9
l7
8 8 6 5
t]
10 11
t4
13 L7 17 11 10 9 11
2 18
t2 t2
-5
11 11
l6
t]
7997 5074 5034 4438
4tI7
4087 3874 3r16 2134
2st3
2445 2423 2389 2340
22n
2051 t787 1782 1694 1-510
1805
t95
11-s6
926 1065
792 532 842 790 610 106
-s01
s66 543 482 379 309 341 283 386
-5-s3
252 2t2 209 433 3-s6
6l
8-s 1
1179 161 1549 136
tn
100
13-5
109 46
28t 4t
75
Sum 63637 13809 7465
Other sources Sum 25413 6249 8287
Total sum 89050 20058 15752
NILII OR 5/99
evaluate
if
these resultswill differ significantly frorn
thereal
situation where theBritish
emissions are transported across and mixedwith
the Norwegian emissionstowards the Norwegian coast. Generally, non-linear effects will reduce
the irnpacts whenthe NO"
concentrations arehigh,
thusindicating that
the present estimation of contributionfrom British
emissions is an upper estirnate.Figure
4
and Figure5
show the 50km x
50km
gridded area sourcesof NO,
andVOC,
r'espectively, excluclingthe 20 Norwegian
rnegasoffces. These emission numbers includeall British
emission, aswell
as the emissionsfrom
shuttle tankersduring transport and smaller Norwegian point
sourcesnot allocated to
the megasources. The emissionsfrom
the shuttle ship track to Tranmere at theBritish
west coast ale apparentin
Figure4
and Figure 5 as crossing theUK.
Although the ship track obviouslyis very simplified,
the emission rates are so srnall comparedto UK's
mainland
emissions, that the small displacementof the
ship trackis of
no irnportance
for
the rnodel results.For
comparisonFigure 6 and Figure 7 show the NO" and VOC
emissions,respectively, from the 20 Norwegian
megasourceswhen allocated to
theircorresponding 50
km x
50km grid
squares.NILII OR 5/99
Figure 4
I9
NO* emissions (tonnes
(NO)lyear) from British
and Norwegian petroleum sector, excluding the 20 Norwegian megasources, all,ocated.to
EMEP's
50 km x 50 kmgrid
squares.A
)
tt
7
{
./
\I
I
)
a V
{ \(
( / \
\ -1
I / \
41 17 99 -nt
(\
:.)/
l
6744 1 4656 85 922 E5 19
r
500r 220 60 153 81
I ) )
'9t
107 1 529 68 I 73 7a r7a--1
7)
127
¿
4658 118 15 78 7A127 \ 2A20 14 15 7E
127 127 6463 2053
155 5918 1861 107 445
15J
K
1tJ9 609E 41 05 220 717 980,.y )
275 3840 1 5681¡J
I
220133
lst
Y
11\ 133)
I/'>
\ \ I
133?
360 2734]
>l I155
/-)
22F )
I
t\\ 133 2374
741 2607 2147
\
\\ f(
642 137 3644 309\
--\ 13\-l
tJ3 155a
L7r
NILI] OR 5/99
\
\
A
I
t,
7
{
/.
\I
)
"L
V
{\
(
( à \
\ -{
x tl / À
43J 569 63 63 416L
-? ¡
I714 2938 237 138 373 76
f
672 J69 631 161 564 223 31 /zo
<.
I ,a
I¿f1
7
2A6 1127 317 56 2'17 .?]¿ --1_ 7)
374
¿
a,+o 357 56 217 217374
\
't100 48 56 217374 374 334 7AA 20
392 344 48 246 J68
392
À
51 299 65 651'y
52 8E6 540392 I
I
631392 /ssz
Y
\-\\ 392)
( ?
