• No results found

φ-meson production at forward rapidity in p–Pb collisions at √sNN=5.02 TeV and in pp collisions at √s=2.76 TeV

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "φ-meson production at forward rapidity in p–Pb collisions at √sNN=5.02 TeV and in pp collisions at √s=2.76 TeV"

Copied!
15
0
0

Laster.... (Se fulltekst nå)

Fulltekst

(1)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics Letters B

www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

φ -Meson production at forward rapidity in p–Pb collisions at

s NN = 5 . 02 TeV and in pp collisions at √

s = 2 . 76 TeV

.ALICE Collaboration

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t ra c t

Articlehistory:

Received16November2015

Receivedinrevisedform8December2016 Accepted9January2017

Availableonline16February2017 Editor:L.Rolandi

Thefirststudyofφ-mesonproductioninp–Pbcollisionsatforwardandbackwardrapidity,atanucleon–

nucleoncentre-of-massenergy√s

NN=5.02 TeV,hasbeenperformedwiththeALICEapparatusatthe LHC.Theφ-mesonshavebeenidentifiedinthedimuondecaychannelinthetransversemomentum(pT) range1<pT<7 GeV/c,bothinthep-going(2.03<y<3.53)andthePb-going(−4.46<y<2.96) directions —where ystandsforthe rapidityinthenucleon–nucleon centre-of-mass—the integrated luminosity amounting to5.01±0.19 nb1 and5.81±0.20 nb1,respectively, for thetwo data sam- ples.Differentialcrosssectionsas afunctionoftransversemomentumandrapidityare presented.The forward–backwardratioforφ-mesonproductionismeasuredfor2.96<|y|<3.53,resultinginaratio

0.5 withnosignificantpTdependencewithintheuncertainties.The pTdependenceoftheφnuclear modificationfactorRpPbexhibitsanenhancementuptoafactor 1.6atpT=3–4 GeV/cinthePb-going direction.The pTdependenceoftheφ-mesoncrosssectioninppcollisionsat√s

=2.76 TeV,whichis used to determineareference for thep–Pb results,is alsopresented herefor 1<pT<5 GeV/c and 2.5<y<4,fora78±3 nb1integratedluminositysample.

©2017TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

1. Introduction

Proton–nucleus (p–A) collisions are of special interest in the context of high-energy nuclear physics for two reasons. On one hand, a precise characterisation of particle production processes in p–A collisions is needed as a reference for nucleus–nucleus data. This allows in-medium effects — linked to the forma- tion of a deconfined phase of the QCD matter, the quark–gluon plasma (QGP)[1–3] —tobedisentangledfromtheeffectsalready present in cold nuclear matter. Among them, a sizeable role is played by the transverse momentum broadening of initial-state partons due to multiple scattering inside the nucleus, responsi- blefortheCronineffect [4],which mayleadto an enhancement of intermediate-pT hadron spectra.In addition, p–A collisions at LHC energies provide a wayto probe the partondistributions of the colliding nucleus at small values of Bjorken-x, in a regime where parton densities can reach saturation [5,6]. In particular, thesmallestxvaluescontributingtothewavefunctionofthecol- liding nucleus can be probed by looking at particle production atlarge rapidities,in the p-going direction. Such a measurement canthus extendtowards lower x-valuestheresults ofthelower- energymeasurements by the PHOBOS andBRAHMS experiments atRHIC[7,8].Measurementsofidentifiedparticleproductionmay,

E-mailaddress:[email protected].

inparticular,provideusefulconstraintsforforthcomingtheoretical studiesofthesaturationmechanismatsmallx.

We havealready reportedresults on chargedparticle produc- tioninp–Pbcollisionsatmid-rapidity.Theseresultsfocusedonthe pseudorapidity density[9]andthe pT dependenceofthenuclear modificationfactor[10–12];thelatterwas foundtobeconsistent with unity for pT2 GeV/c. The nuclear modification factor of charged hadrons was also studied by the BRAHMS and PHOBOS Collaborations in d–Au collisions at the nucleon–nucleon centre- of-mass energy √

sNN=200 GeV at RHIC [13,14], as a function of pseudorapidity, where values smaller than unity were found for

η

1,correspondingtothed-goingdirection.

InthisLetterwereport themeasurementofφ-mesonproduc- tion atforwardrapidityin p–Pbcollisionsat √

sNN=5.02 TeV in the transverse momentum (pT) range 1<pT<7 GeV/c, for the centre-of-massrapidity(y)ranges2.03<y<3.53 (p-goingdirec- tion) and−4.46<y<2.96 (Pb-goingdirection),inthe dimuon decaychannelwiththeALICE detector.Thismeasurementextends theinvestigationoflight-flavourparticleproductiontoforwardra- pidity.Atthesametime,itrepresentsanessentialbaselineforthe understanding of φ productionin heavy-ion collisions, where an enhancement ofstrange particleyields relative to the onesmea- suredinppcollisionshasbeenproposedlongagoasasignatureof theformationofaQGPphase[15–17]triggeringanintenseexper- imentaleffortalreadyatSPSandRHICenergies [18–24].Itshould http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.01.074

0370-2693/©2017TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.

(2)

benotedthat,despiteitshiddenstrangeness,producingaφ-meson inahadroniccollisionstillimpliesthecreationofas¯spairasitis thecaseforotherstrangehadrons,evenifthehadronisationmech- anismscandifferinreasonofthe differentquark composition.In thiscontext,thep–Pbdatapresentedherewillprovidean impor- tantreferenceforfuturemeasurementsinPb–Pb collisionsinthe LHCRun 2,whichwillbeperformedatacomparableenergy.

