• No results found

7. CONCLUDING REMARKS

7.2 S UGGESTIONS FOR F URTHER R ESEARCH

We have complemented the original dataset from the Argentum Centre with complete holding periods on a majority of the VC investments. This provides a platform from which a number of interesting studies could be conducted. A natural starting point would be to further distinguish between different types of exits, for example by looking for differences in the time-to-event for IPOs and trade sales.

Tian and Wang (2011) construct a measure for failure tolerance based on the holding periods and number of investment rounds of failed investments. The willingness to continue investing in underperforming ventures is then linked to a higher degree of innovativeness with the portfolio companies. Replicating this study for the Norwegian market could prove very interesting, especially given the current discussion on how to raise innovativeness in the Norwegian economy.

The discussion of the findings in section 5 further opens up for potential topics to investigate.

We anticipate that as the trend of corporate venturing increases in Norway, more data on exits within this segment will become available. Our main findings concerning the differences between CVCs and IVCs could then be checked using a larger empirical foundation. Furthermore, if statistics were to become available on parent acquisitions in a corporate venture setting, the motivations for such activity could be examined in detail.

As the topic of clean energy becomes ever more relevant, an in-depth analysis of why the rate of successful exit is so low within cleantech would be interesting.

Lastly, it could be interesting to see if the trends uncovered in this thesis are the same across the Nordics, or if there are inherent differences in success rates and holding periods between the countries and when cross-border investing.

We highly encourage future researchers to investigate these topics closer.

References

Chemmanur, T. J., Loutskina, E., & Tian, X. (2014). Corporate venture capital, value creation, and innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(8), 2434-2473.

Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life‐tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187-202.

Cumming, D., & Johan, S. (2010). Venture capital investment duration. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(2), 228-257.

Cummings, D. J., & MacIntosh, J. G. (2003). Venture-capital exits in Canada and the United States. U. Toronto LJ, 53, 101.

Dimitrova, L. (2015). Strategic acquisitions by corporate venture capital investors. Available at SSRN 2553786.

Drover, W., Busenitz, L., Matusik, S., Townsend, D., Anglin, A., & Dushnitsky, G. (2017).

A review and road map of entrepreneurial equity financing research: venture capital, corporate venture capital, angel investment, crowdfunding, and accelerators. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1820-1853.

Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When do incumbents learn from entrepreneurial ventures?: Corporate venture capital and investing firm innovation rates. Research Policy, 34(5), 615-639.

Dushnitsky, G. Z., & Shapira, Z. (2007). Entrepreneurial finance meets corporate reality:

comparing investment practices by corporate and independent venture capitalists.

Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.

EVCA, T. F. (2007). European Private Equity Performance Benchmarks 2007, March 2008 Ernst, H., Witt, P., & Brachtendorf, G. (2005). Corporate venture capital as a strategy for

external innovation: an exploratory empirical study. r&d Management, 35(3), 233-242.

Ernst & Young. (2018). Can corporate venture solve the innovation paradox? Retrieved 02.05, 2019, from EY.com: https://www.ey.com/en_gl/growth/can-corporate-venture-solve-the-innovation-paradox

Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American statistical association, 94(446), 496-509.

Forbes, S. (2009). Portfolio theory and how parent birds manage investment risk. Oikos, 118(10), 1561-1569.

Gage, D. (2012). The venture capital secret: 3 out of 4 start-ups fail. Wall Street Journal, 20.

Ghosh, S., & Nanda, R. (2010). Venture capital investment in the clean energy sector. Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Working Paper, (11-020).

Gompers, P. A. (1996). Grandstanding in the venture capital industry. Journal of Financial economics, 42(1), 133-156.

Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2000). The determinants of corporate venture capital success:

Organizational structure, incentives, and complementarities. In Concentrated corporate ownership (pp. 17-54). University of Chicago Press.

Guo, B., Lou, Y., & Pérez‐Castrillo, D. (2015). Investment, duration, and exit strategies for corporate and independent venture capital‐backed start‐ups. Journal of Economics &

Management Strategy, 24(2), 415-455.

Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American statistical association, 53(282), 457-481.

Kerr, W. R., & Nanda, R. (2010). Banking deregulations, financing constraints, and firm entry size. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(2-3), 582-593.

Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M. (2010). Survival analysis (Vol. 3). New York: Springer.

Kräussl, R., & Krause, S. (2014). Has Europe been catching up? An industry level analysis of venture capital success over 1985–2009. European Financial Management, 20(1), 179-205

Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (2004). The venture capital cycle. MIT press.

Metrick, A., & Yasuda, A. (2010). Venture capital and the finance of innovation. Venture capital and the Finance of Innovation, 2nd Edition, Andrew Metrick and Ayako Yasuda, eds., John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

NVCA (2017a). Verdiskapingsanalyse for de aktive eierskapsfondene I Norge 2017: Såkorn, venture og buyout. Retrieved 15.05, 2019, from NVCA: http://www.nvca.no/wp- content/uploads/2017/12/NVCA-verdiskapingsunders%C3%B8kelse-2017-Menon-Economics.pdf

NVCA (2017b). Private Equity funds in Norway; Activity report 2017, Seed-Venture-Buyout. Retrieved 12. 04, 2019, Retrieved from NVCA: http://www.nvca.no/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Private-Equity-Funds-in-Norway-2017.pdf

OECD (2017). Entrepreneurship at a glance. Retrieved 14.04 from OECD-iLibrary.org:

https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/entrepreneurship-at-a-glance- 2017/venture-capital-investments-in-europe-by-sector_entrepreneur_aag-2017-graph120-en

Rajan, R., Servaes, H., & Zingales, L. (2000). The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and inefficient investment. The journal of Finance, 55(1), 35-80.

Ritter, J. R., & Welch, I. (2002). A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations. The journal of Finance, 57(4), 1795-1828.

Rohleder, M., Scholz, H., & Wilkens, M. (2010). Survivorship bias and mutual fund performance: relevance, significance, and methodical differences. Review of Finance, 15(2), 441-474.

Scott, T. W. (1994). Incentives and disincentives for financial disclosure: Voluntary disclosure of defined benefit pension plan information by Canadian firms.

Accounting Review, 26-43.

Stata (n.d.) Stat glossary. Retrieved 29.04, 2019, from Stata.com:

https://www.stata.com/manuals13/stglossary.pdf

Statista. (2019). Total value of venture capital (VC) investments* in Europe in 2017, by sector (in billion euroes). Retrieved 29.04, 2019, from Statista.com:

https://www.statista.com/statistics/879228/investments-by-venture-capital-europe/

Sorensen, M. (2007). How smart is smart money? A two‐sided matching model of venture capital. The Journal of Finance, 62(6), 2725-2762.

Tian, X., & Wang, T. Y. (2011). Tolerance for failure and corporate innovation. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 211-255.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach: Cengage Learning. A Figures, 18.

Appendix