234 1779-ìl 392
/-)
14)
,L 392 1547 442 't697 1404
\ f(
418 89 2329 201\
-_\ 39\.-l
392 392a
L-r
Figu.re
5:
VOC emissions (tonnes (VOC)lyear)from British
and Norwegian petroleum sector, excluding the 20 Norwegian megasources, allocated toEMEP's
50 kmx
50 kmgrid
squares.NILIj OR 5/99
2I
Figure 6:
The sum of NO* emissions (tonnes(NO)lyear) from
the 20 Norwegiannxegasources, as allocated to the correspondíng
EMEP's
50 km x 50 kmgrid
squares.A
I
I ,
7
{
,/. )
)
1_
V
(\
(
( / \
\ -{
( í / À
5737 L
ì.
$i (\
8231 1 990 4474
r
I
I I F
q
1243--1 ,z¡
/)
I
\\-.-
K
687 7E957i4 1255 117 3
I
1 155Y t\
\)
( ç
\ I lt
>i /_-)r )
t\\
\
\\ I
\ I \ '-I a
L--f
NILU OR 5/99
Figure
7 The sumof
VOC emissions (tonnes (VOC)lyear)from
the20 Norwegian megasoltrces, as allocated to the correspondíng
EMEP's
50 lcm x 50 kmgrid
squares.\
A
)
t,
7
{
/
\)
1
V
((
( à \
---cx I / À
35044 --l.
a\ I
ta4 381
r
I
I I F
å
61 1--1 ,z¡
7)
I \
r
102 1438312 210 249
I
251Y
\-\\)
( \ ?
JI
>l/_) r )
/
t\\
\
\ I
\
I\ '-l a
L=-r
NILTI OR 5/99
LJ
4. Model description
Several parts of the Fotoplume model have been revised and developed
further
aspart
of
the current project. Most importantis
an improved interface to the EMEPtrajectory oxidant model and better sirnulation of the clry and wet
deposition processes.In
addition asimplified
simulation of plumernixing
has been included.The moclel development is described
in
thefollowing
sections.4.1 The EMEP oxidant
modelThe EMEP
model (Eliassen and Saltbones, 1983; Simpson, 1995)is
a one-layerLagrangian trajectory model which has been
developedto
describe regionalformation and long-range transport of air pollutants in Europe. The
modelintegrates the photochemical reactions for an air parcel following 4
clays'trajectories to any
receptorpoints within the EMEP
rnoclel clomain, covering Europe and part of theNorth Atlantic.
Meteorological
data aregiven
eachsix
hoursin
approxirnate 150krn x
150 krngrid
cells on a polar stereographic map (Figure 1). Datafor
thernixing
height aregiven each 12 hours. Annual
emissionsare reported by the Parties to
theConvention on
Long-Range TransboundaryAir Pollution.
Theseale given
asnational totals, but rnany countries also report ernissions
in
150km x
150kln
or 50krn x
50km gricls. The Norwegian Meteorological Institute maintains
a clatabaseof
European emission data, and carries out the necessary additionalwork in
estirnating annual and diurnal variations,distribution
of national total ernissionsin grid
squares, and estirnationof
rnissing values.The
statusof
the ernission clata is given by EMEPMSC-W
(1998).In
order to conforrnwith
the rnodel formulation,total
anthropogenic non-rnethanehydrocarbons (NMHC) emissions are
speciatedinto equivalent
ernissionsof ethane, ethene, propene, n-butane, o-xylene, forrnaldehyde,
acetalclehycle,methanol and
ethanol(Table 3). Natulal
emissionsof volatile organic
hydro- carbons are includecl and representecl by isoprene (Simpson, 1995).The meteorological
information
is prepareclfrorn
the international rneteolological observational networkwith
thehelp of
the Norwegian Meteorological Institute's numerical forecasting model. The reference heightfor
the meteorological data inthe
EMEP-moclelis o =
P/Ps= 0.925 (i.e. at a
surfacewith an
atrnospl-reric pressureof
92.57oof
thepressue
at the ground).This
corresponcls approxirnately to alevel
600 rn above the grouncl.The chernical scheme
involves
about 70 different sompounds, and rnore than 150shemical
reactions.It has recently been tested against lnore
cornprehensive chernical reactions systems, and has beenfound to