The differential φ-meson crosssection asa function oftrans- verse momentum is also presented for pp collisions at √

s= 2.76 TeV. This measurement complements the ALICE results on φ-meson production in pp collisions at √

s=7 TeV, already re- portedin[25] and,combinedwiththelatter,isusedtobuildthe ppreferenceforthep–Pbmeasurementspresentedhere.

2. Experimentalsetup

AfulldescriptionoftheALICE detectorcanbefoundin[26,27].

Theresults presentedinthisLetter havebeenobtaineddetecting muon pairs withthemuon spectrometer, covering the pseudora- pidityregion−4<

η

lab<2.5.Hereandinthefollowing,thesign of

η

lab is determinedby the choiceof theLHC referencesystem.

The other detectorsrelevantfor theanalysisare the SiliconPixel Detector (SPD)oftheInnerTrackingSystem (ITS),theV0detector andtheZeroDegreeCalorimeters (ZDC).

Theelementsofthemuonspectrometerareahadronabsorber, followedbyasetoftrackingstations,adipolemagnet,anironwall actingasmuonfilterandasetoftriggerstations.Thehadronab- sorberis madeofcarbon,concreteandsteelandisplaced0.9 m away from the interaction point. Its total material budget cor- responds to 10 hadronic interaction lengths. The dipole magnet provides an integrated magnetic field of 3 T·m in the vertical direction. The muon tracking is provided by five tracking sta- tions,eachonecomposed oftwo cathodepad chambers.Thefirst twostationsarelocatedupstream ofthedipole magnet,thethird one inthe middle ofits gap andthe last two downstream ofit.

A 1.2 mthickiron wall,corresponding to7.2 hadronicinteraction lengths, isplaced betweenthe trackingandtrigger detectorsand absorbstheresidualsecondaryhadronsemergingfromthehadron absorber.The hadron absorber together with the iron wall stops muons with total momentum lower than ∼4 GeV/c. The muon trigger detector consists of two stations, each one composed of two planes of resistive plate chambers, installed downstream of themuonfilter.

TheSPDconsistsoftwosiliconpixellayers,coveringthepseu- dorapidity regions |

η

lab|<2.0 and |

η

lab|<1.4 for the inner and outer layer, respectively. It is used for the determination of the primary interaction vertex position. The V0 is composed of two scintillator hodoscopescovering thepseudorapidity regions 2.8<

η

lab<5.1 and −3.7<

η

lab<1.7. It is used in the definition ofthe minimum bias trigger signal, andallows the offline rejec- tionofbeam-haloandbeam-gasinteractionstobeperformed.The ZDCdetectors,positioned symmetrically at112.5 m fromthe in- teraction point, are used toclean the eventsample by removing beam–beamcollisionsnotoriginatingfromnominalLHCbunches.

3. Dataselectionandsignalextraction

TheanalysispresentedinthisLetterisbasedontwodatasam- ples, collected by ALICE during the 2013 p–Pb and pp runs at

sNN=5.02 TeV and √

s=2.76 TeV, respectively. In thissection wepresentthedetailsofthedataselection,aswellastheproce- durefollowedfortheextractionoftheφ-mesonsignal.

3.1. Dataselection

TheMinimum-Bias (MB)triggerfortheconsidereddatasample is given by the logical AND ofthe signalsin the two V0 detec-

tors [28]. Events containing a muon pair are selected by means ofa specificdimuontrigger,basedonthe detectionoftwo muon candidate tracksinthe triggersystemofthe muon spectrometer, incoincidencewiththeMBcondition.Duetotheintrinsicmomen- tumcutimposedbythedetector,onlymuonswithpT0.5 GeV/c managetoleaveasignalinthetriggerchambers.

BecauseofthedifferentenergyoftheLHCprotonandPbbeams (Ep=4 TeV, EPb=1.58 A·TeV),in p–Pb collisions the nucleon–

nucleon centre-of-mass moves in the laboratory with a rapidity y0=0.465 in thedirectionoftheprotonbeam. Thedirectionsof theprotonandPbbeamorbitswereinvertedduringthep–Pbdata taking period. Thisallowed the ALICE muon spectrometer to ac- cess two different rapidity regions1: the region 2.03< y<3.53 wheretheprotonbeamisdirected towardsthemuonspectrome- ter (p-going direction) andtheregion −4.46<y<2.96 where thePbbeamisdirectedtowardsthemuonspectrometer(Pb-going direction).Inthefollowing,thesetworapidityranges arealsore- ferred to as“forward” and“backward”, respectively.For pp colli- sionsat√

s=2.76 TeV themuonspectrometercoverstherapidity region2.5<y<4.2

Background events not coming from beam–beam interactions are rejected by performing an offline selection, based on the re- quirementthatthe timingsignalsfromtheV0andZDCdetectors arecompatiblewithacollisionoccurringinthefiducialinteraction region|zvtx|10 cm.

