3. Theory Review
3.2 Transportation Cost
1. Facetas tipo III de porcelana Mark II e de resina composta MZ100 mostraram resistência à fadiga similar quando cimentadas a pilares de zircônia sobre implantescustomizados não-retentivos.
2. A resina composta paradigm MZ100 apresentou uma maior porcentagem de falhas reparaveis, mantendo a interface restauração-pilar e o próprio pilar intactos.
REFERENCIAS
1Garvie RC, Hannink RC, Pascoe RT. Ceramic Steel? Nature 1975; 258:703-704.
2Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24:299-307.
3Pittayachawan P, McDonald A, Petrie A, Knowles JC. The biaxial flexural strength and fatigue property of Lava Y-TZP dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2007; 23:1018-1029.
4Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Three-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs). Clin Oral Investig 2009; 24 [Epub ahead of print].
5Derand T, Molin M, Kvam K. Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater 2005; 21:1158-1162.
6Borges GA, Spohr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DC. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89:479-488.
7Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cements to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003; 19:725-731.
8Della Bona A, Borba M, Benetti P, Cecchetti D. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a zirconia-reinforced ceramic to composite resin. Braz Oral Res 2007; 21:10-15.
9Kim BK, Bae HE, Shim JS, Lee KW. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:357–62.
10Kern M, Wegner SM. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998;14:64–71.
11Atsu SS, Kilicarslan MA, Kucukesmen HC, Aka PS. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95:430- 436.
12Bottino MA, Valandro LF, Scotti R, Buso L. Effect of surface treatments on the resin bond to zirconium-based ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18:60-65.
13Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2006; 22:283-290.
14Wolfart M, Lehmann F, Wolfart S, Kern M. Durability of the resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic after using different surface conditioning methods. Dent Mater 2007;23:45–50.
15Blatz MB, Sadan A, Martin J, Lang B. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely-sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:356–62.
16Tanaka R, Fujishima A, Shibata Y, Manabe A, Miyazaki T. Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on zirconia. J Dent Res 2008;87:666–70.
17Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Selective infiltration-etching technique for a strong and durable bond of resin cements to zirconia-based materials. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98:379-388.
18Sadoun M, Asmussen E. Bonding of resin cements to an aluminous ceramic: a new surface treatment. Dent Mater 1994; 10:185-189.
19Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Blatz M, Sadan A. An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent 2009; 101:29-38.
20Li R, Ren Y, Han G. Effects of Nd:YAG laser irradiation on shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to porcelain. Hua Kou Qiang yi Xue Za Zhi 2000; 18:377-379. 21da Silveira BL, Paglia A, Burnett LH, Shinkai RS, Eduardo C de P, Spohr AM. Micro- tensile bond strength between a resin cement and an aluminous ceramic treated with Nd:YAG laser, Rocatec System, or aluminum oxide sandblasting. Photomed Laser Surg 2005; 23:543-548.
22Spohr AM, Borges GA, Júnior LH, Mota EG, Oshima HM. Surface modification of In- Ceram Zirconia ceramic by Nd:YAG laser, Rocatec system, or aluminum oxide sandblasting and its bond strength to a resin cement. Photomed Laser Surg 2008; 26:203-208.
23Hao L, Lawrence J, Chian KS. Effects of CO2 laser irradiation on the surface properties of magnesia-partially stabilized zirconia (MgO-PSZ) bioceramic and the subsequent improvements in human osteoblast cell adhesion. J Biomater Appl 2004; 19:81-105. 24Akova T, Yoldas O, Toroglu MS, Uysal H. Porcelain surface treatment by laser for bracket-porcelain bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128:630-637.
25Chee, W. & Jivraj, S. (2006) Screw versus cemented implant supported restorations. British Dental Journal 201: 501-517.
26Magne P, Magne M, Jovanovic SA. An esthetic solution for single-implant restorations type III porcelain veneer bonded to a screw-retained custom abutment: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99:2-7.
27Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008;27:849–55.
28Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 1997;76:1298–307.
29Uo M, Sjögren G, Sundh A, Goto M, Watari F, Bergman M. Effect of surface condition of dental zirconia ceramic (Denzir) on bonding. Dent Mater J 2006; 25:626-631
30Tsuo Y, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Effects of alumina-blasting and adhesive primers on bonding between resin luting agent and zirconia ceramics. Dent Mater J 2006 ;25:669– 74.
31Oyagüe RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, Osorio E, Ferrari M, Osorio R. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to densely-sintered zirconium-oxide ceramic. Dent Mater 2009; 25:172-179.
32Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999; 15:426-433.
33Tsukakoshi M, Shinya A, Gomi H, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Shinya A. Effects of dental adhesive cement and surface treatment on bond strength and leakage of zirconium oxide ceramics. Dent Mater J 2008; 27:159-171.
34Aboushelib MN, Matinlinna JP, Salameh Z, Ounsi H. Innovations in bonding to zirconia- based materials: Part I. Dent Mater 2008; 24:1268-1272.
35Yoshida K, Tsuo Y, Atsuta M. Bonding of dual-cured resin cement to zirconia ceramic using phosphate acid ester monomer and zirconate coupler. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2006;77:28-33.
36Akgunkor et al. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material. J Prosthet Dent, 2008; 99:388-399.
37Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging. Dent Mater J, 2008; 27:99-104.
38Matinlinna JP, Heikkinen T, Ozcan M, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Evaluation of resin adhesion to zirconia ceramic using some organosilanes. Dent Mater, 2006; 22:824-831.
39Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A. Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int 2007; 38:745-753. 40Magne P, Knezevic A. Influence of overlay restorative materials and load cusps on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009;40: 729-737a. 41Fennis WMM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthod 2004;17:313- 317.
42Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Verdonschot N, Creugers NH. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations. J Dent 2006;34:19-25.
43Magne P, Knezevic A. Simulated fatigue resistance of composite resin versus porcelain CAD/CAM overlay restorations on endodontically treated molars. Quintessence Int 2009;40:125-133.b
44Magne P, Knezevic A. Thickness of CAD-CAM composite resin overlays influences fatigue resistance of endodontically treated premolars. Dent Mat 2009;25:1264-1268.c
45Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehab 2004;31:18-22.
46Bryant RM, Sadowsky PL, Hazelrig JB. Variability in three morphologic features of the permanent maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod 1984;86:25-32
47van Loenen M, Degrieck J, De Pauw G, Dermaut L. Anterior tooth morphology and its effect on torque. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:258-262.
48Knösel M, Jung K, Attin T, Engelke W, Kubein-Meesenburg D, Gripp-Rudolph L, Attin R. On the interaction between incisor crown-root morphology and third-order angulation. Angle Orthodtist 2009;79:454-461.