sirnulate aclequatelyboth
the chernisal breakdownof
hydrocarbons andthe forrnation of
ozone(Kuhn et
al.,1997;
Anclerson-Skolcl anclSimpson,
1999).The model predictions have
also been tested against measurecl concentrationsof
hyclrocarbonsand
alclehycles atseveral measüement sites in Europe. Goocl agreement has been
obtained,particularly for
aiclehydes (Solberg etal.,
1995).NILI-I OR 5/99
4.2 The Fotoplume
modelFotoplume is the name
of
the photochernicalpuff-trajectory
model developeclfor OLF with the
designatecl purposeof simulating the effect of the North
Sea emissions. Previous versions of the model is presented by e.g. Sernb et al. (1996).Figure 8 shows how the dispersion from a point source is simulated
byFotoplume's
stepwise expanding segments.The
plurneis
divicledinto
segmentsalong the
tnean aclvection axis.The length of the
segments correspondsto
thetime resolution of this
processin
the model, presently 30 rninutes.Thus, with
a rneanwind
speedof
10m/s, the
segmentwill be
18km long. The width
and heightof
theelliptic
segments are determinedfrom
plurne dispersion pararneters,which
have been takenfrom the
meteorological clata.In order to
sirnulate the concentrationvariations
acrossthe plurne,
each segmentis divided into five
shells.The length of the
segmentsis kept
constantuntil
they leavethe model
domain.The wiclth of the
segments'shells expand
accordingto
Gaussian dispersiontheory,
thereby entrainingair
outsicle theplume into
theplume's
shells.For
the sakeof
understanding,it is crucial to regard this
expansiononly
asa
stepwise changein the
3-dimensionalgrid
encompassing the process(i.e.
theplurne)
we want to study.This
so-called "expansion" does therefore not simulate any physical processin
the attnosphere,it only
reflects that we have to expancl the griclin
order to keep trackof
the plurne. The true physical expansion, i.e. the exchangeof
gases and particlesby
turbulentdiffusion in
theplume
(and between the plume andthe
backgroundair) is
rnodelled separately.This is
doneby
applying cliffusion parameters on the interfaces betweenthe
shells.The cliffusion
parameters are calculateclfrorn
the rneteorological data.When the vertical
extensionof the plume (or rather the
expandinggricf
has increasedto
theheight of
themixed
layer,the
shells are replacedby
rectangular blockswith
a height corresponding to the mixecl layer, as shownin
Figure 8. Thisis in
accordancewith
thereal
situation, where arelatively
homogeneous verticaldistribution is
reached when the plumes aremixed in
thewhole of
the planetary boundary layer.Concurrently, photochemical reactions are simulatecl
for
each segrnent ancl shell,with
tirnesteps chosen so that the computational solutions arenurnerically
stable.The photochemical reaction
schemeand the reaction rates in Fotoplume
are identicaiwith
the reaction schemein
the EMEP oxidant rnodel.The segrnents are advected
with
the rnain wincl,which is
changed every6
hours.Because the
wind field
changeswith
thelocation in
theEMEP grid,
the plumeswill travel along ourved trajectories. No interpolation of the windspeed
or clirection is rnadewithin
the 6-h time intervals.NILII OR 5/99
A) Change to
rectângular
Segment
Rectangular sêgiment
/
\
0,8 HMX
HB
Shells
Source
H"
= Height of plume enter after calculating the plumeriseHr,*
= Height of mixing layer25
B) Meteorological period 2
.t
Sêgment Source
Figure 8:
Graphical representation of the díspersion modelA)
The plume segments in perspective.B)
The plume seenfrom above.C)
One segment with shells.c)
I
Rectangular segment
vB
Segment with coucentric elliptical shells
c1
c
4NILI.I OR 5/99