THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF

The respondent Government submitted that the application should be declared inadmissible for failure to comply with the six-month rule. They argued that it had

The Government submitted that the applicant’s detention from 27 August to 13 September 2002 had been authorised under the order of 26 June 2002 issued under Article 232 of the

On 24 October 2005 the Human Rights Office requested that the prosecutor’s office of the Zavodskoy District of Grozny (“the district prosecutor’s office”)

As a result, and having regard to the complexity of the case and the severity of the punishment, the applicant concluded that he had been unable duly to exercise his rights

On 13 June 2000 the Administrative Court held that an oral hearing was manifestly unnecessary in the matter because both parties had submitted all the necessary information