Theintegratedluminosityforthep–Pbdatasampleswas eval- uatedasLint=NMB/

σ

MB,whereNMB isthenumberofMBevents corresponding to the analysed triggered events,and

σ

MB the MB trigger cross section. The value of NMB was obtained by averag- ingtheresultsoftwodifferentmethods—onebasedontheratio of trigger rates and the other based on the offline selection of dimuoneventsintheMBdatasample[29]—whiletheMBtrigger crosssections

σ

MB were measuredwithavanderMeerscanand found tobe 2.09±0.07 b and2.12±0.07 b,respectively,forthe beam configurations corresponding to the forwardandbackward rapidity coverageofthemuon spectrometer[30].Forthe ppdata sample, the integrated luminosity is calculated with the method described in[31],usingasreferencetheMB triggercrosssection

σ

MB=47.0.9 mb,measuredinavanderMeerscan[32].

TheresultingvaluesofLintfortheanalysedp–Pbdatasamples are5.01±0.19 nb1 and5.81±0.20 nb1 [29,30]—correspond- ing to∼24000 and26000 reconstructed φ

μμ

decays (see next section) — respectively for the forward and backward ra- pidity regions. For thepp data sample, theintegrated luminosity amounts to 78±3 nb1 for a total number of1400 recon- structedφ

μμ

decays.

Track reconstruction in the muon spectrometer is based on a Kalman filter algorithm [25,33,34]. Muon identification is per- formed by requiring the candidate track to match a track seg- mentinthetriggerchambers(triggertracklet).Thisrequestselects muonswithpT0.5 GeV/c and,asaconsequence,significantly affects the collected statistics for dimuons with invariant mass 1 GeV/c2andpT1 GeV/c.Itisalsorequiredthatmuontracks lieinthepseudorapidityinterval−4<

η

μ<2.5,where

η

μisde- fined inthelaboratoryframe,inordertoremovethetracksclose to the acceptanceborders of thespectrometer, wherethe accep- tance drops abruptly. Selected tracks are finally required to exit thehadronabsorberataradialdistancefromthebeamaxis,Rabs, intherange17.6<Rabs<89.5 cm:thiscut,forallpracticalpur- posesequivalenttotheoneon

η

μ,explicitlyensurestherejection

1 Thesignofyisdefinedbyassumingtheprotonbeamtohavepositiverapidity.

2 Inthiscasethesignofyisdefinedbyassumingtheprotonbeamenteringthe muonspectrometertohavepositiverapidity.

(3)

Fig. 1.Dimuonmassspectrumaftercombinatorialbackgroundsubtraction: pT-integratedppsample(toppanels)and pT-integratedp–Pbsampleinthebackward(centre panels)andforward(bottompanels)rapidityregions,comparedtotheresultofthehadronic-cocktailandtheempirical-functionfits(left- andright-columnpanels,respec- tively).Errorboxesondatapoints(wellvisibleonlyinsomeregionsontheplots)representthesystematicuncertaintyduetothecombinatorialbackgroundsubtraction, whileerrorbarsaccountforthestatisticaluncertainty.Thewidthofthehadronic-cocktailfitresult(redband)combinesthestatisticaluncertaintiesofthefreefitparameters withthesystematicuncertaintiesonthefixedparameters(seetext).(Forinterpretationofthereferencestocolourinthisfigure,thereaderisreferredtothewebversionof thisarticle.)

oftrackscrossingtheregionoftheabsorberwiththehighestden- sitymaterial,wheremultiplescatteringandenergylosseffectsare largeandcanaffectthemassresolution.Muonpairsarebuiltcom- biningtwomuontracksthatsatisfytheabovecuts.

3.2.Signalextraction

TheOpposite-Sign(OS)muonpairsarecomposedofcorrelated anduncorrelatedpairs. The former contain the signal of interest forthe present analysis, while the latter— mainly comingfrom semi-muonicdecays of pions andkaons — form a combinatorial background.Thecontribution ofthecombinatorial backgroundto theOSmassspectrumwasevaluatedusinganeventmixingtech-

nique inwhich uncorrelatedpairs are formed withmuons taken fromdifferentevents.Adetaileddescription ofthetechniquecan befoundin[25].TheratiobetweencorrelatedanduncorrelatedOS dimuonsattheφ-mesonmassis∼0.65 (∼0.40)inp–Pbcollisions at√

sNN=5.02 TeV atforward(backward)rapidity,and∼1.30 in pp collisions at √

s=2.76 TeV. A direct comparison of the raw OS mass spectrum and the associated combinatorial background ispresentedin[35],foreachofthe pT intervalsconsideredinthe analysis.

Theinvariant massspectrainppandp–Pbcollisions,obtained after combinatorial background subtraction, are shown in Fig. 1 forthe pT-integratedsamples.Intheleft-columnpanelsofFig. 1, thesignalisdescribedinthelow-massregion(fromthethreshold

(4)

up to∼1.5 GeV/c2) by thesuperpositionofa so-calledhadronic cocktailandtheopencharmandopenbeautyprocesses.Thepro- cesses included in the hadronic cocktail are the two-body and Dalitz decays of the light neutral mesons

η

,

ρ

,

ω

,

η

and φ, which dominate dimuon production for invariant masses below

1 GeV/c2.Theopen charmandopenbeautycontributionsarise fromcorrelatedsemi-muonicdecaysofcharmandbeautymesons andbaryons.

Thehadroniccocktailwassimulatedwithadedicatedgenerator described in [25], tuned to theexisting measurements whenever possible,otherwisebasedonthekinematicdistributionsextracted fromPYTHIA[36].Inparticular,thekinematicdistributionsofthe φ-mesonhave beentuned by meansof an iterativeprocedureto the resultspresented inthis Letterto ensure self-consistency for thisanalysis.Theopencharmandbeautygenerationisbasedona parameterisationofthespectrageneratedwithPYTHIA[33].The detectorresponseforalltheseprocessesisobtainedwithasimu- lationbasedontheGEANT3[37]transportcode.Simulatedevents arethensubjectedtothesamereconstructionandselectionproce- dureasthedata.

