QUALITY OF CARE AND HEALTH SYSTEMS – AN OPERATIONAL AGENDA
Austen Davis - Norad UiO Seminar 7th October 2014
BACKGROUND
Disclaimer – this is not an official position from Norad – I am working on these issues for Norad and this is how far I have come struggling with the topic.
Concepts are developed largely in relation to Reproductive, Maternal and Neonatal care (in comparison with under 5 mortality reduction) – as a major case study running troughout the talk
Structure of the talk
1.Is «quality» important?
2.What is quality
3.Difficulties in using the concept of quality 4.Some ways forward?
IS QUALITY (INCREASINGLY) IMPORTANT?
Unequal progress against MDG goals -> quality lag (Maternal and Neonatal lag Vs Child)
New proposed goals more complex -> requiring quality (UHC, NCDs, Risk Reduction)
Economic «transition» - More domestic ownership and financing
(changing role and importance of ODA)
Evidence vertical approaches Not Sufficient -> quality deficit
(Moving Beyond Essential Interventions for Reduction of Maternal Mortality – Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Vogel J et al Lancet 2013 381 1747)
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
Nature CB Medico-Nutritional prevention and EMONC
Deaths/100,000 LBs
Country Level Rates
Different Qualities at Different Stages? – When Does Quality" Kick In?
PHC/
Community Approaches
Quality of Care EMONC
EFFECTIVE INTERVENTIONS?
•FP and Reproductive Health Services
•Nutrition
•Skilled care during pregnancy and delivery
•EOC
•PNC for mother and baby
HEALTH SYSTEMS STANDARD – DO NOT WORK
CEMONC
BEMONC BEMONC BEMONC BEMONC
Mcclure et al. IJOG 2007
Mcclure et al. IJOG 2007
2. WHAT IS QUALITY
Definitions
Different ethical positions
Different scope – individual, facility, programme, systems?
DONABEDIAN MODEL – QUALITY IS
EVERYTHING
QUALITY VS HSS (QUALITY IS ONLY A
BIT)?
DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS – OVERLAPPING BUT NOT THE SAME
IoM Goodlee Hutton et al Hawkins et al Graham et al Campbell et al
• Effectiveness
• Safety
• Timeliness
• Efficiency
• Equity
• Responsivenes s
• Effective
• Safe
• Good experience
• Timely
• Appropriate
• Uphold
reproductive rights
• Available
• Accessible
• Acceptable
• Quality
• Timely
• Effective
• Appropriate
• Affordable
• Access
• Effectiveness of clinical
• Effectiveness of inter- personal
QUALITY VS RESOURCES
Is lack of quality just a lack of resources?
QUARITE study Senegal and Mali 15% reduction in mortality
WHO multi-country study
-> BUT Quality is related to resources/costs
OPERATIONAL UTILITY
Analysis must deliver information that is
Feasible to measure (costs of managing quality)
Timely
Complete (enough) to be of decisional quality
Compelling
Relative (opportunity costs or cognisant of resource constraints)
Feasible to implement
Likely to produce results (good RoI)
SPECIFIC, DEFINED AND RELATIONAL CONCEPT
Effectiveness
Efficiency Equity
Quality
AREAS OF INFORMATION NEED TO LOOK AT QUALITY
ACCEPTABILITY
• Better than alternatives
• Respectful
• Valued
ACCESS
• Reachable
• Timely
• Affordable
EFFECTIVE
• Produces desired outcomes
• Affordable
4. PROMISING WAYS FORWARD
•Mapping
•Breakdowns
•Effective Coverage
•Discrete Choice
Analyse Quality at system level then zero in on bottleknecks or marginal frontiers
HEAT MAPS (ACCESS)
Figure 12 - Combined walking and road transport times (max 120 minutes) to CEMOC facilities
Figure 13 - Combined walking and road transport times (max 120 minutes) to CEMOC facilities
BASELINE MATERNAL MORTALITY SURVEYS
19
91 Maternal Deaths
72 Aware of Problem
63 Sought Help
55 Reached Facility
8 Did Not Reach Facility 9 Did Not Seek
Help 19 Not Aware
60% of maternal deaths occurred after a reaching facility, 31% never sought help and 9% died during transport.
46% of deaths to women reaching facilities received treatment within the first hour.
Effective Coverage (Effectiveness).
Nesbitt RC, Lohela TJ, Manu A, Vesel L, et al. (2013) Quality along the Continuum: A Health Facility Assessment of Intrapartum and Postnatal Care in Ghana. PLoS ONE 8(11): e81089. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081089
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0081089
DISCRETE CHOICE (ACCEPTABILITY)
(KRUK ET AL AJPH 09/2009; VOL 99 NO 9)
DISCRETE CHOICE
(KRUK ET AL AJPH 09/2009; VOL 99 NO 9)
START BROAD - ZERO IN – CONTINUOUS MANAGEMENT
System Wide Analysis (Q,E,E,E)
Hi Impact quality concerns/diagnosis
Quality Improvement
Strategies Accountability
Strategies