• No results found

Public health

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Public health"

Copied!
2
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Public health

WHY FOCUS ON PUBLIC HEALTH?

Preventable health problems related to lifestyle factors such as nutrition, smoking, substance abuse and physical activity are increasing all over Europe. More than half the population in Europe is overweight or obese. Mental health disorders including depression are experienced by approximately one in ten EU citizens.

In 2013 the gap in life expectancy at birth between the EU countries was 11.8 years for males and 7.5 years for females.

According to the European Commission, this is partially attributed to uneven access and quality of health care.

OECD figures show that health spending in the EU countries has decreased each year since 2009. This may affect public health, if not immediately, certainly in years to come.

The European population is also getting older and living longer. The proportion of people over 65 in Europe will increase from 17% in 2010 to almost 30% by 2060. This sets a new challenge for healthcare systems.

WHAT WILL WE ACHIEVE?

The public health programmes contribute to:

> Strengthening capacity in the beneficiary countries to improve service delivery

> Improving access to and quality of healthcare services Particular attention is given to closing the health gap mainly among vulnerable groups including young people, pregnant women, elderly and the Roma population.

HOW WILL WE ACHIEVE IT?

Support from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway is focused on:

> Universal access to safe, high-quality, efficient healthcare services with particular attention to the needs of vulnerable groups.

> Strengthen cooperation between social and healthcare services.

>Effective public health policies to prevent non- communicable diseases (for ex. cancer and heart diseases).

> Improve health surveillance and information systems, such as data registries to track and monitor population health.

> Improve mental health services, such as development of strategies to enable community-based treatment of patients with mental disorders.

> Awareness-raising campaigns for healthy lifestyles in the population generally and among young people in particular.

HOW DOES IT WORK?

Projects are selected based on open calls for proposals organised by the programme operator in each beneficiary country. Calls are published on the websites of the programme operators and on www.eeagrants.org. In some cases projects are already predefined.

The widening health gap, high levels of lifestyle-related diseases and an ageing population are some of the major health challenges in Europe.

Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway strive to reduce health inequalities by promoting physical and mental health in the beneficiary countries, and improving access to, and quality of, healthcare services.

www.eeagrants.org www.norwaygrants.org

© Financial Mechanism Office

(2)

COUNTRY OVERVIEW: PUBLIC HEALTH

Reduced inequalities

between user groups

Prevent and reduce lifestyle diseases

Improve mental health

Prevent HIV/AIDS

and tuberculosis

Improve access and quality of health

services

National health registries and health information

systems

Improve health governance

Partner Grant amount (€ million)

Bulgaria

13.4 n n

Cyprus*

1.2 n

Czech

Republic

n 19.2 n

Estonia

n 8.9 n

Hungary**

n 16.6 n

Lithuania

6.0 n

Poland

n 18.0

58.0

n n n

Portugal

n 10.0 n

Romania

22.6 n

Slovenia

n 10.2 n

Total 184.1

n Norwegian Institute of Public Health n EEA Grants n Norwegian Directorate of Health n Norway Grants

* In Cyprus there is no overall health programme, but two pre-defined projects in the field of health.

**Payments currently suspended in Hungary: bit.ly/1K41Ybl

BILATERAL COOPERATION

The evaluation of support to the health sector in the previous funding period (2004-2009) emphasised the importance of partnership and knowledge sharing.

Funding is available to support networking and foster project partnerships. Activities such as meeting participation, networking and sharing of technology and best practice may be funded by bilateral funds in each country.

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health is involved as donor programme partner in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Portugal and Slovenia and the Norwegian Directorate of Health in Poland. These institutions play a strategic role in programme planning and implementation, and assist Norwegian entities who wish to get involved as project partners or through bilateral funds.

ABOUT THE EEA AND NORWAY GRANTS

* EEA Grants €993.5 million (Norway 95.7%, Iceland 3.2%, Liechtenstein 1.1%) – Norway Grants €804.6 million, financed by Norway alone

€1.8

billion

in funding*

16

beneficiary countries

AREAS OF SUPPORT Environmental management Climate change

Civil society

Cultural heritage and diversity Human and social development Green industry innovation Justice and home affairs Research and scholarships Decent work and social dialogue

Iceland, Liechtenstein and

Norway provide funding to:

reduce disparities

in Europe

strengthen bilateral relations

www.eeagrants.org

www.norwaygrants.org

August 2015

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

Norbert Skokauskas (MD, PhD) is a psychiatrist and Professor of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Research Leader at the Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health and

The current debate on British health care reforms was the reason for a seminar in Oslo on September 21, 2011, which was jointly arranged by The Norwegian Medical Society,

The ideas launched by the Beveridge Commission in 1942 set the pace for major reforms in post-war Britain, and inspired Norwegian welfare programmes as well, with gradual

Be it the preparedness of post industrial coun- tries to cope with infectious diseases, the increased load on health services by newcomers, the worsening of health of migrants as

Under what conditions does the global health governance realm focus on public health security contribute to the protection of individual and popula- tion health as part of

Concepts are developed largely in relation to Reproductive, Maternal and Neonatal care (in comparison with under 5 mortality reduction) – as a major case study running troughout

 “I am a person but I am not a person”: experiences of women living with obstetric fistula in Malawi published in BMC Journal Pregnancy and Childbirth.. 

Recent studies have looked into accessibility to and use of nature on (self- reported) human health and wellbeing. Studies that compared health indicators with access to green