Whendescribingthesignalwiththesuperpositionoftheafore- mentioned contributions, four parameters are adjusted in the fit procedureineachofthepTorrapidityintervalsconsideredinthe analysis:theyieldofthe

η

,

ω

andφ-mesons,andtheoneofthe opencharmandbeautyprocesses,withtherelativebeauty/charm contributionfixed (see later in thisparagraph). Inthis way,each parameter is linked to a process dominating in at least one re- gion ofthe consideredmass spectrum.The remaining degreesof freedomarefixedeitheraccordingtotherelativebranchingratios knownfromliterature[38],orassumingspecifichypothesesonthe crosssection ratios.In particular, theproduction crosssection of the

ρ

-mesonisassumedtobethesameasforthe

ω

assuggested frombothmodelsandppdata[25],whilethe

η

contributionwas derivedfromthe

η

crosssectionby applyingtheratioofthecor- responding cross sections

σ

η/

σ

η=0.3 taken from the PYTHIA tunesATLAS-CSCandD6Twhichbestdescribetheavailablelow- mass dimuon measurements at the LHC energies [25]. The open beautynormalisation isfixed to the open charm one via a fitof the pT- and rapidity-integratedmass spectrain whichthe yields frombothprocessesarefree parameters;whenperformingdiffer- ential studies, the beauty/charm ratio is scaled according to the differentialdistributionsforthetwoprocesses,givenbytheMonte Carlo(MC)simulations.

Foreach pTandrapidityinterval,therawnumberofφ-mesons isdeterminedviaafitprocedurebasedona

χ

2minimisation,per- formedonthesignalobtainedafterthesubtractionofthecombi- natorialbackground,showninFig. 1forthepT-integratedsamples.

Several testshave been performed to evaluate the robustness of the signal extraction andestimate an appropriate systematicun- certaintyforit.Theyincludeinparticular:

– Replacingthe fitbasedonthefull MChadroniccocktail with afitbasedonthesuperpositionofvariousempiricalfunctions.

In this case, illustrated in the right-column panels of Fig. 1, thecontinuum is modelledeitherwithexponential functions orvariable-widthGaussians, whilethe

ρ

+

ω

andφpeaksare describedbyCrystalBallfunctions[39]tunedontheMC.

– Varyingtheratiobetweentheyieldsofopenbeautyandopen charmprocesses.Itwasverifiedthatforperturbationsaslarge as±50% (resultinginareasonablywiderangeofvariationfor theshapeofthetotalcontinuum)nosignificantsystematicef- fectisvisible.

– Varyingtheratiosbetweenthetwo-bodyandDalitzbranching ratiosofthe

η

and

ω

-mesons,aswellasthecrosssection ra- tios

σ

ρ/

σ

ω and

σ

η/

σ

η,withintheuncertaintiescomingeither

fromthe availablemeasurements orfromthe differencesbe- tweenthePYTHIAtunesconsideredintheanalysisofthepp data.The branching ratio B Rωμμ wastaken asthe average (weightedbythecorrespondinguncertainties)oftheavailable measurementsofB RωμμandB Rωee [38],assuminglepton universality.

– Varyingtheconsideredfitrange:inparticular,thefitwasper- formedbothincludingandexcludingthemassregionfrom0.4 to 0.65 GeV/c2 wherethequalityofthecomparisonbetween thedataandthesumoftheMCsourcesturnsouttobelower.

Thetotalsystematicuncertaintyonthesignalextractionwastaken asthequadraticsumoftheabove sources.The systematicuncer- taintyonthecombinatorialbackgroundisestimatedbycomparing theshapeoftheLike-Signdimuoncontributionscomingfromthe event mixingprocedure andfrom theraw data [25]. Thisuncer- tainty dependsonthe mass,itsrelative contributionbeingmaxi- malinthemasswindow0.5–0.8 GeV/c2 andminimalaroundthe φ-mesonpeak,anditisaddedinquadrature,foreachpointofthe massspectrum,to thestatisticaluncertaintyofthesignal:inthis way,thissourceofsystematicsisaccountedforbythe

χ

2 minimi- sation procedure, and automatically propagated when evaluating the φ-meson rawsignal fromthefit parameters.The uncertainty associated to the sum of the MC sources (red band in the left- columnplotsofFig. 1)isevaluatedbycombiningtheuncertainties onthenormalisationofeachconsideredprocess.Fortheprocesses whose normalisationisleft free inthe fit,thisuncertaintyis the statistical oneresulting fromthe fitprocedure itself; forthe rest oftheprocesses,wealsopropagatethesystematicuncertaintyon theparameters(branchingratiosorcrosssectionratios)whichfix theirnormalisationstothoseofthefreeprocesses.

4. Results

The results of the φ-meson analysisare presented asfollows.

Wefirstpresentthemeasurementoftheproductioncrosssections, starting withits pT-dependenceinppcollisionsat√

s=2.76 TeV, followed by p–Pbcollision resultsasa function of pT andrapid- ity.Then,weshowtheratioofthecrosssectionsmeasuredinthe forward andbackward regions, obtained inthe commonrapidity interval2.96<|y|<3.53.Finally,themeasurementofthenuclear modification factor RpPb as a function of pT is presented, sepa- ratelyforthep-goingandthePb-goingdirections.

