THIRD SECTION CASE OF KHACHATRYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 31761/04)

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that an EU Member State decision to deprive an individual of citizenship, in so far as it implied the loss of

The applicants complained that, as a result of the NIPO’s protraction of the administrative proceedings relating to their patent application, they had been denied the

He further submitted that the authorities of Kaisheim Prison, where no substitution treatment had ever been provided, had omitted to examine the medical necessity of drug

In conclusion, although the Court accepts that the decisions of the national authorities were made in what they considered to be the best interests of the child and

“inevitably” be left to national authorities who are in principle better placed than the Court to evaluate particular needs and conditions in a given case.. Regard ought to be had

Given the public interest in free expression in respect of such topics and the fact that the applicant party was an opposition parliamentary political party, the Court

The case originated in an application (no. 12020/09) against the Swiss Confederation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights

The Court notes that the applicant first contacted the child welfare authorities and voiced her concerns about the child and her suspicions of sexual abuse