4.1. Productioncrosssectioninppandp–Pbcollisions

The cross section

σ

φ was evaluated for each pT and rapidity intervalas:

σ

φ

(

x

) =

N

φ→rawμμ

(

x

) [

A

· ε ](

x

) ·

B Rφμμ

·

Lint

,

wherexstands foranyspecific pT orrapidity intervalconsidered.

ThetotalsystematicuncertaintyonNrawφ→μμ(x),aftercombiningthe differentsources described above,rangesbetween3% and8%de- pendingonthecollisionsystemandkinematicrange.Thebranch- ing ratio B Rφμμ wastakenfrom[38] asthe average(weighted bythecorrespondinguncertainties)oftheavailablemeasurements of B Rφ→μμ and B Rφ→ee, assuming lepton universality, resulting inafinaluncertaintyofapproximately 1%.Theproductofthegeo- metricalacceptanceAandthereconstructionefficiency

ε

hasbeen evaluated by meansofMC simulations,usingthecocktail predic- tions forthedifferentialinput spectra.The valuesare obtainedas the ratio between the number of dimuons at the output of the reconstruction chain—includingtheeffectof theeventselection

(5)

Fig. 2.φ-mesoncrosssectionasafunctionofpTinppcollisionsat

s=2.76 TeV.

Errorbarsandboxesrepresentstatisticalandsystematicuncertainties,respectively.

PredictionsfromPHOJET[42]andthePYTHIAtunesATLAS-CSC[44],D6T[45], Perugia0andPerugia11[43]arealsoshownforcomparison,aswellasthe resultofafitwiththeLevy–TsallisfunctiondefinedbyEq.(1).

criteriaimposed on the data — andthe number of dimuons in- jectedasinput.

Theuncertainty on[A·

ε

] mainly originatesfromthe system- atic uncertainty on the dimuon tracking and trigger efficiencies.

The systematicuncertainty on the tracking efficiency, amounting to6% and 4% forthe backwardand forwardrapidity regions, re- spectively,comesfromtheresidualdifferencesbetweentheresults of the efficiency-determination method based on reconstructed tracks [29,40], applied to both data and MC. For the systematic uncertaintyon the trigger efficiency, we alsorefer to the proce- dure discussed in [29], resulting in an uncertainty of 3.2% and 2.8%,respectively, for the backward andforward rapidity regions consideredintheanalysis.Inordertotestpossibleadditionalsys- tematiceffects related to the hardware trigger pT cut, imposing a non-sharp threshold around 0.5 GeV/c, the analysis was re- peatedwiththeadditionalofflinesharpcutspT,μ>0.5 GeV/c and pT,μ>1 GeV/c on single muons. Foreachof thetwo alternative scenarios, the corresponding measurement of the φ-mesoncross sectionwascomparedtotheonecomingfromthereferenceanal- ysis:the difference betweenthe resultswas found to be smaller thanthequadraticdifferenceofthestatisticaluncertainties,show- ingthatnosignificant biasrelatedtothetriggerthresholdaffects theresults[41].

Thereportedvaluescorrespondtoazero-polarisation scenario forthe 2-bodydecayoftheφ-meson, intheabsenceofevidence supportinglesstrivialassumptions(inparticular,nomeasurement ofφ-mesonpolarisationiscurrentlyavailableattheLHCenergies).

4.1.1. Productioncrosssectioninppcollisions

Theinclusive, pT-differential φ-mesoncrosssection inpp col- lisionsat √

s=2.76 TeV isshowninFig. 2. Thedata points,also summarised in Table 1,are compared withthe predictions from PHOJET[42] andPYTHIA [36], wherefor thelatter thePeru- gia0, Perugia11 [43], ATLAS-CSC [44], and D6T [45] tunes areconsidered.An overall goodagreementisfoundbetweenpre- dictionsanddata,withtheexception ofthePerugia0andPe- rugia11 tunes of PYTHIA which underestimate the measured cross section by a factor of two, as already observed for the φ-mesonmeasurementsat√

s=7 TeV[25,46].Itisworthtonote thattheD6Ttuneisnotsuccessfulindescribingthe pT evolution oftheK/

π

ratioatmid-rapidityinppcollisionsat√

s=2.76 TeV, asmeasuredbytheCMSCollaboration[47]:thissuggeststhathid- denstrangenessisbetterreproducedthanopenstrangenessinthis

Table 1

pT-differentialproductioncrosssectionfortheφ-mesoninppcollisionsats= 2.76 TeV,for2.5<y<4.Thefirstuncertaintyisstatisticalandthesecondisthe bin-to-binuncorrelatedsystematic.Thebin-to-bincorrelatedrelativesystematicun- certaintyis3.9%.Theχ2/ndf valuesarerelativetothehadronic-cocktailfitandthe [0.8,1.2 GeV/c2]massregion,wherendf=10.

pT(GeV/c) χ2/ndf d2σφ/(dydpT)(mb/(GeV/c)) [1.0,1.5] 1.1 0.423±0.067±0.043 [1.5,2.0] 1.7 0.182±0.025±0.018 [2.0,2.5] 1.1 0.089±0.011±0.007 [2.5,3.0] 1.1 0.0340±0.0056±0.0020 [3.0,3.5] 0.9 0.0139±0.0032±0.0011 [3.5,4.0] 1.1 0.0087±0.0022±0.0006 [4.0,5.0] 1.1 0.0028±0.0012±0.0002

Table 2

Systematicuncertainties(inpercent)contributingtothemea- surement ofthe φ crosssection in pp collisions at

s= 2.76 TeV.WhentheuncertaintyvaluesdependonthepTin- terval,theirminimumandmaximumvaluesarequoted.

Source Syst. uncertainty onσφpp

Uncorrelated

Signal extraction 3–8%

Tracking efficiency 4%

Trigger efficiency 3%

Correlated

Lint 3.8%

B R) 1%

specificPYTHIAtune.Datapoints werefittedwitha Levy–Tsallis function[48]

1 pT

dN dpT

1

+

mT

nT

n

,

(1)

where mT=

p2T+m2φ stands for the transverse mass, obtain- ing the valuesn=10.4.8 and T =284±72 MeV for the fit parameters, where the errors reflect the statistical uncertainties only. The cross section integrated over the accessible pT range 1<pT<5 GeV/c is

σ

φ=0.566±0.055(stat.)±0.044(syst.)mb.

Thesystematicuncertaintiesforthismeasurementaresummarised inTable 2.

4.1.2. Productioncrosssectioninp–Pbcollisions

The φ cross section as a function of pT in p–Pb collisions is showninFig. 3fortheforwardandbackwardrapidityregionscon- sideredin the analysis. The results, also reportedin Table 3,are fittedwiththeLevy–TsallisdistributiondefinedinEq.(1),there- sultingfitparameters beingβ=9.1.3 andT =366±30 MeV fortheforwardrapidityregionandβ=11.1.4 andT =384± 24 MeV for thebackward one,wheretheerrorsreflectthestatis- ticaluncertaintiesonly.ThepredictionsfromHIJING(withgluon shadowing) [49] andDPMJET[50] are alsoshown:thesegenera- tors provided a good description ofthe ALICE dNch/d

η

lab results atmid-rapidity[9].Averagingovertheavailable pT range,thedis- crepancybetweenthedataandthepredictionsfromHIJINGand DPMJETamounts to ∼18% and57%, respectively,atbackward rapidity (the Pb-going direction) and ∼5% and9.5%, respec- tively,atforwardrapidity (thep-going direction).Inallthecases, thegeneratorsunderestimatethedatapoints.

The φ crosssection inp–Pbcollisions, integratedoverthe ac- cessible pT range, 1<pT<7 GeV/c, is shown as a function of rapidity in Fig. 4. The data points, also summarised in Table 4, exhibit a significant asymmetry between the forward and back- ward rapidity regions.The data pointfrom theφ-mesonanalysis at mid-rapidity in the K+K channel [51], also shown for the

(6)

Fig. 3.φ-mesoncrosssectioninp–Pbcollisionsat

sNN=5.02 TeV asafunctionofpTinthebackward(left)andforward(right)rapidityregions.Errorbars(smallerthan themarkers)andboxesrepresentstatisticalandsystematicuncertainties,respectively.PredictionsbyHIJING[49]andDPMJET[50]arealsoshown,togetherwiththeresult ofafitwiththeLevy–Tsallisfunction (Eq.(1)).

Table 3

Productioncrosssectionfortheφ-mesoninp–Pbcollisionsat

sNN=5.02 TeV,asafunctionofpT,inthebackwardandforwardrapidityregions.Thefirstuncertaintyis statisticalandthesecondisthebin-to-binuncorrelatedsystematic.Thebin-to-bincorrelatedrelativesystematicuncertaintyis3.6%and3.9%,respectively,forthebackward andtheforwardregions.Theχ2/ndf valuesarerelativetothehadronic-cocktailfitandthe[0.8,1.2 GeV/c2]massregion.

pT(GeV/c)4.46<y<2.96 2.03<y<3.53

χ2/ndf d2σφpPb/(dydpT)(mb/(GeV/c)) χ2/ndf d2σφpPb/(dydpT)(mb/(GeV/c))

[1.0,1.5] 0.7 102±8±12 1.5 73.3±5.6±8.0

[1.5,2.0] 1.2 58.6±3.3±5.5 1.9 42.1±2.5±4.3 [2.0,2.5] 2.5 28.3±1.4±2.9 1.7 21.0±1.2±2.0 [2.5,3.0] 4.2 15.0±0.7±1.2 3.1 10.07±0.77±0.97 [3.0,3.5] 2.6 7.66±0.40±0.70 2.0 6.38±0.41±0.61 [3.5,4.0] 1.9 4.20±0.24±0.34 1.2 3.96±0.30±0.36 [4.0,4.5] 0.7 2.15±0.17±0.16 1.0 1.99±0.20±0.15 [4.5,5.0] 0.9 1.20±0.11±0.10 0.9 1.06±0.13±0.08 [5.0,6.0] 1.0 0.560±0.052±0.054 1.0 0.570±0.088±0.043 [6.0,7.0] 1.2 0.201±0.030±0.028 0.9 0.199±0.045±0.016

Fig. 4. φ cross section inp–Pb collisions ats

NN=5.02 TeV as afunction of rapidity,integratedovertherange1<pT<7 GeV/c.Errorbarsandboxesrepre- sentstatisticalandsystematicuncertainties,respectively.Predictions byHIJING andDPMJETarealsoshown,togetherwiththemid-rapiditydatapointfromthe φ-meson measurementin the K+K channel [51], also evaluatedin the range 1<pT<7 GeV/c.

1<pT<7 GeV/c pT range, fits well into the trend defined by thetwoseriesofpoints inthebackwardandforwardrapidityre- gions. This observationcomplements the previous measurements oflight-flavourparticleproduction(chargedunidentifiedparticles) reported in p–Pb by ALICE at the LHC at mid-rapidity [9], and ind–Au byPHOBOS atRHIC ranging frommidto forwardrapid- ity[14].Thecomparisonbetweenthedataandthepredictionsby

Table 4

Productioncrosssectionfor theφ-mesoninp–Pbcollisionsat

sNN=5.02 TeV, asafunctionofrapidity,integratedovertherange1<pT<7 GeV/c.Thefirstun- certaintyisstatisticalandthesecondisthebin-to-binuncorrelatedsystematic.The bin-to-bincorrelatedrelativesystematicuncertaintyis3.6%and3.9%,respectively, forthebackwardandtheforwardregions.Theχ2/ndf valuesarerelativetothe hadronic-cocktailfitandthe[0.8,1.2 GeV/c2]massregion.

y χ2/ndf dσφpPb/dy(mb) y χ2/ndf dσφpPb/dy(mb) [−4.46,4.25] 0.9 89±10±9 [2.03,2.35] 2.6 104±11±6 [−4.25,4.05] 1.8 89±6±7 [2.35,2.55] 1.5 102±7±5 [−4.05,−3.85] 0.9 103±5±8 [2.55,2.75] 2.0 96±5±6 [−3.85,−3.65] 2.9 117±6±9 [2.75,2.95] 1.6 86±4±5 [−3.65,−3.45] 1.2 128±7±9 [2.95,3.15] 2.3 68±4±4 [−3.45,−3.25] 3.6 133±9±9 [3.15,3.35] 1.0 66±5±5 [−3.25,−2.96] 1.2 136±14±11 [3.35,3.53] 1.2 45±8±6

HIJINGandDPMJET,illustratedinFig. 4,clearly showshowthe models—whichsuccessfullydescribedchargedparticleproduction at mid-rapidity in the same collision system [9] — fail to prop- erly reproduce the shape and the normalisation of the observed rapiditydependenceoftheφcrosssection.Still,theHIJINGpre- diction qualitativelyreproducestheforward–backwardasymmetry observed in the data,aswell as —ignoring the normalisation — the shapeofthe y-dependenceinthe backwardregion.DPMJET, onthecontrary,failstoreproduceevenqualitativelytheobserved forward–backwardasymmetry.

4.2. Forward–backwardratioinp–Pbcollisions

To establisha more direct comparison ofthe cross section in thep-goingandPb-goingdirections,

σ

φpPbwasextractedasafunc-

(7)

Fig. 5.Forward–backward ratiofor the φ-meson inp–Pb collisions atsNN= 5.02 TeV asafunctionofpT,intherapidityrange2.96<|y|<3.53 commonto thetworapidityregionsconsideredintheanalysis.Errorbarsandboxesrepresent statisticalandsystematicuncertainties,respectively.Theblueboxontheleftrepre- sentsthebin-to-bincorrelatedsystematicuncertainty,seeTable 7.Predictionsfrom HIJINGandDPMJETarealsoshownforcomparison.(Forinterpretationoftheref- erencestocolourinthisfigurelegend,thereaderisreferredtothewebversionof thisarticle.)

tion of pT in the common |y| range 2.96<|y|<3.53. The pT interval1.0<pT<1.5 GeV/c was discardedinthismeasurement because of the poor statistics available in this limited rapidity range,resultinginanuncertaintylargerthan50%.

The ratio between the forward and backward cross section, RFB, is shown asa function of pT inFig. 5. The data points ex- hibit no significant pT dependence within the experimental un- certainties.Predictions by HIJINGand DPMJETare also shown, withHIJINGslightlyoverestimatingthedatapointsandDPMJET clearly failing to reproduce the observed values, staying above RFB=1 in the whole pT rangeconsidered here. Thisobservation isconsistent withtheobservations inFig. 4, wherethe forward–

backwardasymmetryoftheφ-mesonyieldwasbetterreproduced byHIJINGthanbyDPMJET.

4.3.Nuclearmodificationfactorinp–Pbcollisions

Theφ-mesonnuclearmodificationfactorRpPbisdefinedasthe ratiobetweentheproductioncrosssection

σ

φpPb(pT)inp–Pbcolli- sionsandthecrosssection

σ

φpp(pT)inppcollisions—evaluatedat

s=5.02 TeV asdescribedinthefollowing—scaledby APb:

RpPb

(

pT

) = σ

φpPb

(

pT

)

σ

φpp

(

pT

) ·

APb

,

(2) where APb isthe nuclearmassnumber forthePbnucleus. Since fortheppcrosssection

σ

φpp at√

s=5.02 TeV nodirectmeasure- mentis currentlyavailable, it was evaluated by interpolatingthe measurements in the rapidity interval 2.5<y<4 at √

s=2.76 (see Section 4.1.1) and 7 TeV [25]. For each pT interval, the √

s dependenceof the differential cross section d2

σ

φpp/(dydpT) was describedwithapowerlaw

σ

pp(

s)=C·(

s)α,whereC and

α

aredetermined usingthe dataat2.76and7 TeV. Alternativepa- rameterisationswere alsoconsidered[52],namelyalinearandan exponential function, andthe mean ofthe results obtainedwith thethreefunctionswastaken.Sincetheppmeasurementsarelim- ited to 1<pT<5 GeV/c, the cross section at √

sNN=5.02 TeV was extrapolated towards higher pT by means of a Levy–Tsallis function,which describesthe calculateddifferential cross section in the pT range covered by the measurements. The uncertainty

Table 5

Differentialcrosssectionfortheφ-mesoninppcollisionsat

s=5.02 TeV inthe backwardandforwardrapidityregionsofinterestfortheanalysisofthep–Pbdata, asobtainedinterpolatingtheavailablemeasurementsat

s=2.76 and7 TeV.Total uncertainties,combiningstatisticalandsystematicsources,arereported.

pT(GeV/c) d2σφ/dydpT(mb/(GeV/c))

4.46<y<2.96 2.03<y<3.53 [1.0,1.5] 0.491±0.067 0.656±0.090 [1.5,2.0] 0.223±0.015 0.297±0.020 [2.0,2.5] 0.0995±0.0071 0.1328±0.0095 [2.5,3.0] 0.0467±0.0032 0.0623±0.0043 [3.0,3.5] 0.0234±0.0015 0.0312±0.0020 [3.5,4.0] 0.0125±0.0011 0.0167±0.0015 [4.0,4.5] 0.00706±0.00094 0.0094±0.0012 [4.5,5.0] 0.00419±0.00082 0.0056±0.0011 [5.0,6.0] 0.00213±0.00060 0.00284±0.00081 [6.0,7.0] 0.00093±0.00039 0.00124±0.00052 on the interpolated cross sections arises fromthe choice of the function usedfor theinterpolation, fromtheuncertainties in the measurementsat2.76and7 TeV,and—forpT>5 GeV/c —from the extrapolation based on the Levy–Tsallis fit. They range from about7% for pT=1 GeV/c to20% for pT=5 GeV/c, andexceed 30% for pT>5 GeV/c, representing the major source of system- aticuncertainty forthemeasurement ofthenuclear modification factor.The interpolatedcrosssection,whichrefers totherapidity range2.5<y<4,wasfinallyscaledtotheforwardandbackward rapiditywindows2.03<y<3.53 and−4.46<y<2.96,consid- eredfortheanalysisofthep–Pbdata.Therelativescalingfactors ffwd=1.135±0.031 and fbkw=0.850±0.028 wereevaluatedas an average from simulations with PHOJET and the Perugia0, Perugia11, ATLAS-CSCand D6T PYTHIAtunes. In doing so, we also retainedthe PYTHIAtunes which were observed tofail in describing the pp data (see Section 4.1.1): the reason is that thedisagreement betweenmodels anddata concernsinthiscase theabsolutenormalisationmorethan theshape ofthekinematic distributions, which is the only relevant feature in the evalua- tion of the ffwd and fbkw factors. The uncertainties (amounting toabout 3%)correspondtothedifferencesbetweentheconsidered MC predictions.ThenumericalvaluesarereportedinTable 5.

The nuclear modification factor RpPb as a function of pT is shownin thetwo panelsofFig. 6 forthe backward andforward rapidity regions considered inthe analysis. The numerical values are also quoted in Table 6. For each pT interval, the systematic uncertaintydetailedinTable 7 resultsfromthe quadraticsumof theuncertaintyontheφcrosssectioninp–Pbandtheoneofthe pp reference.ArisingtrendofRpPbwhengoingfrompT=1 GeV/c to pT3–4 GeV/c canbeobservedbothatbackwardandforward rapidity.The values of RpPb inthe two rapidity ranges, however, are significantly different. In particular, at backward rapidity we observeanenhancementoftheφcrosssectionwithrespecttothe scaledppreferencepeakedaround pT=3–4 GeV/c.Thisenhance- ment,absentintheforwardrapidityregion,reachesafactorofup to ∼1.6 and could be associated eitherto an initial-state effect (includingapossibleCronin-likeenhancement[4,53])ortoafinal state effect relatedto radial flowin p–Pbas proposed forrecent ALICEmeasurementsatmid-rapidity[12].Discriminatingbetween thesetwo effects requires moredetailed investigations, including differential analyses as a function of globalevent propertieslike collisioncentrality.

Concerning the behaviour at high pT, we observe that the φ-meson RpPb is compatiblewith unity for pT4 GeV/c in the p-going direction, similar to what was observed for the RpPb of chargedparticle production atmid-rapidity [10,12].The observa- tions in thePb-going directiondo not allowa clear trendofthe RpPb factorat high pT to be established.A possiblesaturation at

Referanser

RELATERTE DOKUMENTER

General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Devel- opment, Greece; Hungarian Orszagos Tudomanyos Kutatasi Alapp- grammok (OTKA) and National Office for

We present measurements of hadronic resonance, strange and multi-strange particle production in collisions of Xe-Xe and Pb-Pb at the center-of-mass energies of √ s NN = 5..

fact that the measured yields include particles and antiparticles while the cross sections are given for particles only; f prompt is the fraction of prompt D mesons in the

Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation (ANSL), State Committee of Science and World Federation of Scientists (WFS), Armenia; Aus- trian

ogy, Ministry of Education, Research and Religions, Greece; National Research, Develop- ment and Innovation Office, Hungary; Department of Atomic Energy Government of

Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation (ANSL), State Com- mittee of Science and World Federation of Scientists (WFS), Armenia; Austrian

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Republic of Korea; Ministry of Education and Scientific Research,

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), Netherlands; The Research Council of Norway, Norway; Commis- sion on Science and Technology for Sustainable